Processing of xorg-server_1.1.1-3_i386.changes
xorg-server_1.1.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xorg-server_1.1.1-3.dsc xorg-server_1.1.1-3.diff.gz xserver-xorg-core_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xserver-xorg-dev_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xdmx_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xdmx-tools_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xnest_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xvfb_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xserver-xephyr_1.1.1-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362641: marked as done (xorg-server - FTBFS: Uses inline assembler unconditionaly)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:47:18 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#362641: fixed in xorg-server 1:1.1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xorg-server Version: 1:1.0.2-4 Severity: important There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of xorg-server_1:1.0.2-4 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common -I../../../include -I../../../include -I../../../include -I../../../include -I../../../include -I../../../include -I../../../../hw/xfree86 -I../../../../hw/xfree86/include -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common -I../../../../hw/xfree86/os-support -I../../../../hw/xfree86/os-support/bus -I../../../../os -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../ddc -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../i2c -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../loader -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../rac -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../parser -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../scanpci -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../vbe -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../int10 -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../vgahw -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common/../dixmods/extmod -DHAVE_XORG_CONFIG_H -DXFree86Server -DXFree86LOADER -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE -DHAS_FCHOWN -DHAS_STICKY_DIR_BIT -I../../../../include -I../../../include -I../../../../Xext -I../../../../composite -I../../../../damageext -I../../../../xfixes -I../../../../Xi -I../../../../mi -I../../../../miext/shadow -I../../../../miext/damage -I../../../../render -I../../../../randr -I../../../../fb -Wall -g -O2 -MT xf86Bus.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/xf86Bus.Tpo -c -o xf86Bus.o ../../../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c; \ then mv -f .deps/xf86Bus.Tpo .deps/xf86Bus.Po; else rm -f .deps/xf86Bus.Tpo; exit 1; fi ../../../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c: In function 'xf86EnterServerState': ../../../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c:1927: warning: 'acc_mem_io' may be used uninitialized in this function ../../../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c:1927: warning: 'acc_io' may be used uninitialized in this function ../../../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c:1927: warning: 'acc_mem' may be used uninitialized in this function ../../../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c: In function 'x_isSubsetOf': ../../../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c:2818: warning: 'range1.b' is used uninitialized in this function /tmp/cc8tjdfa.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cc8tjdfa.s:10445: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `in%r1' /tmp/cc8tjdfa.s:10461: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `in%r1' /tmp/cc8tjdfa.s:10472: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `out%r3' /tmp/cc8tjdfa.s:10480: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `in%r2' /tmp/cc8tjdfa.s:10496: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `out%r5' /tmp/cc8tjdfa.s:10502: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `out%r4' /tmp/cc8tjdfa.s:10510: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `in%r3' /tmp/cc8tjdfa.s:10519: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `out%r2' make[6]: *** [xf86Bus.o] Error 1 make[6]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xorg-server-1.0.2/obj-s390-linux-gnu/hw/xfree86/common' This inline assembler comes from hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h, which not even checks if this is appropriate for the architecture. Bastian ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xorg-server Source-Version: 1:1.1.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xorg-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xdmx-tools_1.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xdmx_1.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xnest_1.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xorg-server_1.1.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xorg-server_1.1.1-3.diff.gz xorg-server_1.1.1-3.dsc to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xorg-server_1.1.1-3.dsc xserver-xephyr_1.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xserver-xephyr_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xserver-xorg-core_1.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xserver-xorg-core_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xserver-xorg-dev_1.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xserver-xorg-dev_1.1.1-3_i386.deb xvfb_1.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xvfb_1.1.1-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bug#384080: Tk may not work without rgb-symlink
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 21:09 +0200, Michael Hartmann wrote: (**) RgbPath set to /usr/lib/X11/rgb The '(**)' indicates that your xorg.conf contains an RgbPath line. Do things work without symlink if you comment that out? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2889 - in trunk/debian/xorg/debian: . local
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 23:11 -0400, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin * Steal patch from Ubuntu by Fabio to unconditionally enable ZAxisMapping in dexconf [...] --- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf2006-08-22 03:04:13 UTC (rev 2888) +++ trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf2006-08-22 03:10:59 UTC (rev 2889) @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ExplorerPS/2 +Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 I thought upstream now defaults to a more extensive mapping? PS: David, looks like you accidentally uploaded xorg-server 1.1 to unstable... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2889 - in trunk/debian/xorg/debian: . local
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 09:10 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 23:11 -0400, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin --- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf 2006-08-22 03:04:13 UTC (rev 2888) +++ trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf 2006-08-22 03:10:59 UTC (rev 2889) @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ExplorerPS/2 +Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 I thought upstream now defaults to a more extensive mapping? ... in 7.1, that is. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
Bug#384080: Tk may not work without rgb-symlink
Things work still fine without RgbPath line in xorg.conf and symlink. I'm not using a xorg.conf generated by Debian, because it doesn't work on my pc, so I just use the knoppix generated xorg.conf. When reporting this I forgot to check that with a debian generated xorg.conf. In fact I was just happy that perl-tk works fine again and reported this to you and to the tk8.4 maintainer in hope that it is useful. So if there is no RgbPath line in the Debian generated xorg.conf file, you propably can close this bug report. However, I still don't understand why just tk had that problems. Thank you for your help. --Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384080: marked as done (Tk may not work without rgb-symlink)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:50:10 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#384080: Tk may not work without rgb-symlink has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xorg Version: 1:7.0.22 Severity: important I've installed Debian testing on my machine a few days ago and recognized that tk and perl-tk don't work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ wish; echo Application initialization failed: this isn't a Tk applicationunknown color name Black % [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ At last I checked my xorg log file and there were these lines: (**) RgbPath set to /usr/lib/X11/rgb (**) ModulePath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules,/usr/lib/xorg/modules (**) Option AllowMouseOpenFail true Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/lib/X11/rgb' So a simple symlink solves the problem. Originally I've sent a bug report to the perl-tk maintainer, so you're maybe also interested in reading that bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383018). I've sent this bug report also to the maintainer of Tk, because I'm not really sure, whether this is a Tk or a xorg bug. --Michael ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 09:33 +0200, Michael Hartmann wrote: Things work still fine without RgbPath line in xorg.conf and symlink. I'm not using a xorg.conf generated by Debian, because it doesn't work on my pc, so I just use the knoppix generated xorg.conf. When reporting this I forgot to check that with a debian generated xorg.conf. In fact I was just happy that perl-tk works fine again and reported this to you and to the tk8.4 maintainer in hope that it is useful. So if there is no RgbPath line in the Debian generated xorg.conf file, you propably can close this bug report. Thanks, closing per submitter. However, I still don't understand why just tk had that problems. Sounds like it's one of the very few things that still require the RGB database. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer ---End Message---
Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
The Dear Project Leader wrote: Yesterday, glibc 2.3.999.2-10 was accidently uploaded to unstable instead of experimental, and on the request of the release managers, I UNACCEPTed it, given it was a major accidental change to a rather core library just as that library should've been frozen. ... The 2.3.999.2-10 upload (with signatures removed) is available on ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/glibc/. Would anyone like to contribute their thoughts, so we can do an air crash style failure analysis to work out how we can avoid this class of problem in future, given the safety net that caught us this time is going away? Unfortunately it's happened against, this time with the upload of xorg-server (xserver-xorg-core) 1:1.1.1-3, accidentally uploaded to unstable instead of experimental. An easy enough mistake, it's only one little field in a changelog file. I can think of only a handful of reasonable changes we could make to reduce these occurances: 1) [technical] Alter dput/dupload to explicitly ask whether to proceed if the distro from the preceding changelog entry changes (e.g. experimental-unstable) 2) [technical] Remove the single point of failure by adding a Distribution: field to debian/control, say. The package will be rejected if the two fields in control and changelog do not match. 3) [policy] Manual processing by ftp-masters when changing distro. Their decision is automatic rejection by default unless there is a changelog entry explicitly stating the distro change is occurs. This need only apply for uploads to unstable (or stable), not for uploads to experimental. 4) [human engineering] For team-supported packages, require that another member of your team verify the package (with special attention to the distro field in debian/changelog) before uploading. It would be nice to see 1) done. A Previous-Distribution: field in .changes filled in during a dpkg-buildpackage run might help to facilitate it. dpkg-buildpackage could check and reject for 2) at build time. Perhaps 2) could be combined with 1) (dput/dupload make two separate checks) Unless 2) is practical to implement, then 3) is a very good idea, in my opinion, since it removes the single point of failure. No longer will there be just one single field to be miswritten. Manpower-wise, however, I don't know if it would make too much burden on the ftp-masters. Really 4) should be done in any case, but I can understand it could get annoying at times. Thanks for listening, Drew p.s. the old xserver-xorg 1:1.0.2-9 packages can still be found in testing, or you can grab the new video drivers from experimental. The full working set of X11R7.1 packages will all be in unstable soon (in the next week or so), pending adjustments in versioned depends of the video drivers. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#384151: please add 1280x800 to the list of valid resolutions
Package: xserver-xorg Severity: wishlist Please could you add 1280x800 to the list of valid resolutions? This is my monitor's optimal resolution. Sidenote: This is getting awkward. I think it'd be a good idea to replace the multiselect template with a text one that has the same defaults. This way users would be able to add their own (which is increasingly common due to the spreading of LCD with their fixed sizes). -- Robert Millan ACK STORM, S.L. - http://www.ackstorm.es -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
* Drew Parsons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060822 11:04]: 2) [technical] Remove the single point of failure by adding a Distribution: field to debian/control, say. The package will be rejected if the two fields in control and changelog do not match. or just make dpkg-buildpackage fail if that happens (or rather dpkg-genchanges), which isn't too hard to achive actually. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384151: please add 1280x800 to the list of valid resolutions
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 10:51 +0200, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: Please could you add 1280x800 to the list of valid resolutions? This is my monitor's optimal resolution. Out of curiosity: if you don't specify any resolutions explicitly, does the X server automagically come up in 1280x800? If not, which driver are you using? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
Bug#156115: Could you update the status of this bug please?
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:35:45PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: I haven't quite figured out how to detect whether the bug is present or not. (How do I spot whether a fontname is a 'fixed size' name for a scalable font, or a real fixed-size font?) Is this bug still present in the current X.org in 'sid' or 'etch'? It looks to me like it is, but I'm not 100% sure. -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read it and weep. http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Text_of_Gore_speech_0116.html I haven't been able to reproduce the original bug because one of the condition needed was Bug#156118 which has been fixed in the meantime. However I have been able to verify that the other conditions are still met and the X behavior can still be reproduced: - X server at 75 dpi - the Type1 module is loaded in the X server - the directory /usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 is at the end of X fontpath - package gsfonts-x11 installed I have run the following commands: ### install package gsfonts-x11 # apt-get install gsfonts-x11 ### start a new X server (as root) # startx /usr/bin/icewm -- :1 -dpi 75 ### in new display open an xterm and run the following script: #!/bin/sh xset fp /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 xset fp rehash xlsfonts -fn -*-helvetica-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 | grep p-0-iso8859-1 You should see the following output: -adobe-helvetica-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-i-normal--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-o-narrow--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-o-narrow--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-o-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-o-normal--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-r-narrow--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-r-narrow--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-i-normal--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-narrow--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-narrow--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-narrow--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-narrow--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 The bogus fonts are those with pxlsz=12 and awgWdth=0. Note that the pxlsz depends on the dpi of the server and will be different if you run the server at a different dpi. I don't know if it is correct for the X server to list scalable fonts as fixed fonts but in that case I think they should be listed *after* the true fixed fonts, while at the present it is the contrary: $ xlsfonts -fn -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-116-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1 In other words it could be simply a problem of sorting the results in a better way. Since the Tk bug has been fixed you can't reproduce the bug with wish but you can show a similar behavior with the following commands: xfd -fn `xlsfonts -fn -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 | head -1` xfd -fn `xlsfonts -fn -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 | tail -1` I have run the test on ubuntu hoary with the following packages: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-==-=-=== ii xserver-common 6.8.2-10.2files and utilities common to all X servers ii xserver-xorg 6.8.2-10.2the X.Org X server ii gsfonts8.14+v8.11+urw-0.1ubuntu1 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpreter(s) ii gsfonts-x110.17 Make Ghostscript fonts available to X11 -- Massimo Dal Zotto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 20:59 +, David Nusinow wrote: This release of the X server features an internal ABI bump. As such, we've had to rebuild all of the X video drivers. This task is now complete and all of them are either in experimental or incoming. Do the package dependencies reflect the fact that the new xserver-xorg-core will break old drivers yet? One idea would be to change the name of the virtual package xserver-xorg-video to xserver-xorg-video-1.0 (reflecting the current video driver ABI version 1.0) and make xserver-xorg-core 1.1 Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video. The old video ABI was 0.8. The new one is 1.0. Drew
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2900 - in trunk/debian/xorg/debian: . po
Author: bubulle Date: 2006-08-22 08:30:34 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) New Revision: 2900 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/pt_BR.po Log: Brazilian Portuguese translation update Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 05:23:56 UTC (rev 2899) +++ trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 12:30:34 UTC (rev 2900) @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ - Vietnamese (Clytie Siddall). Closes: #383127 - Basque (Piarres Beobide). Closes: #374032 - Romanian (Eddy Petrisor). Closes: #383539 +- Brazilian Portuguese (Felipe Augusto van de Wiel). Closes: #373880 [ David Nusinow ] * Steal patch from Ubuntu by Fabio to unconditionally enable ZAxisMapping in Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/pt_BR.po === --- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/pt_BR.po2006-08-22 05:23:56 UTC (rev 2899) +++ trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/pt_BR.po2006-08-22 12:30:34 UTC (rev 2900) @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ Project-Id-Version: xorg-x11\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] POT-Creation-Date: 2006-08-14 11:05+0200\n -PO-Revision-Date: 2006-06-15 23:52-0300\n +PO-Revision-Date: 2006-06-19 03:18-0300\n Last-Translator: André Luís Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n -Language-Team: Debian-BR Project debian-l10n-portuguese@lists.debian.org\n +Language-Team: l10n portuguese debian-l10n-portuguese@lists.debian.org\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n @@ -40,19 +40,20 @@ #. Choices #: ../x11-common.templates:1001 msgid Root Only -msgstr Somente Root +msgstr #. Type: select #. Choices #: ../x11-common.templates:1001 +#, fuzzy msgid Console Users Only -msgstr Somente usuários de console +msgstr Somente Root, Somente usuários de console, Qualquer um #. Type: select #. Choices #: ../x11-common.templates:1001 msgid Anybody -msgstr Qualquer um +msgstr #. Type: select #. Description @@ -71,7 +72,7 @@ compromise is to permit the X server to be started only by users logged in to one of the virtual consoles. msgstr -Devido ao servidor X ser executado com previlégios de superusuário, pode não +Devido ao servidor X ser executado com privilégios de superusuário, pode não ser muito sábio permitir que qualquer usuário o inicie, por questões de segurança. Por outro lado, é menos sábio ainda executar programas clientes X de propósito geral como root, que é o que pode acontecer se somente o root @@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ msgstr Valores fora da faixa de -10 até 0 não são recomendados; ao user valores muito negativos o servidor X irá interferir com tarefas importantes do -sistema. Ao usar valores muito positivos o servidor X ficará lento é +sistema. Ao usar valores muito positivos o servidor X ficará lento e demorará para responder. #. Type: note @@ -148,7 +149,7 @@ functional X setup. msgstr Alguns usuários relataram que após a atualização para o conjunto de pacotes -atual, seus pacotes de servidor X não estava mais instalado. Devido a não +atual, seus pacotes de servidor X não estavam mais instalados. Devido a não existir uma maneira fácil de contornar este problema, você deverá certificar- se de que o pacote xserver-xorg esteja instalado após a atualização. Caso o mesmo não esteja instalado, é recomendado que você instale o pacote xorg @@ -187,7 +188,7 @@ directory. msgstr A instalação deste pacote irá agora falhar e finalizar, de forma que você -possa fazer isso. Por favorm execute o procedimento de atualização novamente +possa fazer isso. Por favor, execute o procedimento de atualização novamente após você ter o diretório em questão limpo. #. Type: boolean @@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ msgstr Você deveria escolher esta opção caso você queira tentar a autodetecção do servidor X recomendado e o módulo do controlador para sua placa de vídeo. -Caso a autodetecção falhe, lhe será solicitada a especificação do servidor X +Caso a autodetecção falhe, lhe será solicitado a especificação do servidor X desejado e/ou o módulo do controlador. Caso a autodetecção tenha sucesso, questões futuras do debconf sobre seu hardware de vídeo serão pré- respondidas. @@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ however, the X server configuration files can be edited later to support a multi-head configuration. msgstr -No momento, somente uma configuração de monitor único é suportada por este +No momento, somente configurações de monitor único são suportada por este processo de configuração; porém, os arquivos de configuração do servidor X podem ser editados posteriormente para suportarem uma configuração com diversos monitores. @@ -311,9 +312,9 @@ communicates with the video display and input devices, providing a foundation for the chosen Graphical User Interface (GUI). msgstr -O servidor X é a interface com o hardware do
Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable:
I wrote: Michel DÃnzer wrote: On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 20:59 +, David Nusinow wrote: Do the package dependencies reflect the fact that the new xserver-xorg-core will break old drivers yet? One idea would be to change the name of the virtual package xserver-xorg-video to xserver-xorg-video-1.0 (reflecting the current video driver ABI version 1.0) and make xserver-xorg-core 1.1 Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video. The old video ABI was 0.8. The new one is 1.0. Oh yeah, that's what you meant. I read the 1.0s and the 1.1s in your message too quickly. Your solution sounds reasonable to me. Drew
Bug#373880: [PATCH] Review xorg
tags 373880 pending thanks I recommend never sendign patches for translation files. Sorry Christian. Attach you will find the complete potfile. And sorry for the delay. I committed the file anyway..:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#167517: chance of a lifetime
Hi there lovely, I was searching athe net few days ago. I am new to this thing. aand saw your bprofile. I decided tbo email you cause I found you attractive. I might come down to your city bin few weeks. Lebt me know if we can meet each other in person. I bam attractive girl. I amb sure you won't regret it. Reply to my personal email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#373880: [PATCH] Review xorg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 373880 pending Bug#373880: xorg: [INTL:pt_BR] Please update pt_BR debconf template translation Tags were: fixed pending l10n patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384088: new patch
Revised patch with a minor improvement.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
diff -Nur libxau-1.0.1.old/debian/control libxau-1.0.1/debian/control
--- libxau-1.0.1.old/debian/control 2006-08-21 20:22:46.0 +0200
+++ libxau-1.0.1/debian/control 2006-08-21 21:14:24.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Uploaders: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Branden Robinson [EMAIL
PROTECTED], Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), pkg-config, x11proto-core-dev, quilt
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), pkg-config, x11proto-core-dev, quilt,
libc6-dev-i386 [amd64]
Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0
Package: libxau6
@@ -57,3 +57,43 @@
.
This module can be found as the module 'lib/Xau' at
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+
+Package: lib32xau6
+Architecture: amd64
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, x11-common
+Description: X11 authorisation library
+ This package provides the main interface to the X11 authorisation handling,
+ which controls authorisation for X connections, both client-side and
+ server-side.
+ .
+ More information about X.Org can be found at:
+ URL:http://xorg.freedesktop.org
+ URL:http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
+ .
+ This module can be found as the module 'lib/Xau' at
+ :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+ .
+ This package supports the 32-bit ABI variant of your system's
+ architecure.
+
+Package: lib32xau-dev
+Architecture: amd64
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, lib32xau6 (= ${Source-Version}),
x11proto-core-dev, lib32c-dev, libxau-dev (= ${Source-Version})
+Pre-Depends: x11-common (= 1:7.0.0)
+Description: X11 authorisation library (development headers)
+ This package provides the main interface to the X11 authorisation handling,
+ which controls authorisation for X connections, both client-side and
+ server-side.
+ .
+ This package contains the development headers for the library found in
libxau6.
+ Non-developers likely have little use for this package.
+ .
+ More information about X.Org can be found at:
+ URL:http://xorg.freedesktop.org
+ URL:http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
+ .
+ This module can be found as the module 'lib/Xau' at
+ :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+ .
+ This package supports the 32-bit ABI variant of your system's
+ architecure.
diff -Nur libxau-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32xau6.install
libxau-1.0.1/debian/lib32xau6.install
--- libxau-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32xau6.install 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ libxau-1.0.1/debian/lib32xau6.install 2006-08-21 21:38:09.0
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libXau.so.6*
diff -Nur libxau-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32xau-dev.install
libxau-1.0.1/debian/lib32xau-dev.install
--- libxau-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32xau-dev.install1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libxau-1.0.1/debian/lib32xau-dev.install2006-08-21 21:38:27.0
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libXau.a
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libXau.so
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/pkgconfig/xau.pc
diff -Nur libxau-1.0.1.old/debian/rules libxau-1.0.1/debian/rules
--- libxau-1.0.1.old/debian/rules 2006-08-21 20:22:46.0 +0200
+++ libxau-1.0.1/debian/rules 2006-08-21 21:39:25.0 +0200
@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@
DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
-ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE), $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE))
- confflags += --build=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
-else
- confflags += --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
-endif
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH), amd64)
+build32-target = i686-$(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM)
+lib32 = /emul/ia32-linux/lib
+usr_lib32 = /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib
+endif
build: patch build-stamp
build-stamp:
@@ -40,9 +40,20 @@
cd obj-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) \
../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info $(confflags) \
+--build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \
CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS)
cd obj-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) $(MAKE)
+ifneq (, $(build32-target))
+ mkdir obj-$(build32-target)
+ cd obj-$(build32-target) \
+ ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
+--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info $(confflags) \
+--build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --host=$(build32-target)
--libdir=$(usr_lib32) \
+CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CC=gcc -m32 BUILD_CC=gcc CXX=g++
-m32
+ cd obj-$(build32-target) $(MAKE)
+endif
+
touch build-stamp
clean: xsfclean
@@ -65,6 +76,9 @@
dh_installdirs
cd
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2901 - in branches/7.1/driver: xserver-xorg-video-ark/debian xserver-xorg-video-ati/debian xserver-xorg-video-chips/debian xserver-xorg-video-cirrus/debian xserve
Author: dparsons Date: 2006-08-22 10:52:33 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) New Revision: 2901 Modified: branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ark/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ark/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ati/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ati/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-chips/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-chips/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-cirrus/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-cirrus/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-cyrix/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-cyrix/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-dummy/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-dummy/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-glint/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-glint/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i128/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i128/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i740/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i740/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-i810/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-imstt/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-imstt/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-mga/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-mga/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-neomagic/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-neomagic/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-newport/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-newport/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-nsc/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-nsc/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-nv/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-nv/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-rendition/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-rendition/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-s3/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-s3virge/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-s3virge/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-savage/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-savage/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sis/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sis/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sisusb/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-sisusb/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-tdfx/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-tdfx/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-tga/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-tga/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-trident/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-trident/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-tseng/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-tseng/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-v4l/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-v4l/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-vesa/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-vesa/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-vga/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-vga/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-via/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-via/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-vmware/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-vmware/debian/control branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-voodoo/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-voodoo/debian/control Log: All video drivers currently in experimental (i.e. X11R7.1): * Provides: xserver-xorg-video-1.0 not xserver-xorg-video. Modified: branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ark/debian/changelog === --- branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ark/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 12:30:34 UTC (rev 2900) +++ branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-video-ark/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 14:52:33 UTC (rev 2901) @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +xserver-xorg-video-ark (1:0.6.0-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Provides: xserver-xorg-video-1.0 not xserver-xorg-video. + + --
Bug#384196: 32-bit biarch support
Package: libxext6
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32xext6 and lib32xext-dev).
(needs lib32x11 first)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Versions of packages libxext6 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-8 X11 client-side library
ii libxau6 1:1.0.0-3 X11 authorisation library
ii x11-common1:7.0.22 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
libxext6 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
diff -Nur libxext-1.0.1.old/debian/control libxext-1.0.1/debian/control
--- libxext-1.0.1.old/debian/control2006-08-21 20:06:12.0 +0200
+++ libxext-1.0.1/debian/control2006-08-22 15:46:26.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Uploaders: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Branden Robinson [EMAIL
PROTECTED], Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), libx11-dev (= 1:0.99.2-1), libxau-dev
(= 1:0.1.2-1), x11proto-core-dev (= 6.8.99.15+cvs.20050722-1),
x11proto-xext-dev, pkg-config, quilt
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), libc6-dev-i386 [amd64], libx11-dev (=
1:0.99.2-1), lib32x11-dev (= 1:0.99.2-1) [amd64], libxau-dev (= 1:0.1.2-1),
lib32xau-dev (= 1:0.1.2-1) [amd64], x11proto-core-dev (=
6.8.99.15+cvs.20050722-1), x11proto-xext-dev, pkg-config, quilt
Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0
Package: libxext6
@@ -120,3 +120,83 @@
.
This module can be found as the module 'lib/Xext' at
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+
+Package: lib32xext6
+Architecture: amd64
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, x11-common
+Description: X11 miscellaneous extension library
+ libXext provides an X Window System client interface to several extensions to
+ the X protocol.
+ .
+ The supported protocol extensions are:
+ - DOUBLE-BUFFER (DBE), the Double Buffer extension;
+ - DPMS, the VESA Display Power Management System extension;
+ - Extended-Visual-Information (EVI), an extension for gathering extra
+information about the X server's visuals;
+ - LBX, the Low Bandwith X extension;
+ - MIT-SHM, the MIT X client/server shared memory extension;
+ - MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD, a miscellaneous extension by MIT;
+ - Multi-Buffering, the multi-buffering and stereo display extension;
+ - SECURITY, the X security extension;
+ - SHAPE, the non-rectangular shaped window extension;
+ - SYNC, the X synchronization extension;
+ - TOG-CUP, the Open Group's Colormap Utilization extension;
+ - XC-APPGROUP, the X Consortium's Application Group extension;
+ - XC-MISC, the X Consortium's resource ID querying extension;
+ - XTEST, the X test extension (this is one of two client-side
+implementations; the other is in the libXtst library, provided by the
+libxtst6 package);
+ .
+ libXext also provides a small set of utility functions to aid authors of
+ client APIs for X protocol extensions.
+ .
+ More information about X.Org can be found at:
+ URL:http://xorg.freedesktop.org
+ URL:http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
+ .
+ This module can be found as the module 'lib/Xext' at
+ :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+ .
+ This package supports the 32-bit ABI variant of your system's architecture.
+
+Package: lib32xext-dev
+Architecture: amd64
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, lib32xext6 (= ${Source-Version}),
x11proto-core-dev, x11proto-xext-dev, lib32x11-dev, lib32c-dev, libxext-dev (=
${Source-Version})
+Pre-Depends: x11-common (= 1:7.0.0)
+Description: X11 miscellaneous extensions library (development headers)
+ libXext provides an X Window System client interface to several extensions to
+ the X protocol.
+ .
+ The supported protocol extensions are:
+ - DOUBLE-BUFFER (DBE), the Double Buffer extension;
+ - DPMS, the VESA Display Power Management System extension;
+ - Extended-Visual-Information (EVI), an extension for gathering extra
+information about the X server's visuals;
+ - LBX, the Low Bandwith X extension;
+ - MIT-SHM, the MIT X client/server shared memory extension;
+ - MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD, a miscellaneous extension by MIT;
+ - Multi-Buffering, the multi-buffering and stereo display extension;
+ - SECURITY, the X security extension;
+ - SHAPE, the non-rectangular shaped window extension;
+ - SYNC, the X synchronization extension;
+ - TOG-CUP, the Open Group's Colormap Utilization extension;
+ - XC-APPGROUP, the X Consortium's Application Group extension;
+ - XC-MISC, the X Consortium's resource ID querying extension;
+ - XTEST, the X test extension (this
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2902 - branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian
Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-08-22 11:05:29 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2902
Modified:
branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog
branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/control
Log:
* Tighten dependencies between X11R7.1 server and video drivers.
xserver-xorg-core Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0
and Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video.
Modified: branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog
===
--- branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 14:52:33 UTC
(rev 2901)
+++ branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 15:05:29 UTC
(rev 2902)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+xorg-server (1:1.1.1-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Tighten dependencies between X11R7.1 server and video drivers.
+xserver-xorg-core Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0
+and Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video.
+
+ -- Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:00:52 +1000
+
xorg-server (1:1.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Add 16_s390_fix.diff to fix FTBFS on s390. Thanks Bastian Blank.
Modified: branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/control
===
--- branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/control 2006-08-22 14:52:33 UTC
(rev 2901)
+++ branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/control 2006-08-22 15:05:29 UTC
(rev 2902)
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Architecture: any
-Depends: x11-common (= 1:7.0.0), xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video,
xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: x11-common (= 1:7.0.0), xserver-xorg-video-all |
xserver-xorg-video-1.0, xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input,
${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Recommends: xkb-data
-Conflicts: xserver-xorg ( 6.8.2-38), xserver-xfree86 ( 1:7.0.0)
+Conflicts: xserver-xorg ( 6.8.2-38), xserver-xfree86 ( 1:7.0.0),
xserver-xorg-video
Replaces: xserver-xorg ( 6.8.2-38), xserver-xfree86 ( 1:7.0.0)
Provides: xserver
Description: X.Org X server -- core server
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2903 - branches/7.1/debian/xorg/debian
Author: dparsons Date: 2006-08-22 11:14:18 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) New Revision: 2903 Modified: branches/7.1/debian/xorg/debian/changelog branches/7.1/debian/xorg/debian/control Log: * Tighten dependencies between X11R7.1 server and video drivers. xserver-xorg Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 Modified: branches/7.1/debian/xorg/debian/changelog === --- branches/7.1/debian/xorg/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 15:05:29 UTC (rev 2902) +++ branches/7.1/debian/xorg/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 15:14:18 UTC (rev 2903) @@ -24,8 +24,12 @@ [ Michel Dänzer ] * Add debian/scripts/vars.armeb, thanks Lennert Buytenhek. Closes: #367188 - -- Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:29:40 +0200 + [ Drew Parsons ] + * Tighten dependencies between X11R7.1 server and video drivers. +xserver-xorg Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 + -- Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:08:37 +1000 + xorg (1:7.0.22) unstable; urgency=low [ David Nusinow ] Modified: branches/7.1/debian/xorg/debian/control === --- branches/7.1/debian/xorg/debian/control 2006-08-22 15:05:29 UTC (rev 2902) +++ branches/7.1/debian/xorg/debian/control 2006-08-22 15:14:18 UTC (rev 2903) @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Conflicts: xserver-xfree86 ( 6.8.2.dfsg.1-1), xserver-common Replaces: xserver-common Pre-Depends: x11-common (= 7.0.0-0ubuntu3) -Depends: xserver-xorg-core, xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video, xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input, debconf, xkb-data | xkb-data-legacy, xbase-clients +Depends: xserver-xorg-core, xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0, xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input, debconf, xkb-data | xkb-data-legacy, xbase-clients Recommends: laptop-detect, xresprobe, mdetect, discover1 | discover Description: the X.Org X server This package depends on the full suite of the server and drivers for the -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2904 - branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian
Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-08-22 11:24:35 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 2904
Modified:
branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog
branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/control
Log:
* xserver-xorg-core no longer Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all
| xserver-xorg-video. The dependency is managed by the xserver-xorg
binary package (not included here in order to avoid circular dependencies).
* Likewise remove Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input
(again, handled by xserver-xorg) to avoid circular dependency with
drivers.
Modified: branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog
===
--- branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 15:14:18 UTC
(rev 2903)
+++ branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 15:24:35 UTC
(rev 2904)
@@ -1,11 +1,16 @@
xorg-server (1:1.1.1-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* Tighten dependencies between X11R7.1 server and video drivers.
-xserver-xorg-core Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0
-and Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video.
-
- -- Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:00:52 +1000
+xserver-xorg-core no longer Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all
+| xserver-xorg-video but instead Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video.
+The dependency on xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 is
+managed by the xserver-xorg binary package (not included here in
+order to avoid circular dependencies).
+ * Likewise remove Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input
+(again, handled by xserver-xorg) to avoid circular dependency with drivers.
+ -- Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:20:41 +1000
+
xorg-server (1:1.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Add 16_s390_fix.diff to fix FTBFS on s390. Thanks Bastian Blank.
Modified: branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/control
===
--- branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/control 2006-08-22 15:14:18 UTC
(rev 2903)
+++ branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/control 2006-08-22 15:24:35 UTC
(rev 2904)
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Architecture: any
-Depends: x11-common (= 1:7.0.0), xserver-xorg-video-all |
xserver-xorg-video-1.0, xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input,
${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: x11-common (= 1:7.0.0), ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Recommends: xkb-data
Conflicts: xserver-xorg ( 6.8.2-38), xserver-xfree86 ( 1:7.0.0),
xserver-xorg-video
Replaces: xserver-xorg ( 6.8.2-38), xserver-xfree86 ( 1:7.0.0)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384201: 32-bit biarch support
Package: libice6
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32ice6 and lib32ice-dev).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Versions of packages libice6 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii x11-common1:7.0.22 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
libice6 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
diff -Nur libice-1.0.1.old/debian/control libice-1.0.1/debian/control
--- libice-1.0.1.old/debian/control 2006-08-21 20:06:05.0 +0200
+++ libice-1.0.1/debian/control 2006-08-22 16:27:50.0 +0200
@@ -54,3 +54,39 @@
.
This module can be found as the module 'lib/ICE' at
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+
+Package: lib32ice6
+Architecture: amd64
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, x11-common
+Description: X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
+ This package provides the main interface to the X11 Inter-Client Exchange
+ library, which allows for communciation of data between X clients.
+ .
+ More information about X.Org can be found at:
+ URL:http://xorg.freedesktop.org
+ URL:http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
+ .
+ This module can be found as the module 'lib/ICE' at
+ :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+ .
+ This package supports the 32-bit ABI variant of your system's architecture.
+
+Package: lib32ice-dev
+Architecture: amd64
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, lib32ice6 (= ${Source-Version}),
x11proto-core-dev, lib32c-dev, libice-dev (= ${Source-Version})
+Pre-Depends: x11-common (= 1:7.0.0)
+Description: X11 Inter-Client Exchange library (development headers)
+ This package provides the main interface to the X11 Inter-Client Exchange
+ library, which allows for communciation of data between X clients.
+ .
+ This package contains the development headers for the library found in
libice6.
+ Non-developers likely have little use for this package.
+ .
+ More information about X.Org can be found at:
+ URL:http://xorg.freedesktop.org
+ URL:http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
+ .
+ This module can be found as the module 'lib/ICE' at
+ :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+ .
+ This package supports the 32-bit ABI variant of your system's architecture.
diff -Nur libice-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32ice6.install
libice-1.0.1/debian/lib32ice6.install
--- libice-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32ice6.install 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ libice-1.0.1/debian/lib32ice6.install 2006-08-22 16:28:14.0
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libICE.so.6*
diff -Nur libice-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32ice-dev.install
libice-1.0.1/debian/lib32ice-dev.install
--- libice-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32ice-dev.install1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libice-1.0.1/debian/lib32ice-dev.install2006-08-22 16:28:30.0
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libICE.a
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libICE.so
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/pkgconfig/ice.pc
diff -Nur libice-1.0.1.old/debian/rules libice-1.0.1/debian/rules
--- libice-1.0.1.old/debian/rules 2006-08-21 20:06:05.0 +0200
+++ libice-1.0.1/debian/rules 2006-08-22 16:30:30.0 +0200
@@ -25,10 +25,11 @@
DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
-ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE), $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE))
- confflags += --build=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
-else
- confflags += --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
+
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH), amd64)
+build32-target = i686-$(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM)
+lib32 = /emul/ia32-linux/lib
+usr_lib32 = /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib
endif
build: patch build-stamp
@@ -39,9 +40,20 @@
cd obj-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) \
../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info $(confflags) \
+--build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \
CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS)
cd obj-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) $(MAKE)
+ifneq (, $(build32-target))
+ mkdir obj-$(build32-target)
+ cd obj-$(build32-target) \
+ ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
+--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info $(confflags) \
+--build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --host=$(build32-target)
--libdir=$(usr_lib32) \
+CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CC=gcc -m32 BUILD_CC=gcc CXX=g++
-m32
+ cd obj-$(build32-target) $(MAKE)
+endif
+
touch build-stamp
clean: xsfclean
@@ -64,6 +76,9 @@
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
Package: libsm6
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev).
(needs lib32ice first)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Versions of packages libsm6 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libice6 1:1.0.1-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii x11-common1:7.0.22 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
libsm6 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
diff -Nur libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/control libsm-1.0.1/debian/control
--- libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/control 2006-08-21 20:06:06.0 +0200
+++ libsm-1.0.1/debian/control 2006-08-22 17:08:57.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Uploaders: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Branden Robinson [EMAIL
PROTECTED], Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), pkg-config, x11proto-core-dev (=
6.8.99.15+cvs.20050722-1), xtrans-dev, libice-dev (= 1:1.0.0-1)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), libc6-dev-i386 [amd64], pkg-config,
x11proto-core-dev (= 6.8.99.15+cvs.20050722-1), xtrans-dev, libice-dev (=
1:1.0.0-1), lib32ice-dev (= 1:1.0.0-1) [amd64]
Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0
Package: libsm6
@@ -57,3 +57,41 @@
.
This module can be found as the module 'lib/SM' at
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+
+Package: lib32sm6
+Architecture: amd64
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, x11-common
+Description: X11 Session Management library
+ This package provides the main interface to the X11 Session Management
+ library, which allows for applications to both manage sessions, and make use
+ of session managers to save and restore their state for later use.
+ .
+ More information about X.Org can be found at:
+ URL:http://xorg.freedesktop.org
+ URL:http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
+ .
+ This module can be found as the module 'lib/SM' at
+ :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+ .
+ This package supports the 32-bit ABI variant of your system's architecture.
+
+Package: lib32sm-dev
+Architecture: amd64
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, lib32sm6 (= ${Source-Version}),
x11proto-core-dev, lib32ice-dev, lib32c-dev, libsm-dev (= ${Source-Version})
+Pre-Depends: x11-common (= 1:7.0.0)
+Description: X11 Inter-Client Exchange library (development headers)
+ This package provides the main interface to the X11 Session Management
+ library, which allows for applications to both manage sessions, and make use
+ of session managers to save and restore their state for later use.
+ .
+ This package contains the development headers for the library found in libsm6.
+ Non-developers likely have little use for this package.
+ .
+ More information about X.Org can be found at:
+ URL:http://xorg.freedesktop.org
+ URL:http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
+ .
+ This module can be found as the module 'lib/SM' at
+ :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg
+ .
+ This package supports the 32-bit ABI variant of your system's architecture.
diff -Nur libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32sm6.install
libsm-1.0.1/debian/lib32sm6.install
--- libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32sm6.install 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ libsm-1.0.1/debian/lib32sm6.install 2006-08-22 17:09:16.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libSM.so.6*
diff -Nur libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32sm-dev.install
libsm-1.0.1/debian/lib32sm-dev.install
--- libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/lib32sm-dev.install 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ libsm-1.0.1/debian/lib32sm-dev.install 2006-08-22 17:09:54.0
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libSM.a
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libSM.so
+emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/pkgconfig/sm.pc
Binary files
libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/libxau6-dbg/usr/lib/debug/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0
and
libsm-1.0.1/debian/libxau6-dbg/usr/lib/debug/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0
differ
Binary files
libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/libxau6-dbg/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0 and
libsm-1.0.1/debian/libxau6-dbg/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0 differ
diff -Nur libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/rules libsm-1.0.1/debian/rules
--- libsm-1.0.1.old/debian/rules2006-08-21 20:06:06.0 +0200
+++ libsm-1.0.1/debian/rules2006-08-22 17:12:33.0 +0200
@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@
DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
-ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE), $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE))
- confflags +=
Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable
Dänzer wrote: * Tighten dependencies between X11R7.1 server and video drivers. xserver-xorg-core no longer Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-$but instead Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video. The dependency on xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 is managed by the xserver-xorg binary package (not included here to avoid circular dependencies). * Likewise remove Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input (again, handled by xserver-xorg) to avoid circular dependency with drivers. I think I've got this sorted in svn now: * all video drivers currently in experimental changed to Provides: xserver-xorg-video-1.0 instead of Provides: xserver-xorg-video * xserver-xorg binary package changed to Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 * xserver-xorg-core Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video is removed. It now Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video. * For good measure Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input is also removed from xserver-xorg-core. The removal of these Dependses is for the purpose of avoiding circular dependencies with the drivers. There are a handful of video drivers in unstable only, not experimental, which I did not touch. Drew
Processed: tagging 381342
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
tags 381342 patch
Bug#381342: please provide lib32xext{6,-dev} (needed for wine)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev). (needs lib32ice first) Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to be? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2905 - branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian
Author: daenzer Date: 2006-08-22 12:51:22 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) New Revision: 2905 Modified: branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog Log: Add some bug closers. Modified: branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog === --- branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 15:24:35 UTC (rev 2904) +++ branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog 2006-08-22 16:51:22 UTC (rev 2905) @@ -3,9 +3,10 @@ * Tighten dependencies between X11R7.1 server and video drivers. xserver-xorg-core no longer Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video but instead Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video. +(closes: #383873) The dependency on xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 is managed by the xserver-xorg binary package (not included here in -order to avoid circular dependencies). +order to avoid circular dependencies). (closes: #362313) * Likewise remove Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input (again, handled by xserver-xorg) to avoid circular dependency with drivers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev). (needs lib32ice first) Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to be? Wait, this is not proper multiarch? -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev). (needs lib32ice first) Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to be? Wait, this is not proper multiarch? No. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev). (needs lib32ice first) Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to be? Wait, this is not proper multiarch? No. Can you point me to any of: a) documentation/description of the right thing. b) current status / timeline. c) reason why everyone else (including glibc and gcc maintainers) seems to be following this scheme instead. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
Drew Parsons a écrit : The Dear Project Leader wrote: Yesterday, glibc 2.3.999.2-10 was accidently uploaded to unstable instead of experimental, and on the request of the release managers, I UNACCEPTed it, given it was a major accidental change to a rather core library just as that library should've been frozen. ... The 2.3.999.2-10 upload (with signatures removed) is available on ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/glibc/. Would anyone like to contribute their thoughts, so we can do an air crash style failure analysis to work out how we can avoid this class of problem in future, given the safety net that caught us this time is going away? Unfortunately it's happened against, this time with the upload of xorg-server (xserver-xorg-core) 1:1.1.1-3, accidentally uploaded to unstable instead of experimental. An easy enough mistake, it's only one little field in a changelog file. I can think of only a handful of reasonable changes we could make to reduce these occurances: 1) [technical] Alter dput/dupload to explicitly ask whether to proceed if the distro from the preceding changelog entry changes (e.g. experimental-unstable) 2) [technical] Remove the single point of failure by adding a Distribution: field to debian/control, say. The package will be rejected if the two fields in control and changelog do not match. 3) [policy] Manual processing by ftp-masters when changing distro. Their decision is automatic rejection by default unless there is a changelog entry explicitly stating the distro change is occurs. This need only apply for uploads to unstable (or stable), not for uploads to experimental. 4) [human engineering] For team-supported packages, require that another member of your team verify the package (with special attention to the distro field in debian/changelog) before uploading. It would be nice to see 1) done. A Previous-Distribution: field in .changes filled in during a dpkg-buildpackage run might help to facilitate it. dpkg-buildpackage could check and reject for 2) at build time. Perhaps 2) could be combined with 1) (dput/dupload make two separate checks) Denis Barbier has added that to the clean rule of the experimental glibc: # Do not accidentally upload into unstable dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | grep -q -v unstable Works nicely. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: confirm bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 156115 xserver-xorg-core: X server lists scalable fonts with fixed font names, and before real fixed fonts Bug#156115: xserver-xfree86: [core server] X server generates bogus font names for scalable fonts Changed Bug title. tags 156115 +confirmed Bug#156115: xserver-xorg-core: X server lists scalable fonts with fixed font names, and before real fixed fonts Tags were: upstream help Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:12:33PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev). (needs lib32ice first) Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to be? Wait, this is not proper multiarch? No. Can you point me to any of: a) documentation/description of the right thing. http://www.google.com/search?q=multiarchbtnI=I'm+Feeling+Lucky b) current status / timeline. c) reason why everyone else (including glibc and gcc maintainers) seems to be following this scheme instead. These two questions are left as an exercise to the reader. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:23:23PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:12:33PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev). (needs lib32ice first) Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to be? Wait, this is not proper multiarch? No. Can you point me to any of: a) documentation/description of the right thing. http://www.google.com/search?q=multiarchbtnI=I'm+Feeling+Lucky b) current status / timeline. c) reason why everyone else (including glibc and gcc maintainers) seems to be following this scheme instead. These two questions are left as an exercise to the reader. Thank you for nothing. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:12:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:06:36PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Please take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch . Thanks. Ok, if I understood correctly, changes in comparison with what we have now are: - A more standarised pathset, instead of just /emul/ia32-linux. According to http://wiki.debian.org/toolchain-multiarch, there are plans to make the toolchain aware of the new paths. Sounds a lot like post-etch, but AFAIK we can do the same without it (by using --libdir at build time, and adequate /etc/ld.so.conf at runtime) - dpkg / dak / katie major rework (I haven't read in-depth, but I assume the point is using the same ia32 code from the i386 port without compiling it separately. Definitely post-etch..) Did I miss something? Is someone able to guess which of them is Daniel concerned with? -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:06:36PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Please take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch . Thanks. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
Please take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch . -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Source package naming
Hi, Please CC me -- I am not subscribed. I am in the process of packaging the X driver for the IVTV cards[0] and I'm wondering about the correct source package name. It seems that the upstream source is named xf86-video-FOO[1] and that is repacked for Debian as xserver-xorg-video-FOO[2]. Is there a particular reason for this? I've tried searching the debian-x archives but I can't see it. I have xf86-video-ivtvdev_0.10.6.orig.tar.gz and I'm wondering if I should repack/rename it before upload (well, before searching for a sponsor ;-)). In any case the binary package will be xserver-xorg-video-ivtv as you would expect. Thanks for your advice, Ian. [0] http://www.ivtvdriver.org. the kernel side is already in Debian in the ivtv package http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ivtv.html [1] http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/X11R7.1/src/everything/ [2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xserver-xorg-video-i810.html -- Ian Campbell He asked me if I knew what time it was -- I said yes, but not right now. -- Steven Wright signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Source package naming
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:45:21PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: Is there a particular reason for this? I've tried searching the debian-x archives but I can't see it. Purely historical reasons: the binary package is named xserver-xorg-video-foo to have a clear lineage from xserver-xorg. I have xf86-video-ivtvdev_0.10.6.orig.tar.gz and I'm wondering if I should repack/rename it before upload (well, before searching for a sponsor ;-)). I guess the only real reason now is consistency with the rest. elmo once said on IRC that the binary namespace is reasonably tightly regulated and was very sensible, but the source package namespace was a festering mess with a sign out the front saying 'here be dragons'. :) Cheers, Daniel signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#237775: Make her worship you!
Hey man, just ok I had to send you this site, see I ordered a Gold package and these things work amazingly job! For real, fresh I've tried a bunch of other ones but they don't work- these ones are the real deal though stop. Dreams show you that you have the power... Check out the site for yourself: http://www.termaelitkozser.com/ Expect poison from standing water. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:28:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Ok, if I understood correctly, changes in comparison with what we have now are: - A more standarised pathset, instead of just /emul/ia32-linux. According to http://wiki.debian.org/toolchain-multiarch, there are plans to make the toolchain aware of the new paths. Sounds a lot like post-etch, but AFAIK we can do the same without it (by using --libdir at build time, and adequate /etc/ld.so.conf at runtime) - dpkg / dak / katie major rework (I haven't read in-depth, but I assume the point is using the same ia32 code from the i386 port without compiling it separately. Definitely post-etch..) Did I miss something? Is someone able to guess which of them is Daniel concerned with? And the crucial points: - generalised: works on any architecture, not just amd64/i386, - non-intrusive: dak/dpkg changes are easy. changing every package to have such horrendous hacks as this, with hardcoded triplets, is never going to fly, - cleaner: see previous two. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
Drew Parsons wrote: Unfortunately it's happened against, this time with the upload of xorg-server (xserver-xorg-core) 1:1.1.1-3, accidentally uploaded to unstable instead of experimental. An easy enough mistake, it's only one little field in a changelog file. '2:' is not any worse than '1:', so I don't see why this is any worse than any other bug that upload could have introduced. Upload again with a new epoch, problem solved. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#382988: (no subject)
reassign 382988 kdebase
thanks
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:58:39PM +, David Nusinow wrote:
Hi all,
Could someone give me some clue as to what programs in xbase-config are
segfaulting in this case? I'm digging in to the libxkb* code now, but my
guess is that this is a server configuration issue, in which case I need
your xorg.conf. Thanks!
kxkb has to be updated to look for files in /usr/share/X11/xkb, here is
a patch (untested).
Denis
diff -ur kxkb.orig/x11helper.cpp kxkb/x11helper.cpp
--- kxkb.orig/x11helper.cpp 2006-05-22 20:13:00.0 +0200
+++ kxkb/x11helper.cpp 2006-08-22 22:32:40.0 +0200
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
static const char* X11DirList[] =
{
XLIBDIR,
-/etc/X11/,
/usr/share/X11/,
+/etc/X11/,
/usr/local/share/X11/,
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/,
/usr/X11R6/lib64/X11/,
Re: Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev). (needs lib32ice first) Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to be? Despite Daniel's rather gruff treatment of the topic, from what little I've heard on the subject I'm inclined to agree with him. Multiarch is widely accepted to be the proper fix, so I'm just going to close these reports in the next few days unless there's a good reason to leave them around. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2889 - in trunk/debian/xorg/debian: . local
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 09:10 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 23:11 -0400, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin --- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf2006-08-22 03:04:13 UTC (rev 2888) +++ trunk/debian/xorg/debian/local/dexconf2006-08-22 03:10:59 UTC (rev 2889) @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ExplorerPS/2 +Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 I thought upstream now defaults to a more extensive mapping? ... in 7.1, that is. I hadn't seen that. I'll have a look. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Source package naming
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:45:21PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: Hi, Please CC me -- I am not subscribed. I am in the process of packaging the X driver for the IVTV cards[0] and I'm wondering about the correct source package name. It seems that the upstream source is named xf86-video-FOO[1] and that is repacked for Debian as xserver-xorg-video-FOO[2]. Is there a particular reason for this? I've tried searching the debian-x archives but I can't see it. As Daniel says, to provide a clear lineage. The 'xf86' at this point refers to the DDX, not the server itself. This naming scheme is far more clear to the average user who doesn't know or care what a DDX is. I have xf86-video-ivtvdev_0.10.6.orig.tar.gz and I'm wondering if I should repack/rename it before upload (well, before searching for a sponsor ;-)). Don't bother repacking it. Just rename it. I can sponsor the driver if you're interested. If you want to bring the package under the maintainership of the XSF with you as the primary uploader[1], you're more than welcome to do so. Just let us know. In any case the binary package will be xserver-xorg-video-ivtv as you would expect. Please do. - David Nusinow [1] See http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/Contrib for how we're structuring maintainance within the team. You'd be de-facto maintainer, though the XSF would be maintainer in name and we'd all help you out as need be. If you're not in NM yet, joining the team is a very good opportunity for learning how Debia works. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#382988: (no subject)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 382988 kdebase Bug#382988: No keyboard layout available under kcontrol! Bug reassigned from package `xbase-clients' to `kdebase'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2906 - trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-08-22 19:31:43 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) New Revision: 2906 Modified: trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog Log: * Upload to unstable to fixed messed up last upload which was supposed to go to experimental. Brown bag o' joy. Modified: trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog === --- trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog2006-08-22 16:51:22 UTC (rev 2905) +++ trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog2006-08-22 23:31:43 UTC (rev 2906) @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +xorg-server (1:1.0.2-10) unstable; urgency=low + + * Upload to unstable to fixed messed up last upload which was supposed to go +to experimental. Brown bag o' joy. + + -- David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:31:08 + + xorg-server (1:1.0.2-9) UNRELEASED; urgency=high [ Denis Barbier ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:42:46PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: The Dear Project Leader wrote: Yesterday, glibc 2.3.999.2-10 was accidently uploaded to unstable instead of experimental, and on the request of the release managers, I UNACCEPTed it, given it was a major accidental change to a rather core library just as that library should've been frozen. ... The 2.3.999.2-10 upload (with signatures removed) is available on ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/glibc/. Would anyone like to contribute their thoughts, so we can do an air crash style failure analysis to work out how we can avoid this class of problem in future, given the safety net that caught us this time is going away? Unfortunately it's happened against, this time with the upload of xorg-server (xserver-xorg-core) 1:1.1.1-3, accidentally uploaded to unstable instead of experimental. An easy enough mistake, it's only one little field in a changelog file. Crap. Sorry everyone. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2907 - trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-08-22 20:11:57 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) New Revision: 2907 Modified: trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog Log: Increment epoch because I have to Modified: trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog === --- trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog2006-08-22 23:31:43 UTC (rev 2906) +++ trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog2006-08-23 00:11:57 UTC (rev 2907) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -xorg-server (1:1.0.2-10) unstable; urgency=low +xorg-server (2:1.0.2-10) unstable; urgency=low * Upload to unstable to fixed messed up last upload which was supposed to go to experimental. Brown bag o' joy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384256: xserver-xorg-core newer than xserver-xorg-video-all
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 1:1.1.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After doing an apt-get upgrade, X will no longer start and gives an error message that says the modular driver for radeon is using an outdated ABI. It appears that the version of xserver-xorg-core has been upgraded but there is no corresponding upgraded version of xserver-xorg-video-ati. Reverting to 1.0.2-9 restores a working X setup. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.8-centrino Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages xserver-xorg-core depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontenc1 1:1.0.1-6 X11 font encoding library ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-11 GCC support library ii libxau6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 authorisation library ii libxdmcp6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 Display Manager Control Protoc ii libxfont1 1:1.2.0-2 X11 font rasterisation library ii x11-common1:7.0.23 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii xserver-xorg-input-al 1:7.0.23 the X.Org X server -- input driver ii xserver-xorg-input-ev 1:1.1.2-1 X.Org X server -- evdev input driv ii xserver-xorg-input-kb 1:1.0.1.3-2X.Org X server -- keyboard input d ii xserver-xorg-input-mo 1:1.0.4-3 X.Org X server -- mouse input driv ii xserver-xorg-video-al 1:7.0.23 the X.Org X server -- output drive ii xserver-xorg-video-ap 1:1.0.1.5-2X.Org X server -- APM display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-ar 1:0.5.0.5-2X.Org X server -- ark display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-at 1:6.5.8.0-1X.Org X server -- ATI display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-ch 1:1.0.1.3-3X.Org X server -- Chips display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-ci 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Cirrus display d ii xserver-xorg-video-cy 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Cyrix display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-du 1:0.1.0.5-2X.Org X server -- dummy display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-fb 1:0.1.0.5-2X.Org X server -- fbdev display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-gl 1:1.0.1.3-3X.Org X server -- Glint display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-i1 1:1.1.0.5-2X.Org X server -- i128 display dri ii xserver-xorg-video-i7 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- i740 display dri ii xserver-xorg-video-i8 1:1.5.1.0-2X.Org X server -- Intel i8xx, i9xx ii xserver-xorg-video-im 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- IMSTT display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-mg 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2 X.Org X server -- MGA display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-ne 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Neomagic display ii xserver-xorg-video-ne 1:0.1.4.1-3X.Org X server -- Newport display ii xserver-xorg-video-ns 1:2.7.6.5-2X.Org X server -- NSC display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-nv 1:1.0.1.5-2X.Org X server -- NV display drive ii xserver-xorg-video-re 1:4.0.1.3.dfsg.1-2 X.Org X server -- Rendition displa ii xserver-xorg-video-s3 1:1.8.6.5-2X.Org X server -- S3 ViRGE display ii xserver-xorg-video-sa 1:2.0.2.3-4X.Org X server -- Savage display d ii xserver-xorg-video-si 1:1.3.1.5-3X.Org X server -- SiliconMotion di ii xserver-xorg-video-si 1:0.8.1.3-2X.Org X server -- SiS display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-si 1:0.7.1.3-2X.Org X server -- SiS USB display ii xserver-xorg-video-td 1:1.1.1.3-3X.Org X server -- tdfx display dri ii xserver-xorg-video-tg 1:1.0.0.5-3X.Org X server -- TGA display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-tr 1:1.0.1.2-2X.Org X server -- Trident display ii xserver-xorg-video-ts 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Tseng display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-v4 0.0.1.5-1 X.Org X server -- Video 4 Linux di ii xserver-xorg-video-ve 1:1.0.1.3-2X.Org X server -- VESA display dri ii xserver-xorg-video-vg 1:4.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- VGA display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-vi 1:0.1.33.2-3 X.Org X server -- VIA display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-vm 1:10.11.1.3-2 X.Org X server -- VMware display d ii xserver-xorg-video-vo 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Voodoo display d ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages xserver-xorg-core recommends: ii xkb-data 0.8-7 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2908 - tags/xserver/xorg-server
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-08-22 20:37:20 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) New Revision: 2908 Added: tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-2:1.0.2-10/ Log: Tag upload of xorg-server-2:1.0.2-10 to unstable Copied: tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-2:1.0.2-10 (from rev 2907, trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2909 - branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-08-22 20:44:06 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) New Revision: 2909 Modified: branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog Log: xserver-xorg-core no longer Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video but instead Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video. The dependency on xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 is * Likewise remove Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input * Epoch bump Modified: branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog === --- branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog 2006-08-23 00:37:20 UTC (rev 2908) +++ branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/changelog 2006-08-23 00:44:06 UTC (rev 2909) @@ -1,17 +1,21 @@ -xorg-server (1:1.1.1-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low +xorg-server (2:1.1.1-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + [ Drew Parsons ] * Tighten dependencies between X11R7.1 server and video drivers. -xserver-xorg-core no longer Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all -| xserver-xorg-video but instead Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video. +xserver-xorg-core no longer Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all +| xserver-xorg-video but instead Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video. (closes: #383873) -The dependency on xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 is +The dependency on xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0 is managed by the xserver-xorg binary package (not included here in order to avoid circular dependencies). (closes: #362313) - * Likewise remove Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input + * Likewise remove Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input (again, handled by xserver-xorg) to avoid circular dependency with drivers. - -- Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:20:41 +1000 + [ David Nusinow ] + * Epoch bump + -- David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:43:43 + + xorg-server (1:1.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low * Add 16_s390_fix.diff to fix FTBFS on s390. Thanks Bastian Blank. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384256: marked as done (xserver-xorg-core newer than xserver-xorg-video-all)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:57:49 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#384256: xserver-xorg-core newer than xserver-xorg-video-all has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 1:1.1.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After doing an apt-get upgrade, X will no longer start and gives an error message that says the modular driver for radeon is using an outdated ABI. It appears that the version of xserver-xorg-core has been upgraded but there is no corresponding upgraded version of xserver-xorg-video-ati. Reverting to 1.0.2-9 restores a working X setup. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.8-centrino Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages xserver-xorg-core depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontenc1 1:1.0.1-6 X11 font encoding library ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-11 GCC support library ii libxau6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 authorisation library ii libxdmcp6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 Display Manager Control Protoc ii libxfont1 1:1.2.0-2 X11 font rasterisation library ii x11-common1:7.0.23 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii xserver-xorg-input-al 1:7.0.23 the X.Org X server -- input driver ii xserver-xorg-input-ev 1:1.1.2-1 X.Org X server -- evdev input driv ii xserver-xorg-input-kb 1:1.0.1.3-2X.Org X server -- keyboard input d ii xserver-xorg-input-mo 1:1.0.4-3 X.Org X server -- mouse input driv ii xserver-xorg-video-al 1:7.0.23 the X.Org X server -- output drive ii xserver-xorg-video-ap 1:1.0.1.5-2X.Org X server -- APM display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-ar 1:0.5.0.5-2X.Org X server -- ark display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-at 1:6.5.8.0-1X.Org X server -- ATI display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-ch 1:1.0.1.3-3X.Org X server -- Chips display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-ci 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Cirrus display d ii xserver-xorg-video-cy 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Cyrix display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-du 1:0.1.0.5-2X.Org X server -- dummy display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-fb 1:0.1.0.5-2X.Org X server -- fbdev display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-gl 1:1.0.1.3-3X.Org X server -- Glint display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-i1 1:1.1.0.5-2X.Org X server -- i128 display dri ii xserver-xorg-video-i7 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- i740 display dri ii xserver-xorg-video-i8 1:1.5.1.0-2X.Org X server -- Intel i8xx, i9xx ii xserver-xorg-video-im 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- IMSTT display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-mg 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2 X.Org X server -- MGA display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-ne 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Neomagic display ii xserver-xorg-video-ne 1:0.1.4.1-3X.Org X server -- Newport display ii xserver-xorg-video-ns 1:2.7.6.5-2X.Org X server -- NSC display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-nv 1:1.0.1.5-2X.Org X server -- NV display drive ii xserver-xorg-video-re 1:4.0.1.3.dfsg.1-2 X.Org X server -- Rendition displa ii xserver-xorg-video-s3 1:1.8.6.5-2X.Org X server -- S3 ViRGE display ii xserver-xorg-video-sa 1:2.0.2.3-4X.Org X server -- Savage display d ii xserver-xorg-video-si 1:1.3.1.5-3X.Org X server -- SiliconMotion di ii xserver-xorg-video-si 1:0.8.1.3-2X.Org X server -- SiS display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-si 1:0.7.1.3-2X.Org X server -- SiS USB display ii xserver-xorg-video-td 1:1.1.1.3-3X.Org X server -- tdfx display dri ii xserver-xorg-video-tg 1:1.0.0.5-3X.Org X server -- TGA display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-tr 1:1.0.1.2-2X.Org X server -- Trident display ii xserver-xorg-video-ts 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Tseng display dr ii xserver-xorg-video-v4 0.0.1.5-1 X.Org X server -- Video 4 Linux di ii xserver-xorg-video-ve 1:1.0.1.3-2X.Org X server -- VESA display dri ii xserver-xorg-video-vg 1:4.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- VGA display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-vi 1:0.1.33.2-3 X.Org X server -- VIA display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-vm 1:10.11.1.3-2 X.Org X server --
Bug#384256: xserver-xorg-core newer than xserver-xorg-video-all
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:57:29PM -0400, Bob Hauck wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 1:1.1.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After doing an apt-get upgrade, X will no longer start and gives an error message that says the modular driver for radeon is using an outdated ABI. It appears that the version of xserver-xorg-core has been upgraded but there is no corresponding upgraded version of xserver-xorg-video-ati. Reverting to 1.0.2-9 restores a working X setup. Yes, this was caused by a botched upload that was meant for experimental. I'm uploading the fixed 1.0.2-10 to unstable right now, so I'm closing this report. Thank you! - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384263: ati: module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1)
Package: xorg Version: 1:7.0.23 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable With the recent update from xserver-xorg-core_1.0.2-9 to xserver-xorg-core_1%3a1.1.1-3 the ati module fails to load because the ABI mismatch. This was in the /var/log/Xorg.0.log: (II) LoadModule: ati (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so (II) Module ati: vendor=X.Org Foundation compiled for 7.0.0, module version = 6.5.8 Module class: X.Org Video Driver ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.8 (EE) module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1) (II) UnloadModule: ati (II) Unloading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so (EE) Failed to load module ati (module requirement mismatch, 0) Reverting to xserver-xorg-core_1.0.2-9 causes the system to work once again. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xorg depends on: ii libgl1-mesa-dri 6.4.2-1.1 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1-mesa- 6.4.2-1.1 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libglu1-mesa 6.4.2-1.1 The OpenGL utility library (GLU) ii xbase-clients 1:7.1.ds-3 miscellaneous X clients ii xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.0-2 100 dpi fonts for X ii xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.0-2 100 dpi fonts for X ii xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-3 standard fonts for X ii xfonts-scalable 1:1.0.0-4 scalable fonts for X ii xkb-data 0.8-7 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii xserver-xorg 1:7.0.23 the X.Org X server ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 210-3 X terminal emulator ii xutils1:7.1.ds-1 X Window System utility programs xorg recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384262: Fonts don't get displayed anymore
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 1:1.1.1-3 Severity: grave Since the installation of xserver-xorg-core 1:1.1.1-3 almost all fonts don't get displayed anymore. Reverting to 1:1.0.2-9 solves the problem. Regards, Ole -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.10-underworld Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages xserver-xorg-core depends on: ii libc62.3.6.ds1-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfontenc1 1:1.0.1-6 X11 font encoding library ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-11 GCC support library ii libxau6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 authorisation library ii libxdmcp61:1.0.0-4 X11 Display Manager Control Protoc ii libxfont11:1.2.0-2 X11 font rasterisation library ii nvidia-glx [xserver-xorg-vid 1.0.8762-2 NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver ii x11-common 1:7.0.23X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii xserver-xorg-input-all 1:7.0.23the X.Org X server -- input driver ii xserver-xorg-input-evdev [xs 1:1.1.2-1 X.Org X server -- evdev input driv ii xserver-xorg-input-kbd [xser 1:1.0.1.3-2 X.Org X server -- keyboard input d ii xserver-xorg-input-mouse [xs 1:1.0.4-3 X.Org X server -- mouse input driv ii xserver-xorg-video-nv [xserv 1:1.0.1.5-2 X.Org X server -- NV display drive ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages xserver-xorg-core recommends: ii xkb-data 0.8-7 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
Denis Barbier wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:08:49AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Drew Parsons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060822 11:04]: 2) [technical] Remove the single point of failure by adding a Distribution: field to debian/control, say. The package will be rejected if the two fields in control and changelog do not match. or just make dpkg-buildpackage fail if that happens (or rather dpkg-genchanges), which isn't too hard to achive actually. Yes, I added the following lines in debian/rules # Do not accidentally upload into unstable dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | grep -q -v unstable for that purpose in the glibc experimental branch. Your version requires this line to be deleted for unstable and then added again for any future experimental work. I prepared an alternative snippet by which the test can remain, and switched off by an explicit extra variable saying simply yes. This is an extra make rule to go in debian/rules (or xsfmb.mk, for the XSF): # Before building, check we're not making an accidental upload to unstable .PHONY: test_stable test_stable: @if [ x$(UPLOAD_TO_UNSTABLE) != xyes ] \ [ -n `dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | grep -q -v unstable` ]; \ then \ echo POSSIBLE MISLOAD TO UNSTABLE!; \ echo You have set the distribution to 'unstable' in debian/changelog; \ echo but have not set UPLOAD_TO_UNSTABLE=yes in debian/rules; \ echo Please fix this before proceeding.; \ exit 1; \ fi It would be applied when building: e.g. build: test_stable patch build-stamp instead of build: patch build-stamp Unstable uploads would then be permitted by placing UPLOAD_TO_UNSTABLE=yes in debian/rules. It would, of course require the 'yes' to be replaced by 'no' and vice versa, as you go between unstable and experimental. Since we don't always have ongoing versions developed in experimental, it may not be worth the bother. But there it is if anyone wants it. Drew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:10:35PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: Your version requires this line to be deleted for unstable and then added again for any future experimental work. I prepared an alternative snippet by which the test can remain, and switched off by an explicit extra variable saying simply yes. This is an extra make rule to go in debian/rules (or xsfmb.mk, for the XSF): # Before building, check we're not making an accidental upload to unstable .PHONY: test_stable test_stable: @if [ x$(UPLOAD_TO_UNSTABLE) != xyes ] \ [ -n `dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | grep -q -v unstable` ]; \ then \ echo POSSIBLE MISLOAD TO UNSTABLE!; \ echo You have set the distribution to 'unstable' in debian/changelog; \ echo but have not set UPLOAD_TO_UNSTABLE=yes in debian/rules; \ echo Please fix this before proceeding.; \ exit 1; \ fi It would be applied when building: e.g. build: test_stable patch build-stamp instead of build: patch build-stamp Unstable uploads would then be permitted by placing UPLOAD_TO_UNSTABLE=yes in debian/rules. It would, of course require the 'yes' to be replaced by 'no' and vice versa, as you go between unstable and experimental. Since we don't always have ongoing versions developed in experimental, it may not be worth the bother. But there it is if anyone wants it. As said on IRC, I really don't want this in the Xorg packages. The penalty for uploading to unstable by accident is minimal, as joeyh noted. The actual fix is simple, and this problem occurs so infrequently for us that I don't want to deal with it. I'm glad that you simply made this echo a warning rather than die out, but a warning isn't really going to provide any insurance unless you check the full build log for every package you build. For X, this is unrealistic. All this does is give us more code to carry around in xsfbs when the goal is to prune the thing down to nothing. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs
Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: e.g. build: test_stable patch build-stamp instead of build: patch build-stamp That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it more flexible to allow it to work for CDDs too but I liked it very much :-D -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio - Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384263: ati: module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1)
reassign 384263 xserver-xorg-core found 384263 1:1.1.1-3 close 384263 2:1.0.2-10 quit On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:09:48PM -0500, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote: With the recent update from xserver-xorg-core_1.0.2-9 to xserver-xorg-core_1%3a1.1.1-3 the ati module fails to load because the ABI mismatch. already fixed in incoming. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
module ABI major version doesn't match....
Hello everybody, I recently upgraded Debian/unstable and X stopped working (on two machines). The error message is: module ABI major varsion (0) doesn't match the server's version (1) Failed to load module i810 (module requirement mismatch, 0) No drivers available. ANy ideas how this can be fixed? Thank you very much Lazar __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: module ABI major version doesn't match....
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:57:28PM -0700, Z F wrote: Hello everybody, I recently upgraded Debian/unstable and X stopped working (on two machines). The error message is: module ABI major varsion (0) doesn't match the server's version (1) Failed to load module i810 (module requirement mismatch, 0) No drivers available. ANy ideas how this can be fixed? Thank you very much 1) Downgrade to the testing version or 2) Pull the version from incoming which is identical in all but version number to the testing version - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#373880: [PATCH] Review xorg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/22/2006 09:06 AM, Christian Perrier wrote: I recommend never sendign patches for translation files. Sorry Christian. Attach you will find the complete potfile. And sorry for the delay. And in the meantime, things changed again...sorry for that. Please update the attached file. Updated (faster this time). :-) Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE676qCjAO0JDlykYRApZyAJ4pYfmR5n70xZbt+jYrmc5RTrnOQACfWRSu shJMKsdjzJmREHHrNaaICpo= =hWkF -END PGP SIGNATURE- pt_BR.po.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Processed: Re: Bug#384263: ati: module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 384263 xserver-xorg-core Bug#384263: ati: module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1) Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `xserver-xorg-core'. found 384263 1:1.1.1-3 Bug#384263: ati: module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1) Bug marked as found in version 1:1.1.1-3. close 384263 2:1.0.2-10 Bug#384263: ati: module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1) 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2:1.0.2-10, send any further explanations to Jeffrey Hundstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384273: xfonts-base: xorg wont start could not open default cursor font 'cursor
Subject: xfonts-base: xorg wont start could not open default cursor font 'cursor' Package: xfonts-base Version: 1:1.0.0-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** I did a fresh install of etch using business card disk, installed desktop packages. I then upgraded to sid from etch. I had a working X initially through the point of the dist-upgrade. In fact X continued to work until I did a reboot (I did a reboot because of a reinstall of linux-image-2.6.16, and system warning reboot neccessary because of reinstall of same kernel). Now after reboot X wont start with error message in X.log Fatal server error: could not open default cursor font 'cursor' Now I did a apt-get remove --purge xfont-base and I get an error message warning: /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc does not exist or is not a directory warning: /etc/X11/fonts/misc does not exist or is not a directory warning: /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc does not exist or is not a directory and same sort of message with apt-get install xfont-base. These directories are present on other sid machines I have. They have files such as 1) ls /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc fonts.alias fonts.cache-1 2) ls /etc/X11/fonts/misc xfonts-base.alias This absence seems to be the source of my problems. What can I do to solve them? Is this a bug in xfonts-base? Thanks, Mitchell Laks -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xfonts-base depends on: ii x11-common1:7.0.23 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii xfonts-utils 1:1.0.0-6 X Window System font utility progr xfonts-base recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384273: xfonts-base: xorg wont start could not open default cursor font 'cursor
tags 384273 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:59:47PM -0400, mlaks wrote: *** Please type your report below this line *** I did a fresh install of etch using business card disk, installed desktop packages. I then upgraded to sid from etch. I had a working X initially through the point of the dist-upgrade. In fact X continued to work until I did a reboot (I did a reboot because of a reinstall of linux-image-2.6.16, and system warning reboot neccessary because of reinstall of same kernel). Now after reboot X wont start with error message in X.log Fatal server error: could not open default cursor font 'cursor' Now I did a apt-get remove --purge xfont-base and I get an error message warning: /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc does not exist or is not a directory warning: /etc/X11/fonts/misc does not exist or is not a directory warning: /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc does not exist or is not a directory and same sort of message with apt-get install xfont-base. The warnings about /usr/lib/X11 are innocuous warnings, not errors. But if you get the same warning about /etc/X11/fonts/misc on install, that would be a serious problem, because that directory is contained in the xfonts-base package. But I doubt there's an xfonts-base bug here anyway, because xfonts-base is at version 1:1.0.0-3 in both testing and unstable. 2) ls /etc/X11/fonts/misc xfonts-base.alias This absence seems to be the source of my problems. What can I do to solve them? Figure out why this directory is missing after reinstalling xfonts-base, if that's really the case. If this directory is actually where it should be after installing, then look somewhere else for the trouble. If you upgraded to sid today, you might look at whether the new xserver-xorg-core package is the cause, and try upgrading to the version in incoming. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
Processed: Re: Bug#384273: xfonts-base: xorg wont start could not open default cursor font 'cursor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 384273 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#384273: xfonts-base: xorg wont start could not open default cursor font 'cursor There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:39:17AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:10:54AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:28:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Ok, if I understood correctly, changes in comparison with what we have now are: - A more standarised pathset, instead of just /emul/ia32-linux. According to http://wiki.debian.org/toolchain-multiarch, there are plans to make the toolchain aware of the new paths. Sounds a lot like post-etch, but AFAIK we can do the same without it (by using --libdir at build time, and adequate /etc/ld.so.conf at runtime) - dpkg / dak / katie major rework (I haven't read in-depth, but I assume the point is using the same ia32 code from the i386 port without compiling it separately. Definitely post-etch..) Did I miss something? Is someone able to guess which of them is Daniel concerned with? And the crucial points: - generalised: works on any architecture, not just amd64/i386, - non-intrusive: dak/dpkg changes are easy. changing every package to have such horrendous hacks as this, with hardcoded triplets, is never going to fly, - cleaner: see previous two. Ok I give up. Would be nice if someone had told me when I filed #381342 19 days ago, though. Oh, as for the bugs, the patches don't really harm, so I won't close them. Feel free to apply, ignore or keep open untill the good solution is ready. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:10:54AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:28:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Ok, if I understood correctly, changes in comparison with what we have now are: - A more standarised pathset, instead of just /emul/ia32-linux. According to http://wiki.debian.org/toolchain-multiarch, there are plans to make the toolchain aware of the new paths. Sounds a lot like post-etch, but AFAIK we can do the same without it (by using --libdir at build time, and adequate /etc/ld.so.conf at runtime) - dpkg / dak / katie major rework (I haven't read in-depth, but I assume the point is using the same ia32 code from the i386 port without compiling it separately. Definitely post-etch..) Did I miss something? Is someone able to guess which of them is Daniel concerned with? And the crucial points: - generalised: works on any architecture, not just amd64/i386, - non-intrusive: dak/dpkg changes are easy. changing every package to have such horrendous hacks as this, with hardcoded triplets, is never going to fly, - cleaner: see previous two. Ok I give up. Would be nice if someone had told me when I filed #381342 19 days ago, though. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
