Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:52:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to > a few porters tonight. You could just point 'em at a specific date in the nightly tarballs. http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/ For Jack Howarth, the above URL is: http://.*.***/***/ -- G. Branden Robinson| Debian GNU/Linux | Please do not look directly into [EMAIL PROTECTED] | laser with remaining eye. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | pgpc2jbmRbLkj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:52:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to > a few porters tonight. You could just point 'em at a specific date in the nightly tarballs. http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/ For Jack Howarth, the above URL is: http://.*.***/***/ -- G. Branden Robinson| Debian GNU/Linux | Please do not look directly into [EMAIL PROTECTED] | laser with remaining eye. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:58:57PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac > > > does not.. :/ > > > > That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k. > > But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours probably neither. > Its just none of the mac users noticed yet. And I have no reports about > Atari, and the three VMEs. Is it important for XFree86, I mean will 4.3 only > work with a 2.4 kernel? I heard Ray Knight is trying to get some > improvements from the powerpc kernel. If somebody can make it work on Macs, > its Ray... > > As for the build-failure, when I built from David's source two weeks ago, it Who's he? :) > failed here (cut'n'paste messed up the format a bit): > > # Create the xlibmesa-drm-src package. > > [...] > rm debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile > debian/local/xlib > mesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Imakefile > debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile.kernel > > rm: cannot remove > `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile': > No such file or directory > I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to a few porters tonight. > Is this before or after your failure? Is it from the same source or did > Daniel add the fix he suggested for this to the source? What James was reporting wasn't an error per se, just a factual incorrectness. I'll get back to you soon, I've just had exams (and still do - last exam is today), sorry. -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org pgpNv6br9K6WK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ > > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture > > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES > > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ > > > > This seems out-of-date? > > Hmm, yes, but only recently so. :) > > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge > the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? I'll be doing a few things on branches/4.3.0/sid tonight, mainly merging back from branch and taking into account all the private mail I've got from porters. Gimme about 8 hours. -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org pgpFF73gIkpBW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:58:57PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac > > > does not.. :/ > > > > That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k. > > But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours probably neither. > Its just none of the mac users noticed yet. And I have no reports about > Atari, and the three VMEs. Is it important for XFree86, I mean will 4.3 only > work with a 2.4 kernel? I heard Ray Knight is trying to get some > improvements from the powerpc kernel. If somebody can make it work on Macs, > its Ray... > > As for the build-failure, when I built from David's source two weeks ago, it Who's he? :) > failed here (cut'n'paste messed up the format a bit): > > # Create the xlibmesa-drm-src package. > [...] > rm debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile > debian/local/xlib > mesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Imakefile > debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile.kernel > > rm: cannot remove > `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile': > No such file or directory I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to a few porters tonight. > Is this before or after your failure? Is it from the same source or did > Daniel add the fix he suggested for this to the source? What James was reporting wasn't an error per se, just a factual incorrectness. I'll get back to you soon, I've just had exams (and still do - last exam is today), sorry. -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ > > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture > > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES > > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ > > > > This seems out-of-date? > > Hmm, yes, but only recently so. :) > > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge > the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? I'll be doing a few things on branches/4.3.0/sid tonight, mainly merging back from branch and taking into account all the private mail I've got from porters. Gimme about 8 hours. -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac > > does not.. :/ > > That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k. But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours probably neither. Its just none of the mac users noticed yet. And I have no reports about Atari, and the three VMEs. Is it important for XFree86, I mean will 4.3 only work with a 2.4 kernel? I heard Ray Knight is trying to get some improvements from the powerpc kernel. If somebody can make it work on Macs, its Ray... As for the build-failure, when I built from David's source two weeks ago, it failed here (cut'n'paste messed up the format a bit): # Create the xlibmesa-drm-src package. mkdir /build/cts/xfree86-4.3.0/debian/tmp/usr/src mkdir -p debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm cp -R debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/* debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm cp: cannot copy a directory, `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules', into itself, `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/modules' cp: cannot copy a directory, `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules', into itself, `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/modules' make: [debian/stampdir/install] Error 1 (ignored) m4 -DOURVERSION="4.3.0-0pre1v1" debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/module-changelog.m4 > debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/changelog.m4 rm debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/module-changelog.m4 chmod +x debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/rules cp -L build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/* debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/ cp: omitting directory `build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/CVS' make: [debian/stampdir/install] Error 1 (ignored) rm debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile debian/local/xlib mesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Imakefile debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile.kernel rm: cannot remove `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile': No such file or directory make: *** [debian/stampdir/install] Error 1 [...] Finished at 20030529-1826 Build needed 65:27:12, 2857764k disk space Is this before or after your failure? Is it from the same source or did Daniel add the fix he suggested for this to the source? Christian
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
Fabio, I subscribe to this list; please do not CC me on replies. On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:51:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge > > the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac > does not.. :/ That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k. -- G. Branden Robinson| The National Security Agency is Debian GNU/Linux | working on the Fourth Amendment [EMAIL PROTECTED] | thing. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Phil Lago, Deputy XD, CIA pgpUySu3L7vhN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac > > does not.. :/ > > That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k. But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours probably neither. Its just none of the mac users noticed yet. And I have no reports about Atari, and the three VMEs. Is it important for XFree86, I mean will 4.3 only work with a 2.4 kernel? I heard Ray Knight is trying to get some improvements from the powerpc kernel. If somebody can make it work on Macs, its Ray... As for the build-failure, when I built from David's source two weeks ago, it failed here (cut'n'paste messed up the format a bit): # Create the xlibmesa-drm-src package. mkdir /build/cts/xfree86-4.3.0/debian/tmp/usr/src mkdir -p debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm cp -R debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/* debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm cp: cannot copy a directory, `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules', into itself, `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/modules' cp: cannot copy a directory, `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules', into itself, `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/modules' make: [debian/stampdir/install] Error 1 (ignored) m4 -DOURVERSION="4.3.0-0pre1v1" debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/module-changelog.m4 > debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/changelog.m4 rm debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/module-changelog.m4 chmod +x debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/rules cp -L build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/* debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/ cp: omitting directory `build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/CVS' make: [debian/stampdir/install] Error 1 (ignored) rm debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile debian/local/xlib mesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Imakefile debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile.kernel rm: cannot remove `debian/local/xlibmesa-drm-src/modules/xlibmesa-drm/Makefile': No such file or directory make: *** [debian/stampdir/install] Error 1 [...] Finished at 20030529-1826 Build needed 65:27:12, 2857764k disk space Is this before or after your failure? Is it from the same source or did Daniel add the fix he suggested for this to the source? Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
Fabio, I subscribe to this list; please do not CC me on replies. On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:51:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge > > the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac > does not.. :/ That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k. -- G. Branden Robinson| The National Security Agency is Debian GNU/Linux | working on the Fourth Amendment [EMAIL PROTECTED] | thing. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Phil Lago, Deputy XD, CIA pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ > > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture > > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES > > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ > > > > This seems out-of-date? > > Hmm, yes, but only recently so. :) > > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge > the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac does not.. :/ Fabio
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: >> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ >> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture >> > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES >> > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ >> > >> > This seems out-of-date? >> >> Hmm, yes, but only recently so. :) >> >> I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge >> the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? Yes, I can. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ > > This seems out-of-date? Hmm, yes, but only recently so. :) I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? -- G. Branden Robinson| The noble soul has reverence for Debian GNU/Linux | itself. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Friedrich Nietzsche http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | pgpUf5RprT4JR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian:. patches
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ > > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture > > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES > > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ > > > > This seems out-of-date? > > Hmm, yes, but only recently so. :) > > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge > the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac does not.. :/ Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: >> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ >> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture >> > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES >> > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ >> > >> > This seems out-of-date? >> >> Hmm, yes, but only recently so. :) >> >> I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge >> the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? Yes, I can. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) >> >> Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was >> that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, >> not everything. The current xfree86 changelogs are massive, and we have >> our revision control system to fully log everything. Plus, crediting >> people right is a pain - what if two people work on something? Should >> Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of >> thing. :) Ah, I agree this point of view. OK, I'll write only these thning to debian/changelog, more details will be written to commitlog. Thanks :-) -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture > > + #define HasLinuxInput YES > > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ > > This seems out-of-date? Hmm, yes, but only recently so. :) I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge the change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk? -- G. Branden Robinson| The noble soul has reverence for Debian GNU/Linux | itself. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Friedrich Nietzsche http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, not everything. The current xfree86 changelogs are massive, and we have our revision control system to fully log everything. Plus, crediting people right is a pain - what if two people work on something? Should Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of thing. :) -d, going to sleep now on account of having an exam tomorrow morning -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org pgpistvhYihc9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) >> >> Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was >> that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, >> not everything. The current xfree86 changelogs are massive, and we have >> our revision control system to fully log everything. Plus, crediting >> people right is a pain - what if two people work on something? Should >> Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of >> thing. :) Ah, I agree this point of view. OK, I'll write only these thning to debian/changelog, more details will be written to commitlog. Thanks :-) -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: >> > --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev >> > 171) >> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev >> > 172) >> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ >> > keyboard away from me. >> > >> >* #057_X11.tmpl_warning_fix.diff: Imake warning fix patch [ISHIKAWA >> > Mutsumi] >> > - >> > + * #003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff: >> > +- Always disable `FontLibSharedFreeType' for compatiblity between >> > + normal XFree86 server and XFree86-dbg server. >> > + We should drop this change, when we can build the Loader Server >> > + liked against external FreeType2 [ISHIKAWA >> > Mutsimi] >> > + >> >* debian/control: >> > - Change all references to libstdc++5-dev to be >> >libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, allowing libstdc++5-3.3-dev to >> > satiffy >> >> I thought we were just using the changelog to close bugs (heh), not to >> notify everyone of everything? I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */ > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture > + #define HasLinuxInput YES > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@ This seems out-of-date? -- James
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: > --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev > 171) > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev > 172) > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ > keyboard away from me. > >* #057_X11.tmpl_warning_fix.diff: Imake warning fix patch [ISHIKAWA > Mutsumi] > - > + * #003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff: > +- Always disable `FontLibSharedFreeType' for compatiblity between > + normal XFree86 server and XFree86-dbg server. > + We should drop this change, when we can build the Loader Server > + liked against external FreeType2 [ISHIKAWA > Mutsimi] > + >* debian/control: > - Change all references to libstdc++5-dev to be >libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, allowing libstdc++5-3.3-dev to satiffy I thought we were just using the changelog to close bugs (heh), not to notify everyone of everything? -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org pgp4PVq9GWeQI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, not everything. The current xfree86 changelogs are massive, and we have our revision control system to fully log everything. Plus, crediting people right is a pain - what if two people work on something? Should Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of thing. :) -d, going to sleep now on account of having an exam tomorrow morning -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: >> > --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev 171) >> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev 172) >> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ >> > keyboard away from me. >> > >> >* #057_X11.tmpl_warning_fix.diff: Imake warning fix patch [ISHIKAWA Mutsumi] >> > - >> > + * #003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff: >> > +- Always disable `FontLibSharedFreeType' for compatiblity between >> > + normal XFree86 server and XFree86-dbg server. >> > + We should drop this change, when we can build the Loader Server >> > + liked against external FreeType2 [ISHIKAWA Mutsimi] >> > + >> >* debian/control: >> > - Change all references to libstdc++5-dev to be >> >libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, allowing libstdc++5-3.3-dev to satiffy >> >> I thought we were just using the changelog to close bugs (heh), not to >> notify everyone of everything? I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 172 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: > --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev 171) > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev 172) > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ > keyboard away from me. > >* #057_X11.tmpl_warning_fix.diff: Imake warning fix patch [ISHIKAWA Mutsumi] > - > + * #003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff: > +- Always disable `FontLibSharedFreeType' for compatiblity between > + normal XFree86 server and XFree86-dbg server. > + We should drop this change, when we can build the Loader Server > + liked against external FreeType2 [ISHIKAWA Mutsimi] > + >* debian/control: > - Change all references to libstdc++5-dev to be >libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, allowing libstdc++5-3.3-dev to satiffy I thought we were just using the changelog to close bugs (heh), not to notify everyone of everything? -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
