RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-20 Thread John Tolmachoff
 Good idea, Bill, I hadn't even thought of using ENDSWITH.
 
 Bill

Thanks for the tip, Bill.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message



Hi;
I know this 
subject was discussed but I can not find it in the archives. 


We are seeing more 
and more SPAM that have IP address as return address. I just can't think 
of a legitimate email that would do that.

=
X-RBL-Warning: IPNOTINMX: X-RBL-Warning: 
SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam 
[4000100f].X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCHK: Message failed SPAMCHK: 
8.X-RBL-Warning: WORDFILTERMx: Message failed WORDFILTERMx test 
(2)X-RBL-Warning: COUNTRY: Message failed COUNTRY test 
(215)X-Declude-Sender:  
[12.4.218.17]X-Declude-Spoolname: Db07e004f01f2ba39.SMDX-Note: 
This E-mail was scanned  filtered by Declude [1.66i2] for SPAM  
virus.X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, SPAMHEADERS, SPAMCHK, WORDFILTERMx, 
COUNTRY, WEIGHT20s, WEIGHT20rX-Weight: 26
=

Was there a 
decision made on how to treat these? Anyway to add weight if return 
address is an IP?

I will keep on 
searching the archives.

Regards,
Kami




Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry


We are seeing more and more SPAM that have IP address as return 
address.  I just can't think of a legitimate email that would do that.

Actually, what is happening here:


X-Declude-Sender:  [12.4.218.17]


is that the spammer is using a null return address.  In this case, the 
return address is , which happened to be sent from the IP 12.4.218.17.

Was there a decision made on how to treat these?


This is what you will see for all bounce messages (and delivery status 
notifications), which makes it more difficult to handle.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Markus Gufler
Title: Nachricht



Hi 
Kami,

This 
are all the X-Declude-Sender lines from over 5000 hold messages on our system 
without an "@" inside

X-Declude-Sender: C:\`Bulk [68.15.65.94]X-Declude-Sender:  
[216.127.33.23]X-Declude-Sender:  
[68.35.200.107]X-Declude-Sender:  
[212.154.34.10]X-Declude-Sender:  [62.123.0.57]X-Declude-Sender: 
 [212.41.208.19]X-Declude-Sender: dtcLISA 
[212.19.66.109]X-Declude-Sender: FREE [61.194.11.2]X-Declude-Sender: 
 [216.127.33.27]X-Declude-Sender:  
[216.127.33.27]X-Declude-Sender:  
[216.127.33.28]X-Declude-Sender:  
[216.127.33.13]

Or 
most of this type of messages passes our filters or there are only around 0,24% 
of spam messages using no valid sender adress.
As I 
understand a X-Declude-Sender line like this you've posted means that there was 
nosender in the SMTP-protocol. The IP in [] behind is the sending 
SMTP-servers adress and are indicated in every X-Declude-Sender 
line.

Scott: 

Are 
the "" gathered in any case from the SMTP-Data or are they created from 
declude if there was no value?

Markus



  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  On Behalf Of Kami RazvanSent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 7:00 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP
  Hi;
  I know this 
  subject was discussed but I can not find it in the archives. 
  
  
  We are seeing 
  more and more SPAM that have IP address as return address. I just can't 
  think of a legitimate email that would do that.
  
  =
  X-RBL-Warning: IPNOTINMX: X-RBL-Warning: 
  SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam 
  [4000100f].X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCHK: Message failed SPAMCHK: 
  8.X-RBL-Warning: WORDFILTERMx: Message failed WORDFILTERMx test 
  (2)X-RBL-Warning: COUNTRY: Message failed COUNTRY test 
  (215)X-Declude-Sender:  
  [12.4.218.17]X-Declude-Spoolname: 
  Db07e004f01f2ba39.SMDX-Note: This E-mail was scanned  filtered by 
  Declude [1.66i2] for SPAM  virus.X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, 
  SPAMHEADERS, SPAMCHK, WORDFILTERMx, COUNTRY, WEIGHT20s, WEIGHT20rX-Weight: 
  26
  =
  
  Was there a 
  decision made on how to treat these? Anyway to add weight if return 
  address is an IP?
  
  I will keep on 
  searching the archives.
  
  Regards,
  Kami
  
  


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Dan Patnode
Kami,

I believe this can be nailed with:

MAILFROM  0  CONTAINS  

But Scott is correct, this should be used only as a weighted test as it will trigger 
on every non delivery report and then some.


Markus,

I would like to expand my search to include some of the types you identified.  Any 
idea how to nail these with a content filter?:

X-Declude-Sender: dtcLISA [212.19.66.109]
X-Declude-Sender: FREE [61.194.11.2]


Dan



On Sunday, January 19, 2003 9:59, Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message
Hi;
I know this subject was discussed but I can not find it in the archives. 
  
We are seeing more and more SPAM that have IP address as return
address.  I just can't think of a legitimate email that would do that.
 
=
X-RBL-Warning: IPNOTINMX:
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [4000100f].
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCHK: Message failed SPAMCHK: 8.
X-RBL-Warning: WORDFILTERMx: Message failed WORDFILTERMx test (2)
X-RBL-Warning: COUNTRY: Message failed COUNTRY test (215)
X-Declude-Sender:  [12.4.218.17]
X-Declude-Spoolname: Db07e004f01f2ba39.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned  filtered by Declude [1.66i2] for SPAM  virus.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, SPAMHEADERS, SPAMCHK,
WORDFILTERMx, COUNTRY, WEIGHT20s, WEIGHT20r
X-Weight: 26
=
 
Was there a decision made on how to treat these?  Anyway to add
weight if return address is an IP?
 
I will keep on searching the archives.
 
Regards,
Kami
 
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry


Are the  gathered in any case from the SMTP-Data or are they created 
from declude if there was no value?

IMail requires that *something* be sent as the MAIL FROM: data, but it 
could potentially be sent as either  or .  In either case, Declude 
will treat it as .
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi;
Is it a viable solution to filter the header for:

From: 

Regards,
Kami

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP



Are the  gathered in any case from the SMTP-Data or are they
created
from declude if there was no value?

IMail requires that *something* be sent as the MAIL FROM: data, but it 
could potentially be sent as either  or .  In either case, Declude 
will treat it as .
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Dan Patnode
Scott,

So you are saying that 

From: dtcLISA [212.19.66.109] looks the same as 
From:  [212.19.66.109]

and both are caught by:

MAILFROM  0  CONTAINS  

?

Thanks
Dan



On Sunday, January 19, 2003 11:09, R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Are the  gathered in any case from the SMTP-Data or are they created 
from declude if there was no value?

IMail requires that *something* be sent as the MAIL FROM: data, but it 
could potentially be sent as either  or .  In either case, Declude 
will treat it as .
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Markus Gufler
 I would like to expand my search to include some of the types 
 you identified.  Any idea how to nail these with a content filter?:
 
 X-Declude-Sender: dtcLISA [212.19.66.109]
 X-Declude-Sender: FREE [61.194.11.2]

The problem is that there are not very much messages without a valid
sender adress. (excluding bounce messages and delivery status
notifications)
Even if we check all SMTP mailfrom-adresses (= X-Declude-Sender) if
there is a @ inside, this concerns only around 0,24 % of all messages
on our system.


At the moment we make some research for auto-generated mailfrom-adresses
using more then 3 consecutive consonants like [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Anyone has suggestions or objections?


Markus



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry


Is it a viable solution to filter the header for:

From: 


No -- a spammer would probably send an E-mail with a return address (MAIL 
FROM) of , but have a header like From: Youwill berich 
[EMAIL PROTECTED].

You could filter with something like:

MAILFROM2   CONTAINS

-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry


So you are saying that

From: dtcLISA [212.19.66.109] looks the same as
From:  [212.19.66.109]

and both are caught by:

MAILFROM  0  CONTAINS  


No.  The  will only be used if the return address is  or , it 
will not be used under any other conditions.

Note that the dtcLISA one will get caught by the MAILFROM test.
  -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Dan Patnode
Cool, so all the bases are covered!  I also use MAILFROM.  :)

Dan



On Sunday, January 19, 2003 11:50, R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

So you are saying that

From: dtcLISA [212.19.66.109] looks the same as
From:  [212.19.66.109]

and both are caught by:

MAILFROM  0  CONTAINS  

No.  The  will only be used if the return address is  or , it 
will not be used under any other conditions.

Note that the dtcLISA one will get caught by the MAILFROM test.
   -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Bill Landry
The only way I can think of to currently block an e-mail address with an IP
after the @ symbol would be something like:

MAILFROM0   CONTAINS@1
MAILFROM0   CONTAINS@2

However, this would also flag e-mail addresses like:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I don't see how, with the current implementation of the filter file, that
you could check just the extension of the e-mail address (i.e., .net, .com,
.org, etc.).  Maybe Scott would consider that as a future feature add. :)
Maybe:

MAILEXTBOGUSextinvalid  x   x   5   0

Where the e-mail address extension contains anything but valid/approved
letter combinations.  Or, maybe the MAILFROM (global.cfg) test could include
the extension testing, if it is not already doing this.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP


Scott.. Thanks..

I guess this still leaves the other variation up for attack..

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

We have seen this also.. When they are sending email with userID and IP.

I guess one way to decipher this is if the last characters after the last
period are not letters.

Can that be a filter?

Regards,
Kami

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP



Is it a viable solution to filter the header for:

From: 

No -- a spammer would probably send an E-mail with a return address (MAIL 
FROM) of , but have a header like From: Youwill berich 
[EMAIL PROTECTED].

You could filter with something like:

 MAILFROM2   CONTAINS

 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning Service]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Bill B.
How about this...

MAILFROM 0 ENDSWITH 0
MAILFROM 0 ENDSWITH 1
MAILFROM 0 ENDSWITH 2
...etc



-Original Message-
From: Bill Landry
Sent: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:15:57 -0800
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP


The only way I can think of to currently block an e-mail address with an IP
after the @ symbol would be something like:

MAILFROM0   CONTAINS@1
MAILFROM0   CONTAINS@2

However, this would also flag e-mail addresses like:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I don't see how, with the current implementation of the filter file, that
you could check just the extension of the e-mail address (i.e., .net, .com,
.org, etc.).  Maybe Scott would consider that as a future feature add. :)
Maybe:

MAILEXTBOGUSextinvalid  x   x   5   0

Where the e-mail address extension contains anything but valid/approved
letter combinations.  Or, maybe the MAILFROM (global.cfg) test could include
the extension testing, if it is not already doing this.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP


Scott.. Thanks..

I guess this still leaves the other variation up for attack..

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

We have seen this also.. When they are sending email with userID and IP.

I guess one way to decipher this is if the last characters after the last
period are not letters.

Can that be a filter?

Regards,
Kami

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP



Is it a viable solution to filter the header for:

From: 

No -- a spammer would probably send an E-mail with a return address (MAIL 
FROM) of , but have a header like From: Youwill berich 
[EMAIL PROTECTED].

You could filter with something like:

 MAILFROM2   CONTAINS

 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning Service]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Bill Landry
Good idea, Bill, I hadn't even thought of using ENDSWITH.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill B.
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP


How about this...

MAILFROM 0 ENDSWITH 0
MAILFROM 0 ENDSWITH 1
MAILFROM 0 ENDSWITH 2
...etc



-Original Message-
From: Bill Landry
Sent: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:15:57 -0800
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP


The only way I can think of to currently block an e-mail address with an IP
after the @ symbol would be something like:

MAILFROM0   CONTAINS@1
MAILFROM0   CONTAINS@2

However, this would also flag e-mail addresses like:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I don't see how, with the current implementation of the filter file, that
you could check just the extension of the e-mail address (i.e., .net, .com,
.org, etc.).  Maybe Scott would consider that as a future feature add. :)
Maybe:

MAILEXTBOGUSextinvalid  x   x   5   0

Where the e-mail address extension contains anything but valid/approved
letter combinations.  Or, maybe the MAILFROM (global.cfg) test could include
the extension testing, if it is not already doing this.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP


Scott.. Thanks..

I guess this still leaves the other variation up for attack..

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

We have seen this also.. When they are sending email with userID and IP.

I guess one way to decipher this is if the last characters after the last
period are not letters.

Can that be a filter?

Regards,
Kami

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP



Is it a viable solution to filter the header for:

From: 

No -- a spammer would probably send an E-mail with a return address (MAIL 
FROM) of , but have a header like From: Youwill berich 
[EMAIL PROTECTED].

You could filter with something like:

 MAILFROM2   CONTAINS

 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning Service]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning Service]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.