Re: now no denemo

[Andreas Schneider]

Actually, I don't understand what you are doing. The change in the
package is that the manual is now at /usr/share/denemo/manual (the
application's default location) instead of /usr/share/doc/denemo-doc
(Debian's default location). Thus, Denemo can find it in the location
coded into the source (i.e. if you click on Help > Browse Manual).

Andreas


On 2020-09-06 14:07, aaron mehl wrote:
> Oh, I don't think it will help since I just did a copy and paste so that
> when I click help it opes the docs, so I won't see any difference
> Please advise me what I should do.
> Aaron
>
> On Sep 6 2020, at 5:53 am, Andreas Schneider  wrote:
>
> Debian has a specific location for the docs which is different from the
> application default. They have a patch to change the directory hardcoded
> in the source when choosing Help > Browse Manual in the menu. Since I am
> using the latest source from git and don't want to patch it, I have
> changed the build scripts to use the application's original path. I have
> uploaded new packages. Please test.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> On 2020-09-03 01:15, aaron mehl wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > For some reason the docs didn't install in the expected directory
> when I
> > click on help firefox can't find it.
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
>

Re: now no denemo

[aaron mehl]

Oh, I don't think it will help since I just did a copy and paste so that when I 
click help it opes the docs, so I won't see any difference
Please advise me what I should do.
Aaron

Sent from Mailspring (https://getmailspring.com/), the best free email app for 
work
On Sep 6 2020, at 5:53 am, Andreas Schneider  wrote:
> Debian has a specific location for the docs which is different from the
> application default. They have a patch to change the directory hardcoded
> in the source when choosing Help > Browse Manual in the menu. Since I am
> using the latest source from git and don't want to patch it, I have
> changed the build scripts to use the application's original path. I have
> uploaded new packages. Please test.
>
> Andreas
>
> On 2020-09-03 01:15, aaron mehl wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > For some reason the docs didn't install in the expected directory when I
> > click on help firefox can't find it.
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
>

Re: now no denemo

[Andreas Schneider]

Debian has a specific location for the docs which is different from the
application default. They have a patch to change the directory hardcoded
in the source when choosing Help > Browse Manual in the menu. Since I am
using the latest source from git and don't want to patch it, I have
changed the build scripts to use the application's original path. I have
uploaded new packages. Please test.

Andreas


On 2020-09-03 01:15, aaron mehl wrote:
> Hi again,
> For some reason the docs didn't install in the expected directory when I
> click on help firefox can't find it.
> Thanks,
> Aaron

Re: now no denemo

[aaron mehl]

Hi again,
For some reason the docs didn't install in the expected directory when I click 
on help firefox can't find it.
Thanks,
Aaron

Sent from Mailspring (https://getmailspring.com/), the best free email app for 
work
On Sep 2 2020, at 6:48 pm, aaron mehl  wrote:
> Thanks,]
> I did and it installed and is running
> thanks
> Aaron
>
> Sent from Mailspring (https://getmailspring.com/), the best free email app 
> for work
> On Sep 2 2020, at 5:04 pm, Andreas Schneider  wrote:
> > On 2020-08-31 13:56, aaron mehl wrote:
> > > libfluidsynth2 version 2.1.1-2
> > > Aaron
> >
> > libfluidsynth2 is not available in Debian stable, only in Debian testing
> > (codenamed bullseye). Thus I have set up an installation of Debian
> > testing on my local computer to build Denemo packages. I have uploaded
> > the resulting packages to http://denemo.org/~aschneider/bullseye/ Please
> > test if those work for you.
> >
> > Andreas

Re: now no denemo

[aaron mehl]

Thanks,]
I did and it installed and is running
thanks
Aaron

Sent from Mailspring (https://getmailspring.com/), the best free email app for 
work
On Sep 2 2020, at 5:04 pm, Andreas Schneider  wrote:
> On 2020-08-31 13:56, aaron mehl wrote:
> > libfluidsynth2 version 2.1.1-2
> > Aaron
>
> libfluidsynth2 is not available in Debian stable, only in Debian testing
> (codenamed bullseye). Thus I have set up an installation of Debian
> testing on my local computer to build Denemo packages. I have uploaded
> the resulting packages to http://denemo.org/~aschneider/bullseye/ Please
> test if those work for you.
>
> Andreas

Re: now no denemo

[Andreas Schneider]

On 2020-08-31 13:56, aaron mehl wrote:
> libfluidsynth2 version 2.1.1-2
> Aaron

libfluidsynth2 is not available in Debian stable, only in Debian testing
(codenamed bullseye). Thus I have set up an installation of Debian
testing on my local computer to build Denemo packages. I have uploaded
the resulting packages to http://denemo.org/~aschneider/bullseye/ Please
test if those work for you.

Andreas

Re: now no denemo

[aaron mehl]

libfluidsynth2 version 2.1.1-2
Aaron

Sent from Mailspring (https://getmailspring.com/), the best free email app for 
work
On Aug 31 2020, at 7:42 am, Andreas Schneider  wrote:
> Can you please look up which packages the denemo from the distribution
> depends on? To install/run, you don't need any dev package, that is only
> needed if you want to compile yourself.
>
> Andreas
>
> On 2020-08-31 13:24, aaron mehl wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I see from a different thread that the compile issue is fixed.
> > I need to know what package contains libfluidsynth is it fluid synth or
> > the dev package?
> > Isn't there anyone out there with a respository of bleeding edge debs
> > that could include denemo?
> > Anyways I did get 2.2.0 back from my distro. I hesitant to install the
> > latest and greatest it was a big waste of my time.
> > I may however put it on my windows laptop possibly...
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
> >
> > Sent from Mailspring , the best free email
> > app for work
> > On Aug 31 2020, at 3:26 am, Andreas Schneider  wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-08-30 22:47, aaron mehl wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Yeah I used your packages and part of the issue seems to be it wanting
> > > older versions of dependencies as well
> > > Building dependency tree
> > > Reading state information... Done
> > > Note, selecting 'denemo' instead of './denemo_2.4.0_amd64.deb'
> > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> > >
> > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > denemo : Depends: libfluidsynth1 (>= 1.1.6-4~) but it is not
> > installable
> > > Recommends: denemo-doc (= 2.4.0) but 2.4.2 is to be
> > installed
> > > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > > but doing this from a repository would make this so much easier.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help,
> > > Aaron
> >
> >
> > Which version of libfluidsynth do you have available in your package
> > manager? I am building on the current stable version of the Debian
> > distribution.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
>

Re: now no denemo

[Andreas Schneider]

Can you please look up which packages the denemo from the distribution
depends on? To install/run, you don't need any dev package, that is only
needed if you want to compile yourself.

Andreas


On 2020-08-31 13:24, aaron mehl wrote:
> Hi all,
> I see from a different thread that the compile issue is fixed.
> I need to know what package contains libfluidsynth  is it fluid synth or
> the dev package?
> Isn't there anyone out there with a respository of bleeding edge debs
> that could include denemo?
> Anyways I did get 2.2.0 back from my distro. I  hesitant to install the
> latest and greatest it was a big waste of my time.
> I may however put it on my windows laptop possibly...
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> Sent from Mailspring , the best free email
> app for work
> On Aug 31 2020, at 3:26 am, Andreas Schneider  wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-30 22:47, aaron mehl wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Yeah I used your packages and part of the issue seems to be it wanting
> > older versions of dependencies as well
> > Building dependency tree  
> > Reading state information... Done
> > Note, selecting 'denemo' instead of './denemo_2.4.0_amd64.deb'
> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >  denemo : Depends: libfluidsynth1 (>= 1.1.6-4~) but it is not
> installable
> >   Recommends: denemo-doc (= 2.4.0) but 2.4.2 is to be
> installed
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> >  but doing this from a repository would make this so much easier.
> >
> > Thanks for your help,
> > Aaron
>
>
> Which version of libfluidsynth do you have available in your package
> manager? I am building on the current stable version of the Debian
> distribution.
>
> Andreas
>

Re: now no denemo

[aaron mehl]

Hi all,
I see from a different thread that the compile issue is fixed.
I need to know what package contains libfluidsynth is it fluid synth or the dev 
package?
Isn't there anyone out there with a respository of bleeding edge debs that 
could include denemo?
Anyways I did get 2.2.0 back from my distro. I hesitant to install the latest 
and greatest it was a big waste of my time.
I may however put it on my windows laptop possibly...
Thanks,
Aaron

Sent from Mailspring (https://getmailspring.com/), the best free email app for 
work
On Aug 31 2020, at 3:26 am, Andreas Schneider  wrote:
> On 2020-08-30 22:47, aaron mehl wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Yeah I used your packages and part of the issue seems to be it wanting
> > older versions of dependencies as well
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > Note, selecting 'denemo' instead of './denemo_2.4.0_amd64.deb'
> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > denemo : Depends: libfluidsynth1 (>= 1.1.6-4~) but it is not installable
> > Recommends: denemo-doc (= 2.4.0) but 2.4.2 is to be installed
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > but doing this from a repository would make this so much easier.
> >
> > Thanks for your help,
> > Aaron
>
>
> Which version of libfluidsynth do you have available in your package
> manager? I am building on the current stable version of the Debian
> distribution.
>
> Andreas

Re: now no denemo

[Andreas Schneider]

On 2020-08-30 22:47, aaron mehl wrote:
> Hi,
> Yeah I used your packages and part of the issue seems to be it wanting
> older versions of dependencies as well
> Building dependency tree  
> Reading state information... Done
> Note, selecting 'denemo' instead of './denemo_2.4.0_amd64.deb'
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  denemo : Depends: libfluidsynth1 (>= 1.1.6-4~) but it is not installable
>   Recommends: denemo-doc (= 2.4.0) but 2.4.2 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>  but doing this from a repository would make this so much easier.
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Aaron


Which version of libfluidsynth do you have available in your package
manager? I am building on the current stable version of the Debian
distribution.

Andreas

Re: now no denemo

[aaron mehl]

Hi,
Yeah I used your packages and part of the issue seems to be it wanting older 
versions of dependencies as well
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Note, selecting 'denemo' instead of './denemo_2.4.0_amd64.deb'
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
denemo : Depends: libfluidsynth1 (>= 1.1.6-4~) but it is not installable
Recommends: denemo-doc (= 2.4.0) but 2.4.2 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
but doing this from a repository would make this so much easier.

Thanks for your help,
Aaron
Sent from Mailspring (https://getmailspring.com/), the best free email app for 
work

On Aug 30 2020, at 4:42 pm, Andreas Schneider  wrote:
> As I wrote to this list on 15th August, my automated Debian builds fail
> since 4th August due to a compiler error. It looks like that this has
> been introduced by a commit on 3rd August. Richard, do you have a
> suggestion how to solve that issue?
> However, the last build from 3rd August does work for me. What error do
> you encounter?
>
> Andreas
>
> On 2020-08-30 19:36, aaron mehl wrote:
> > I used the .deb pacakges to install the latest denemo but something is
> > broken/wrong. Now no Denemo :(
> > Is there a repository I can add?
> > I am using the latest Linux Mint.
> > But any debian should do the trick.
> > Aaron
>

Re: now no denemo

[Andreas Schneider]

As I wrote to this list on 15th August, my automated Debian builds fail
since 4th August due to a compiler error. It looks like that this has
been introduced by a commit on 3rd August. Richard, do you have a
suggestion how to solve that issue?
However, the last build from 3rd August does work for me. What error do
you encounter?

Andreas


On 2020-08-30 19:36, aaron mehl wrote:
> I used the .deb pacakges to install the latest denemo but something is
> broken/wrong. Now no Denemo :(
> Is there a repository I can add?
> I am using the latest Linux Mint.
> But any debian  should do the trick.
> Aaron