Re: [Bug 1274193] Re: Nautilus Extract Here interprets backslashes as characters not directories
Update: Not a problem of FileRoller - ZIP was created under Windows using PowerShell and that thing has a bug in creating ZIPs. They use backslashes in filenames rather than forward slashes which does not meet the standard. Best regards, Martin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1274193 Title: Nautilus Extract Here interprets backslashes as characters not directories To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1274193/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 792085] Re: Automatic remount of safely removed USB 3.0 drive
I can also confirm fix after upgrading from something older to 4.4.0-63-generic. Thanks to everybody who was involved bringing the solution! Best wishes, Martin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed USB 3.0 drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/792085/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1274193] Re: Nautilus Extract Here interprets backslashes as characters not directories
Approximately every 2 weeks I am downloading a few ZIP files from the same location (they change usually about once a week containing windows setup files). Suddenly I am experiencing this issue (using Ubuntu 14.04 - Archive Manager v3.10.2.1) with these zips. I cannot see any related update being done on my machine lately that may have introduced this behaviour. However, extracting the ZIP on the commandline using 'unzip' produces the desired output. I tried unzip on the commandline also with the zip that has been attached by Vaclav Petras and that also works here on the commandline but not using file-roller or Extract... in Nautilus. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1274193 Title: Nautilus Extract Here interprets backslashes as characters not directories To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1274193/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 792085] Re: Automatic remount of safely removed drive
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:16 PM, jcsjcs 792...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: My previous computer with 12.04 did not have USB 3.0 ports and I didn't experience this problem. I have experienced the problem on 12.04 in the beginning, but went away with some kernel update (currently running 3.5.0-30-generic which works fine), so this might be the reason why you didn't experience it on 12.04. Best regards, Martin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/792085/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 905686] Re: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:12 PM, nicky peakman nickypeak...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: ** Changed in: libx11 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete On a current 12.04 with all updates on a Dell Latitude E6530 and only default desktop environment (Unity) installed, I don't have this issue. And also does not occur with 12.10 on a Dell Latitude E5500 having only default desktop environment (Unity). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905686 Title: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xlibs/+bug/905686/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 658618] Re: Window state not remembered
I cannot see that bug fixed (Ubuntu 12.10). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to eog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658618 Title: Window state not remembered To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eog/+bug/658618/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1077737] [NEW] Brasero CD-burning error - CD unusable
Public bug reported: The latest 2 or 3 attempts (being on different kernels) burning a data CD always ended up a burning error and the CD was unusable. I cannot provide any more helpful info and hope the logfiles that have been collected automatically using ubuntu-bug brasero show something helpful. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: brasero 3.4.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-18.29-generic 3.5.7 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-18-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu14 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Nov 11 23:04:14 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) SourcePackage: brasero UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077737 Title: Brasero CD-burning error - CD unusable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/1077737/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1077737] Re: Brasero CD-burning error - CD unusable
I am using a Dell Latitude E-6530, currently on kernel 3.5.0-18-generic ** Attachment added: lshw output https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/1077737/+attachment/3431084/+files/lshw.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077737 Title: Brasero CD-burning error - CD unusable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/1077737/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1077737] Re: Brasero CD-burning error - CD unusable
Interestingly, it seems to happen with data-CDs but not with audio-CDs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077737 Title: Brasero CD-burning error - CD unusable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/1077737/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1055766] Re: grep -R doesn't automatically search amazon
Sorry folks, for introducing another factor - but I am austrian and we have something similar to Amazon - http://www.thalia.at - when adding amazon you should - of course depending on my location, on my mother tongue and interests add more 3rd party search results. Of course Google should be searched in general to give more options. Oh and BTW: When searching in my home in Dash, you should offer me to buy new slippers - of course already using my shoe size. Now - back to reality: All this stuff is maybe funny, maybe offers really interesting results. Hence it should be separate lense! NOT in the Dash HOME. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055766 Title: grep -R doesn't automatically search amazon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/1055766/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1005403] Re: Brasero is a mess, does not burn properly, fails and can't eject??
I wonder why not more users are affected. I experience this and other burning issues on different machines and with different versions of Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005403 Title: Brasero is a mess, does not burn properly, fails and can't eject?? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/1005403/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 382379] Re: pdftops CUPS filter has several problems
I am on Ubuntu 12.04 and experiencing the problem with whatever filter that has been posted or referenced here. Did not have that problem on 10.04 - tried also with the pdftops filter from there without luck. Sad... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382379 Title: pdftops CUPS filter has several problems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/382379/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 382379] Re: pdftops CUPS filter has several problems
I found that I still have poppler-utils 0.18.4 although at the top in launchpad I can see that 0.20.2 should be the most current. Switched to main server in synaptic but still no update. BTW: I am on 64-bit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382379 Title: pdftops CUPS filter has several problems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/382379/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 792085] Re: Automatic remount of safely removed drive
Tried again (as a while passed by and I am currently on 12.04): Still same issue. Clicking eject in Nautilus seems to remove the device correctly, but disk usage analyzer for example still sees it - so that does not completely unmount the drive/device! I consider this a critical issue as I am not always able to eject and in the next seconds find the correct plug - otherwise it is already remounted when I unplug it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/792085/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 792085] Re: Automatic remount of safely removed drive
I don't have an nvidia chipset and it happened to me also - however does not occur any more on Precise released version with latest updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/792085/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 905686] Re: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 05:45, BavarianPH bavaria...@gmail.com wrote: . yet getting rid of unity solves a myriad of problems. Off topic=on It looks that mileage varies. I have a Dell Latitude E5500 with EVERY desktop environment installed you can think of. Tested them all. I had the least troubles with Unity. Apart from that during the beta phase it seems that 12.04 is one of the stablest - just my experience. Mobile broadband internet the first time works out of the box with all my sticks without the need of filing a bug. That's the first time for me. Off topic=off I also only noticed that on Unity - and somebody mentioned, that he has the problem only on his upgraded Dell. - I also have a Dell as mentioned above. Maybe this helps finding the cause of the problem. -- Martin Wildam http://martin.wildam.org/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905686 Title: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xlibs/+bug/905686/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 905686] Re: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.
Yes, also in my case is sufficient to log in and wait. -- Martin Wildam Am 14.04.2012 19:55 schrieb KDontenville 905...@bugs.launchpad.net: Logged in with Unity on Precise daily build of yesterdays date and got this or v similar 3+ times. New install from scratch. Nopthing specific that seems to repeat it but it is frequent. Also the bug reporter then often dies too. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905686 Title: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed. Status in Modular X11 Libraries: Confirmed Status in “libx11” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Here is a backtrace from Ubuntu Precise. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: nautilus 1:3.2.1-2ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-5.11-generic-pae 3.2.0-rc5 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-5-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 AssertionMessage: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed. Date: Sat Dec 17 14:16:03 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus ExecutableTimestamp: 1324036665 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcCmdline: nautilus -n ProcCwd: / Signal: 6 SourcePackage: nautilus StacktraceTop: __kernel_vsyscall () raise () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 __assert_fail () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 _XAllocID () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6 Title: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed. UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2011-12-16 (1 days ago) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin plugdev sambashare vboxusers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xlibs/+bug/905686/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905686 Title: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xlibs/+bug/905686/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 876894] Re: Laptop LCD not switched off when closed and external monitor is attached
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:46, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote: Thank you for your bug report, could you try if that's still an issue in the precise version? What laptop and configuration do you use? (dock station or not?) Yes, Docking station for Dell Latitude E-5500. There is a VGA port on the Laptop + on the docking station. Monitor was attached to the VGA on the docking station. Maybe it has to do with the fact that there are two VGA ports because previously (job before) I had it attached to a monitor via DVI cable (no DVI port on the laptop itself, just on the docking station). Not 100 % sure whether I had that issue before because I usually don't even open the display (just leave it closed when putting into the dock). Best regards, Martin. -- Martin Wildam http://sites.google.com/site/mwildam/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876894 Title: Laptop LCD not switched off when closed and external monitor is attached To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/876894/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 628388] Re: Original screen visible until try to do something - then login dialog
So far never occured in 11.10. oneiric. So seems to be solved. -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388 Title: Original screen visible until try to do something - then login dialog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/628388/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 792085] Re: Automatic remount of safely removed drive
Hello, tried with Fedora 15 Live CD on kernel 2.6.38.6-26 and did not experience the problem there. Ubuntu 11.10 with current kernel 3.0.0-12 also does not show the issue. On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 17:33, Nikhil P Joseph 792...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Im assuming we need a distribution with kernel version=2.6.35. that's the one which shipped with maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed drive Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “udev” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “usb-creator” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: nautilus When I choose Safely remove drive context menu entry for an external USB drive within a nautilus window or directly clicking on the desktop icon, after about 10 seconds the drive is automatically remounted and a Nautilus window showing the root folder opens. I have noticed that similar already happened with a very old Ubuntu version - Bug #110589 and as that is so long time ago I thought it is better to open a new bug. Reason of the problem might even be completely different. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic-pae 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jun 2 23:40:08 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/792085/+subscriptions -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/792085/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 792085] Re: Automatic remount of safely removed drive
product: Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller vendor: Intel Corporation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/792085/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 792085] Re: Automatic remount of safely removed drive
Don't experience this any more on Oneiric with Intel graphic card and 11.10 (release) under unity (other desktops not yet tested). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/792085/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 416236] Re: [Regression] Closing laptop lid should not blank external monitor
See also Bug #390816 And yes, I somehow also have an opposite problem now (desktop lid not going off when closed). However this bug still seems to happen also. During the last 15 minutes I had weird effects ranging from external monitor going off or displaying as the second monitor (missing the unity bar). What should I use to configure behaviour if lid is closed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416236 Title: [Regression] Closing laptop lid should not blank external monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/416236/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 871316] [NEW] Brasero stops responding after burning disc
Public bug reported: Tried to burn a few photos to a CD - After burning finished Brasero stops responding. Tried two times and at first attempt CD was even corrupt (could not be mounted). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: brasero 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 9 16:41:56 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta i386 (20111004) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brasero UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871316 Title: Brasero stops responding after burning disc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/871316/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 871316] Re: Brasero stops responding after burning disc
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871316 Title: Brasero stops responding after burning disc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/871316/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 634122] Re: Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally
I tried now the brand new Oneiric Beta and here I did not have the issue so far after a few reboots and cold starts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634122 Title: Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/634122/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 669824] Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr
After being on vacation and having stress at work I wanted to test on oneiric alpha. Problem is currently more serious, so I can't even start testing this. Am 23.06.2011 13:17 schrieb Wildam Martin mwil...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 22:55, Pedro Villavicencio pe...@ubuntu.com wrote: Thanks for the report... I already have a Natty test machine - but there is no VirtualBox on it yet - will do that and re-test on natty. -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669824 Title: Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/669824/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 628388] Original screen visible until try to do something - then login dialog
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 21:28, Pedro Villavicencio pe...@ubuntu.com wrote: we are wondering if this is still an issue for you with the latest release of Ubuntu the Natty Narwhal, May you please test with that version and comment back if you're still having or not the issue? I did not have the issue with Natty so far, but: a) I am using Natty only on a test basis only, so from the usage I am far from using it the same intensive way as Lucid. b) It does not occur always - as I did not find so far a sure way to reproduce, there is no guarantee that it is solved with Natty. For example, something that right now comes to my ind: On my Natty I don't have shutter running most of the time while on Lucid (my productive work machine) I use shutter often and hence have it running more often. On my test machine I even don't have a dropbox or Skype installed while on my production machine is. - Could it be that one of those applications have an influence to the problem? -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388 Title: Original screen visible until try to do something - then login dialog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/628388/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 634122] Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 21:35, Pedro Villavicencio pe...@ubuntu.com wrote: we are wondering if this is still an issue for you with the latest release of Ubuntu the Natty Narwhal, May you please test with that version and comment back if you're still having or not the issue? Using Natty on a test machine only but I have seen it right on first installation: After first testing it live I rebooted and then installed - during install I had the same effect, but since second reboot after installation it did not occur so far. -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634122 Title: Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/634122/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:38, avdd 44...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I am observing this behaviour in lucid, but didn't see it in karmic 9.10. I observed that issue in general only after you first moved something on the right side manually. Or basically, as long as you re-align your panels (content) on a large screen and then working only = that size, everything works. -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 Title: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/44082/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:21, Geert Jan Alsem gj_al...@yahoo.com wrote: felix.rommel, the problem is not gone in Natty. The problem is only a bit less bad, because all the indicators are grouped in one applet. But the order of different applets still gets messed up sometimes. Yep, I have tested on Natty, and still there. The problem should be gone in Oneiric Ocelot though, because of the upgrade to GNOME 3. I haven't tested it myself, but in the changelogs they say that in gnome-panel 3 all the old annoying bugs of gnome-panel 2 have been fixed. From what I have seen until now from Gnome 3 I don't like it - either prefer Unity. I hope it will all come to a good end until next LTS on 12.04... -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 Title: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/44082/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 669824] Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 22:55, Pedro Villavicencio pe...@ubuntu.com wrote: Thanks for the report, it has been some time without any response or feedback in this bug report and we are wondering if this is still an issue for you with the latest release of Ubuntu the Natty Narwhal, May you please test with that version and comment back if you're still having or not the issue? Please have a look at http://www.ubuntu.com/download to know how to install that version.Thanks in advance and sorry for the late response. I already have a Natty test machine - but there is no VirtualBox on it yet - will do that and re-test on natty. -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669824 Title: Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/669824/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 792085] [NEW] Automatic remount of safely removed drive
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus When I choose Safely remove drive context menu entry for an external USB drive within a nautilus window or directly clicking on the desktop icon, after about 10 seconds the drive is automatically remounted and a Nautilus window showing the root folder opens. I have noticed that similar already happened with a very old Ubuntu version - Bug #110589 and as that is so long time ago I thought it is better to open a new bug. Reason of the problem might even be completely different. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic-pae 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jun 2 23:40:08 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed drive -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 792085] Re: Automatic remount of safely removed drive
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed drive -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 508632] Re: [FFe] Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 16:52, Oliver Joos 508...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @Nandox7: do you use a pre-release of Nautilus 2.9x or 3.0? In my Nautilus 2.30 and 2.32 right-clicking the toolbar does nothing. I have v2.32.2.1 (Natty Narwhal) and I can't find any way to customize. -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508632 Title: [FFe] Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 656702] Changed resolution/monitor causes panel applet order and position messed up
Hi, On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 21:38, Pedro Villavicencio pe...@ubuntu.com wrote: Thanks for the report, it has been some time without any response or feedback in this bug report and we are wondering if this is still an issue for you with the latest release of Ubuntu the Natty Narwhal, May you please test with that version and comment back if you're still having or not the issue? Don't have a bigger monitor at home but tried manually reducing the resolution including rotation of the screen. After restoring to default, panel items still are on the upper right in the right order. Tried under Unity and Gnome. Then: Only under Gnome I was able to add further items to the panel and to unlock the panel and move it. Made several tests and now I can tell you exactly when it happens (still on Natty Narwhal): Steps to reproduce: 1. Unlock applets on the upper right panel. 2. Reduce screen resolution and apply. 3. Move applet(s) more to the left and back to the right corner. 4. Increase screen resolution and apply. You can see that panel applets remain somewhere in the middle (according to lower resolution top right). The problem seems, that when you put something on the rightmost position, it saves that as absolute position from the left. When you put something to the right top, it should save the position calculating from the right side or something like this. -- Martin Wildam http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656702/+attachment/2148179/+files/Screenshot.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656702 Title: Changed resolution/monitor causes panel applet order and position messed up -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 287646] Re: Default window size is unhelpfully small
FYI: bug 730495 is fixed now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287646 Title: Default window size is unhelpfully small -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 777069] Re: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777069 Title: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 777069] [NEW] DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus When I try to connect to a samba location (previously saved in favorites) I might get the following error: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Message did not receive a reply (timeout by message bus) Often this happens when I try to connect to multiple shares saved in the favorites one shortly after the other and sometimes it simply does not work on the first attempt, but after waiting 5-10 seconds on a second attempt it works. The servers I am connecting to are Windows servers (but don't know more OS level details because I don't have console access to these servers). Steps to reproduce: 1. Places-Connect to server... 2. Select Windows Share 3. Enter rest of the details such as credentials, server share etc and add bookmark 4. Do steps 1-3 for a second server and/or share. 5. Open the shares saving credentials. 6. close the nautilus windows from the shares 7. Unmount the shares. 8. Open the first and then the second quickly one after the other. 9. Do steps 6-8 several times, the error should appear then. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-31.61-generic-pae 2.6.32.32+drm33.14 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-31-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed May 4 14:12:58 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8 LANGUAGE=en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777069 Title: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 562588] Re: PDF files with no password ask for one anyway
Will there be a backport of this fix to 10.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562588 Title: PDF files with no password ask for one anyway -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 708156] [NEW] Put display to sleep when inactive does not work for external monitor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager When I enable the option Put display to sleep when inactive (let's say put it to 10 minutes) then it does not work on my laptop (Dell E-5500) when put into docking station and connected (via HDMI cable) from there to an external monitor. The laptop lid is closed all the time and I solely work with the external monitor. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gnome-power-manager 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-27.49-generic-pae 2.6.32.26+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-27-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jan 26 17:53:22 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-power-preferences GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No GnomeSessionInhibitors: None GnomeSessionSuspendInhibited: No InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E5500 PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-27-generic-pae root=UUID=0c5230d6-05d2-47c8-9325-347fe42d71f9 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8 LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-power-manager dmi.bios.date: 04/15/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A11 dmi.board.name: 0DW634 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA11:bd04/15/2009:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE5500:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0DW634:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: dmi.product.name: Latitude E5500 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708156 Title: Put display to sleep when inactive does not work for external monitor -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 708156] Re: Put display to sleep when inactive does not work for external monitor
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708156 Title: Put display to sleep when inactive does not work for external monitor -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 634122] Re: Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally
After upgrading to kernel 2.6.35-24-generic-pae #42-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 2 03:21:31 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux this happens occassionally again - or still? - Anyway, I have not experienced this issue for a long time in the meantime. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634122 Title: Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 669824] [NEW] Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
My report is somehow related to Bug #617421 however, effect more
critical and including data loss.
From time to time it happens that the screen shortly flickers and a
second monitor gets detected (by mistake).
It happens even without touching mouse or keyboard - this time I was
taking notes on paper.
The screen/monitor that gets detected can be TV1 when I am working on my
laptop only or LVDS1 when I am in docking station with external monitor
attached and laptop lid closed (LVDS1 is the laptop-builtin-
monitor/screen).
When I then call xrandr for example using:
xrandr --output HDMI1 --mode 1680x1050 --rate 60 --primary --output LVDS1 --off
--output TV1 --off --output VGA1 --off --output HDMI2 --off --output DP1 --off
--output DP1 --off --output DP2 --off --output DP3 --off
(in this case to switch to the external monitor only), the Gnome desktop
completely freezes / locks up. Switching to a text console with
CTRL+ALT+F1 for example, does not work either. Mouse pointer does not
move - nothing. I have to switch off the laptop and restart.
Unfortunately this is not reproducable - it does not occur always. Often
the xrandr call is successful without freezing everything.
The only thing I can tell so far is that I am pretty sure, that always,
when it happens the VirtualBox is started with at least one virtual
machine being up (with a Windows guest). I also tried disabling all
acceleration features within VirtualBox (2D and 3D), remote display
disabled - and I gave 63 MB of video memory which should be enough.
Monitor count is set to 1.
Contents of compreg.dat is:
[HEADER]
Version,0,5
[COMPONENTS]
rel:VBoxSVCM.so,1286550763000
rel:VBoxC.so,1286550763000
rel:VBoxXPCOMIPCC.so,1238375354000,VBoxXPCOM.so libpthread.so libdl.so
[CLASSIDS]
{d9e56bf8-e32e-4b6d-87f1-06d73b0ce7ca}rel:VBoxXPCOMIPCC.so
{1403adf4-94d1-4c67-a8ae-d9f86972d378}rel:VBoxXPCOMIPCC.so
{9f12676a-5168-4a08-beb8-edf8a593a1ca}rel:VBoxXPCOMIPCC.so
{b1a7a4f2-47b9-4a1e-82b2-07ccd5323c3f}rel:VBoxSVCM.so
{3c02f46d-c9d2-4f11-a384-53f0cf917214}rel:VBoxC.so
{49ee8561-5563-4715-b18c-a4b1a490dafe}rel:VBoxC.so
{63a5d9dc-4828-425a-bd50-bd10a4b26f2c},@mozilla.org/ipc/dconnect-service;1,,ipcDConnectService,rel:VBoxXPCOMIPCC.so
[CONTRACTIDS]
@virtualbox.org/Session;1,{3c02f46d-c9d2-4f11-a384-53f0cf917214}
@mozilla.org/ipc/lock-service;1,{d9e56bf8-e32e-4b6d-87f1-06d73b0ce7ca}
@mozilla.org/ipc/service;1,{9f12676a-5168-4a08-beb8-edf8a593a1ca}
@virtualbox.org/CallbackWrapper;1,{49ee8561-5563-4715-b18c-a4b1a490dafe}
@virtualbox.org/VirtualBox;1,{b1a7a4f2-47b9-4a1e-82b2-07ccd5323c3f}
@mozilla.org/ipc/dconnect-service;1,{63a5d9dc-4828-425a-bd50-bd10a4b26f2c}
@mozilla.org/ipc/transaction-service;1,{1403adf4-94d1-4c67-a8ae-d9f86972d378}
[CATEGORIES]
xpcom-startup,ipcDConnectService,@mozilla.org/ipc/dconnect-service;1
Attached VirtualBox.xml - for the case it helps
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: gdm 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Nov 2 10:00:52 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429)
ProcEnviron:
LC_TIME=en_DK.utf8
LANGUAGE=en
LANG=en_US.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gdm
** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid
--
Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669824
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 669824] Re: Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr
** Attachment added: VirtualBox.xml https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669824/+attachment/1720408/+files/VirtualBox.xml -- Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 669824] Re: Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr
Attached the settings of the only virtual machine I started today (if the problem is somehow triggered by VirtualBox and depends on the settings this example configuration should be enough). ** Attachment added: WinSrv2008.xml https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/669824/+attachment/1720410/+files/WinSrv2008.xml -- Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 669824] Re: Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr
Maybe also the VBox logfiles are also of interest (VBox.log.2 was the last start of the virtual machine before the freeze) The freeze occured around 09:51. ** Attachment added: VBox-Logs.zip https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/669824/+attachment/1720418/+files/VBox-Logs.zip -- Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 669824] Re: Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr
Anyway I am not sure if it has to do with the VirtualBox - I posted the information for the case anyone could see from this if VirtualBox could be a part of the problem. -- Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 669824] Re: Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr
Installing the TeamViewer debian package (available at http://www.teamviewer.com) and launching it for the first time (after a reboot) I can often reproduce the flickering and re-recognizing the second monitor. I forced that now with VirtualBox up and was not able to reproduce the freeze. So still not reproducable with a set of actions. -- Gnome desktop freeze / hangup after calling xrandr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 656702] Re: Changed resolution/monitor causes panel applet order and position messed up
Glad to hear that the external monitor problem got better. You have a workaround using gconf editor? - Can you tell me more about that? -- Changed resolution/monitor causes panel applet order and position messed up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 646474] Re: Screen Resolution not correctly detected
Problem seems to be solved with release (I am the original reporter of the bug). -- Screen Resolution not correctly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 345345] Re: Gnome panel freezes when connecting projector
Last week I was on a presentation connecting to a beamer. Not just the panel frozen - complete desktop - had to restart gdm. Fortunately it happened only the first time, then while connected it worked (although xrandr did not find the correct resoluton). -- Gnome panel freezes when connecting projector https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 656702] [NEW] Changed resolution/monitor causes panel applet order and position messed up
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel When the resolution of the screen changes (e.g. connecting a notebook to an external monitor and then again when detaching later or when temporarily using a beamer/projector) the Gnome panel applets (not matter if top or bottom panel) all the applets on the right side get messed up in position and order. Happens in approx 70-80 % of times, however - not always. I found Bug #472926 - which has been classified as wishlist. Well that particular solution idea could be a wish, but the effect is IMHO a bug. It is completely annoying - show that a new user considering a switch from Windows and guess what he/she thinks when the desktop neither remember system tray / notifier position... I guess, there is no automatic recognition when panel elements/applets are intended to stick to the right side. Other than for Bug #472926 which in particular talks about a specific feature, I could see more possible solutions, e.g. a flag in an applets context menu Stick/Anchor to right or - for an automatic solution: When repositioning (=moving) elements manually It could check whether there is space in between until the end of the panel on the right. If that way panel notices that an element has been put on the righthand side then it could automatically remember a flag that it should stick to righthand side. Then of course it needs to remember order/relation of the other elements also sticking to righthand side. If just manually flagging or automatically - if the position/order/space is then calculated from the righthand side resolution changes would not do harm any more. Another solution attempt could be to remember position of elements related to the righthand side as soon as it is positioned in the right half of the panel or in the rightmost third of the panel - something like this. I am not advocating a particular solution, if a solution like described in Bug #472926 is considered best, ok (although I think one of the attempts mentioned here could be easier and less problematic to implement). Anyway the problem of the elements getting messed up is very annoying. Using notebooks with external monitors (and docking stations) or beamers/projectors is by far not an uncommon use case. In companies it is a standard situation. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gnome-panel 1:2.30.2-0ubuntu0.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.44-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 8 08:06:00 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-panel ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Changed resolution/monitor causes panel applet order and position messed up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 656702] Re: Changed resolution/monitor causes panel applet order and position messed up
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656702/+attachment/1678367/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656702/+attachment/1678368/+files/GConfNonDefault.txt -- Changed resolution/monitor causes panel applet order and position messed up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 472926] Re: Enable gnome panel to always force icons to the left the right using an expandable spacer
See also Bug #656702 -- Enable gnome panel to always force icons to the left the right using an expandable spacer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 655738] [NEW] Evince claims password protected pdf although is not
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince For some PDF documents evince claims that they have a password being set to open the document although there has not been set any and Adobe Adobe Reader 9 for Linux opens the PDF without any problems. Looking at the properties in Adobe Reader it shows that for opening should be no password, but for particular other actions. So it would be expected in Evince, that the PDF opens without asking for a password. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: evince 2.30.3-0ubuntu1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.44-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Oct 6 16:16:28 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evince ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Evince claims password protected pdf although is not https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 655738] Re: Evince claims password protected pdf although is not
** Attachment added: Sample PDF https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655738/+attachment/1675144/+files/sample.pdf ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655738/+attachment/1675145/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: KernLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655738/+attachment/1675146/+files/KernLog.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655738/+attachment/1675147/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt -- Evince claims password protected pdf although is not https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 655738] Re: Evince claims password protected pdf although is not
See screenshot (that is what Adobe Reader says about the document in file properties). ** Attachment added: Sample PDF File properties in Adobe Reader https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/655738/+attachment/1675149/+files/screen108.png ** Bug watch added: Maemo Bugzilla #4600 https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4600 -- Evince claims password protected pdf although is not https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 655738] Re: Evince claims password protected pdf although is not
I found a similar bug in maemo here: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4600 And some mailing list entries here: http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora- devel-l...@redhat.com/msg00317.html (the latter is from 2006) -- Evince claims password protected pdf although is not https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 646474] Re: Screen Resolution not correctly detected
Friday I have been on a presentation - there was another guy with a Win 7 machine and we both had to use a beamer. What should I say: 1. Attempt: Gnome crashed completely - had to restart gdm 2. Attempt: Needed to call xrandr manually. During normal work it is called too often and when needed And after running xrandr, resolution was not correctly recognized. Screen was vertically stretched - had to accept because no time to frickle around. The Win 7 machine had no problems. That was embarrassing and is not putting good lights onto Ubuntu. :-( -- Screen Resolution not correctly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 646474] Re: Screen Resolution not correctly detected
BTW: This was 10.04.1 and not Maverick in the case described above. Anyway I do not consider Maverick working much better as Lucid is at least correctly determining my main screen resolution... -- Screen Resolution not correctly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 646474] [NEW] Screen Resolution not correctly detected
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm I installed the latest maverick nightly build (from 09-23) and screen resolution was recoginzed correctly (1440x900) on my Dell latitude E5500. After applying waiting updates and rebooting, screen resolution is autodetected wrong: It is set to 1024x768 xrandr output attached. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: gdm 2.30.5-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic-pae 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Sep 24 01:28:16 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Alpha i386 (20100923) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdm ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- Screen Resolution not correctly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 646474] Re: Screen Resolution not correctly detected
** Attachment added: xrandr output https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646474/+attachment/1629511/+files/xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646474/+attachment/1629512/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Screen Resolution not correctly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 646474] Re: Screen Resolution not correctly detected
lshw-output ** Attachment added: lshw-output https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/646474/+attachment/1629513/+files/lshw-sudo.txt -- Screen Resolution not correctly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 646474] Re: Screen Resolution not correctly detected
After a manual xrandr --output LVDS1 --mode 1440x900 and reboot the resolution was kept after login screen. Will check again for the next reboots. -- Screen Resolution not correctly detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 634122] [NEW] Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm On restart it happened that the resolution is not set to maximum available by default - in my case I do have now black bars on the left and right side. xrandr shows that instead of 1440x900 on my Dell Latitude E5500 1024x768 is used. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: gdm 2.30.5-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-19.28-generic 2.6.35.3 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-19-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Sep 9 17:24:11 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Beta i386 (20100901.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdm ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 634122] Re: Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally
** Attachment added: xrandr --current output https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634122/+attachment/1561046/+files/xrandr-current.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634122/+attachment/1561047/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 634122] Re: Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally
xrandr without parameters does not help to fix the issue. xrandr --output LVDS1 --mode 1440x900 does correct the resolution. -- Resolution not set to preferred/maximum occassionally https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 628388] [NEW] Original screen visible until try to do something - then login dialog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver When I leave the computer and return I often see the original screen instead of the screensaver being activated. When I then want to do something (move the mouse, press a key), the screen gets black and the login dialog appears (as it should be). So the problem is just that the original screen does not get turned off and screensaver display (floating Ubuntu in my case) activated. However, the locking mechanism gets activated. It does not always occur, but sometimes (and cannot tell the difference in those cases). I tested a few times pressing CTRL+ALT+L when I leave - in those cases always everything worked fine - so this is my workaround so far. I would say, it is not really a security issue, but a privacy issue. It could only be a security risk, if I would leave some passwords in clear text displayed (e.g. open documentation file). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gnome-screensaver 2.30.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.42-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Sep 1 23:01:17 2010 GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No GnomeSessionInhibitors: None InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver WindowManager: compiz ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Original screen visible until try to do something - then login dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 628388] Re: Original screen visible until try to do something - then login dialog
** Attachment added: Screenshot of screensaver settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388/+attachment/1535493/+files/screen093.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388/+attachment/1535494/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GconfGnomeLockdown.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388/+attachment/1535495/+files/GconfGnomeLockdown.txt ** Attachment added: GconfGnomePowerManager.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388/+attachment/1535496/+files/GconfGnomePowerManager.txt ** Attachment added: GconfGnomeScreensaver.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388/+attachment/1535497/+files/GconfGnomeScreensaver.txt ** Attachment added: GconfGnomeSession.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388/+attachment/1535498/+files/GconfGnomeSession.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388/+attachment/1535499/+files/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388/+attachment/1535500/+files/XorgLogOld.txt -- Original screen visible until try to do something - then login dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 627165] [NEW] File Management Preferences dialog too high on netbooks (1024x600)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I installed Lucid Netbook remix on a Dell Latitude 2110 which has a highest possible screen resolution of 1024x600. The File Management Preferences dialog has a too large height to see everything. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.30.0-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 31 02:46:03 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429.4) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid ubuntu-une -- File Management Preferences dialog too high on netbooks (1024x600) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627165 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 627165] Re: File Management Preferences dialog too high on netbooks (1024x600)
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627165/+attachment/1530932/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627165/+attachment/1530933/+files/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- File Management Preferences dialog too high on netbooks (1024x600) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627165 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 390816] Re: external monitor output is switched off when closing the laptop-lid when gnome-power-manager is set to blank screen on closing
I also noticed that the option to clone outputs is always getting re- enabled - it seems just to ignore it when disabled by the user. -- external monitor output is switched off when closing the laptop-lid when gnome-power-manager is set to blank screen on closing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390816 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 390816] Re: external monitor output is switched off when closing the laptop-lid when gnome-power-manager is set to blank screen on closing
Maybe this workaround can help you also in the suspend case: http://it-tactics.blogspot.com/2010/08/ubuntu-1004-with-docking-station.html I noticed that after these changes my Desktop is much more stable in the meaning of flickering and resolution changes (which also happened e.g. when starting TeamViewer (and other applications) for the first time. The bug #613650 and bug #617421 could be related to this one I guess. -- external monitor output is switched off when closing the laptop-lid when gnome-power-manager is set to blank screen on closing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390816 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 94512] Re: Nautilus-folder Properties-Permissions: No recursive CHOWN
Just for information: Nautilus 2.30.1 still having this issue. -- Nautilus-folder Properties-Permissions: No recursive CHOWN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613650] Re: docking station and closed lid does not disable notebook screen
I found out additional details: Occassionally it was TV1 recognized to be active even if I was completely unplugged from external monitors and docking station (I could see this by wide desktop icons below and moving the mouse completely out of sight on the right side was possible). See updated blog post which describes the issue and offers a workaround (latest discoveries in update 3): http://it- tactics.blogspot.com/2010/08/ubuntu-1004-with-docking-station.html -- docking station and closed lid does not disable notebook screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613650] [NEW] docking station and closed lid does not disable notebook screen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm I am on 10.04.1, Kernel 2.6.32-24-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 5 09:22:14 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux. Hardware: Dell Latitude E-5500 I have a port replicator / docking station in the office and under 9.04 (and later upgraded to 9.10) I had no problem putting the notebook with lid closed into the dock and after turning on running with external monitor as the only used display. Now, after clean install of 10.04 + applying all updates, when I do the same, the notebook monitor is kept considered by Ubuntu. Although I see the login screen on the external monitor (with lower resolution - maybe in parallel displaying also on the imaginary - because closed - notebook builtin monitor). After login I see empty desktop without notification area, task bar or menus. When opening the notebook lid I can see all the elements there. Changing monitor order (left and right) does not keep the settings until reboot. I also tried using arandr - configured monitor settings - only lasted until next reboot. After fiddling around a long time and trying a lot of things (other people have similar problems out in the wild) I got it to work with changing gdm startup script + adding an additional script that I run on X startup - a quite long story, that can be read here: http://it-tactics.blogspot.com/2010/08/ubuntu-1004-with-docking-station.html BTW: I don't have an xorg.conf. This issue is a regression - it worked in 9.04 and 9.10 (upgraded from 9.04). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gdm 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.38-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Aug 4 22:50:59 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdm ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid regression -- docking station and closed lid does not disable notebook screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613650] Re: docking station and closed lid does not disable notebook screen
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53065162/Dependencies.txt -- docking station and closed lid does not disable notebook screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613650] Re: docking station and closed lid does not disable notebook screen
Oh, btw: Compiz is enabled - compiz configuration attached (exported from compiz settings manager). ** Attachment added: MyCompizSettings-withdefaults.profile http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53068388/MyCompizSettings-withdefaults.profile -- docking station and closed lid does not disable notebook screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613650 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 13:23, Ubuntu-Me 532...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Rather then deal with Mark's mistakes directly, and I think I speak for many, I can only say one thing. ( DEBIAN ! ) My problem with debian the last time I tried it is that I need to do much more things by hand and they have very old versions of some programs in their repositories only. - But maybe you are using the testing version and not the stable. I tried several other distributions also but had issues with Fedora also for example. I like(d) Ubuntu for making most things work out-of-the-box or with just a few clicks. I can't frickle around at each new user with Hardware xy. Unfortunately, even with the mobile internet sticks which were used to work out-of-the-box for me I got more and more troubles lately. However, I could help them being solved in Lucid during beta - but this is off-topic here. The point for me is: It is not so easy to find the right distribution - either had a hardware lately that only works with Suse (no other distri tested worked) although I avoid Suse where I can. In reality there should be more and better cooperation in the Linux world between distributions. With actions like this - and now we get back to the topic finally - the Ubuntu team is causing separation and not uniting forces which would be so important for the whole Linux community. -- Martin Wildam -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 15:09, Mark Shuttleworth 532...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On 23/07/10 13:18, Martin Wildam wrote: the Ubuntu team is causing separation and not uniting forces which would be so important for the whole Linux community. I'd like to hear your justification for that statement. We've: - built a bug tracker that explicitly lets us share bugs and fixes with other distributions and upstreams (and is still the only open source comprehensive hosting platform) - consistently invited people from other distributions (debian, red hat, suse) to our conference, even sponsoring them - supported multiple efforts to converge on open standards across desktop environments and distributions Don't get me wrong please! - I was really not talking about the infrastructure and about your community activities! The whole launchpad is awesome very effective KISS software - Participating in the Ubuntu community is a lot more pleasureful for me than e.g. in Fedora/redhat world (at least my experience). I was talking about decisions like the positioning of the buttons. This and some other decisions have been taken without coordinating with the community. I read a lot of Linux related blogs and listen to a lot of Linux related podcasts. The vast majority of people is definitely agains decisions like this - changing window control buttons. I do consider myself as a GTD focus person and mouse miles driven vastly increased (not just because I was first moving right and then left only after discovering that the buttons are not there any more. ;-) ) You're entitled to your opinions, but simply repeating something you heard (potentially from a competitor) is a poor way to form or shape opinions. Again, I was not talking about the general interaction with the community or the service in general! I was talking about a few design decisions that have been taken without really considering the opinion of the community. And I am not just repeating what I have heard or read elsewhere - it is my very own experience that I only get confirmed when readin/listening on the web. I am trying hard to spread the word for Ubuntu and my testing and intallations done for friends, I do in the nights when family sleeps and all other work is done. I face a lot of potential new end users and I am working in IT business for about 20 years (mostly as software developer), so I think I have some experience regarding usability. And it is not, that I am not flexible: If you can give me something on the free space at the Window border that I find awesome useful, I am willing to adapt. That said, I am quite sure that the new feature could also perfectly go to the left so the minimize, maximize and close buttons could remain where they have ever been. And: Why not waiting with that change until the new feature is availble? With the current situation I do face either different themes design broken because they got hit in the cold with the change in 10.04 - oh and as we are talking about 10.04: It is definitely the worst idea introducing such experiments with an LTS - I am far from being alone with this opinion! But let me come to a very positive end of my reply: I am very happy about the fact that you are personally here - never ever would I expect Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, Steve Jobs or Larry Ellison to personally read and respond to my feedback - so thumbs up for you! -- Martin Wildam -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 15:36, James Lewis 532...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: As for the previous poster suggesting that this is the reason to move to another distribution... IMO, that's ridiculous... Ubuntu has clearly made huge strides in the last few releases and 10.04 is no different... I do also tend to think that a few bad decisions (that mostly can be fixed by configuration) are not enough reason to change distribution. - Not, when the other distributions do worse (which I tend to think focusing on my personal needs). if you don't like the window controls on the left, move them back to the right and chill! So far, I always changed theme to one that has the buttons on the right as I don't yet remember how to move them to the left by heart. IMO, we should spend more time worrying about getting BTRFS in, and personally I'd like to see a GUI to manage LUKS encrypted volumes files... so we can steer people away from truecrypt, rather than spending so much effort debating such a simple change as if some buttons are on the left or the right. As far as I have read (not my own experience), BTRFS is still considered unstable and I have seen a few benchmark results where BTRFS was faster only in a few of the use cases. From what I have interpreted, Ext4 could be still the best choice for allround-use, but I am not into details - there might be pretty good reasons for pushing BTRFS - however, this is off-topic here. -- Martin Wildam -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 586937] Re: Brasero fails to copy video DVD from video camera
I am sorry for the delay on my side. I could send you information - but I was on vacation and now have a whole bunch of work in the queue. I will provide you the needed information as soon as possible. -- Brasero fails to copy video DVD from video camera https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 586937] [NEW] Brasero fails to copy video DVD from video camera
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero I got a DVD from a friend who made a film with his video camera at a family celebration. I wanted to duplicate that with Brasero. It reads the original and very quickly tells to insert a blank media which made me wonder. Then I noticed it shows only 3 or 4 MB to burn although it's a DVD containing more than 400 MB and it can't have read that amount in such an instant. I looked in Nautilus to check and it confirmed more than 400 MB - see attached screenshot. I found a similar bug ( bug #224840 ) which already has been closed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: brasero 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Fri May 28 19:43:16 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brasero ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Brasero fails to copy video DVD from video camera https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 586937] Re: Brasero fails to copy video DVD from video camera
** Attachment added: LG_COMBI_RECORDER.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49274609/LG_COMBI_RECORDER.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49273407/Dependencies.txt -- Brasero fails to copy video DVD from video camera https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 586937] Re: Brasero fails to copy video DVD from video camera
BTW: K3B is able to copy the same DVD. -- Brasero fails to copy video DVD from video camera https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessable
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 00:08, Alexander Fomichev alex_fomic...@mail.ru wrote: Martin Wildam, don't judge anybody. The choice is good, the determinism is evil. One decided that touch screens are for the stupid. Another decided that battery percentage is unneeded. They both are wrong. OK, you convinced me that this might all be a matter of circumstances and personal preferences. But if others want a touch-only environment I want be negatively affected by that. So there should be found a solution - even if a different one that is useful for both. Proposal: Keeping the finger for a longer time (e.g. 2 seconds) on the icon then bring up the status information (= emulation of the hovering with the mouse - also for hovering a delay is applied before displaying the information). The more I think of the touch interfaces the more unhandy I find it - sorry. My finger is soo big - clicking on a menu half the item is covered by my finger. -- Martin Wildam -- current battery charge not easily accessable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessable
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 21:49, Tom Jaeger thjae...@gmail.com wrote: Please don't hijack this bug report. This bug is about the removal of the battery percentage info from g-p-m, not about the way this information is presented. The title says it a little different: current battery charge not easily accessable I think this affects both - that the information should be presented and how. Of course there is an overlapping with other bugs. -- Martin Wildam -- current battery charge not easily accessible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessable
I think the argument, that on touch devices no hover feature exists, is poor. Just because those hype things exist, I don't want to miss features on my real environment. And BTW: I hate these touch devices because all you get is a dirty screen and you have to keep the hands up in the air. Silly person who decided to use touch screens for computers. -- Martin Wildam -- current battery charge not easily accessable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:19, Jesper jes...@staunhansen.dk wrote: Ubuntu does it again. Screwing over its user-base over and over. And for a LTS you get the Bad Choices Award. There is a saying: Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement. So there is hope that they learn from it. ;-) I can't see so many major issues with 10.4 (I participated with testing - although with focus on some particular elements). Anyway my judgement here is: Thumbs up for the developers, Thumbs down for the design team. But although I don't like the dark theme (dark themes in general I find worse for usability) and don't like the button position, I like the light new theme more than older themes. So it is either not a complete thumbs down. -- Martin Wildam -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 09:39, Wildam Martin mwil...@gmail.com wrote: I like the light new theme more than older themes. So it is either not a complete thumbs down. But anyway, although I like the new theme, from usability Clearlooks is better. And this is an issue often designers have: They design for cool look and not for usability. -- Martin Wildam -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 508632] Re: [FFe] Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone
As far as I remember, a major reason for removing that button was to make the UI easier and simpler. But why the hack then having the close button for the side pane? It would be better to replace that one with the path/breadcrumb toggle button. Because: Closing the side-pane with that button you anyway need to go to the menu or press F9 to bring it back again. So you have to memorize F9 to toggle side-pane anyway if you need that often. And let's face the facts: Displaying the side pane or not is a decision you take once and then keep it for all your nautilus windows (as in Windows you go to configure your folder views as you like and then keep your favorite settings - and of course hope that Windows is _really_ applying it to all windows ;-) ). See screenshot. ** Attachment added: screen054.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46183858/screen054.png -- [FFe] Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 539912] Re: [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable
If occupying too much space is the issue (which I can't really see), just change to something like: ~ 3 hours 15 minutes remaining (100%) See screenshot. ** Attachment added: screen046.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45890431/screen046.png -- [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 539912] Re: [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable
And the time left can vary strongly depending on what you are doing - e.g. using mobile USB internet stick takes quite a lot. -- [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
Interesting, how often UI changes although already frozen... -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 508632] Re: [FFe] Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone
It seems there is a frozen and not frozen status at the same time... - http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/04/window-buttons-shift-order-again.html -- [FFe] Toggle button for Nautilus location field gone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
I thought that UI freeze was already in the beginning of march - just read, maybe that was not true. Then they shifted the buttons to the left and then changed order again. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
@Paul: Thanks for pointing that out and editing the description - It is already a huge amount of reading work to go through all the comments. In the morning under the shower I thought again of my proposal for displaying the buttons just on hovering over the title bar. The only disadvantage of displaying the buttons only when hovering over the title bar is that it could be irritating that buttons might not show up exactly on the expected position. Why: Let's say they are always displayed left from the mouse cursor position, then if you go to the upper left of the window and there is not enough place left the buttons have to show up on the right side. Knowing that I wouldn't go to the very top left, but anyway - wanted to mention that. Other solution could be to show the buttons in a dropdown-style menu instead. Advantage: If you want to add more entries over time there is enough free space most of the time (not considering really mini confirmation dialog boxes). But going up and then down (in the menu) again means additional mouse miles. :-( Thinking of all the possible options I also want to mention that there is already a title context menu where a lot of stuff is that I often use. BTW: I use the feature to move a window to a particular desktop more often than I use the minimize button. However, the longer I think of it the more I get to the conclusion that minimize, maximize and close are the essential operations that deserve buttons even although only minimize is really required, because menu button on the left is the same as clicking with the right mouse button anywhere on the title, maximize is double-click and close is clicking the middle (mousewheel) button. BTW: I have listened to the interview with Ivanka already and today also the answer from Jono Bacon who mentions that they are wanting to use the right top of the Window to place something else in the future. Whatever it is, it could perfectly also go to the left, I would say. One another thing: Putting too many buttons on the window title bar maybe will reduce the space too much for the title. I would put spicy new things to the context menu as they can't be really essential. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
@bt90: This is a really GREAT IDEA! - And the coolness factor could be also given by displaying no buttons at all and only when you get near to the title bar (let's say about twice the height of the title bar) they are displayed left or right depending on which corner is nearer to your mouse. Another advantage: The full title bar can be used to display the window title. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 508452] Re: wnck-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
I got this error two times when clicking with the right mouse-button on workspaces switcher panel - Properties. The third time it worked and from now seems to work (Ubuntu is running from the live CD in this case). -- wnck-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
