[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1415502] Re: Couldn't bind port 51413 on 192.168.1.xxx: Cannot assign requested address (net.c:371)
A bug from 2015 and still "new". Nice – Here's a fix: Edit the systemd unit file with `sudo systemctl edit --full transmission-daemon.service` and replace the line > After=network.target with the lines > After=network-online.target > Wants=network-online.target With this, systemd should wait for the network to become fully available before starting the daemon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to transmission in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415502 Title: Couldn't bind port 51413 on 192.168.1.xxx: Cannot assign requested address (net.c:371) Status in transmission package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: When transmission-deamon is started automatically during system boot it doesn't download any files. In log-file i see this message: "Couldn't bind port 51413 on 192.168.1.xxx: Cannot assign requested address (net.c:371)". When i restart transmission-deamon with "sudo service transmission-daemon stop" and "sudo service transmission-daemon start" transmission-deamon works correctly and in log-file i see other message: "Bound socket 11 to port 51413 on 192.168.1.xxx (net.c:379)". I changed in /etc/init/transmission-daemon.conf string "start on (filesystem and net-device-up IFACE=lo)" to "start on (filesystem and static-network-up)" and now transmission-daemon can download files even if it starts during system boot. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+bug/1415502/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1614840] Re: Fontcaching takes long and cache seems damaged
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1614870 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614870 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1614870 Problems with font cache after update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614840 Title: Fontcaching takes long and cache seems damaged Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: After last update on my 14.04 trusty machine, it takes a long time to regenrate the fonts cache. Now after that, most graphical applications take about 30 seconda to start with 100% CPU load. It is impossible to work with my system in this state. I already tried purging and reinstallong all fontconfig-related packages and completely deleted and rebuildt my font cache, but the problem persists. Before the update everything was fine. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1614840/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1614870] Re: Problems with font cache after update
I also have some OS X fonts installed. Everything that comes with OS X and was not already present in Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614870 Title: Problems with font cache after update Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: After last update on my 14.04 trusty machine, it takes a long time to regenerate the fonts cache. Now after that, most graphical applications take about 30 seconds to start with 100% CPU load. It is impossible to work with my system in this state. I already tried purging and reinstallong all fontconfig-related packages and completely deleted and rebuildt my font cache, but the problem persists. Before the update everything was fine. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fontconfig 2.11.0-0ubuntu4.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-93.140-generic 3.13.11-ckt39 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-93-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.21 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: MATE Date: Fri Aug 19 10:11:10 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-16 (856 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20140326) SourcePackage: fontconfig UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1614870/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1614870] [NEW] Problems with font cache after update
Public bug reported: After last update on my 14.04 trusty machine, it takes a long time to regenerate the fonts cache. Now after that, most graphical applications take about 30 seconds to start with 100% CPU load. It is impossible to work with my system in this state. I already tried purging and reinstallong all fontconfig-related packages and completely deleted and rebuildt my font cache, but the problem persists. Before the update everything was fine. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fontconfig 2.11.0-0ubuntu4.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-93.140-generic 3.13.11-ckt39 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-93-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.21 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: MATE Date: Fri Aug 19 10:11:10 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-16 (856 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20140326) SourcePackage: fontconfig UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614870 Title: Problems with font cache after update Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: After last update on my 14.04 trusty machine, it takes a long time to regenerate the fonts cache. Now after that, most graphical applications take about 30 seconds to start with 100% CPU load. It is impossible to work with my system in this state. I already tried purging and reinstallong all fontconfig-related packages and completely deleted and rebuildt my font cache, but the problem persists. Before the update everything was fine. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fontconfig 2.11.0-0ubuntu4.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-93.140-generic 3.13.11-ckt39 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-93-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.21 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: MATE Date: Fri Aug 19 10:11:10 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-16 (856 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20140326) SourcePackage: fontconfig UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1614870/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 676917] Re: Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676917 Title: Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: gvfs When /home is on a separate partition, and the user deletes a file on root, it is moved to /.Trash-1000, but it does not show up in trash, nor is it going to be deleted when the trash emptied. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Nov 18 11:04:11 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100816.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:de:en_US:en LANG=de_DE.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gvfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/676917/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 361498] Re: When I use thunderbird to my mediawiki recently changes rss feed, it tells me "It's not a valid rss feed".
Can confirm this for Thunderbird 13 on Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid) with MediaWiki 1.18.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361498 Title: When I use thunderbird to my mediawiki recently changes rss feed, it tells me "It's not a valid rss feed". Status in “thunderbird” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: This lead thunderbird cannot subscribe any rss feed. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp Package: yelp 2.24.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_AU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/361498/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 779730] Re: SFTP is destroying symlinks
Still an issue ** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779730 Title: SFTP is destroying symlinks Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: gvfs I think this bug is related to gvfs. I used to change files on my server through an SFTP connection. When I open a symbolic link, then change it and save, it creates me a copy of that file, applying the changes to the linked one. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/779730/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 939661] Re: After a short period of use nautilus no longer reponds and becomes a zombie
I'm also encountering this issue since a few days, and I'm using Lucid. When it happens, there's always an "uname" zombie too. As natilus refuses to start another instance, and both are children of init, the only option is to reboot the system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939661 Title: After a short period of use nautilus no longer reponds and becomes a zombie Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Nautilus may last for hours or just minutes then fails to respond. Menu items don't respond. It can't be shut down. ps -A does not show a process for nautilus. It can't be restarted. Shutdown of linux usually hangs at the request to terminate all processes. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.2.1-0ubuntu4.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.28-generic 3.0.17 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Feb 23 09:53:44 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007) SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-30 (115 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/939661/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 676917] Re: Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions
PS: It is aware of files on non-home partitions, just not root. I know it, because I've got an aditional partition /media/iTunes/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676917 Title: Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: gvfs When /home is on a separate partition, and the user deletes a file on root, it is moved to /.Trash-1000, but it does not show up in trash, nor is it going to be deleted when the trash emptied. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Nov 18 11:04:11 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100816.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:de:en_US:en LANG=de_DE.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gvfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/676917/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 676917] Re: Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions
> This is still an issue with oneiric Wow. Is anybody surprised? I'm not. :/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676917 Title: Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: gvfs When /home is on a separate partition, and the user deletes a file on root, it is moved to /.Trash-1000, but it does not show up in trash, nor is it going to be deleted when the trash emptied. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Nov 18 11:04:11 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100816.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:de:en_US:en LANG=de_DE.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gvfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/676917/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 189066] Re: Don't follow symlinks
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 215302 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215302 Furthermore, if you delete a symlink pointing to a directory from the archive, every file in the linked directory OUTSIDE the archive gets deleted! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189066 Title: Don't follow symlinks Status in “file-roller” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: file-roller File Roller 2.20.1 tar (GNU tar) 1.18 gzip 1.3.12 DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 7.10" I discovered that when creating an archive of a user's home directory File Roller would run until it exhausts all free space even if the amount of data in the folder was relatively small. I traced the problem to symlinks in ~/.wine/dosdevices (like "c: -> ../drive_c" or "h: -> /home/user") which cause it to loop through other directories repeatedly. It appears to ignore links to directories owned by root but if they belong the the current user then it follows them. It also doesn't seem to kill tar and gzip correctly when the archive creation dialog is cancelled but this may be a different issue. Bug #124992 and bug #117066 may be related. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/189066/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 322936] Re: File-roller can't just archive symlinks to folders
Furthermore, if you delete a symlink pointing to a directory from the archive, every file in the linked directory OUTSIDE the archive gets deleted! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322936 Title: File-roller can't just archive symlinks to folders Status in File Roller: New Status in “file-roller” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: file-roller When I tring to add symlinks to folders to my archive File-roller includes that folders to the archive and as far as I can see there is no way to just archive symlinks. And if symlinks are recursive Fileroller makes archives with recursive folders and then complains while unpacking ("Not a folder" many times). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/file-roller NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal nvidia Package: file-roller 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 SourcePackage: file-roller Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic x86_64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/322936/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp