[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1415502] Re: Couldn't bind port 51413 on 192.168.1.xxx: Cannot assign requested address (net.c:371)

2020-07-30 Thread Bachsau
A bug from 2015 and still "new". Nice – Here's a fix:
Edit the systemd unit file with `sudo systemctl edit --full 
transmission-daemon.service` and replace the line

> After=network.target

with the lines

> After=network-online.target
> Wants=network-online.target

With this, systemd should wait for the network to become fully available
before starting the daemon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to transmission in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415502

Title:
  Couldn't bind port 51413 on 192.168.1.xxx: Cannot assign requested
  address (net.c:371)

Status in transmission package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When transmission-deamon is started automatically during system boot it 
doesn't download any files. In log-file i see this message: "Couldn't bind port 
51413 on 192.168.1.xxx: Cannot assign requested address (net.c:371)". When i 
restart  transmission-deamon with "sudo service transmission-daemon stop" and 
"sudo service transmission-daemon start" transmission-deamon works correctly 
and in log-file i see other message: "Bound socket 11 to port 51413 on 
192.168.1.xxx (net.c:379)".
  I changed in /etc/init/transmission-daemon.conf string "start on (filesystem 
and net-device-up IFACE=lo)" to "start on (filesystem and static-network-up)" 
and now transmission-daemon can download files even if it starts during system 
boot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+bug/1415502/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1614840] Re: Fontcaching takes long and cache seems damaged

2016-09-07 Thread Bachsau
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1614870 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614870

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1614870
   Problems with font cache after update

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614840

Title:
  Fontcaching takes long and cache seems damaged

Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After last update on my 14.04 trusty machine, it takes a long time to
  regenrate the fonts cache. Now after that, most graphical applications
  take about 30 seconda to start with 100% CPU load. It is impossible to
  work with my system in this state.

  I already tried purging and reinstallong all fontconfig-related
  packages and completely deleted and rebuildt my font cache, but the
  problem persists. Before the update everything was fine.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1614840/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1614870] Re: Problems with font cache after update

2016-08-22 Thread Bachsau
I also have some OS X fonts installed. Everything that comes with OS X
and was not already present in Ubuntu.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614870

Title:
  Problems with font cache after update

Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After last update on my 14.04 trusty machine, it takes a long time to
  regenerate the fonts cache. Now after that, most graphical
  applications take about 30 seconds to start with 100% CPU load. It is
  impossible to work with my system in this state.

  I already tried purging and reinstallong all fontconfig-related
  packages and completely deleted and rebuildt my font cache, but the
  problem persists. Before the update everything was fine.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: fontconfig 2.11.0-0ubuntu4.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-93.140-generic 3.13.11-ckt39
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-93-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.21
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Fri Aug 19 10:11:10 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-16 (856 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20140326)
  SourcePackage: fontconfig
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1614870/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1614870] [NEW] Problems with font cache after update

2016-08-19 Thread Bachsau
Public bug reported:

After last update on my 14.04 trusty machine, it takes a long time to
regenerate the fonts cache. Now after that, most graphical applications
take about 30 seconds to start with 100% CPU load. It is impossible to
work with my system in this state.

I already tried purging and reinstallong all fontconfig-related packages
and completely deleted and rebuildt my font cache, but the problem
persists. Before the update everything was fine.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: fontconfig 2.11.0-0ubuntu4.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-93.140-generic 3.13.11-ckt39
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-93-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.21
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Fri Aug 19 10:11:10 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-16 (856 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20140326)
SourcePackage: fontconfig
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614870

Title:
  Problems with font cache after update

Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After last update on my 14.04 trusty machine, it takes a long time to
  regenerate the fonts cache. Now after that, most graphical
  applications take about 30 seconds to start with 100% CPU load. It is
  impossible to work with my system in this state.

  I already tried purging and reinstallong all fontconfig-related
  packages and completely deleted and rebuildt my font cache, but the
  problem persists. Before the update everything was fine.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: fontconfig 2.11.0-0ubuntu4.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-93.140-generic 3.13.11-ckt39
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-93-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.21
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Fri Aug 19 10:11:10 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-16 (856 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20140326)
  SourcePackage: fontconfig
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1614870/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 676917] Re: Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions

2012-09-29 Thread Bachsau
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676917

Title:
  Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions

Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: gvfs

  When /home is on a separate partition, and the user deletes a file on
  root, it is moved to /.Trash-1000, but it does not show up in trash,
  nor is it going to be deleted when the trash emptied.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Nov 18 11:04:11 2010
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100816.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=de_DE:de:en_US:en
   LANG=de_DE.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gvfs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/676917/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 361498] Re: When I use thunderbird to my mediawiki recently changes rss feed, it tells me "It's not a valid rss feed".

2012-09-16 Thread Bachsau
Can confirm this for Thunderbird 13 on Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid) with
MediaWiki 1.18.5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361498

Title:
  When I use thunderbird to my mediawiki recently changes rss feed, it
  tells me "It's not a valid rss feed".

Status in “thunderbird” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  This lead thunderbird cannot subscribe any rss feed.

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: i386
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp
  Package: yelp 2.24.0-0ubuntu2
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
   LANG=en_AU.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: yelp
  Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/361498/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 779730] Re: SFTP is destroying symlinks

2012-06-19 Thread Bachsau
Still an issue

** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779730

Title:
  SFTP is destroying symlinks

Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: gvfs

  I think this bug is related to gvfs. I used to change files on my
  server through an SFTP connection. When I open a symbolic link, then
  change it and save, it creates me a copy of that file, applying the
  changes to the linked one.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/779730/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 939661] Re: After a short period of use nautilus no longer reponds and becomes a zombie

2012-03-27 Thread Bachsau
I'm also encountering this issue since a few days, and I'm using Lucid.
When it happens, there's always an "uname" zombie too. As natilus
refuses to start another instance, and both are children of init, the
only option is to reboot the system.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939661

Title:
  After a short period of use nautilus no longer reponds and becomes a
  zombie

Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Nautilus may last for hours or just minutes then fails to respond.
  Menu items don't respond. It can't be shut down.  ps -A does not show
  a process for nautilus.  It can't be restarted. Shutdown of linux
  usually hangs at the request to terminate all processes.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
  Package: nautilus 1:3.2.1-0ubuntu4.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.28-generic 3.0.17
  Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Feb 23 09:53:44 2012
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-30 (115 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/939661/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 676917] Re: Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions

2012-03-05 Thread Bachsau
PS: It is aware of files on non-home partitions, just not root. I know
it, because I've got an aditional partition /media/iTunes/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676917

Title:
  Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions

Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: gvfs

  When /home is on a separate partition, and the user deletes a file on
  root, it is moved to /.Trash-1000, but it does not show up in trash,
  nor is it going to be deleted when the trash emptied.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Nov 18 11:04:11 2010
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100816.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=de_DE:de:en_US:en
   LANG=de_DE.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gvfs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/676917/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 676917] Re: Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions

2012-03-05 Thread Bachsau
> This is still an issue with oneiric

Wow. Is anybody surprised? I'm not. :/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676917

Title:
  Trash is not aware of files deleted from non-home partitions

Status in “gvfs” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: gvfs

  When /home is on a separate partition, and the user deletes a file on
  root, it is moved to /.Trash-1000, but it does not show up in trash,
  nor is it going to be deleted when the trash emptied.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Nov 18 11:04:11 2010
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100816.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=de_DE:de:en_US:en
   LANG=de_DE.utf8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gvfs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/676917/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 189066] Re: Don't follow symlinks

2011-10-30 Thread Bachsau
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 215302 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215302

Furthermore, if you  delete a symlink pointing to a directory from the
archive, every file in the linked directory OUTSIDE the archive gets
deleted!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189066

Title:
  Don't follow symlinks

Status in “file-roller” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: file-roller

  File Roller 2.20.1
  tar (GNU tar) 1.18
  gzip 1.3.12
  DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
  DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.10
  DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy
  DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 7.10"

  I discovered that when creating an archive of a user's home directory
  File Roller would run until it exhausts all free space even if the
  amount of data in the folder was relatively small.  I traced the
  problem to symlinks in ~/.wine/dosdevices (like "c: -> ../drive_c" or
  "h: -> /home/user") which cause it to loop through other directories
  repeatedly.  It appears to ignore links to directories owned by root
  but if they belong the the current user then it follows them.  It also
  doesn't seem to kill tar and gzip correctly when the archive creation
  dialog is cancelled but this may be a different issue.  Bug #124992
  and bug #117066 may be related.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/189066/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 322936] Re: File-roller can't just archive symlinks to folders

2011-10-30 Thread Bachsau
Furthermore, if you  delete a symlink pointing to a directory from the
archive, every file in the linked directory OUTSIDE the archive gets
deleted!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322936

Title:
  File-roller can't just archive symlinks to folders

Status in File Roller:
  New
Status in “file-roller” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: file-roller

  When I tring to add symlinks to folders to my archive File-roller
  includes that folders to the archive and as far as I can see there is
  no way to just archive symlinks. And if symlinks are recursive
  Fileroller makes archives with recursive folders and then complains
  while unpacking ("Not a folder" many times).

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: amd64
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/file-roller
  NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal nvidia
  Package: file-roller 2.24.1-0ubuntu2
  ProcEnviron:
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
   LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
  SourcePackage: file-roller
  Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic x86_64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/322936/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp