[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2056767] Re: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split

2024-04-19 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
HI Jeremy, I am sorry that we couldn't get to it then. As you'd know the
release team was swamped with so many things happening in the archive
(time_64, xz CVE, et al). That said, I am still not sure if landing this
now is a great idea. We're really close to the release and changing
something like this in gnome-software for an LTS seems like a rather
risky thing.

Can I please ask you to defer this to post Noble release? And perhaps do
a 0-day SRU or a regular SRU as you see fit?

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056767

Title:
  FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  with gnome-software packaging split

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  I request permission to sync the gnome-software packaging from Debian. The 
biggest change is splitting gnome-software's .deb support into a separate 
package, gnome-software-plugin-deb, to match the existing -snap and -flatpak 
packages. This will allow users and flavors to specifically opt into the parts 
of the GNOME Software experience they want. For instance, someone may want to 
use only the Flatpak part because they use the Snap Store to manage .debs and 
Snaps. Or maybe they want a different combination.

  This has been requested by multiple users on Ubuntu Discourse and at
  least one Launchpad bug and one Debian bug.

  fwupd plugin
  
  I am dropping the fwupd plugin (now in a separate package too) to Suggests so 
upgrades to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will likely get it uninstalled and new installs 
won't have it either unless a user explicitly installs it later.

  Ubuntu Desktop includes the firmware-updater snap. Several Ubuntu
  desktop flavors also include it. For people who don't want snaps,
  there is also the gnome-firmware app packaged as a .deb.

  Because Ubuntu already has update-manager to handle apt update
  notifications, I am also dropping the autostart file to reduce
  background RAM use.

  A few Ubuntu desktop flavors do not provide any firmware updater app
  at all. Ubuntu Budgie developers thought a firmware updater app was
  too technical for inclusion in the default Ubuntu 24.04 LTS install.

  autostart
  -
  I have also dropped the autostart file since the fwupd plugin is no longer 
included by default and Ubuntu already has ways to notify users about available 
apt updates (update-manager and unattended upgrades) and snaps already 
automatically update.

  Potential Problems
  ---
  gnome-software has an explicit Recommend: gnome-software-plugin-deb so that 
people upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will keep the deb support installed. That 
recommends will be dropped for Ubuntu 26.04 LTS because it won't be needed 
then. (There is a Depends on the virtual packages that enable installing apps.)

  Full Changelog Entries
  --
  gnome-software (46.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium

    * Fix typo in gnome-software-plugin-deb package description
    * Add lintian overrides for desktop-command-not-in-package

   -- Jeremy Bícha  Fri, 29 Mar 2024 16:45:30 -0400

  gnome-software (46.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium

    * Update Homepage
    * Release to Unstable

   -- Jeremy Bícha  Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:23:28 -0400

  gnome-software (46.0-2) experimental; urgency=medium

    * Split deb support into separate gnome-software-plugin-deb package
  (Closes: #1066030) (LP: #2019137, #2056767)
    * Have each plugin provide a virtual gnome-software-plugin package
    * Suggest all the gnome-software plugins
    * Recommend gnome-software-plugin-deb for upgrades
    * Split firmware update support into separate fwupd plugin & recommend it
  except on Ubuntu which provides a separate firmware-updater app
  Intentionally, do not have this provides the virtual gnome-software-plugin
  since it doesn't allow browsing apps.
    * Drop patch that hides upstreams Software Sources dialog (Closes: #1060803)
    * Drop Depends: software-properties-gtk
    * Stop recommending gnome-software-plugin-snap on Ubuntu

   -- Jeremy Bícha  Wed, 27 Mar 2024 18:33:03 -0400

  Build Logs
  --
  
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15898505/+listing-archive-extra

  Desktop Flavors Affected
  
  GNOME Software is currently included in the default install for only
  Ubuntu Cinnamon. See Joshua's comment below.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2056767/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2056767] Re: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split

2024-04-18 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, hi!

Quick question, the main concern is about splitting of the .deb into
multiple binaries. Can this not happen in the next cycle? I'm always
hesitant to bring in changes for LTS at the eleventh hour? What do you
think about that?

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056767

Title:
  FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
  with gnome-software packaging split

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  I request permission to sync the gnome-software packaging from Debian. The 
biggest change is splitting gnome-software's .deb support into a separate 
package, gnome-software-plugin-deb, to match the existing -snap and -flatpak 
packages. This will allow users and flavors to specifically opt into the parts 
of the GNOME Software experience they want. For instance, someone may want to 
use only the Flatpak part because they use the Snap Store to manage .debs and 
Snaps. Or maybe they want a different combination.

  This has been requested by multiple users on Ubuntu Discourse and at
  least one Launchpad bug and one Debian bug.

  fwupd plugin
  
  I am dropping the fwupd plugin (now in a separate package too) to Suggests so 
upgrades to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will likely get it uninstalled and new installs 
won't have it either unless a user explicitly installs it later.

  Ubuntu Desktop includes the firmware-updater snap. Several Ubuntu
  desktop flavors also include it. For people who don't want snaps,
  there is also the gnome-firmware app packaged as a .deb.

  Because Ubuntu already has update-manager to handle apt update
  notifications, I am also dropping the autostart file to reduce
  background RAM use.

  A few Ubuntu desktop flavors do not provide any firmware updater app
  at all. Ubuntu Budgie developers thought a firmware updater app was
  too technical for inclusion in the default Ubuntu 24.04 LTS install.

  autostart
  -
  I have also dropped the autostart file since the fwupd plugin is no longer 
included by default and Ubuntu already has ways to notify users about available 
apt updates (update-manager and unattended upgrades) and snaps already 
automatically update.

  Potential Problems
  ---
  gnome-software has an explicit Recommend: gnome-software-plugin-deb so that 
people upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will keep the deb support installed. That 
recommends will be dropped for Ubuntu 26.04 LTS because it won't be needed 
then. (There is a Depends on the virtual packages that enable installing apps.)

  Full Changelog Entries
  --
  gnome-software (46.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium

    * Fix typo in gnome-software-plugin-deb package description
    * Add lintian overrides for desktop-command-not-in-package

   -- Jeremy Bícha  Fri, 29 Mar 2024 16:45:30 -0400

  gnome-software (46.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium

    * Update Homepage
    * Release to Unstable

   -- Jeremy Bícha  Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:23:28 -0400

  gnome-software (46.0-2) experimental; urgency=medium

    * Split deb support into separate gnome-software-plugin-deb package
  (Closes: #1066030) (LP: #2019137, #2056767)
    * Have each plugin provide a virtual gnome-software-plugin package
    * Suggest all the gnome-software plugins
    * Recommend gnome-software-plugin-deb for upgrades
    * Split firmware update support into separate fwupd plugin & recommend it
  except on Ubuntu which provides a separate firmware-updater app
  Intentionally, do not have this provides the virtual gnome-software-plugin
  since it doesn't allow browsing apps.
    * Drop patch that hides upstreams Software Sources dialog (Closes: #1060803)
    * Drop Depends: software-properties-gtk
    * Stop recommending gnome-software-plugin-snap on Ubuntu

   -- Jeremy Bícha  Wed, 27 Mar 2024 18:33:03 -0400

  Build Logs
  --
  
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15898505/+listing-archive-extra

  Desktop Flavors Affected
  
  GNOME Software is currently included in the default install for only
  Ubuntu Cinnamon. See Joshua's comment below.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2056767/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2061857] Re: [FFe] enable the new GNOME OneDrive backend

2024-04-18 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey there,

Thanks for filing an FFe. I think, as you mentioned, this is low risk
since it doesn't change the existing features. The builds looks OK,
please make sure to smoke test before uploading to the archive.

That said, consider this FFe approved. Thanks,

Utkarsh

** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061857

Title:
  [FFe] enable the new GNOME OneDrive backend

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in gvfs package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  One of the new features of the new GNOME 46 is the support of
  Microsoft OneDrive accounts. The code relies on a new library
  'msgraph'. The MIR bug #2060035 just got approved and such we would
  like to turn on the option now in Noble.

  The changes are in

  - gnome-online-accounts, adding a new provider for OneDrive

  The package with the change has been built in the desktop ppa
  
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15971851/+listing-archive-extra

  The change is basically adding the libmsgraph-dev Build-Depends in
  debian/control and changing the option to true in debian/rules

  - gvfs, adding a new backend to be able to browse those locations from
  nautilus

  The package is similar built in our ppa
  
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15972025/+listing-archive-extra

  And the change are similar Build-Depends/rules option

  
  The regression potential is low since those are new backends and not changing 
existing features.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/2061857/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1951586] Re: Need option to specify wifi regulatory domain

2023-10-31 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Is this fixed in Noble?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951586

Title:
  Need option to specify wifi regulatory domain

Status in cloud-init:
  Invalid
Status in netplan:
  Fix Released
Status in NetworkManager:
  New
Status in netplan.io package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in netplan.io source package in Jammy:
  Triaged
Status in network-manager source package in Jammy:
  Incomplete
Status in netplan.io source package in Kinetic:
  Fix Released
Status in network-manager source package in Kinetic:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  It would be nice if netplan offered an option to specify the wifi
  regulatory domain (country code).

  
  For devices such as the Raspberry Pi you are currently advertising that users 
can simply setup Ubuntu Server headless by putting the wifi configuration 
details in cloudinit/netplan's "network-config" on the FAT partition of the SD 
card: 
https://ubuntu.com/tutorials/how-to-install-ubuntu-on-your-raspberry-pi#3-wifi-or-ethernet
  But an option to set the wifi country code there does not seem to exist, so 
may not work.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1951586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-10-31 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Juerg Haefliger (juergh)
   Status: Fix Released

** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Dave Jones (waveform)
   Status: Fix Released

** Also affects: pipewire (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Juerg Haefliger (juergh)
   Status: Invalid

** Also affects: linux-meta-raspi (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Juerg Haefliger (juergh)
   Status: Fix Released

** Also affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Juerg Haefliger (juergh)
   Status: Fix Released

** Also affects: libcamera (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Juerg Haefliger (juergh)
   Status: Triaged

** Also affects: rpi-eeprom (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Dave Jones (waveform)
   Status: Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libcamera in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037642

Title:
  [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

Status in Release Notes for Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libcamera package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in linux-meta-raspi package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-raspi package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in pipewire package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rpi-eeprom package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libcamera source package in Noble:
  Triaged
Status in linux-meta-raspi source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-raspi source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in mesa source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in pipewire source package in Noble:
  Invalid
Status in rpi-eeprom source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-settings source package in Noble:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

   * HWE for Raspberry Pi 5 https://raspberrypi.com/5

  [ Test Plan ]

   * Private builds tested on all existing/supported Raspberry Pi SKUs
  in armhf & arm64 variants

   * No regressions on any existing SKUs

   * Test that Raspberry Pi 5 boards work

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * Mesa is upgraded, and there are patches to mesa, the raspberry-pi
  specific provider this has been tested but not as extensively.
  Separately there is mesa FFe granted to upgrade to latest release,
  thus these changes piggy-back on top of it.

   * libcamera has new build-depends on new package libpisp for the
  raspberry-pi specific provider which also affects pipewire to provide
  full webcam support.

   * These dependencies, will need to make their way into gnome platform
  snaps to be usable by default in Firefox.

  [ Other Info ]

   * The proposed code changes have been tested in private, prior to
  public announcement

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/2037642/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2013107] Re: [lunar] GNOME does not display high contrast app icons

2023-10-31 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Wait, I think this is already fixed in Noble, isn't it? In that case, if
someone could confirm, could they adjust the bug status for Noble?

** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: High
   Status: Triaged

** Also affects: gnome-themes-extra (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Also affects: yaru-theme (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Won't Fix

** Changed in: gnome-themes-extra (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: Invalid => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2013107

Title:
  [lunar] GNOME does not display high contrast app icons

Status in Yaru Theme:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-themes-extra package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in yaru-theme package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell source package in Lunar:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-themes-extra source package in Lunar:
  New
Status in yaru-theme source package in Lunar:
  New
Status in gnome-shell source package in Mantic:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-themes-extra source package in Mantic:
  Invalid
Status in yaru-theme source package in Mantic:
  Won't Fix
Status in gnome-shell source package in Noble:
  Triaged
Status in gnome-themes-extra source package in Noble:
  New
Status in yaru-theme source package in Noble:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  gnome-accessibility-themes (3.28-2ubuntu1) offers an incomplete set of
  high contrast icons, resulting in a very inconsistent look when the
  user enables Accessibility > Seeing > High Contrast from gnome-
  control-center.  A screenshot showing of the current sad state of
  affairs is attached.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yaru/+bug/2013107/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2038761] Re: gnome-disk-utility does not give size of nvme disk

2023-10-12 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Tags added: regression-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to udisks2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038761

Title:
  gnome-disk-utility does not give size of nvme disk

Status in udisks:
  New
Status in udisks2 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Mantic gnome-disk-utility: 45.0-1ubuntu1 Size of nvme disk is blank while in 
Jammy 42.0-1ubuntu1 gives correct size.
  see attached image

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: gnome-disk-utility 45.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-7.7-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-7-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Oct  8 17:16:12 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-10-07 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10 "Mantic Minotaur" - Daily amd64 (20231005)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/udisks/+bug/2038761/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2038951] Re: Welcome To Ubuntu application not in specified language after installing offline.

2023-10-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Package changed: ubiquity (Ubuntu) => gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-initial-setup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038951

Title:
  Welcome To Ubuntu application not in specified language after
  installing offline.

Status in gnome-initial-setup package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I installed in swedish with no internet connection, and after the install 
completed and rebooted, everything was in swedish except the Welcome To Ubuntu 
application. This is not the case with an installation with internet access.
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-10-10 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu Legacy 23.10 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 
(20231010)
  Package: ubiquity (not installed)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-9.9-generic 6.5.3
  Tags: mantic wayland-session ubiquity-23.10.8
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-9-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo users
  _MarkForUpload: True

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-initial-setup/+bug/2038951/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2034664] Re: Meta.Rectangle is deprecated, use Mtk.Rectangle instead

2023-10-09 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock is not something that we (release
team) are planning to accept ahead of Mantic release, so we're going to
let it be in the unapproved queue and consider this for a 0-day SRU.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034664

Title:
  Meta.Rectangle is deprecated, use Mtk.Rectangle instead

Status in gnome-shell-extension-tiling-assistant package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  The gnome-shell 45.rc log fills with:

  Meta.Rectangle is deprecated, use Mtk.Rectangle instead

  [ Test case ]

  Run ubuntu with ubuntu extensions enabled (only).
  journalctl /usr/bin/gnome-shell should not contain any reference to 
Meta.Rectangle deprecation

  [ Regression potential ]

  Introspected types are not defined and so extensions my try to use
  undefined code.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-tiling-assistant/+bug/2034664/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2038783] Re: Exit code of locations mount script is not respecting error

2023-10-09 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock is not something that we (release
team) are planning to accept ahead of Mantic release, so we're going to
let it be in the unapproved queue and consider this for a 0-day SRU.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038783

Title:
  Exit code of locations mount script is not respecting error

Status in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  When mounting an external location a script is used to get the current
  default app for a type, its return error is parsed by the dock to
  provide users a feedback, but the returned code is not valid in case
  of error.

  [ Test case ]

  Run:
gjs -m 
/usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-d...@ubuntu.com/locationsWorker.js 
/foo/bar/baz
echo $?

  An error should be shown and the return code should be 15

  Doing instead

gjs -m 
/usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-d...@ubuntu.com/locationsWorker.js 
$HOME
echo $?

  The file manager desktop-id should be printed and the script should
  return 0.

  [ Regression Potential ]

  Some locations may not have a default handler and so not being
  launched

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/2038783/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1991022] Re: [FFe] Socket activation

2022-09-29 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Nathan,

Thank you for filing the FFe bug. The bug is well documented and
supported via attached logs and diff. Whilst this looks good for FFe,
please wait for an ACK from the actual Release team member. Thanks! \o/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to speech-dispatcher in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991022

Title:
  [FFe] Socket activation

Status in speech-dispatcher package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Description]

  Systemd socket activation for Speech Dispatcher.

    - Creates the speech-dispatcher.socket;
    - Modifies the server so that it can detect it was automatically launched 
by that socket activation; and
    - Modifies the Autotools files accordingly.

  [Rationale]

  It's relevance is described in [1], of which I quote the essential
  parts [my notes in brackets]:

  > Sandboxed applications [snaps] that use Speech Dispatcher currently bundle 
it inside of the sandbox, so that each application has its own "private" 
instance of Speech Dispatcher running. This works more or less, but it has the 
downside that speech dispatcher cannot coordinate simultaneous messages from 
multiple apps. When multiple sandboxed apps use Speech Dispatcher at the same 
time, the text reading overlaps.
  >
  > In order to solve this issue, I would really like to give sandboxed apps 
access to the Speech Dispatcher instance of the host.

  And then,

  > The only issue I see is having it auto launch. I think it would
  probably be a good step forward for speech-dispatcher to be auto
  launched by a systemd socket like other daemons already do on demand.
  That way the host speech-dispatcher with it's configuration would be
  used by all snaps,

  [Additional information]

  The changes are already merged upstream[2], but still not released.

  I have built and installed the package in Kinetic and verified that
  spd-say still causes the dispatcher spawn and emits sound. Upstream
  test can also confirm this.

  [1]: https://github.com/brailcom/speechd/issues/335
  [2]: https://github.com/brailcom/speechd/pull/763

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speech-dispatcher/+bug/1991022/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1923505] Re: thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-06-03 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Aaah, I see. It looks like another problem then. Gotcha! Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923505

Title:
  thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

Status in thunderbird package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  The build hangs forever when compiling the webrender rust crate (see
  
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.9.0+build2-0ubuntu3/+build/21368163).
  I'm attaching the full build log for future reference.

  This happens when building with rustc 1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu4 and 
1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu5 (the latter is the version currently in the hirsute 
release pocket).
  The build completes when building with rustc 1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1923505/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1923505] Re: thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-06-02 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
This is awesome! Would you mind submitting to Debian as well? I can
probably re-trigger the builds there to get this working and we can drop
the delta at some point.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923505

Title:
  thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

Status in thunderbird package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  The build hangs forever when compiling the webrender rust crate (see
  
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.9.0+build2-0ubuntu3/+build/21368163).
  I'm attaching the full build log for future reference.

  This happens when building with rustc 1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu4 and 
1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu5 (the latter is the version currently in the hirsute 
release pocket).
  The build completes when building with rustc 1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1923505/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1923505] Re: thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-05-28 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Gee, I wonder what's up with ci.d.net; it's basically dead for ppc64el
for thunderbird. I'll try to take a look at this on the Debian side when
I have some time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923505

Title:
  thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

Status in thunderbird package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  The build hangs forever when compiling the webrender rust crate (see
  
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.9.0+build2-0ubuntu3/+build/21368163).
  I'm attaching the full build log for future reference.

  This happens when building with rustc 1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu4 and 
1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu5 (the latter is the version currently in the hirsute 
release pocket).
  The build completes when building with rustc 1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1923505/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1923505] Re: thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-05-25 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
FWIW, this happens in Debian as well; cf:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/t/thunderbird/unstable/ppc64el/.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923505

Title:
  thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

Status in thunderbird package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  The build hangs forever when compiling the webrender rust crate (see
  
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.9.0+build2-0ubuntu3/+build/21368163).
  I'm attaching the full build log for future reference.

  This happens when building with rustc 1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu4 and 
1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu5 (the latter is the version currently in the hirsute 
release pocket).
  The build completes when building with rustc 1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1923505/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2020-06-08 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
It looks like some fixes were merged in GNOME/gtk:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1606 . Waiting for
them to be merged into ubuntu too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

Status in GNOME Terminal:
  New
Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  1. Open a gnome-terminal window (from the launcher or by pressing Ctrl + Alt 
+ T)
  2. "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 24; columns 80;"
  3. Maximize the window (by clicking on the maximize button, or double 
clicking the title bar, or dragging the window up to the panel)
  4. Do the same again to un-maximize the window
  5. Now "stty -a | grep rows" reports "rows 23; columns 79;"

  Each time I do this, the window keeps getting one character shorter
  and one character narrower!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: gnome-terminal 3.6.1-0ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-17.31-generic 3.11.10.3
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-17-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Mar  6 10:22:46 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-04-15 (1421 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta amd64 (20100406.1)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-29 (128 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp