[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: sane-backends (Debian)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

This bug was fixed in the package sane-backends -
1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2.4

---
sane-backends (1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2.4) bionic; urgency=medium

  * debian/patches/0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch:
- Support /usr/lib64/sane as location for SANE backends
  (LP: #1835220)

 -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:50:00
+0200

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

This bug was fixed in the package sane-backends - 1.0.29-0ubuntu5.2

---
sane-backends (1.0.29-0ubuntu5.2) focal; urgency=medium

  * debian/patches/0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch:
- Support /usr/lib64/sane as location for SANE backends
  (LP: #1835220)

 -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:47:00
+0200

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

Out of curiosity I also tried to scan on groovy. To make it work I had
to take two additional steps:

* Added brscan2 to /etc/sane.d/dll.conf (without that my scanner
  wasn't even found by scanimage -L)

* Added the same symlink as proved to be needed on bionic; see
  comment #7

So the situation for 3:d party scanners is anything but ideal.
Nevertheless, the conclusion is still that the change in question
improves the situation a bit. (And in focal it proved to be it.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 has now migrated to groovy-release.

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

Did the verification using a Brother MFC-240C USB scanner.

Preparations:

* Installed brscan2 (brscan2-0.2.5-1.amd64.deb)
* Installed libusb-0.1-4 (ought to be a dependency of brscan2
  but that's not the case)
* Added myself to the lp group (sudo adduser $USER lp)

focal
-
Verified the test case using version 1.0.29-0ubuntu5.2 of libsane, 
libsane-common and sane-utils from focal-proposed. The scanner was found and I 
could scan.

bionic
--
Verified the test case using version 1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2.4 of 
libsane1, libsane-common and sane-utils from bionic-proposed. The scanner was 
found, which is an improvement, but I could not scan.

brscan2 installs files not only in /usr/lib64/sane, but also directly in
/usr/lib64, and to be able to scan I had to add one of the symlinks
previously used to work around the absence of the proposed fix:

$ ls -l /usr/lib/libbr*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 sep 19 02:49 /usr/lib/libbrscandec2.so -> 
../lib64/libbrscandec2.so.1.0.0

So in my case this proved to be a fragile solution for bionic. But for
drivers which only installs in /usr/lib64/sane it should be a safe
solution of a long standing issue.

Conclusion
--
Even if the solution isn't sufficient for bionic in my case, it's a step in the 
right direction, and I would consider the proposed upload verified for both 
focal and bionic.

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic 
verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic 
verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Timo Aaltonen]

Hello Gunnar, or anyone else affected,

Accepted sane-backends into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-
backends/1.0.29-0ubuntu5.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

@Bartosz: Well, this bug should have been fixed +10 years ago. Finally
it was fixed in Debian, and I decided to backport to focal and bionic.
Skipped xenial since it will be EOL in less than a year. But please feel
free to do it if you think it's worth it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Bartosz Kosiorek]

Thanks! It will be great to also backport it to Xenial.
So following workaroun would no be needed:
https://kitson-consulting.co.uk/blog/ubuntu-brother-printer-scanner-network-setup

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

** Patch added: "sane-backends_lp1835220-bionic.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+attachment/5411680/+files/sane-backends_lp1835220-bionic.debdiff

** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

** Patch added: "sane-backends_lp1835220-focal.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+attachment/5411679/+files/sane-backends_lp1835220-focal.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ 
  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
- /usr/lib64/sane. It would be great if that directory could be supported
- too.
+ /usr/lib64/sane.
  
  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.
  
- If Debian accepts the proposal in , the
- change is a SRU candidate to bionic at first hand.
+ sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
+ and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and bionic.
+ 
+ [Test case]
+ 
+ * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
+   e.g. brscan2
+ 
+ * Try to scan with simple-scan
+ 
+ -> Find that the scanner is not found
+ 
+ * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
+   {focal,bionic}-proposed
+ 
+ * Try to scan again
+ 
+ -> Scanner found and scanning works
+ 
+ [Regression risk]
+ 
+ This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing patch,
+ so the regression risk should be minimal.

** Also affects: sane-backends (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Medium
   Status: Confirmed

** Also affects: sane-backends (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: sane-backends (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj)

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu Bionic)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in sane-backends source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  sane-backends 1.0.31-1~experimental1 adds support for /usr/lib64/sane,
  and so do the debdiffs attached to this bug report for focal and
  bionic.

  [Test case]

  * Configure an affected scanner with drivers installed via
e.g. brscan2

  * Try to scan with simple-scan

  -> Find that the scanner is not found

  * Install libsane{,1}, libsane-common and sane-utils from
{focal,bionic}-proposed

  * Try to scan again

  -> Scanner found and scanning works

  [Regression risk]

  This only adds a directory to the lib search path via an existing
  patch, so the regression risk should be minimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Mantas Kriaučiūnas]

** Changed in: sane-backends (Baltix)
Milestone: None => baltix-18.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane. It would be great if that directory could be
  supported too.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  If Debian accepts the proposal in ,
  the change is a SRU candidate to bionic at first hand.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Mantas Kriaučiūnas]

** Also affects: sane-backends (Baltix)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: sane-backends (Baltix)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: sane-backends (Baltix)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Baltix:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane. It would be great if that directory could be
  supported too.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  If Debian accepts the proposal in ,
  the change is a SRU candidate to bionic at first hand.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: sane-backends (Debian)
   Status: Fix Released => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane. It would be great if that directory could be
  supported too.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  If Debian accepts the proposal in ,
  the change is a SRU candidate to bionic at first hand.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: sane-backends (Debian)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane. It would be great if that directory could be
  supported too.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  If Debian accepts the proposal in ,
  the change is a SRU candidate to bionic at first hand.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: sane-backends (Debian)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane. It would be great if that directory could be
  supported too.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  If Debian accepts the proposal in ,
  the change is a SRU candidate to bionic at first hand.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1835220] Re: Please support /usr/lib64/sane

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: sane-backends (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to sane-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835220

Title:
  Please support /usr/lib64/sane

Status in sane-backends package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in sane-backends package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  The patch 0125-multiarch_dll_search_path.patch makes /usr/lib/sane be
  recognized as a directory for SANE backends. However, some .deb files
  with scanner drivers, typically provided by Brother, install files in
  /usr/lib64/sane. It would be great if that directory could be
  supported too.

  This issue has been discussed in bug #1728012, but was broken out from
  there to not block another more important change in bionic.

  If Debian accepts the proposal in ,
  the change is a SRU candidate to bionic at first hand.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1835220/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp