Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Release notes and downloads page have been updated on staging. Please give them a read and modify them as you see fit. I tried to go through the entire CHANGES list and pick out the "big" stuff. http://accumulo.staging.apache.org/release_notes/1.5.2.html http://accumulo.staging.apache.org/downloads/ The dist updates to the mirrors should be done late tonight, so I anticipate sending out the announcement email tomorrow sometime. On 9/19/14, 12:56 AM, Josh Elser wrote: Done * Javadocs updates * Nexus repo released Doing * Updated dist svn repo (to kick off mirror propagation) ToDo * Write some release notes * Update http://accumulo.apache.org/downloads/ What else have I missed? On 9/18/14, 10:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who made the time to participate. I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 Tag: 1.5.2rc1 SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a given artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, 8/18 5:00PM PT) - Josh
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Right, I was mainly thinking of new users, who may not be aware of 1.6.x. One cannot perform the (1.5 < 1.6) computation if one isn't aware of 1.6.x. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:57 AM, William Slacum < wilhelm.von.cl...@accumulo.net> wrote: > Not to be a total jerk, but what's unclear about 1.5 < 1.6? Lots of > projects have multiple release lines and it's not an issue. > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > > > +1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this > latest > > release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release narrative > is > > not clear and we should not muddle the waters. > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher > wrote: > > > > > Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can > batch > > > the two? > > > > > > My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x > adoption > > > when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to > > new > > > users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an > > > announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 > > second. > > > That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will > > still > > > inform 1.5.x users of updates. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser > > wrote: > > > > > > > Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who > > > made > > > > the time to participate. > > > > > > > > I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. > > > > > > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > > > > > >> Devs, > > > >> > > > >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > > > >> > > > >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > > > >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > > >> Staging Repository: > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > > > >> > > > >> Source tarball: > > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > > > >> > > > >> Binary tarball: > > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > > > >> > > > >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash > for a > > > >> given artifact.) > > > >> > > > >> Signing keys available at: > https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > > >> > > > >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved > > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= > > > >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= > > > >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B > > > >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > > > >> > > > >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM > > ET, > > > >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) > > > >> > > > >> - Josh > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Thanks for following up, Keith. On 9/19/14, 11:41 AM, Keith Turner wrote: +1 Test (Environment : 20 node EC2 cluster w/ ZK 3.4.5, Hadoop 2.3.0, and CentOS 6) * 24 hr RW test on a 20 node EC2 cluster against 1.5.2 RC1. * 24 hr CI w/o agitation. Verified successfully. Wrote 30.7B entries. Ran against 1.5.2 RC1 * 24 hr CI w/ agitation (killing tserver every 4 min). Verified successfully. Wrote 23.4B entries. Ran against 139bd83 1.5.2-SNAPSHOT Opened ACCUMULO-3140, ACCUMULO-3141, and ACCUMULO-3135 as a result of RW test. On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 Tag: 1.5.2rc1 SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a given artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a7 6363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, 8/18 5:00PM PT) - Josh
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
I agree w/ Bill and Corey. I don't think there is anything confusing about 1.5 < 1.6. Also if someone thinks of something that is confusing, we can document that on the website in release notes and/or on download page. I think its ok to make the 1.5.2 announcement independently from 1.6.1. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Corey Nolet wrote: > If we are concerned with confusion about adoption of new versions, we > should make a point to articulate the purpose very clearly in each of the > announcements. I was in the combined camp an hour ago and now I'm also > thinking we should keep them separate. > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > No we did not bundle any release announcements prior. I also have to > agree > > with Bill -- I don't really see how there would be confusion with a > > properly worded announcement. > > > > Happy to work with anyone who has concerns in this regard to come up with > > something that is agreeable. I do think they should be separate. > > > > > > On 9/19/14, 1:02 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > > > >> Did we bundle 1.5.1/1.6.0? If not, they were fairly close together, I > >> think. Historically, we have not done a great job of distinguishing our > >> release lines, so that has led to confusion. Maybe I'm on the path to > >> talking myself out of a combined announcement here. > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, William Slacum < > >> wilhelm.von.cl...@accumulo.net> wrote: > >> > >> Not to be a total jerk, but what's unclear about 1.5 < 1.6? Lots of > >>> projects have multiple release lines and it's not an issue. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mike Drob > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this > > >>> latest > >>> > release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release > narrative > > >>> is > >>> > not clear and we should not muddle the waters. > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher > > >>> wrote: > >>> > > Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can > > > batch > >>> > the two? > > > > My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x > > > adoption > >>> > when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to > > > new > > > users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an > > announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 > > > second. > > > That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will > > > still > > > inform 1.5.x users of updates. > > > > > > -- > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser > > > wrote: > > > > > Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those > who > >> > > made > > > >> the time to participate. > >> > >> I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. > >> > >> On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> > >> Devs, > >>> > >>> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > >>> > >>> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > >>> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > >>> Staging Repository: > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > >>> > >>> Source tarball: > >>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > >>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > >>> > >>> Binary tarball: > >>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > >>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > >>> > >>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash > >>> > >> for a > >>> > given artifact.) > >>> > >>> Signing keys available at: > >>> > >> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > >>> > > >>> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= > >>> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= > >>> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > >>> > >>> > >>> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B > >>> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > >>> > >>> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 > 8:00PM > >>> > >> ET, > > > 8/18 5:00PM PT) > >>> > >>> - Josh > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
+1 Test (Environment : 20 node EC2 cluster w/ ZK 3.4.5, Hadoop 2.3.0, and CentOS 6) * 24 hr RW test on a 20 node EC2 cluster against 1.5.2 RC1. * 24 hr CI w/o agitation. Verified successfully. Wrote 30.7B entries. Ran against 1.5.2 RC1 * 24 hr CI w/ agitation (killing tserver every 4 min). Verified successfully. Wrote 23.4B entries. Ran against 139bd83 1.5.2-SNAPSHOT Opened ACCUMULO-3140, ACCUMULO-3141, and ACCUMULO-3135 as a result of RW test. On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > > Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > > Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a > given artifact.) > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a7 > 6363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries > using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > > Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, > 8/18 5:00PM PT) > > - Josh >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
If we are concerned with confusion about adoption of new versions, we should make a point to articulate the purpose very clearly in each of the announcements. I was in the combined camp an hour ago and now I'm also thinking we should keep them separate. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > No we did not bundle any release announcements prior. I also have to agree > with Bill -- I don't really see how there would be confusion with a > properly worded announcement. > > Happy to work with anyone who has concerns in this regard to come up with > something that is agreeable. I do think they should be separate. > > > On 9/19/14, 1:02 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > >> Did we bundle 1.5.1/1.6.0? If not, they were fairly close together, I >> think. Historically, we have not done a great job of distinguishing our >> release lines, so that has led to confusion. Maybe I'm on the path to >> talking myself out of a combined announcement here. >> >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, William Slacum < >> wilhelm.von.cl...@accumulo.net> wrote: >> >> Not to be a total jerk, but what's unclear about 1.5 < 1.6? Lots of >>> projects have multiple release lines and it's not an issue. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mike Drob wrote: >>> >>> +1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this >>> latest >>> release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release narrative >>> is >>> not clear and we should not muddle the waters. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher >>> wrote: >>> Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can > batch >>> the two? > > My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x > adoption >>> when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to > new > users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an > announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 > second. > That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will > still > inform 1.5.x users of updates. > > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser > wrote: > > Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who >> > made > >> the time to participate. >> >> I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. >> >> On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >> >> Devs, >>> >>> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 >>> >>> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 >>> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >>> Staging Repository: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ >>> >>> Source tarball: >>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz >>> >>> Binary tarball: >>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >>> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz >>> >>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash >>> >> for a >>> given artifact.) >>> >>> Signing keys available at: >>> >> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >>> >>> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= >>> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= >>> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >>> >>> >>> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B >>> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. >>> >>> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM >>> >> ET, > 8/18 5:00PM PT) >>> >>> - Josh >>> >>> >> > >>> >>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
No we did not bundle any release announcements prior. I also have to agree with Bill -- I don't really see how there would be confusion with a properly worded announcement. Happy to work with anyone who has concerns in this regard to come up with something that is agreeable. I do think they should be separate. On 9/19/14, 1:02 AM, Mike Drob wrote: Did we bundle 1.5.1/1.6.0? If not, they were fairly close together, I think. Historically, we have not done a great job of distinguishing our release lines, so that has led to confusion. Maybe I'm on the path to talking myself out of a combined announcement here. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, William Slacum < wilhelm.von.cl...@accumulo.net> wrote: Not to be a total jerk, but what's unclear about 1.5 < 1.6? Lots of projects have multiple release lines and it's not an issue. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mike Drob wrote: +1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this latest release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release narrative is not clear and we should not muddle the waters. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher wrote: Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can batch the two? My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x adoption when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to new users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 second. That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will still inform 1.5.x users of updates. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who made the time to participate. I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 Tag: 1.5.2rc1 SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a given artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, 8/18 5:00PM PT) - Josh
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Did we bundle 1.5.1/1.6.0? If not, they were fairly close together, I think. Historically, we have not done a great job of distinguishing our release lines, so that has led to confusion. Maybe I'm on the path to talking myself out of a combined announcement here. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, William Slacum < wilhelm.von.cl...@accumulo.net> wrote: > Not to be a total jerk, but what's unclear about 1.5 < 1.6? Lots of > projects have multiple release lines and it's not an issue. > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > > > +1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this > latest > > release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release narrative > is > > not clear and we should not muddle the waters. > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher > wrote: > > > > > Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can > batch > > > the two? > > > > > > My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x > adoption > > > when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to > > new > > > users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an > > > announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 > > second. > > > That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will > > still > > > inform 1.5.x users of updates. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser > > wrote: > > > > > > > Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who > > > made > > > > the time to participate. > > > > > > > > I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. > > > > > > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > > > > > >> Devs, > > > >> > > > >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > > > >> > > > >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > > > >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > > >> Staging Repository: > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > > > >> > > > >> Source tarball: > > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > > > >> > > > >> Binary tarball: > > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > > > >> > > > >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash > for a > > > >> given artifact.) > > > >> > > > >> Signing keys available at: > https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > > >> > > > >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved > > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= > > > >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= > > > >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B > > > >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > > > >> > > > >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM > > ET, > > > >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) > > > >> > > > >> - Josh > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Not to be a total jerk, but what's unclear about 1.5 < 1.6? Lots of projects have multiple release lines and it's not an issue. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > +1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this latest > release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release narrative is > not clear and we should not muddle the waters. > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher wrote: > > > Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can batch > > the two? > > > > My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x adoption > > when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to > new > > users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an > > announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 > second. > > That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will > still > > inform 1.5.x users of updates. > > > > > > -- > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser > wrote: > > > > > Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who > > made > > > the time to participate. > > > > > > I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. > > > > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > > > >> Devs, > > >> > > >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > > >> > > >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > > >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > >> Staging Repository: > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > > >> > > >> Source tarball: > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > > >> > > >> Binary tarball: > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > > >> > > >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a > > >> given artifact.) > > >> > > >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > >> > > >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= > > >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= > > >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > >> > > >> > > >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B > > >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > > >> > > >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM > ET, > > >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) > > >> > > >> - Josh > > >> > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Done * Javadocs updates * Nexus repo released Doing * Updated dist svn repo (to kick off mirror propagation) ToDo * Write some release notes * Update http://accumulo.apache.org/downloads/ What else have I missed? On 9/18/14, 10:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who made the time to participate. I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 Tag: 1.5.2rc1 SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a given artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, 8/18 5:00PM PT) - Josh
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
+1 to combining. I've already had questions about upgrading to "this latest release" from somebody currently on the 1.6 line. Our release narrative is not clear and we should not muddle the waters. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher wrote: > Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can batch > the two? > > My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x adoption > when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to new > users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an > announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 second. > That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will still > inform 1.5.x users of updates. > > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who > made > > the time to participate. > > > > I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. > > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > >> Devs, > >> > >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > >> > >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > >> Staging Repository: > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > >> > >> Source tarball: > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > >> > >> Binary tarball: > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > >> > >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a > >> given artifact.) > >> > >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > >> > >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= > >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= > >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > >> > >> > >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B > >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > >> > >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, > >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) > >> > >> - Josh > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Doesn't matter much to me how we do a formal announcement. I think adequate description in 1.5.2 (that it is really a bug-fix release for 1.5) should assuage most fears of confusion between 1.5 and 1.6. My biggest concern would be trivializing the 1.5.2 release. Yes, it's not what we necessarily want people to use, but it is still important for those on 1.5 who still want/need to stay on the 1.5 line. Lots of people have made contributions to 1.5.2 (myself included) -- an announcement is also a bit of recognition for them. On 9/18/14, 10:27 PM, Christopher wrote: Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can batch the two? My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x adoption when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to new users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 second. That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will still inform 1.5.x users of updates. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who made the time to participate. I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 Tag: 1.5.2rc1 SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a given artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, 8/18 5:00PM PT) - Josh
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Should we wait to do a release announcement until 1.6.1, so we can batch the two? My main concern here is that I don't want to encourage new 1.5.x adoption when we have 1.6.x, and having two announcements could be confusing to new users who aren't sure which version to start using. We could issue an announcement that primarily mentions 1.6.1, and also mentions 1.5.2 second. That way, people will see 1.6.x as the stable/focus release, but will still inform 1.5.x users of updates. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who made > the time to participate. > > I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Devs, >> >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 >> >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >> Staging Repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ >> >> Source tarball: >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz >> >> Binary tarball: >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz >> >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a >> given artifact.) >> >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >> >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >> >> >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. >> >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) >> >> - Josh >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Vote passes with 3 +1's and nothing else. Huge thank you to those who made the time to participate. I'll finish up the rest of the release work tonight. On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 Tag: 1.5.2rc1 SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a given artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, 8/18 5:00PM PT) - Josh
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
On 9/18/14, 7:15 PM, Christopher wrote: > > > >Does anybody consider the outstanding issues identified here to be > >blockers? Or just nice-to-have, worth taking a few days to try to get >done > >before RC2? > > > >I do not consider any of the issues I found to be blockers. None are new >issues in 1.5.2. > > Good. I'm in agreement with Josh's statement about proceeding and just making 1.5.3 later (though I'd prefer focus switch to 1.6.x after 1.6.1 is released and only do critical fixes for 1.5.x). Yeah, that's fine. I don't really see anything new going into 1.5 (obvious, given how we do versioning), but I don't mind continuing to get things together if we have bug fixes for the 1.5 line.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Christopher wrote: > > > I think we agreed previously on the list that we aren't going to allow > vote > > extensions. However, I think the vote is screwed up anyway, because it > says > > > > We do not have to extend on my account. We already have 3 +1s. Also I > ran CI fo 24 hr against RC0. For RC0 I ran w/ agitation. For RC1 I am > running w/o agitation. > > > > it closes in August, and we're in September. So, I don't think it would > > hurt to go ahead and invalidate the vote, and proceed to RC2. > > > > I think we can reasonably infer the intended date. > > Okay, I agree. > > > > > Does anybody consider the outstanding issues identified here to be > > blockers? Or just nice-to-have, worth taking a few days to try to get > done > > before RC2? > > > > I do not consider any of the issues I found to be blockers. None are new > issues in 1.5.2. > > Good. I'm in agreement with Josh's statement about proceeding and just making 1.5.3 later (though I'd prefer focus switch to 1.6.x after 1.6.1 is released and only do critical fixes for 1.5.x). > > > > > > -- > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > > > > > I was not paying close attention to the close date. I started a CI run > at > > > ~9pm ET last night against RC1. I will shut down ingest and run a > > > verify in a bit. Would anyone be opposed to waiting till Friday > morning? > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Josh Elser > > wrote: > > > > > > > Reminder that this closes in a few hours. We're currently at about > 25% > > of > > > > PMC participating, would be much nicer to more activity... > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > > > > > >> Devs, > > > >> > > > >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > > > >> > > > >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > > > >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > > >> Staging Repository: > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > > > >> > > > >> Source tarball: > > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > > > >> > > > >> Binary tarball: > > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > > > >> > > > >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash > for a > > > >> given artifact.) > > > >> > > > >> Signing keys available at: > https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > > >> > > > >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved > > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= > > > >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= > > > >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B > > > >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > > > >> > > > >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM > > ET, > > > >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) > > > >> > > > >> - Josh > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Christopher wrote: > I think we agreed previously on the list that we aren't going to allow vote > extensions. However, I think the vote is screwed up anyway, because it says > We do not have to extend on my account. We already have 3 +1s. Also I ran CI fo 24 hr against RC0. For RC0 I ran w/ agitation. For RC1 I am running w/o agitation. > it closes in August, and we're in September. So, I don't think it would > hurt to go ahead and invalidate the vote, and proceed to RC2. > I think we can reasonably infer the intended date. > > Does anybody consider the outstanding issues identified here to be > blockers? Or just nice-to-have, worth taking a few days to try to get done > before RC2? > I do not consider any of the issues I found to be blockers. None are new issues in 1.5.2. > > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > > > I was not paying close attention to the close date. I started a CI run at > > ~9pm ET last night against RC1. I will shut down ingest and run a > > verify in a bit. Would anyone be opposed to waiting till Friday morning? > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Josh Elser > wrote: > > > > > Reminder that this closes in a few hours. We're currently at about 25% > of > > > PMC participating, would be much nicer to more activity... > > > > > > > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > > > >> Devs, > > >> > > >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > > >> > > >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > > >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > >> Staging Repository: > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > > >> > > >> Source tarball: > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > > >> > > >> Binary tarball: > > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > > >> > > >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a > > >> given artifact.) > > >> > > >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > >> > > >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= > > >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= > > >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > >> > > >> > > >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B > > >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > > >> > > >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM > ET, > > >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) > > >> > > >> - Josh > > >> > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Oh my, my apologies. I didn't even copy-paste that snippet, I just had an extreme brain fart. If there was any confusion about the ending date/time, let me know and I can re-roll. As far as the issues found, I'd prefer to get out 1.5.2 and consider 1.5.3, say, before the end of the year. We have a number of fixes that are already good for 1.5.2. I think we should get those out and we can improve the rest at our leisure. - Josh On 9/18/14, 6:41 PM, Christopher wrote: I think we agreed previously on the list that we aren't going to allow vote extensions. However, I think the vote is screwed up anyway, because it says it closes in August, and we're in September. So, I don't think it would hurt to go ahead and invalidate the vote, and proceed to RC2. Does anybody consider the outstanding issues identified here to be blockers? Or just nice-to-have, worth taking a few days to try to get done before RC2? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Keith Turner wrote: I was not paying close attention to the close date. I started a CI run at ~9pm ET last night against RC1. I will shut down ingest and run a verify in a bit. Would anyone be opposed to waiting till Friday morning? On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Reminder that this closes in a few hours. We're currently at about 25% of PMC participating, would be much nicer to more activity... On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 Tag: 1.5.2rc1 SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a given artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, 8/18 5:00PM PT) - Josh
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
I think we agreed previously on the list that we aren't going to allow vote extensions. However, I think the vote is screwed up anyway, because it says it closes in August, and we're in September. So, I don't think it would hurt to go ahead and invalidate the vote, and proceed to RC2. Does anybody consider the outstanding issues identified here to be blockers? Or just nice-to-have, worth taking a few days to try to get done before RC2? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > I was not paying close attention to the close date. I started a CI run at > ~9pm ET last night against RC1. I will shut down ingest and run a > verify in a bit. Would anyone be opposed to waiting till Friday morning? > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > Reminder that this closes in a few hours. We're currently at about 25% of > > PMC participating, would be much nicer to more activity... > > > > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > >> Devs, > >> > >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > >> > >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > >> Staging Repository: > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > >> > >> Source tarball: > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > >> > >> Binary tarball: > >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > >> > >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a > >> given artifact.) > >> > >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > >> > >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= > >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= > >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > >> > >> > >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B > >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > >> > >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, > >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) > >> > >> - Josh > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
In addition to ACCUMULO-3135, I also ran into ACCUMULO-3140 and ACCUMULO-3141 while running RW against RC1 On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Reminder that this closes in a few hours. We're currently at about 25% of > PMC participating, would be much nicer to more activity... > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Devs, >> >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 >> >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >> Staging Repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ >> >> Source tarball: >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz >> >> Binary tarball: >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz >> >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a >> given artifact.) >> >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >> >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >> >> >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. >> >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) >> >> - Josh >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
I was not paying close attention to the close date. I started a CI run at ~9pm ET last night against RC1. I will shut down ingest and run a verify in a bit. Would anyone be opposed to waiting till Friday morning? On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Reminder that this closes in a few hours. We're currently at about 25% of > PMC participating, would be much nicer to more activity... > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Devs, >> >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 >> >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >> Staging Repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ >> >> Source tarball: >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz >> >> Binary tarball: >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz >> >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a >> given artifact.) >> >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >> >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >> >> >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. >> >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) >> >> - Josh >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
+1 - verified source dist hash - built from tag - ran koverse integration tests against 1.5.2 On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Reminder that this closes in a few hours. We're currently at about 25% of > PMC participating, would be much nicer to more activity... > > > On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Devs, >> >> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 >> >> Tag: 1.5.2rc1 >> SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >> Staging Repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ >> >> Source tarball: >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz >> >> Binary tarball: >> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. >> 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz >> >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a >> given artifact.) >> >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS >> >> Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a= >> blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb= >> 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c >> >> >> Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B >> entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. >> >> Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, >> 8/18 5:00PM PT) >> >> - Josh >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Reminder that this closes in a few hours. We're currently at about 25% of PMC participating, would be much nicer to more activity... On 9/15/14, 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 Tag: 1.5.2rc1 SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a given artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, 8/18 5:00PM PT) - Josh
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Saw ACCUMULO-3135. I am going to look into this more tomorrow. On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > > Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > > Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a > given artifact.) > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a7 > 6363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries > using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > > Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, > 8/18 5:00PM PT) > > - Josh >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
+1 Verified GPG signatures (those embedded in the RPMs included) and all hashes. Verified each jar is accompanied by a javadoc and source jar. Verified contents of jars don't contain classes from non-org/apache/accumulo dependencies. Verified all jars are sealed. Verified tag matches source tarball and the specified sha1. (don't forget to use --sign when creating final tag). Verified all build tests pass with -Dhadoop.profile=1 and -Dhadoop.profile=2 Note: built with OpenJDK 7, Maven 3.2.3, and CentOS 6.5 -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Eric Newton wrote: > +1 > I pulled the source, verified hashes and signature. Everything built as > expected. SunnyDay functional test passes. > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > Devs, > > > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > > > > Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > > SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > > > > Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > > Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > > 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a > > given artifact.) > > > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > > > Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > > > repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a7 > > 6363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > > > Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B > entries > > using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > > > > Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, > > 8/18 5:00PM PT) > > > > - Josh > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
+1 I pulled the source, verified hashes and signature. Everything built as expected. SunnyDay functional test passes. On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 > > Tag: 1.5.2rc1 > SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ > > Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > 2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz > Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5. > 2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a > given artifact.) > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS > > Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a7 > 6363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c > > Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries > using CI w/ agitation over rc0. > > Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, > 8/18 5:00PM PT) > > - Josh >
[VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 RC1
Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.5.2 Tag: 1.5.2rc1 SHA1: 039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/ Source tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-src.tar.gz Binary tarball: http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1014/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.5.2/accumulo-1.5.2-bin.tar.gz (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a given artifact.) Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS Over 1.5.1, we have 109 issues resolved https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=c2892d6e9b1c6c9b96b2a58fc901a76363ece8b0;hb=039a2c28bdd474805f34ee33f138b009edda6c4c Testing: all unit and functional tests are passing and ingested 1B entries using CI w/ agitation over rc0. Vote will be open until Friday, August 19th 12:00AM UTC (8/18 8:00PM ET, 8/18 5:00PM PT) - Josh
