[VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Corey Nolet]

  Devs,

Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2

Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
Staging Repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/

Source tarball:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
Binary tarball:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
(Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
given artifact.)

Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS

Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3

Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.

API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html

API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html

The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC (1/30
8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Christopher]

Does it matter that this was built with Java 1.7.0_25? Is that going to
cause issues running in a 1.6 JRE?


--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  wrote:

>   Devs,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
>
> Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> Staging Repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
>
> Source tarball:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> Binary tarball:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
>
> Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
>
> API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
>
> API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
>
> The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC (1/30
> 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Sean Busbey]

If the binaries show class files with major version > 50 (e.g. java 7 = 51,
java 8 = 52), then Java 6 JVMs won't be able to run them.

A quick check of the classes in the binary:

$ curl -O
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
  % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime Time
 Current
 Dload  Upload   Total   SpentLeft
 Speed
100 14.2M  100 14.2M0 0  2254k  0  0:00:06  0:00:06 --:--:--
2973k
$ tar xzf accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
$ cd accumulo-1.6.2
$ for jar in `ls -1 lib/accumulo-*`; do jar xf ${jar}; done
$ for clazz in `find org/apache/accumulo -name *.class`; do javap -verbose
`echo ${clazz} | sed -e 's/\//./g' | sed -e 's/\.class$//' | sed -e
's/\\$/./g'` | grep "major version:"; done | uniq -c
5208   major version: 50


So that looks fine. I have seen cases before where using the maven compiler
plugin's -source -target options without the correct rt.jar file resulted
in Java 6 JVM compatible class files that still referenced JRE classes that
weren't available.

Attempting to compile the source tarball with a Java 6 JDK should cause
that to show up. The nightly build I do outside of ASF infra runs with
JDK6u31 and it succeeded yesterday on the 1.6 dev branch. So as of
commit b2f7e9 on the 1.6 branch we're fine (I did not check yet how rc3
compares to the 1.6 dev branch).

(as an aside, I couldn't find us actually documenting anywhere in the user
manual or README what java versions we support.)


On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Christopher https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm&fs=1&tf=1&to=ctubb...@apache.org>>
wrote:

> Does it matter that this was built with Java 1.7.0_25? Is that going to
> cause issues running in a 1.6 JRE?
>
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  >
> wrote:
>
> >   Devs,
> >
> > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> >
> > Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> > SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> > Staging Repository:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> >
> > Source tarball:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> > Binary tarball:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for
> a
> > given artifact.)
> >
> > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >
> > Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> >
> > Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> >
> > API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> >
> > API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> >
> > The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC (1/30
> > 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> >
>



-- 
Sean

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Andrew Wells]

My $0.02

I still see a lot of Java 6, so I would suggest using that for builds etc
to ensure compatibility with that version.


On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Sean Busbey  wrote:

> If the binaries show class files with major version > 50 (e.g. java 7 = 51,
> java 8 = 52), then Java 6 JVMs won't be able to run them.
>
> A quick check of the classes in the binary:
>
> $ curl -O
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
>   % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime Time
>  Current
>  Dload  Upload   Total   SpentLeft
>  Speed
> 100 14.2M  100 14.2M0 0  2254k  0  0:00:06  0:00:06 --:--:--
> 2973k
> $ tar xzf accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> $ cd accumulo-1.6.2
> $ for jar in `ls -1 lib/accumulo-*`; do jar xf ${jar}; done
> $ for clazz in `find org/apache/accumulo -name *.class`; do javap -verbose
> `echo ${clazz} | sed -e 's/\//./g' | sed -e 's/\.class$//' | sed -e
> 's/\\$/./g'` | grep "major version:"; done | uniq -c
> 5208   major version: 50
>
>
> So that looks fine. I have seen cases before where using the maven compiler
> plugin's -source -target options without the correct rt.jar file resulted
> in Java 6 JVM compatible class files that still referenced JRE classes that
> weren't available.
>
> Attempting to compile the source tarball with a Java 6 JDK should cause
> that to show up. The nightly build I do outside of ASF infra runs with
> JDK6u31 and it succeeded yesterday on the 1.6 dev branch. So as of
> commit b2f7e9 on the 1.6 branch we're fine (I did not check yet how rc3
> compares to the 1.6 dev branch).
>
> (as an aside, I couldn't find us actually documenting anywhere in the user
> manual or README what java versions we support.)
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Christopher  >
> wrote:
>
> > Does it matter that this was built with Java 1.7.0_25? Is that going to
> > cause issues running in a 1.6 JRE?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > >   Devs,
> > >
> > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> > >
> > > Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> > > SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> > > Staging Repository:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> > >
> > > Source tarball:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> > > Binary tarball:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> for
> > a
> > > given artifact.)
> > >
> > > Signing keys available at:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > >
> > > Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> > >
> > > Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> > >
> > > API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> > >
> > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> > >
> > > The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC
> (1/30
> > > 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>



-- 
*Andrew George Wells*
*Software Engineer*
*awe...@clearedgeit.com *

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Keith Turner]

I started running CI against RC3 a bit ago and started seeing
[ACCUMULO-3541][1].  Going to look into it.

[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3541

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  wrote:

>   Devs,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
>
> Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> Staging Repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
>
> Source tarball:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> Binary tarball:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
>
> Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
>
> API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
>
> API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
>
> The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC (1/30
> 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Keith Turner]

-1 because of ACCUMULO-3541

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  wrote:

>   Devs,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
>
> Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> Staging Repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
>
> Source tarball:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> Binary tarball:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
>
> Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
>
> API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
>
> API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
>
> The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC (1/30
> 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Corey Nolet]

I'll start on an RC4 but leave this open for awhile in case any more issues
like pop up like this.
On Jan 28, 2015 5:24 PM, "Keith Turner"  wrote:

> -1 because of ACCUMULO-3541
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  wrote:
>
> >   Devs,
> >
> > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> >
> > Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> > SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> > Staging Repository:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> >
> > Source tarball:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> > Binary tarball:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for
> a
> > given artifact.)
> >
> > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >
> > Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> >
> > Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> >
> > API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> >
> > API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> >
> > The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC (1/30
> > 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Keith Turner]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Corey Nolet  wrote:

> I'll start on an RC4 but leave this open for awhile in case any more issues
> like pop up like this.
>

ok .. I am going to work on fixing 3541.  Also I left the CI test running
for RC3 and will run verify tomorrow after 24hr.


> On Jan 28, 2015 5:24 PM, "Keith Turner"  wrote:
>
> > -1 because of ACCUMULO-3541
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  wrote:
> >
> > >   Devs,
> > >
> > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> > >
> > > Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> > > SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> > > Staging Repository:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> > >
> > > Source tarball:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> > > Binary tarball:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> for
> > a
> > > given artifact.)
> > >
> > > Signing keys available at:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > >
> > > Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> > >
> > > Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> > >
> > > API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> > >
> > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> > >
> > > The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC
> (1/30
> > > 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Christopher]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Sean Busbey  wrote:
[snip]

> So that looks fine. I have seen cases before where using the maven compiler
> plugin's -source -target options without the correct rt.jar file resulted
> in Java 6 JVM compatible class files that still referenced JRE classes that
> weren't available.
>
>
Right, my main concern was this kind of problem (which I think can be
resolved by setting bootstrap classpath during compile).


> Attempting to compile the source tarball with a Java 6 JDK should cause
> that to show up.

[snip]

That's what I'd hope also, but I think there are fringe cases that wouldn't
catch this: use of constants which differ in value between versions,
changes between interface/abstract class, and maybe a few other fringe
cases that wouldn't be caught at compile time, but could cause runtime
errors. (I'm no expert on this, though, which is why I phrased it as a
question initially.)


> (as an aside, I couldn't find us actually documenting anywhere in the user
> manual or README what java versions we support.)
>
>
Maybe it'd be good to document it somewhere, but the java version is
specified in the pom, and has been:
Java 6 or newer for Accumulo < 1.7
Java 7 or newer for Accumulo >= 1.7

FWIW, we don't really document any other compatible dependency versions
either, outside the pom.xml, but divergence from this I'd typically expect
a downstream package maintainer to deal with (except for the fact that many
people use the upstream binaries directly, and that's a valid support case
for our community). More FWIW: if we were using maven to generate a site,
this kind of documentation could be generated automatically.


> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Christopher  >
> wrote:
>
> > Does it matter that this was built with Java 1.7.0_25? Is that going to
> > cause issues running in a 1.6 JRE?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > >   Devs,
> > >
> > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> > >
> > > Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> > > SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> > > Staging Repository:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> > >
> > > Source tarball:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> > > Binary tarball:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> for
> > a
> > > given artifact.)
> > >
> > > Signing keys available at:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > >
> > > Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> > >
> > > Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> > >
> > > API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> > >
> > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> > >
> > > The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC
> (1/30
> > > 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Corey Nolet]

Ok. I'm documenting this in the release procedures I've been working on and
will cut RC4 with jdk1.6. I think its fair at this point to steer
developers towards just cutting the release with the actual jdk version
that matches the version of the bytecode.
On Jan 28, 2015 7:18 PM, "Christopher"  wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Sean Busbey  wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > So that looks fine. I have seen cases before where using the maven
> compiler
> > plugin's -source -target options without the correct rt.jar file resulted
> > in Java 6 JVM compatible class files that still referenced JRE classes
> that
> > weren't available.
> >
> >
> Right, my main concern was this kind of problem (which I think can be
> resolved by setting bootstrap classpath during compile).
>
>
> > Attempting to compile the source tarball with a Java 6 JDK should cause
> > that to show up.
>
> [snip]
>
> That's what I'd hope also, but I think there are fringe cases that wouldn't
> catch this: use of constants which differ in value between versions,
> changes between interface/abstract class, and maybe a few other fringe
> cases that wouldn't be caught at compile time, but could cause runtime
> errors. (I'm no expert on this, though, which is why I phrased it as a
> question initially.)
>
>
> > (as an aside, I couldn't find us actually documenting anywhere in the
> user
> > manual or README what java versions we support.)
> >
> >
> Maybe it'd be good to document it somewhere, but the java version is
> specified in the pom, and has been:
> Java 6 or newer for Accumulo < 1.7
> Java 7 or newer for Accumulo >= 1.7
>
> FWIW, we don't really document any other compatible dependency versions
> either, outside the pom.xml, but divergence from this I'd typically expect
> a downstream package maintainer to deal with (except for the fact that many
> people use the upstream binaries directly, and that's a valid support case
> for our community). More FWIW: if we were using maven to generate a site,
> this kind of documentation could be generated automatically.
>
>
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Christopher  >  >>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Does it matter that this was built with Java 1.7.0_25? Is that going to
> > > cause issues running in a 1.6 JRE?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  > >  >>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >   Devs,
> > > >
> > > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> > > >
> > > > Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> > > > SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> > > > Staging Repository:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> > > >
> > > > Source tarball:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> > > > Binary tarball:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> > for
> > > a
> > > > given artifact.)
> > > >
> > > > Signing keys available at:
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> > > >
> > > > Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> > > >
> > > > API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> > > >
> > > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC
> > (1/30
> > > > 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Keith Turner]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Corey Nolet  wrote:

> I'll start on an RC4 but leave this open for awhile in case any more issues
> like pop up like this.
>

I think I have finished up 3541.  However I am seeing ACCUMULO-3545[1] that
I need to investigate.

[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3545



> On Jan 28, 2015 5:24 PM, "Keith Turner"  wrote:
>
> > -1 because of ACCUMULO-3541
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Corey Nolet  wrote:
> >
> > >   Devs,
> > >
> > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> > >
> > > Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> > > SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> > > Staging Repository:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> > >
> > > Source tarball:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> > > Binary tarball:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> for
> > a
> > > given artifact.)
> > >
> > > Signing keys available at:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > >
> > > Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> > >
> > > Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> > >
> > > API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> > >
> > > API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> > >
> > > The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC
> (1/30
> > > 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Josh Elser]

Given the stuff Keith found already, I'm -1, but I did take some time 
this RC to rerun some tests. I had one IT that failed on me from the 
source build which we can fix later -- things are looking good otherwise 
from my testing.


Thanks for working through this Corey, and Keith for finding bugs :)

Corey Nolet wrote:

   Devs,

 Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2

 Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
 SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
 Staging Repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/

 Source tarball:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
 Binary tarball:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
 (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
given artifact.)

 Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS

 Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3

 Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.

 API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html

 API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html

 The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC (1/30
8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Corey Nolet]

> However I am seeing ACCUMULO-3545[1] that
I need to investigate.

Ok. I'll cut another RC as soon as that's complete.

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Josh Elser  wrote:

> Given the stuff Keith found already, I'm -1, but I did take some time this
> RC to rerun some tests. I had one IT that failed on me from the source
> build which we can fix later -- things are looking good otherwise from my
> testing.
>
> Thanks for working through this Corey, and Keith for finding bugs :)
>
>
> Corey Nolet wrote:
>
>>Devs,
>>
>>  Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
>>
>>  Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
>>  SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
>>  Staging Repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
>>
>>  Source tarball:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
>> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
>>  Binary tarball:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
>> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
>>  (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for
>> a
>> given artifact.)
>>
>>  Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>>
>>  Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=
>> blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
>>
>>  Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
>>
>>  API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
>> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
>> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
>>
>>  API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
>> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
>> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
>>
>>  The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC (1/30
>> 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Keith Turner]

On Jan 29, 2015 7:30 PM, "Corey Nolet"  wrote:
>
> > However I am seeing ACCUMULO-3545[1] that
> I need to

Its  not a problem.  At around 7 I discovered I had forgotten to increase
the number of max maps in the CI config.  I killed the job, changed max
maps from 64 to 4096, and restarted.  After that there was a mapper for
each of the 2178 tablets and the mappers were running locally.  I'll let
you know how the verify went in the morning.

>
> Ok. I'll cut another RC as soon as that's complete.
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Josh Elser  wrote:
>
> > Given the stuff Keith found already, I'm -1, but I did take some time
this
> > RC to rerun some tests. I had one IT that failed on me from the source
> > build which we can fix later -- things are looking good otherwise from
my
> > testing.
> >
> > Thanks for working through this Corey, and Keith for finding bugs :)
> >
> >
> > Corey Nolet wrote:
> >
> >>Devs,
> >>
> >>  Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> >>
> >>  Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> >>  SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> >>  Staging Repository:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> >>
> >>  Source tarball:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
> >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> >>  Binary tarball:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
> >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> >>  (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
for
> >> a
> >> given artifact.)
> >>
> >>  Signing keys available at:
https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >>
> >>  Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=
> >> blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> >>
> >>  Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> >>
> >>  API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
> >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> >>
> >>  API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
> >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> >>
> >>  The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC
(1/30
> >> 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> >>
> >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Keith Turner]

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Corey Nolet  wrote:

> > However I am seeing ACCUMULO-3545[1] that
> I need to investigate.
>
> Ok. I'll cut another RC as soon as that's complete.
>

Verification completed.   Successfully wrote and verified 31B entries on a
20 nodes EC2 cluster.   Used Hadoop 2.6.0, ZK 3.4.5, Centos 6, and openjdk
7.


>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Josh Elser  wrote:
>
> > Given the stuff Keith found already, I'm -1, but I did take some time
> this
> > RC to rerun some tests. I had one IT that failed on me from the source
> > build which we can fix later -- things are looking good otherwise from my
> > testing.
> >
> > Thanks for working through this Corey, and Keith for finding bugs :)
> >
> >
> > Corey Nolet wrote:
> >
> >>Devs,
> >>
> >>  Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> >>
> >>  Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> >>  SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> >>  Staging Repository:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> >>
> >>  Source tarball:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
> >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> >>  Binary tarball:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
> >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> >>  (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> for
> >> a
> >> given artifact.)
> >>
> >>  Signing keys available at:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >>
> >>  Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=
> >> blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> >>
> >>  Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> >>
> >>  API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
> >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> >>
> >>  API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
> >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> >>
> >>  The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC
> (1/30
> >> 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> >>
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Eric Newton]

-0

It would be nice to have ACCUMULO-3547
 in 1.6.2.

We are running at scale with it at the moment, and it has made a huge
improvement.  I hate to hold up 1.6.2, though.  If it doesn't make it,
please update the ticket to point to 1.6.3.

Corey, thanks for all your effort.

-Eric

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Keith Turner  wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Corey Nolet  wrote:
>
> > > However I am seeing ACCUMULO-3545[1] that
> > I need to investigate.
> >
> > Ok. I'll cut another RC as soon as that's complete.
> >
>
> Verification completed.   Successfully wrote and verified 31B entries on a
> 20 nodes EC2 cluster.   Used Hadoop 2.6.0, ZK 3.4.5, Centos 6, and openjdk
> 7.
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Josh Elser 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Given the stuff Keith found already, I'm -1, but I did take some time
> > this
> > > RC to rerun some tests. I had one IT that failed on me from the source
> > > build which we can fix later -- things are looking good otherwise from
> my
> > > testing.
> > >
> > > Thanks for working through this Corey, and Keith for finding bugs :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Corey Nolet wrote:
> > >
> > >>Devs,
> > >>
> > >>  Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2
> > >>
> > >>  Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> > >>  SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> > >>  Staging Repository:
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> > >>
> > >>  Source tarball:
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
> > >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> > >>  Binary tarball:
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
> > >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > >>  (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> > for
> > >> a
> > >> given artifact.)
> > >>
> > >>  Signing keys available at:
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > >>
> > >>  Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=
> > >> blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> > >>
> > >>  Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.
> > >>
> > >>  API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
> > >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> > >>
> > >>  API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
> > >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> > >>
> > >>  The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC
> > (1/30
> > >> 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC3

[Corey Nolet]

I have RC4 staged and ready. I'll hold off until tonight (Thursday) to fire
off the vote to give the community time to verify recent changes in the
1.6.1 branch.

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Eric Newton  wrote:

> -0
>
> It would be nice to have ACCUMULO-3547
>  in 1.6.2.
>
> We are running at scale with it at the moment, and it has made a huge
> improvement.  I hate to hold up 1.6.2, though.  If it doesn't make it,
> please update the ticket to point to 1.6.3.
>
> Corey, thanks for all your effort.
>
> -Eric
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Keith Turner  wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Corey Nolet  wrote:
> >
> > > > However I am seeing ACCUMULO-3545[1] that
> > > I need to investigate.
> > >
> > > Ok. I'll cut another RC as soon as that's complete.
> > >
> >
> > Verification completed.   Successfully wrote and verified 31B entries on
> a
> > 20 nodes EC2 cluster.   Used Hadoop 2.6.0, ZK 3.4.5, Centos 6, and
> openjdk
> > 7.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Josh Elser 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Given the stuff Keith found already, I'm -1, but I did take some time
> > > this
> > > > RC to rerun some tests. I had one IT that failed on me from the
> source
> > > > build which we can fix later -- things are looking good otherwise
> from
> > my
> > > > testing.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for working through this Corey, and Keith for finding bugs :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Corey Nolet wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Devs,
> > > >>
> > > >>  Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo
> 1.6.2
> > > >>
> > > >>  Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
> > > >>  SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
> > > >>  Staging Repository:
> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/
> > > >>
> > > >>  Source tarball:
> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
> > > >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
> > > >>  Binary tarball:
> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > >> orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.
> > > >> 2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > > >>  (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the
> signature/hash
> > > for
> > > >> a
> > > >> given artifact.)
> > > >>
> > > >>  Signing keys available at:
> > > https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > > >>
> > > >>  Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
> > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=
> > > >> blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3
> > > >>
> > > >>  Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are
> passing.
> > > >>
> > > >>  API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
> > > >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html
> > > >>
> > > >>  API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/
> > > >> compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html
> > > >>
> > > >>  The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC
> > > (1/30
> > > >> 8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>