Good catch, we need to update that to reflect the HornetQ code donation
instead of pointing only at Apollo.
Bruce
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:57 PM, davidthomas426 davidthomas...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wasn't sure where to post this, but I've seen lots of chatter here lately
about the future of ActiveMQ, voting on the name of the HornetQ donation,
Apollo, etc.
I was trying to get information about the project the other day, and I was
very thrown off by this page:
http://activemq.apache.org/new-features-in-60.html
That page is very misleading right now. Someone may want to fix that soon.
Sorry if this is the wrong forum for this. I thought about creating an
issue
in the issue tracker instead, but I wasn't sure if that was appropriate for
a problem with a web page.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Incorrect-info-on-ActiveMQ-New-features-in-6-0-web-page-tp4694932.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
perl -e 'print
unpack(u30,D0G)U8V4\@4VYY95R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT* );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
