Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 0.7.0 Release

[vongosling]

+1

I  checked:
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are ok
- No binary in the source distribution
- incubating is in the name

Dehowe Feng  于2022年1月19日周三 07:38写道：

> Dear Apache Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have
> been
> working toward it.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>
> Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
>
> *Add VLE core to the MATCH clause.
> *Added support for various list functions
> *range()
> *relationships()
> *keys()
> *label()
> *nodes()
> *reverse()
> *Various bug fixes
>
> *
>
> The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v.0.7.0-rc0
>
> The git commit hash: commit d0175f4a2fb03f28c356ea43da3bd48a47f5ef42
>
> The release files for 0.7.0, can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.7.0.rc0/
>
> Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
>
> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> 847F A9F0 CB17 2A51 DEC9 D0F3 8285 D595 875F 13B1
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v.0.7.0-rc0
>
>
>
> Please vote:
>
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.7.0
> [ ] 0 I won't get in the way
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
>
> Best,
> Dehowe Feng
>


-- 
Best Regards :-)

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 0.7.0 Release

[vongosling]

Do we have a plan to transfer all pg files to an external directory? I have
seen we have many files like we have pointed.

Josh Innis  于2022年1月24日周一 02:03写道：

> There is some code that the AGE team wrote that is in those files, but no
> third party code is in those files.
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 8:46 AM John Gemignani 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Juan,
> >
> > Not necessarily the file names but the contents of those files.
> >
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022, 3:31 AM Juan Pan  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Josh,
> > >
> > >
> > > I see. I just want to double check the following files all comes from
> > > PostgreSQL, not from others, right?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> > > Juan Pan(Trista), Twitter: @tristaZero
> > >
> > >
> > > On 01/23/2022 11:43，Josh Innis wrote：
> > > Hi Trista,
> > >
> > > From the discussion from the last release the team reviewed the project
> > and
> > > determined that there was a large enough amount of the Postgres code
> base
> > > in those files to warrant  the Postgres header instead of the Apache
> > > header.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 6:35 AM Juan Pan  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [x] Download links are valid.
> > >
> > > [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > >
> > > [x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files exist.
> > >
> > > [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The following files with source coding are all from Postgres project?
> > > 
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/.gitignore
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/.travis.yml
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/CONTRIBUTING.md
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/README.md
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/doc/.gitignore
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/drivers/golang/README.md
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/drivers/golang/TYPES.md
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/drivers/golang/parser/README.md
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/drivers/nodejs/README.md
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/drivers/python/README.md
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/drivers/python/antlr/README.md
> > >
> > >
> >
> apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/drivers/python/samples/apache-age-agtypes.ipynb
> > >
> apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/drivers/python/samples/apache-age-basic.ipynb
> > >
> apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/drivers/python/samples/apache-age-note.ipynb
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/regress/.gitignore
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/executor/cypher_utils.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/parser/.gitignore
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/parser/cypher_clause.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/parser/cypher_expr.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/parser/cypher_item.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/parser/cypher_keywords.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/parser/cypher_parse_agg.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/parser/cypher_parse_node.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/utils/ag_func.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/utils/adt/ag_float8_supp.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/utils/adt/agtype.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/utils/adt/agtype_parser.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/backend/utils/adt/agtype_util.c
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/include/parser/.gitignore
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/include/parser/ag_scanner.h
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/include/parser/cypher_expr.h
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/include/parser/cypher_parse_agg.h
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/include/utils/ag_float8_supp.h
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/include/utils/ag_func.h
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/include/utils/agtype.h
> > > apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/src/include/utils/agtype_parser.h
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> > > Juan Pan(Trista), Twitter: @tristaZero
> > >
> > >
> > > On 01/19/2022 07:37，Dehowe Feng wrote：
> > > Dear Apache Community,
> > >
> > > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have
> > > been
> > > working toward it.
> > >
> > > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> > >
> > > Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
> > >
> > > *Add VLE core to the MATCH clause.
> > > *Added support for various list functions
> > > *range()
> > > *relationships()
> > > *keys()
> > > *label()
> > > *nodes()
> > > *reverse()
> > > *Various bug fixes
> > >
> > > *
> > >
> > > The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v.0.7.0-rc0
> > >
> > > The git commit hash: commit d0175f4a2fb03f28c356ea43da3bd48a47f5ef42
> > >
> > > The release files for 0.7.0, can be found at:
> > > 

Re: Apache AGE (Incubating) - Community Graduation Vote

[vongosling]

Hi,

I strongly recommend our PPMCs pay more attention to our community
building, such as our issue, pr activities, our committer diversity.
Although we have released 5 versions, there are a few minor questions
waiting to be clarified in the incubator thread.

I think we still have some way to go, so let's start with these points?
Don't worry about graduation, I'm sure it will come soon as we realize what
we can improve：-)


Eya Badal  于2021年11月9日周二 下午12:32写道：

> Hi AGE community and Mentors,
>
> Since entering incubation 18 months ago in April 2020 and with five
> versions of AGE released, and 0.6.0 imminent, it's fair to say the AGE
> community has demonstrated its ability to build software releases the
> Apache Way.
>
> We have prepared an assessment of the Apache AGE podling’s maturity, meant
> to help inform the decision (of the mentors, community, Incubator PMC, and
> ASF Board of Directors) to graduate it as a top-level Apache project. We
> used the ASF project maturity model
> <
> https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html
> >
> to evaluate the Apache AGE project and assess itself as having no major
> areas for concern. The assessment can be found at the Apache AGE website
>  under the COMMUNITY menu.
>
> In addition to building and releasing software, the community has grown the
> Apache AGE project in other areas.
>
>
>-
>
>There have been 64 unique contributors across the AGE and the subproject
>AGE Viewer. These Contributors have raised >170 issues or pull requests.
>-
>
>We have been addressing Github issues since the start but timeliness was
>an issue. In April we created our internal SLA to categorise (label),
>assign, and respond to issue and pull requests. Since April, 95% are
>responded within 72 hours (80% of issues are responded to within 24
> hrs).
>-
>
>Contributions span more than 20 countries across the globe - Belarus,
>Belgium, China, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg,
>Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Thailand, UK, Ukraine, USA, and
> Vietnam.
>-
>
>We have amassed positive comments throughout and gathered >470 stars.
>-
>
>We have committers from 4 different companies.
>
>
> AGE mentors, what is your opinion on this?
>
> Do you agree that we are ready to graduate?
>
> Are there any remaining issues that we can improve on?
>
> If we can capture your issues of concern we can then work those issues to
> resolution.
>
> Your feedback would be very much appreciated!
>
> Regards,
>
> Eya
>


-- 
Best Regards :-)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.5.0

[vongosling]

Hi Eya,

I hope that the community will pay attention to the issues that we raised
after +1. No clarification is a very bad sign :-(

Eya Badal  于2021年7月31日周六 上午12:11写道：

> Dear AGE Community,
>
> I'm closing this vote and happy to announce the results of the vote for
> Apache AGE 0.5.0 Incubating
>
> This vote passes with 9 +1 votes (3 bindings and 6 non bindings) and no 0
> or -1 votes.
>
> +1 (Binding)
>  --
> * Felix Cheung
> * vongosling
> * Kevin Ratnasekera
>
>
> There were no 0 or -1 votes. Thank you to all who helped make this happen.
>
>
> Vote thread can be found here [1].
>
> I'll continue with the next round of the voting process and update the
> community as progress is
> made.
>
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0f291fd923bd0217da1935811b4276699aac28715c1936d713e99002%40%3Cdev.age.apache.org%3E
>
> Best regards,
> Eya Badal
>
>
> On 2021/07/10 14:32:05, Eya Badal  wrote:
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version
> 0.5.0
> >
> > The vote is open now and until July 13th at 7:32 AM PST and passes if a
> majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.5.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> >
> > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> >
> > *
> > The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.5.0
> >
> > The git commit hash:
> > commit e36e6d79c2a65259f4b46cd9a3623d69518605a4
> >
> > The release files for 0.5.0, can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.5.0.rc0%20/
> >
> > The signatures, files, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
> >
> > Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS
> >
> > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201  E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.5.0
> >
> > Thank you for your time in advance.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Eya Badal
> >
> >
>


-- 
Best Regards :-)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.5.0

[vongosling]

+1,

I have checked:
- signature and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER is fine
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files, actually you could remove gradle-wrapper.jar
dependency. right?

Last, could you guys use rat to check the license before we call
for release?  as Felix point, about 20 source files for tests do not have
the Apache header.
/drivers/jdbc/lib/src/test/java/org/apache/age/jdbc/


Andrew Ko  于2021年7月27日周二 上午12:14写道：

> +1
> thanks
>
> 2021년 7월 26일 (월) 오전 8:52, John Gemignani 님이
> 작성:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 9:21 PM Felix Cheung 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Though it will be great to fix soon:
> > >
> > >
> > >   *incubating in name
> > >
> > > - signature and hash fine
> > > - DISCLAIMER is fine
> > > - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> > > - No unexpected binary files
> > >
> > > - Check: All source files have ASF headers
> > > about 20 source files for tests do not have the Apache header.
> > > /drivers/jdbc/lib/src/test/java/org/apache/age/jdbc/
> > >
> > > what is the source of this jar?
> > > /drivers/jdbc/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar
> > >
> > > 
> > > From: Dehowe Feng 
> > > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 10:41:28 AM
> > > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.5.0
> > >
> > > Hey Eya,
> > >
> > > I can vouch for what you wrote to be true, and am looking forward to
> the
> > > release.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 2021/07/10 14:32:05, Eya Badal  wrote:
> > > > Dear Apache Community,
> > > >
> > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE
> version
> > > 0.5.0
> > > >
> > > > The vote is open now and until July 13th at 7:32 AM PST and passes
> if a
> > > majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.5.0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > > The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.5.0
> > > >
> > > > The git commit hash:
> > > > commit e36e6d79c2a65259f4b46cd9a3623d69518605a4
> > > >
> > > > The release files for 0.5.0, can be found at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.5.0.rc0%20/
> > > >
> > > > The signatures, files, etc. can be found at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
> > > >
> > > > Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > > > FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201  E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.5.0
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your time in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Eya Badal
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Best Regards :-)

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache AGE Sub Project - Visualization Tool

[vongosling]

Thank you for clarifying this fact, I think it's okay to have a separate
repo for the virtualization dashboard, but we're going to go through the
process of IP clearance if it's a donation.


Eya Badal  于2021年7月7日周三 上午6:53写道：

> Dear everyone and @all mentors,
> @vongosling
>
> I just want to make some clarifications about this visualization tool for
> Apache AGE.
>
> We are not looking to propose a new sub-project and what we need is just
> another repository for visualization tool inside the same project.
>
> We believe it is better to have a separate repository and not add it to
> our existing incubator-age repository to have independent release cycles
> and avoid any dependencies regarding the releases.
>
> These are examples from other Apache incubating projects where they have
> separate repositories for their sub-projects/tools, including drivers, UI,
> etc.
>
> **https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail-foal
> **https://github.com/apache/incubator-yunikorn-k8shim
> **https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps
>
> I strongly believe that having a visualization tool will benefit our users
> and make a better user experience while working with Apache AGE. I have
> experience working with Graph databases, where a visualization tool
> significantly impacted the experience while analyzing and processing my
> data.
>
> @all mentors, please advise.
>
> On 2021/06/17 01:36:45, vongosling  wrote:
> > Hi Eya，
> >
> > I haven't seen the specific code for the project yet, but in recent
> times,
> > I suggest not to propose it as a new sub-project, We could focus on
> > building the community. I'd like to know how many users are using our
> > project now? Is our project open enough? How many contributors do we
> absorb?
> >
> >
> > Eya Badal  于2021年6月16日周三 上午1:53写道：
> >
> > > Hello Felix,
> > > @all mentors
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for your prompt reply, I greatly appreciate it. We
> are
> > > retooling an existing project to work with incubating Apache AGE. The
> > > project is not complete yet and we are hoping to have it as a
> sub-project
> > > of AGE and continue the development of it.
> > >
> > > Could you please advise if we have to go through the proposal process?
> If
> > > yes please also advise if it is the same process that we have been
> through
> > > for AGE - creating a proposal and then calling for a vote in the
> incubator.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much,
> > > Eya Badal
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2021/06/10 21:10:37, Eya Badal  wrote:
> > > > Dear Everyone,
> > > > @All Mentors
> > > >
> > > > I hope you are doing great.
> > > >
> > > > We would like to discuss the possibility of having a sub-project for
> > > Apache
> > > > AGE. This sub-project is a visualization tool that enables Apache AGE
> > > users
> > > > to visualize their data.
> > > >
> > > > This tool is a web-based graph visualization tool that allows you to
> > > > visualize a graph. It connects to a Postgres server running the AGE
> graph
> > > > database extension. AGViewer has a query editor where you can submit
> SQL
> > > > and Cypher (or Hybrid) queries, allowing you to build, modify and
> query
> > > > graphs in AGE. The visualization supports many layout formats such as
> > > > COSE-Bilkent, Dagre, and Euler. In addition, there is a table output
> for
> > > > displaying non-graph results.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please advise and give us your feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you very much,
> > > > Eya Badal
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards :-)
> >
>


-- 
Best Regards :-)

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache AGE Sub Project - Visualization Tool

[vongosling]

Hi Eya，

I haven't seen the specific code for the project yet, but in recent times,
I suggest not to propose it as a new sub-project, We could focus on
building the community. I'd like to know how many users are using our
project now? Is our project open enough? How many contributors do we absorb?


Eya Badal  于2021年6月16日周三 上午1:53写道：

> Hello Felix,
> @all mentors
>
> Thank you very much for your prompt reply, I greatly appreciate it. We are
> retooling an existing project to work with incubating Apache AGE. The
> project is not complete yet and we are hoping to have it as a sub-project
> of AGE and continue the development of it.
>
> Could you please advise if we have to go through the proposal process? If
> yes please also advise if it is the same process that we have been through
> for AGE - creating a proposal and then calling for a vote in the incubator.
>
> Thank you very much,
> Eya Badal
>
>
>
> On 2021/06/10 21:10:37, Eya Badal  wrote:
> > Dear Everyone,
> > @All Mentors
> >
> > I hope you are doing great.
> >
> > We would like to discuss the possibility of having a sub-project for
> Apache
> > AGE. This sub-project is a visualization tool that enables Apache AGE
> users
> > to visualize their data.
> >
> > This tool is a web-based graph visualization tool that allows you to
> > visualize a graph. It connects to a Postgres server running the AGE graph
> > database extension. AGViewer has a query editor where you can submit SQL
> > and Cypher (or Hybrid) queries, allowing you to build, modify and query
> > graphs in AGE. The visualization supports many layout formats such as
> > COSE-Bilkent, Dagre, and Euler. In addition, there is a table output for
> > displaying non-graph results.
> >
> >
> > Please advise and give us your feedback.
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> > Eya Badal
> >
>


-- 
Best Regards :-)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.4.0

[vongosling]

+1

I have checked the problems that we miss in the last release.

I have to clarify with the community that voting during incubation requires
not only the participation of mentors, but also more ppmc members. I'm
sorry I missed the community vote earlier, but I'd like to see more guys
participate and learn what version can be officially released.


Kevin Ratnasekera  于2021年4月28日周三 下午12:27写道：

> +1
>
> I checked the following.
>
> - Incubating in name.
>
> - PGP Signatures.
>
> - SHA512 Checksums.
>
> - DISCLAIMER-WIP exists.
>
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine.
>
> - ASF headers on source files.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Kevin
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:36 AM Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > drivers/nodejs/src/index.ts - is there a reason this file does not have
> > Apache License header?
> >
> > - incubating in name
> > - signature and hash fine
> > - DISCLAIMER is fine
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> > - No unexpected binary files
> > - source files have ASF headers - see note at the top
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Eya Badal 
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 12:05:07 PM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.4.0
> >
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version
> > 0.4.0
> >
> > The vote is open now and until April 16th at 12:05 PM PST and passes if a
> > majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.4.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> >
> > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> >
> > *
> > The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/0.4.0
> >
> > The git commit hash:
> > commit e9add439468ccff3780a392f9cead627fcaecf1e
> >
> > The release files for 0.4.0, can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.4.0.rc0/
> >
> > The signatures, files, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
> >
> > Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS
> >
> > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201  E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/0.4.0
> >
> > Thank you for your time in advance.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Eya Badal
> >
> >
>


-- 
Best Regards :-)

Re: [DISCUSS] AGE Container Support

[vongosling]

Personally, some of the questions I have on the subject before going
forward on providing support for this is: AGE is an extension of Postgres,
so should our containers include Postgres in them to avoid dependencies.
Furthermore, would that affect users' ability to use other extensions, such
as TimeScaleDB, in these environments

About package all in one including PG? This depends on your distribution
strategy, and of course, take into account Apache's distribution
constraints [1]. If you could not find your distribution repo or package
manager such as snap, we should seriously discuss it.



[1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html

Josh Innis  于2021年2月19日周五 上午6:24写道：

> Hi All,
>
> The AGE community is asking us to support more containers than just Docker,
> see https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/issues/24. Additionally, upon
> review of our Docker images they are in need of being updated.
>
> The Docker images still refer to AgensGraph-Extension. This is due to these
> images being set up before our official acceptance to the Apache incubator
> and the official name change to Apache AGE (A Graph Extension).
> Furthermore, these images refer to the master branch of AGE, so these are
> pointing to development work instead of any official release. Personally, I
> believe that should be altered, but please let us know what you think.
>
> Moving on to the github issue: Some of our community is unable to use
> Docker and is requesting us to support LXC/Snap and/or Kata. For a brief
> summary of all these technologies, please refer to the links below.
>
> LXC:
> https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/introduction/
>
> Snap:
> https://snapcraft.io/about
>
> A forum discussing Snap:
>
> https://askubuntu.com/questions/808524/whats-the-main-difference-between-docker-and-snap
>
> Kata Official Site:
> https://katacontainers.io/
>
> A Good Discussion on Kata:
>
> https://platform9.com/blog/kata-containers-docker-and-kubernetes-how-they-all-fit-together/
>
> Personally, some of the questions I have on the subject before going
> forward on providing support for this is: AGE is an extension of Postgres,
> so should our containers include Postgres in them to avoid dependencies.
> Furthermore, would that affect users' ability to use other extensions, such
> as TimeScaleDB, in these environments?
>
> Thanks.
>


-- 
Best Regards :-)

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache AGE Coding standard adjustment

[vongosling]

Hi,

New committer discussion would better happen in the private email list[1].
I'd suggest that the voting thread be grounded before we finish the
discussion. I would like to remind all PPMC should familiar with the apache
incubating ways which are addressed here[2].


[1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
[2] https://incubator.apache.org/


-- 
Best Regards :-)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.3.0 (RC1)

[vongosling]

TL;DR: we should reference the instrument[1] for how to release docker
image.

[1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html#docker

vongosling  于2021年2月8日周一 下午3:36写道：

> +1
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - DISCLAIMER-WIP exists
> - No unexpected binary files
> - source files have ASF headers
> - Signature ok
>
> It's difficult to have a project done so well in the first release, but
> there are still some issues I need to point out.
>
>   - year range not right on the website's Copyright part
>   - package including unpackaged name need to correct
> to age-0.3.0-incubating, removed rcxxx. The dist directory already said
> you're the RC version.
>   - Installing the AGE manual should not reference non-apache repo. the
> docker image should be hosted in apache sharing repo
>   - I strongly recommend removing the clang-format.5 file, which
> references your company's private spec.
>
> [1]  http://age.apache.org/#
>
> Eya Badal  于2021年2月3日周三 上午7:11写道：
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version
>> 0.3.0
>>
>> The vote is open now and until February 5th at 3:11 PM PST and passes if
>> a majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.3.0
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>>
>> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>>
>> Please note that this is the first Apache release for Apache AGE.
>>
>>
>> The tag to be voted on is v0.3.0.rc0-incubating (commit
>> 549ac9ff63337f64a9c19d8b9950b89ae412edee):
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/tree/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating
>>
>> The release files, including signatures, etc. can be found at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
>>
>> Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS
>>
>> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
>> FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201  E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2
>>
>> The notes corresponding to this release can be found at:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much,
>> Eya Badal
>>
>>
>
> --
> Nothing is impossible
>


-- 
Nothing is impossible

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

[vongosling]

Hi,

@Eya Badal Abdisho  we must start a formal
discussion before the call for a vote. In addition, I'm more concerned
about the activities of our community than that. Our mailing list doesn't
seem to see the voice of discussion. If there's any confusion, please raise
it ：-0

There is some default output when we call for a discussion or vote for some
release, which includes not only the source(or bin) tarball location as
here. but also including git tag, keys location, and other necessary
references, such as release notes. The following is an example like this:

The git tag to be voted upon:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/tree/0.6.0-rc0



The git commit hash:

2c0214d6c12804773383ff14755e867788936da2
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/commit/2c0214d6c12804773383ff14755e867788936da2



THE SOURCE TARBALL CAN BE FOUND AT:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.6.0/rc0/



The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
1CEF 33FA 6180 0117 BDB2  E0E0 D51E A8F0 0EE7 9B28

Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS


Eya Badal  于2021年1月20日周三 上午12:18写道：

> Thank you very much for your feedback and suggestions. I will change the
> disclaimer to WIP also we will not include the file regarding the
> OpneCypher.
>
> I will call for a VOTE after the changes soon.
>
> Best regards,
> Eya
>
> On 2021/01/19 05:58:03, Felix Cheung  wrote:
> > Thanks for the updates.
> >
> > For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is
> off (for example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache
> license and normally will not be possible to release with) it is just
> easier to get through the process. The community can decide if you want to
> go this route or not.
> >
> > For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be best
> not to include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is best
> not to include files, source code etc from another project because then
> proper attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE file)
> >
> > See bundled dependencies here
> https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Eya Badal 
> > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
> >
> > Hi Felix,
> >
> > I just want to mention some points.
> >
> > 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names
> is fixed now.
> > 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source
> distribution.
> > 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it
> is included.
> > 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP:
> > We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have
> to go by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice?
> >
> > All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks
> so I am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer.
> Please advise.
> >
> > We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung  wrote:
> > > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and
> content.
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > From: Eya Badal 
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM
> > > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
> > >
> > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback.
> > > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list
> and ask everyone to vote?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
> > > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it
> shouldn’t be just the mentor.
> > > >
> > > > A good vote thread might be like:
> > > >
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html
> > > >
> > > > 1. md5 - should not include
> > > >I will remove this file.
> > > >
> > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a
> apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip
> > > >  and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/
> > > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file.
> > > >
> > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make
> sure it is consistent.
> > > >
> > > > 3.
> > > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > >
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers
> > > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer?
> > > >
> > > > 4.

Re: First Apache Release

[vongosling]

Great news for the first podling release, I would like to hear any feedback
from the community?

Kevin Ratnasekera  于2020年12月20日周日 下午6:54写道：

> Hi Folks,
>
> I wanted to bring discussion on  $subject, I think we should now start
> working on it and plan out our first release work ahead. I think we should
> only concentrate on doing a source only release as our first release, as it
> will remove some of the burdens in the release process.
>
> Here [1] [2] some materials which I think will be helpful when you are
> working on the release process.
>
> Please reach out to mentors if you need further help or concerns regarding
> the Apache release process.
>
> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
> [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>
> Regards
> Kevin
>


-- 
Nothing is impossible

Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - October 2020

[vongosling]

Hi,

I have helped do a round of reviews, corrected some syntax. Hope to be a
more open discussion in the dev mail list, such as our first release, new
committer voting. At least the mail was too quiet :-)









Eya Badal  于2020年10月4日周日 上午4:45写道：

>
>
> On 2020/09/30 18:41:44, Josh Innis  wrote:
> > Hi Eya,
> >
> > I'll do this upcoming report.
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 1:39 PM Eya Badal  wrote:
> >
> > > >Hello all,
> > > >Anyone would like to volunteer for the next upcoming report due on
> (Wed,
> > > October 07) ?
> > >
> > >Thank you, Josh.
> >
>


-- 
Nothing is impossible