Re: [VOTE] Which logo to use as default logo?

[Robert Casties]

I think I would to with

C (blue) first
D (yellow) second

but I like all colors :-)

Robert


On 19.06.19 16:39, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hi folks,
> As per Benjamin's suggestion, I'm sending out a vote for which color to
> go with for the default Annotator logo.
> 
> The candidates are found here: https://imgur.com/a/1DnmnvK
> 
> Please vote on which candidate you think is best (and optionally your
> 2nd pick), and we'll get the ball rolling :)
> 
> 72h duration of vote etc etc bla bla, will tally up on Saturday.
> 
> With regards,
> Daniel


-- 
Dr. Robert Casties -- Information Technology Group
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
Boltzmannstr. 22, D-14195 Berlin
Tel: +49/30/22667-342



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Annotator logo??

[Robert Casties]

On 18.06.19 22:15, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 6/18/19 9:13 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
>> I think a pencil is nicely recognizable from the parts. Highlighter,
>> maybe
>> less legible. Angled tip, though, maybe works to convey it.
>>
>> I'm up for pulling this in and we can always replace it!
> 
> +1, i'll go ahead and submit it to the ASF logo database for now :)
> In the meantime, I also had a highlighter idea, at
> https://imgur.com/a/V4iLx3I that may be what Benjamin was looking for?
> I'll leave it to you folks to figure out which one is best ultimately :)

Thanks for the nice designs Daniel!

+1 for both ideas and for putting the pencil in first!

I also really like the idea of the highlighter and your second sketch.
The pencil sketch with the curvy line looks more whimsical and fun,
which I like but the highlighter to me is more about annotating and I
find its shape really great and recognizable.

Maybe you could attach the line in the second sketch to the tip of the
highlighter and make the line more wavy or something?

Robert

>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019, 11:29 Benjamin Young  wrote:
>>
>>> Nice work, Daniel! :)
>>>
>>> Would a highlighter be more appropriate?
>>>
>>> I do like the overall feel, though, for sure. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> http://bigbluehat.com/
>>>
>>> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>>>
>>> 
>>> From: ajs6f 
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 11:24 AM
>>> To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Annotator logo??
>>>
>>> +1. A nice combination of cute and serious.
>>>
>>> ajs6f
>>>
 On Jun 14, 2019, at 9:01 AM, Randall Leeds 
>>> wrote:

 I like it! +1 to using this.

 On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, 08:40 Daniel Gruno  wrote:

> Hi folks,
> do we have a logo for the annotator project? I'm asking specifically
> because the project shows up on www.apache.org
>>> from time to time, but it
> doesn't show a logo (so the page breaks).
>
> If we have a logo, where is it?
> If we don't, I did a little doodle, at https://i.imgur.com/2WoIRc6.png
> that we could either adopt or use temporarily till we find something
> nifty (I have it as SVG and all that).
>
> WDYT?!
>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[Robert Casties]

+1

...now for some spare time ;-)

Robert

On 02.02.18 19:49, Benjamin Young wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> 
> This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial 
> committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom are 
> BCC'd on this email).
> 
> 
> It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that list, or 
> that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer have an 
> interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this to 
> happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless, we'd 
> love to have you join the party! :)
> 
> 
> Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the core 
> contributors to Apache Annotator [2].
> 
> 
> First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to Randall and 
> Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository structure (monorepo), 
> initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication planning/setup. If 
> you're interested in any of this, please checkout the code repo.
> 
> 
> Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at 
> http://annotator.apache.org/ We'd like to get the demo integrated [4] and 
> begin to provide documentation there as we're able to write it (and would 
> love help writing it!). ^_^
> 
> 
> Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more initial 
> committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks interested 
> in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the project because we 
> lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or even just able ;) ), 
> we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the mailing list, even if you 
> lack time to code or write docs (etc).
> 
> 
> If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial committer, 
> please respond (on list!) to this email and begin reading/skimming this guide:
> 
> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-for-new-committers
> 
> 
> It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be happy to 
> help you through the process. :)
> 
> 
> Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
> 
> Benjamin
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal
> 
> [2] http://annotator.apache.org/
> 
> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator
> 
> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> http://bigbluehat.com/
> 
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
> 


-- 
Dr. Robert Casties -- Information Technology Group
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
Boltzmannstr. 22, D-14195 Berlin
Tel: +49/30/22667-342 Fax: -299