Re: [POLL] update of ant's web site (and Ivy's?)
I am not forgetting this topic. I will work on it next week. Regards, Antoine Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2010-02-12, Martijn Kruithof wrote: On 11-2-2010 17:12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: If we put work into creating a branch for the website, then it should save us at least some work (the update of the site), so, yes. Count this at least as a +0.5;-) It is not like the current way of publishing would seize to function when we use a separate branch for the website. True. What would be the effort to using svnpubsub vs the current mechanism? >From what I've read - I haven't followed it close enough to be sure - svnpubsub triggers updates on the live machines, so it not only publishes any checkins immediately to people.ao, it also takes away the up-to one hour delay. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [POLL] update of ant's web site (and Ivy's?)
On 2010-02-12, Martijn Kruithof wrote: > On 11-2-2010 17:12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> If we put work into creating a branch for the website, then it should >> save us at least some work (the update of the site), so, yes. >> Count this at least as a +0.5;-) > It is not like the current way of publishing would seize to function > when we use a separate branch for the website. True. > What would be the effort to using svnpubsub vs the current mechanism? >From what I've read - I haven't followed it close enough to be sure - svnpubsub triggers updates on the live machines, so it not only publishes any checkins immediately to people.ao, it also takes away the up-to one hour delay. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [POLL] update of ant's web site (and Ivy's?)
On 11-2-2010 17:12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: If we put work into creating a branch for the website, then it should save us at least some work (the update of the site), so, yes. Count this at least as a +0.5;-) It is not like the current way of publishing would seize to function when we use a separate branch for the website. What would be the effort to using svnpubsub vs the current mechanism? (updating the frequency is a no-brainer, and doesn't take much resources). The current frequency is daily, the website is updated hourly so anything more frequent than that is not adding much speed to the publishing process. (count this as +1 for a separate branch, and a request for more info on the benefits of using svnpubsub in our environment.) Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: [POLL] update of ant's web site (and Ivy's?)
On 2010-02-11, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > The other idea which we can pursue is to move to using svnpubsub for > the web site. To do this we would need to have a special branch > containing our web site. I've changed the subject to include Ivy as well since it would probably be a good idea to collect all content that goes under ant.apache.org in a single place that way. Such a branch would allow us to publish Ant user manual patches to the website as well - currently the manual is fixed at a tag. For example I've added the documentation for the sortfilter filterreader after 1.8.0 jas been released, so the doc not only didn't make it into the release, it isn't visible on the website either. > Do we want to move to svnpubsub ? If we put work into creating a branch for the website, then it should save us at least some work (the update of the site), so, yes. Count this at least as a +0.5 ;-) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
