Re: [VOTE][RESULT] name for target-group

2010-01-08 Thread Nicolas Lalevée

Le 6 janv. 2010 à 22:09, Antoine Levy Lambert a écrit :

> Hello Jesse,
> 
> true, extension-of would have looked nicer together with extension-point. 
> Maybe Eclipse uses "extensionOf" too ?

When I mentioned that in Eclipse world they use "extension of", it was talking 
about the vocabulary more than any particular syntax.
For the syntax, I just look randomly into the existing tasks in the doc to know 
what is the used syntax. But looking closer now, I see different syntaxes. See 
the attributes "preservelastmodified" and "includeEmptyDirs" of the "copy" 
task: http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/copy.html
But I don't find any dash, at least in the core tasks. If any change would 
appear, maybe the better would be to remove the dash in extension-point ?

Nicolas


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: [VOTE][RESULT] name for target-group

2010-01-06 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert

Hello Jesse,

true, extension-of would have looked nicer together with 
extension-point. Maybe Eclipse uses "extensionOf" too ?


I wish you would have chimed in before I did the RC1 build.

Regards,

Antoine

Jesse Glick wrote:

Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:

extension-point/extensionOf is the winning ticket.


Why the hyphenated-name in one and camelCase in the other? Would 
expect 'extension-of'.






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: [VOTE][RESULT] name for target-group

2010-01-06 Thread Jesse Glick

Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:

extension-point/extensionOf is the winning ticket.


Why the hyphenated-name in one and camelCase in the other? Would expect 
'extension-of'.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: [VOTE][RESULT] name for target-group

2010-01-05 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert

Hello Steve,

there will be for sure several release candidates. And afterwards 
several 1.8.x builds.


Regards,

Antoine


Steve Loughran wrote:

Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
I am thinking of building the first ant 1.8.0 release candidate 
tomorrow.


I need to get my  docs together; won't be able to do it today 
in EU working hours. what is the timetable for getting doc patches 
into the release chain?





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: [VOTE][RESULT] name for target-group

2010-01-05 Thread Steve Loughran

Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:

I am thinking of building the first ant 1.8.0 release candidate tomorrow.


I need to get my  docs together; won't be able to do it today 
in EU working hours. what is the timetable for getting doc patches into 
the release chain?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: [VOTE][RESULT] name for target-group

2010-01-04 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert

I am thinking of building the first ant 1.8.0 release candidate tomorrow.

Regards,

Antoine

Stefan Bodewig wrote:

On 2009-12-29, Antoine Levy Lambert  wrote:

  

extension-point/extensionOf is the winning ticket.



svn revision 895567 has been adapted to it.

Stefan

  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: [VOTE][RESULT] name for target-group

2010-01-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-12-29, Antoine Levy Lambert  wrote:

> extension-point/extensionOf is the winning ticket.

svn revision 895567 has been adapted to it.

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



[VOTE][RESULT] name for target-group

2009-12-29 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert


[ ]  for the group and extensionOf="foo" ... for members of the group



- 4 binding votes for extension-point. (Nicolas, Matt, Bruce, Stefan)
Stefan wrote that he prefers extension-point and would go with the 
majority. So I am counting him here.


- 2 binding votes for