Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
> Do you agree that we should do it ? > > [ ] Yes > > [ ] No > > Let me start with my +1 > +1 Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
I don't think I already reacted: > Do you agree that we should do it ? > > [+1] Yes > > [ ] No Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
[+1] Yes Peter On 4/28/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > Do you agree that we should do it ? > > [+1] Yes > > [ ] No -Matt __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > Do you agree that we should do it ? > > [+1] Yes > > [ ] No -Matt __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
On 4/26/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The cleanup means concretely removing: org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optiona.metamata packages, with the corresponding documentation and testcases. +1. --DD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: The 3 people who answered were all in favor of this cleanup. I thought that it might be better to start a vote thread on this one too. The cleanup means concretely removing the org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka and the org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optiona.metamata packages, with the corresponding documentation and testcases. Do you agree that we should do it ? [X] Yes [ ] No Let me start with my +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Stephane Bailliez wrote: Hi all, As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup going on in the code, I think it would be worth to get rid of: - JProbe Coverage task - Metamata Audit task - Metamata Metrics task JProbe should not be working anymore since JProbe 4 As for Metamata, I doubt anyone is using it anymore as Metamata/WebGain products disappeared after being absorbed by Oracle in 2002 (except Toplink). Thoughts ? Stephane The 3 people who answered were all in favor of this cleanup. I thought that it might be better to start a vote thread on this one too. The cleanup means concretely removing the org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka and the org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optiona.metamata packages, with the corresponding documentation and testcases. Do you agree that we should do it ? [+1 ] Yes [ ] No - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Kev Jackson wrote: Why is this code change different from the other changes to remove deprecated classes? Is it simply because these tasks are 3pp? If so does that mean that we can break bwc iff it's dependent on a 3pp? Kev I assume that there are no extensions (by API programmers) of the Metamata and of the Sitraka JProbe tasks. To the contrary, it is possible that there are API users who use for instance the Project#resolveFile() methods. Ok that makes sense, thanks for answering. Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
Kev Jackson wrote: > > >> > Why is this code change different from the other changes to remove > deprecated classes? Is it simply because these tasks are 3pp? If so > does that mean that we can break bwc iff it's dependent on a 3pp? > > Kev > I assume that there are no extensions (by API programmers) of the Metamata and of the Sitraka JProbe tasks. To the contrary, it is possible that there are API users who use for instance the Project#resolveFile() methods. Regards, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks
Do you agree that we should do it ? [ X ] Yes +1 [ ] No Why is this code change different from the other changes to remove deprecated classes? Is it simply because these tasks are 3pp? If so does that mean that we can break bwc iff it's dependent on a 3pp? Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
