Re: Ant 1.7.0 Maven2 repo version has problem
Hi, dependency groupIdorg.apache.ant/groupId artifactIdant/artifactId version[1.7.0,)/version ---^ Are you sure about the brackets? Looks weird :) - apparently this is how you state 1.7.0 or greater than or equal to in mvn pom language. So it should pick up the jar (which it does). Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Peter, my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed this. What are the critical changes we are waiting for ? I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails sent (delay the RC (steve).) I do not know of any critical changes, except maybe to suppress caching resource collections. We need: to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing vmwatcher file issue), manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef, scriptselector etc. However these are not critical. Peter Regards, Antoine On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: I thought that the plan was to have an RC2. Peter On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold final 1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major platforms? This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting work on a compliant platform. Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
Hello, I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 + Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ? On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Peter, my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed this. What are the critical changes we are waiting for ? I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails sent (delay the RC (steve).) I do not know of any critical changes, except maybe to suppress caching resource collections. We need: to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing vmwatcher file issue), manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef, scriptselector etc. However these are not critical. Peter Regards, Antoine On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: I thought that the plan was to have an RC2. Peter On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold final 1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major platforms? This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting work on a compliant platform. Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
I do think we should not be adding any functionality between a RC and the final build, would I be the only one (I already have my doubts on doing non-essential things between the RCs). Martijn Hello, I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 + Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ? On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Peter, my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed this. What are the critical changes we are waiting for ? I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails sent (delay the RC (steve).) I do not know of any critical changes, except maybe to suppress caching resource collections. We need: to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing vmwatcher file issue), manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef, scriptselector etc. However these are not critical. Peter Regards, Antoine On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: I thought that the plan was to have an RC2. Peter On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold final 1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major platforms? This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting work on a compliant platform. Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
My comment was on the define feature in macrodef it has been in the build for a while (~a year). It was placed there as an experiment, but I do not think that people have used it (as there is no comments, and it does not fullfill its usecase - it leaves removable properties). If it is left in now, it will be there forever! (due to BC). Peter On 12/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do think we should not be adding any functionality between a RC and the final build, would I be the only one (I already have my doubts on doing non-essential things between the RCs). Martijn Hello, I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 + Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ? On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Peter, my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed this. What are the critical changes we are waiting for ? I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails sent (delay the RC (steve).) I do not know of any critical changes, except maybe to suppress caching resource collections. We need: to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing vmwatcher file issue), manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef, scriptselector etc. However these are not critical. Peter Regards, Antoine On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: I thought that the plan was to have an RC2. Peter On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold final 1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major platforms? This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting work on a compliant platform. Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
--- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My comment was on the define feature in macrodef
it has been in the build for a while (~a year). It
was placed
there as an experiment, but I do not think that
people have
used it (as there is no comments, and it does not
fullfill
its usecase - it leaves removable properties). If it
is left in now,
it will be there forever! (due to BC).
:( +1 to remove, then.
-Matt (eternally opposed to namespace pollution)
Peter
On 12/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think we should not be adding any
functionality between a RC and the
final build, would I be the only one (I already
have my doubts on doing
non-essential things between the RCs).
Martijn
Hello,
I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening
then.
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 +
Von: Peter Reilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Peter,
my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last
Sunday, but I delayed this.
What are the critical changes we are waiting
for ?
I assumed that there was to be another RC from
emails
sent (delay the RC (steve).)
I do not know of any critical changes, except
maybe to suppress caching resource collections.
We need:
to add extra diagnostics for junit (the
missing
vmwatcher file issue),
manual pages for the new script options for
scriptdef, scriptselector
etc.
However these are not critical.
Peter
Regards,
Antoine
On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly
wrote:
I thought that the plan was to have an RC2.
Peter
On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading
now), can we hold final
1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on
Java6/JDK6 on major platforms?
This will also give us more time to test
Peters javax.scripting work
on a compliant platform.
Thanks,
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly wrote: My comment was on the define feature in macrodef it has been in the build for a while (~a year). It was placed there as an experiment, but I do not think that people have used it (as there is no comments, and it does not fullfill its usecase - it leaves removable properties). If it is left in now, it will be there forever! (due to BC). Peter Looks like a very good reason to not make the final build until it is removed, I would call this essential. On 12/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do think we should not be adding any functionality between a RC and the final build, would I be the only one (I already have my doubts on doing non-essential things between the RCs). Martijn Hello, I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 + Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ? On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Peter, my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed this. What are the critical changes we are waiting for ? I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails sent (delay the RC (steve).) I do not know of any critical changes, except maybe to suppress caching resource collections. We need: to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing vmwatcher file issue), manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef, scriptselector etc. However these are not critical. Peter Regards, Antoine On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: I thought that the plan was to have an RC2. Peter On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold final 1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major platforms? This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting work on a compliant platform. Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
On 12/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Peter Reilly wrote:
My comment was on the define feature in macrodef
it has been in the build for a while (~a year). It was placed
there as an experiment, but I do not think that people have
used it (as there is no comments, and it does not fullfill
its usecase - it leaves removable properties). If it is left in now,
it will be there forever! (due to BC).
Peter
Looks like a very good reason to not make the final build until it is
removed, I would call this essential.
I have removed it now, ( it had comments in the code, I had meant to say
that there was no documention in the manual.)
Hopefully, we will figure out a solution for scratch properties for Ant 1.8.0.
Peter
On 12/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think we should not be adding any functionality between a RC and the
final build, would I be the only one (I already have my doubts on doing
non-essential things between the RCs).
Martijn
Hello,
I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then.
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 +
Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Peter,
my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed
this.
What are the critical changes we are waiting for ?
I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails
sent (delay the RC (steve).)
I do not know of any critical changes, except
maybe to suppress caching resource collections.
We need:
to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing
vmwatcher file issue),
manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef,
scriptselector
etc.
However these are not critical.
Peter
Regards,
Antoine
On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote:
I thought that the plan was to have an RC2.
Peter
On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold
final
1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major
platforms?
This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting
work
on a compliant platform.
Thanks,
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
--- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] Hopefully, we will figure out a solution for scratch properties for Ant 1.8.0. I still think you were on the right track with those property stacks... if we can just figure out what it was about the ThreadLocal scope branching that was leaking memory... -Matt Peter Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
On 12/12/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] Hopefully, we will figure out a solution for scratch properties for Ant 1.8.0. I still think you were on the right track with those property stacks... if we can just figure out what it was about the ThreadLocal scope branching that was leaking memory... I do not think that theadlocal is needed, something can be done in parallel to get stacks per parallel. The solution is still probally too compilicated, I think that we could just use ac:var unset=yes name=prop xmlns:ac=antlib:net.sf.antcontrib/ i.e. have an unset name=prop/ task this will unset a property. If the property is a user property, the task would throw a build exception. Peter -Matt Peter Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
--- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/12/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] Hopefully, we will figure out a solution for scratch properties for Ant 1.8.0. I still think you were on the right track with those property stacks... if we can just figure out what it was about the ThreadLocal scope branching that was leaking memory... I do not think that theadlocal is needed, something can be done in parallel to get stacks per parallel. The solution is still probally too compilicated, I s/complicated/cool/ ;) think that we could just use ac:var unset=yes name=prop xmlns:ac=antlib:net.sf.antcontrib/ i.e. have an unset name=prop/ task this will unset a property. If the property is a user property, the task would throw a build exception. That's not nearly as much fun. :( -Matt Peter -Matt Peter Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then. Hi, I have finished my commits. Cheers, Peter Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 + Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ? On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Peter, my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed this. What are the critical changes we are waiting for ? I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails sent (delay the RC (steve).) I do not know of any critical changes, except maybe to suppress caching resource collections. We need: to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing vmwatcher file issue), manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef, scriptselector etc. However these are not critical. Peter Regards, Antoine On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: I thought that the plan was to have an RC2. Peter On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold final 1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major platforms? This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting work on a compliant platform. Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
Hello Peter,
are you happy now for the build ?
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:07:27 +
Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
My comment was on the define feature in macrodef
it has been in the build for a while (~a year). It was placed
there as an experiment, but I do not think that people have
used it (as there is no comments, and it does not fullfill
its usecase - it leaves removable properties). If it is left in now,
it will be there forever! (due to BC).
Peter
On 12/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think we should not be adding any functionality between a RC and
the
final build, would I be the only one (I already have my doubts on doing
non-essential things between the RCs).
Martijn
Hello,
I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then.
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 +
Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Peter,
my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed
this.
What are the critical changes we are waiting for ?
I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails
sent (delay the RC (steve).)
I do not know of any critical changes, except
maybe to suppress caching resource collections.
We need:
to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing
vmwatcher file issue),
manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef,
scriptselector
etc.
However these are not critical.
Peter
Regards,
Antoine
On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote:
I thought that the plan was to have an RC2.
Peter
On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold
final
1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major
platforms?
This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting
work
on a compliant platform.
Thanks,
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
This answers my question. Regards, Antoine On Dec 12, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Peter Reilly wrote: On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then. Hi, I have finished my commits. Cheers, Peter Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 + Von: Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ? On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Peter, my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed this. What are the critical changes we are waiting for ? I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails sent (delay the RC (steve).) I do not know of any critical changes, except maybe to suppress caching resource collections. We need: to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing vmwatcher file issue), manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef, scriptselector etc. However these are not critical. Peter Regards, Antoine On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: I thought that the plan was to have an RC2. Peter On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold final 1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major platforms? This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting work on a compliant platform. Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
Hi Antoine, Would you like me to roll back the java6 related changes (and breakages) before you start the build? Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ant 1.7.0?
Hi,
Will Tatam has updated the package for us and I have uploaded it to JPP
1.7 'devel'.
However, I had to disabl the manifest-only subpackage so I could build
and uploaded it to JPP 1.7 devel, as those JARs are no longer being
generated. Lets see if someone can figure out why the MANIFEST-only
JARs are not generated anymore in Ant 1.7.0.
This is due a change in the jar task, it will not make MANIFEST-only files
if
the attribute whenmanifestonly=skip. This attribute is now used in ant's
build.xml.
It can be overridden by setting the property optional.jars.whenmanifestonly
= build
i.e. ./build.sh -Doptional.jars.whenmanifestonly=build
The relavant changes to build.xml are:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/build.xml?r1=278535r2=293157diff_format=h
and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/build.xml?r1=293157r2=295060diff_format=h
I am not too sure that it is a good idea to generate the MANIFEST-only files
- these
correspond to ant tasks and types that do not get built. It was a common
report that
a certain task did not work, the reporter said that say ant-apache-bsf.jarwere
bsf.jar is present in $ANT_HOME/lib,
on investigation, the reporter had built ant themselves without bsf.jar in
$ANT_BUILD/lib/optional.
There is also a stacktrace when generating the javadocs using a BEA
1.4.2 JDK. With the Sun 1.5 one that goes away. I still have to try
the Sun 1.4.2 JDK to see if it is related to the brand or to the Java
version.
If there is an issue here please enter a bug.
Note that ant 1.7 should be compiled with java5, it can be compiled
with java1.4, but a small part will be left out.
P.S.: I looked into the build logs for the old 1.6.5 Ant and for the
1.7.0 that did not generate the manifest-only JARs and it clearly shows
where the builds differ. If someone want to dig a little deeper into
this...
Fernando Nasser wrote:
I didn't see anything in the list that would really affect us.
So, it _*seems*_ we can upgrade. We can try and add a 1.7.0 0.b2.1jpp RPM
to 1.7 'devel' and try building with it.
Jason Corley wrote:
I do not know, but found these (long-ish) blurbs:
-
We try to doc all changes here (but can miss a few!).
Not sure how much that really answers your question.
Jason
On 9/21/06, Fernando Nasser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gmane.org/get-address.php?address=fnasser%2dH%2bwXaHxf7aLQT0dZR%2bAlfA%40public.gmane.org
wrote:
Hi guys,
Someone asked me in off for Ant 1.7.0, which is actually B2.
Anyone knows how compatible that is with our 1.6.x Ant?
The intention is that it should be as compatible as possible both at the
java
api level and especially at the build script level.
Regards to all,
Fernando
P.S.: It would be nice to release JPP 1.7 with Ant 1.7 (as we released
JPP 1.6 with Ant 1.6.x). There is no real connection between the
releases but it does sound nice [image: :-)]
True ;-)
Looking at
http://www.jpackage.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/rpms/free/ant/?root=jpackagepathrev=JPACKAGE-1_7
I think that we can get most of these patches into ant directly except for
apache-ant-bz163689.patch.
There is one change I would like in jpackage, it is to do with the
/etc/ant.conf. It gets dot ed from the ant bash
script. It overwrites ANT_HOME (unless the -noconfig option is set). This
has given rise
to a large number of e-mails to user@ant.apache.org, and a number of bug
reports:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40623
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31278
+ others
the ant script file has been altered to whine if /etc/ant.conf changes the
user's ANT_HOME.
One suggestion is that /etc/ant.conf does not modify ANT_HOME if it is
already
set - ANT_HOME=${ANT_HOME:-/usr/share/ant}, however this I think does not
work as $rpm_mode will still be set, and ant will be called with the user's
ANT_HOME/lib/*.jar
and the contents of /etc/ant.d/*.
I think that /etc/ant.conf should *not* be called if the env variable
ANT_HOME is set but
would need to get agreement from jpackage people before doing this.
Peter
