Re: [api-dev] writing writer doc to stream unpacked
Am So, den 24.04.2005 schrieb Mathias Bauer um 23:47: > Marc Santhoff wrote: > > Am So, den 24.04.2005 schrieb Mathias Bauer um 11:48: > > > >> If you want to have unpacked XML in a stream you should use the "flat" > >> XML filter that puts alltogether in one file. > > > > As you can see from the commented out code I've tried that already with > > the same result (IOException). > > I'm not surprised that the code you commented out didn't work because > the filter name is not correct. It *does* work, but there is one little thing: The filter name ist not the string shown in the save dialog (which I used) but can be taken from the XML filter settings dialog. Thanks, Marc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [api-dev] writing writer doc to stream unpacked
Am So, den 24.04.2005 schrieb Mathias Bauer um 23:47: > Marc Santhoff wrote: > > Am So, den 24.04.2005 schrieb Mathias Bauer um 11:48: > > > >> If you want to have unpacked XML in a stream you should use the "flat" > >> XML filter that puts alltogether in one file. > > > > As you can see from the commented out code I've tried that already with > > the same result (IOException). > > I'm not surprised that the code you commented out didn't work because > the filter name is not correct. I have registered a filter for testing purposes with exactly that name. It is a testbed for fiddling with XSLT, not the main flat xml filter. But I had no time to try again yet... Marc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [api-dev] writing writer doc to stream unpacked
Marc Santhoff wrote: > Am So, den 24.04.2005 schrieb Mathias Bauer um 11:48: > >> If you want to have unpacked XML in a stream you should use the "flat" >> XML filter that puts alltogether in one file. > > As you can see from the commented out code I've tried that already with > the same result (IOException). I'm not surprised that the code you commented out didn't work because the filter name is not correct. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [api-dev] writing writer doc to stream unpacked
Am So, den 24.04.2005 schrieb Mathias Bauer um 11:48: > Marc Santhoff wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I' trying with the code below, but the result is always negative, the > > contents of the written file is still in zipped form. Without using a > > stream as storage but a file as normally done it works, the whole bunch > > is written out as text (content.xml, ...). > > > > If I use a "FilterName" it results in a css.io.IOException with the > > message ".". > > > > What's happening here? Is it technically impossible to write unpacked to > > a file stream or am I missing something? > > Yes, the "unpacked" way creates a *folder* containing all the streams > you usually get in a zip package. > > If you want to have unpacked XML in a stream you should use the "flat" > XML filter that puts alltogether in one file. As you can see from the commented out code I've tried that already with the same result (IOException). Thank you anyways, now I know it *should* work with a flat filter. I'll walk through my code oncemore with a clean brain and try again... Marc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [api-dev] writing writer doc to stream unpacked
Marc Santhoff wrote: > Hi, > > I' trying with the code below, but the result is always negative, the > contents of the written file is still in zipped form. Without using a > stream as storage but a file as normally done it works, the whole bunch > is written out as text (content.xml, ...). > > If I use a "FilterName" it results in a css.io.IOException with the > message ".". > > What's happening here? Is it technically impossible to write unpacked to > a file stream or am I missing something? Yes, the "unpacked" way creates a *folder* containing all the streams you usually get in a zip package. If you want to have unpacked XML in a stream you should use the "flat" XML filter that puts alltogether in one file. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
