Re: Installation issue in 0.1.0 release

2017-07-10 Thread Ran Ziv 
I created a new voting thread for a 0.1.1 release candidate.

I understand it's important someone else does the release manager's role as
well, but since this is a quick fix version I hope it's ok I took it again
upon myself.
We'll make sure next time someone else takes this role.


On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Suneel Marthi  wrote:

> ...and that's something i follow even on the TLPs I am involved with - more
> frequent releases
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:54 AM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> > IMHO, podlings should try to cut releases frequently.  Gets in the habit
> of
> > how to do it.  So if you or someone else has the cycles to cut the
> release
> > I say do it.
> >
> > I personally don't care what version it is, its just a number.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:13 AM Ran Ziv  wrote:
> >
> > > I've found the following issue with the 0.1.0 release:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-304
> > >
> > > A fix for this has already been merged into master; PR can be seen
> here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/178
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm proposing the possibility of creating a quick 0.1.1 release for
> > fixing
> > > this bug.
> > > On one hand it's not necessarily in the main path (requires optional
> > > dependency installation, not relevant for Windows) and has a simple
> > > workaround (see comment on the JIRA issue); On the other hand, it's a
> > > pretty annoying bug that could deter users from using the 0.1.0, and
> the
> > > fix is simple.
> > >
> > >
> > > If we're to release a 0.1.1 package, there are a few other bug fixes
> that
> > > have been merged since the original 0.1.0 proposal, that we could have
> > as a
> > > part of this release as well:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-296
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-202
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-298
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-287
> > >
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Ran
> > >
> >
>

Re: Installation issue in 0.1.0 release

2017-07-10 Thread Suneel Marthi 
...and that's something i follow even on the TLPs I am involved with - more
frequent releases

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:54 AM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> IMHO, podlings should try to cut releases frequently.  Gets in the habit of
> how to do it.  So if you or someone else has the cycles to cut the release
> I say do it.
>
> I personally don't care what version it is, its just a number.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:13 AM Ran Ziv  wrote:
>
> > I've found the following issue with the 0.1.0 release:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-304
> >
> > A fix for this has already been merged into master; PR can be seen here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/178
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm proposing the possibility of creating a quick 0.1.1 release for
> fixing
> > this bug.
> > On one hand it's not necessarily in the main path (requires optional
> > dependency installation, not relevant for Windows) and has a simple
> > workaround (see comment on the JIRA issue); On the other hand, it's a
> > pretty annoying bug that could deter users from using the 0.1.0, and the
> > fix is simple.
> >
> >
> > If we're to release a 0.1.1 package, there are a few other bug fixes that
> > have been merged since the original 0.1.0 proposal, that we could have
> as a
> > part of this release as well:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-296
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-202
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-298
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-287
> >
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Ran
> >
>

Re: Installation issue in 0.1.0 release

2017-07-10 Thread John D. Ament 
IMHO, podlings should try to cut releases frequently.  Gets in the habit of
how to do it.  So if you or someone else has the cycles to cut the release
I say do it.

I personally don't care what version it is, its just a number.

John

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:13 AM Ran Ziv  wrote:

> I've found the following issue with the 0.1.0 release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-304
>
> A fix for this has already been merged into master; PR can be seen here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/178
>
>
>
> I'm proposing the possibility of creating a quick 0.1.1 release for fixing
> this bug.
> On one hand it's not necessarily in the main path (requires optional
> dependency installation, not relevant for Windows) and has a simple
> workaround (see comment on the JIRA issue); On the other hand, it's a
> pretty annoying bug that could deter users from using the 0.1.0, and the
> fix is simple.
>
>
> If we're to release a 0.1.1 package, there are a few other bug fixes that
> have been merged since the original 0.1.0 proposal, that we could have as a
> part of this release as well:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-296
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-202
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-298
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-287
>
>
> What do you think?
>
> Ran
>

Installation issue in 0.1.0 release

2017-07-10 Thread Ran Ziv 
I've found the following issue with the 0.1.0 release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-304

A fix for this has already been merged into master; PR can be seen here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/178



I'm proposing the possibility of creating a quick 0.1.1 release for fixing
this bug.
On one hand it's not necessarily in the main path (requires optional
dependency installation, not relevant for Windows) and has a simple
workaround (see comment on the JIRA issue); On the other hand, it's a
pretty annoying bug that could deter users from using the 0.1.0, and the
fix is simple.


If we're to release a 0.1.1 package, there are a few other bug fixes that
have been merged since the original 0.1.0 proposal, that we could have as a
part of this release as well:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-296
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-202
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-298
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-287


What do you think?

Ran