Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
There are a few interesting topics that I think would make a good sync up in the sync document. For personal reasons I can no longer host such meetings on Thursdays for a while but I would like to propose one for next Wednesday March 20, 2022 at 15:00 UTC. Please see the document for more details and to offer comments. I also want to remind the community that anyone should feel free to organize meetups on days / timezones that work well for them and publicize them in the document, in the slack channel and on the mailing list. Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:56 PM Bob Tinsman wrote: > I just missed the call, but I watched the recording (thank you to Andrew > for posting [1]). Really interesting! > I'm diving into Arrow because I have some previous experience with > in-memory query engines. I'm following discussions around improving > performance and adding features so I can determine how best to contribute. > > In particular, I was interested in some of the background for the JIT > implementation [2] and the row format [3] but I guess I'm missing context. > I saw the comment in #1708 [4] that "many pipeline-breaking operators are > inherently row-based". > My questions: > - By "pipeline-breaking" I assume you mean "very slow", but can you give me > details? Does this arise from some particular observation, or other > reported issues? > - An example would be nice, like "select a, b, c from blah order by d" > with table "blah" having 1 million rows and 10 columns takes 5 minutes, or > even anecdotal evidence like mailing list discussions > - In general, what tools are you using to analyze datafusion performance? > - The criterion benchmarks are nice but do you have anything higher-level > which exercises a broad range of workloads? > - How much profiling have you done to identify bottlenecks? > > To be honest, I was kind of surprised to see using a row format to solve a > performance problem, but I figured you must have good reasons, and I'm > still getting my brain around datafusion's query execution model. Thanks > for any illumination! > > [1] https://youtu.be/5NJcqXm6uE0 > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1849 > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1782 > [4] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1708 > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 12:25 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > I am not sure if everyone saw it in the agenda[1], but we plan to have a > > meeting tomorrow. I'll plan to record it for anyone who can not make this > > time. > > > > 15:00 UTC Wednesday March 9, 2022 > > Meeting Location: (in agenda) > > Matthew Turner: focused on JIT and row representation, next Wednesday, > > March 9th, > > @yijie: JIT overview > > > > [1] > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:50 AM Benson Muite > > > wrote: > > > > > Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and > > > discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC. > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a > walk > > > > through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- > would > > > > anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it? > > > > > > > > I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I just missed the call, but I watched the recording (thank you to Andrew for posting [1]). Really interesting! I'm diving into Arrow because I have some previous experience with in-memory query engines. I'm following discussions around improving performance and adding features so I can determine how best to contribute. In particular, I was interested in some of the background for the JIT implementation [2] and the row format [3] but I guess I'm missing context. I saw the comment in #1708 [4] that "many pipeline-breaking operators are inherently row-based". My questions: - By "pipeline-breaking" I assume you mean "very slow", but can you give me details? Does this arise from some particular observation, or other reported issues? - An example would be nice, like "select a, b, c from blah order by d" with table "blah" having 1 million rows and 10 columns takes 5 minutes, or even anecdotal evidence like mailing list discussions - In general, what tools are you using to analyze datafusion performance? - The criterion benchmarks are nice but do you have anything higher-level which exercises a broad range of workloads? - How much profiling have you done to identify bottlenecks? To be honest, I was kind of surprised to see using a row format to solve a performance problem, but I figured you must have good reasons, and I'm still getting my brain around datafusion's query execution model. Thanks for any illumination! [1] https://youtu.be/5NJcqXm6uE0 [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1849 [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1782 [4] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1708 On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 12:25 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > I am not sure if everyone saw it in the agenda[1], but we plan to have a > meeting tomorrow. I'll plan to record it for anyone who can not make this > time. > > 15:00 UTC Wednesday March 9, 2022 > Meeting Location: (in agenda) > Matthew Turner: focused on JIT and row representation, next Wednesday, > March 9th, > @yijie: JIT overview > > [1] > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:50 AM Benson Muite > wrote: > > > Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and > > discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC. > > > > Benson > > > > On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk > > > through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- would > > > anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it? > > > > > > I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I am not sure if everyone saw it in the agenda[1], but we plan to have a meeting tomorrow. I'll plan to record it for anyone who can not make this time. 15:00 UTC Wednesday March 9, 2022 Meeting Location: (in agenda) Matthew Turner: focused on JIT and row representation, next Wednesday, March 9th, @yijie: JIT overview [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:50 AM Benson Muite wrote: > Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and > discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC. > > Benson > > On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk > > through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- would > > anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it? > > > > I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior > > > > Andrew > > > > [1] > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC. Benson On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- would anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it? I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- would anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it? I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 6:09 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > I don't see any discussion items for today, so I won't plan on any call > today. If anyone still wants to have a call please let me know > > Andrew > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:23 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > >> I don't see any items on the agenda[1] for tomorrow's sync at 16:00 UTC; >> Please add items if there is anything you would like to discuss. >> >> If there are no agenda items, we'll cancel the call and continue >> asynchronously as always >> >> Andrew >> >> [1] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq >> >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:28 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: >> >>> Minutes from the call today. Recording can also be found in agenda[2] >>> >>> Attendees: Andrew Lamb, Rich, Paddy Horan >>> >>> Discussed proposal for more frequent releases [1] >>> >>> Discussed arrow / arrow2 >>> >>> Decided to postpone multi-threaded execution walk through until someone >>> with specific questions was on the call to guide where it went >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1120 >>> [2] >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 AM Andrew Lamb >>> wrote: >>> As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December 22 at 16:00 UTC The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC > (e.g. 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the > agenda accordingly > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite < > benson_mu...@emailplus.org> wrote: > >> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC? >> >> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: >> > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow >> > >> > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one. >> > >> > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a >> code >> > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of >> the >> > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes >> > >> > Andrew >> > >> > >> > >> > [1] >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# >> > >> > >> >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I don't see any discussion items for today, so I won't plan on any call today. If anyone still wants to have a call please let me know Andrew On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:23 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > I don't see any items on the agenda[1] for tomorrow's sync at 16:00 UTC; > Please add items if there is anything you would like to discuss. > > If there are no agenda items, we'll cancel the call and continue > asynchronously as always > > Andrew > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:28 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > >> Minutes from the call today. Recording can also be found in agenda[2] >> >> Attendees: Andrew Lamb, Rich, Paddy Horan >> >> Discussed proposal for more frequent releases [1] >> >> Discussed arrow / arrow2 >> >> Decided to postpone multi-threaded execution walk through until someone >> with specific questions was on the call to guide where it went >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1120 >> [2] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 AM Andrew Lamb >> wrote: >> >>> As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December >>> 22 at 16:00 UTC >>> >>> The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> [1] >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: >>> Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g. 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the agenda accordingly On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite < benson_mu...@emailplus.org> wrote: > The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC? > > On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow > > > > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one. > > > > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a > code > > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of > the > > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I don't see any items on the agenda[1] for tomorrow's sync at 16:00 UTC; Please add items if there is anything you would like to discuss. If there are no agenda items, we'll cancel the call and continue asynchronously as always Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:28 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > Minutes from the call today. Recording can also be found in agenda[2] > > Attendees: Andrew Lamb, Rich, Paddy Horan > > Discussed proposal for more frequent releases [1] > > Discussed arrow / arrow2 > > Decided to postpone multi-threaded execution walk through until someone > with specific questions was on the call to guide where it went > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1120 > [2] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > >> As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December >> 22 at 16:00 UTC >> >> The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend >> >> Andrew >> >> [1] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: >> >>> Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g. >>> 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the >>> agenda accordingly >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite >>> wrote: >>> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC? On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow > > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one. > > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes > > Andrew > > > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > >>>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Minutes from the call today. Recording can also be found in agenda[2] Attendees: Andrew Lamb, Rich, Paddy Horan Discussed proposal for more frequent releases [1] Discussed arrow / arrow2 Decided to postpone multi-threaded execution walk through until someone with specific questions was on the call to guide where it went [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1120 [2] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December > 22 at 16:00 UTC > > The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend > > Andrew > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq > > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > >> Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g. >> 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the >> agenda accordingly >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite >> wrote: >> >>> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC? >>> >>> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: >>> > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow >>> > >>> > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one. >>> > >>> > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a >>> code >>> > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the >>> > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes >>> > >>> > Andrew >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > [1] >>> > >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# >>> > >>> > >>> >>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December 22 at 16:00 UTC The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g. > 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the > agenda accordingly > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite > wrote: > >> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC? >> >> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: >> > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow >> > >> > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one. >> > >> > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code >> > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the >> > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes >> > >> > Andrew >> > >> > >> > >> > [1] >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# >> > >> > >> >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g. 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the agenda accordingly On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite wrote: > The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC? > > On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow > > > > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one. > > > > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code > > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the > > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC? On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote: I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one. After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one. After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:36 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > Due to lack of agenda items [1] this week , I do not plan on holding the > call > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:57 PM Benson Muite > wrote: > >> Cannot host at 4:00 UTC on 28 October, but can host at 4:00 UTC on 11 >> November. >> >> Benson >> >> On 10/27/21 1:02 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: >> > We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so >> I >> > will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow. >> > >> > Andrew >> > >> > [1] >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# >> > [2] >> > >> https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/community/communication.html#sync-up-zoom-calls >> > >> >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Due to lack of agenda items [1] this week , I do not plan on holding the call [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:57 PM Benson Muite wrote: > Cannot host at 4:00 UTC on 28 October, but can host at 4:00 UTC on 11 > November. > > Benson > > On 10/27/21 1:02 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so I > > will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow. > > > > Andrew > > > > [1] > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > [2] > > > https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/community/communication.html#sync-up-zoom-calls > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Cannot host at 4:00 UTC on 28 October, but can host at 4:00 UTC on 11 November. Benson On 10/27/21 1:02 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so I will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow. Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# [2] https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/community/communication.html#sync-up-zoom-calls
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so I will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow. Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# [2] https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/community/communication.html#sync-up-zoom-calls On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:59 AM QP Hou wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Anyone is welcome to join the party. > > --QP > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:02 AM Ben Chen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm new to Arrow. Is such a call specific to a small group of people or > > welcome to anyone? > > > > Thanks, > > Ben > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andrew Lamb > wrote: > > > > > I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will > cancel it > > > (and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect) > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:23 AM QP Hou wrote: > > > > > > > I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before > > > > the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a > > > > good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of > ad-hoc > > > > meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up. > > > > > > > > > > However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1] > > > > > > > > > > Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? > Maybe > > > > > monthly would be a better cadence? > > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to > "meet" > > > > > > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb < > al...@influxdata.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attendees: > > > > > > > Andrew Lamb > > > > > > > Shen Yi Jie > > > > > > > Matt Turner > > > > > > > Zied BF > > > > > > > Remi Dettai > > > > > > > Rich > > > > > > > Ruihang > > > > > > > Jaiyu Liu > > > > > > > QP > > > > > > > Jorn Horstmann > > > > > > > Benson Muite > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Introductions (20 minutes) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes): > > > > > > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind > > > > > > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite < > > > > > > benson_mu...@emailplus.org> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attendees: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ruihang > > > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Discussion items: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Self-introduction > > > > > > > > OpenVidu seemed to work > > > > > > > > Data Fusion introduction > > > > > > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases > > > > > > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > > > > > Join link: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems > there > > > is a > > > > > > > > > preference for one meeting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at > 3:45 > > > > UTC > > > > > > > > >> tomorrow. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Update the google doc [1] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same > day, > > > > or > > > > > > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most > people. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > > > >> Benson > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> [1] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> Thank you! > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video > > > > > > conferencing > > > > > > > > solution that should just work in the browser. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/22/21 11:15
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Hi Ben, Anyone is welcome to join the party. --QP On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:02 AM Ben Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm new to Arrow. Is such a call specific to a small group of people or > welcome to anyone? > > Thanks, > Ben > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will cancel it > > (and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect) > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:23 AM QP Hou wrote: > > > > > I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before > > > the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a > > > good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of ad-hoc > > > meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up. > > > > > > > > However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1] > > > > > > > > Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe > > > > monthly would be a better cadence? > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet" > > > > > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call: > > > > > > > > > > > > Attendees: > > > > > > Andrew Lamb > > > > > > Shen Yi Jie > > > > > > Matt Turner > > > > > > Zied BF > > > > > > Remi Dettai > > > > > > Rich > > > > > > Ruihang > > > > > > Jaiyu Liu > > > > > > QP > > > > > > Jorn Horstmann > > > > > > Benson Muite > > > > > > > > > > > > Introductions (20 minutes) > > > > > > > > > > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes): > > > > > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind > > > > > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite < > > > > > benson_mu...@emailplus.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attendees: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ruihang > > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Discussion items: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Self-introduction > > > > > > > OpenVidu seemed to work > > > > > > > Data Fusion introduction > > > > > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases > > > > > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > > > > Join link: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there > > is a > > > > > > > > preference for one meeting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 > > > UTC > > > > > > > >> tomorrow. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Update the google doc [1] > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, > > > or > > > > > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > > >> Benson > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> [1] > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > > > >>> Thank you! > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video > > > > > conferencing > > > > > > > solution that should just work in the browser. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > > > > The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not > > > typically > > > > > > > > available > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please > > > > > arrange > > > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can > > > > > adjust > > > > > > > > schedules or technology as needed: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting > > > September > > > > > > > > 30, 2021 > > > > > > > > Location: Zoom [2] > > > > > > > > Agenda: Google docs [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Hi, I'm new to Arrow. Is such a call specific to a small group of people or welcome to anyone? Thanks, Ben On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will cancel it > (and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect) > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:23 AM QP Hou wrote: > > > I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before > > the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a > > good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of ad-hoc > > meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed. > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb > wrote: > > > > > > Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up. > > > > > > However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1] > > > > > > Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe > > > monthly would be a better cadence? > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet" > > > > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call: > > > > > > > > > > Attendees: > > > > > Andrew Lamb > > > > > Shen Yi Jie > > > > > Matt Turner > > > > > Zied BF > > > > > Remi Dettai > > > > > Rich > > > > > Ruihang > > > > > Jaiyu Liu > > > > > QP > > > > > Jorn Horstmann > > > > > Benson Muite > > > > > > > > > > Introductions (20 minutes) > > > > > > > > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes): > > > > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind > > > > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite < > > > > benson_mu...@emailplus.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Attendees: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ruihang > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > > > > Discussion items: > > > > > > > > > > > > Self-introduction > > > > > > OpenVidu seemed to work > > > > > > Data Fusion introduction > > > > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases > > > > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > > > Join link: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there > is a > > > > > > > preference for one meeting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 > > UTC > > > > > > >> tomorrow. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Update the google doc [1] > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, > > or > > > > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > >> Benson > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [1] > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > > >>> Thank you! > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video > > > > conferencing > > > > > > solution that should just work in the browser. > > > > > > > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > > > The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not > > typically > > > > > > > available > > > > > > at > > > > > > > 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please > > > > arrange > > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can > > > > adjust > > > > > > > schedules or technology as needed: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting > > September > > > > > > > 30, 2021 > > > > > > > Location: Zoom [2] > > > > > > > Agenda: Google docs [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing > list. I > > > > have > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > proposed adding this information to the website [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will cancel it (and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect) On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:23 AM QP Hou wrote: > I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before > the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a > good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of ad-hoc > meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed. > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up. > > > > However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1] > > > > Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe > > monthly would be a better cadence? > > > > Andrew > > > > > > [1] > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu wrote: > > > > > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet" > > > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening. > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb > wrote: > > > > > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call: > > > > > > > > Attendees: > > > > Andrew Lamb > > > > Shen Yi Jie > > > > Matt Turner > > > > Zied BF > > > > Remi Dettai > > > > Rich > > > > Ruihang > > > > Jaiyu Liu > > > > QP > > > > Jorn Horstmann > > > > Benson Muite > > > > > > > > Introductions (20 minutes) > > > > > > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes): > > > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind > > > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite < > > > benson_mu...@emailplus.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Attendees: > > > > > > > > > > Ruihang > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > > Discussion items: > > > > > > > > > > Self-introduction > > > > > OpenVidu seemed to work > > > > > Data Fusion introduction > > > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases > > > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees? > > > > > > > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > > Join link: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a > > > > > > preference for one meeting. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 > UTC > > > > > >> tomorrow. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Update the google doc [1] > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, > or > > > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > >> Benson > > > > > >> > > > > > >> [1] > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > >>> Thank you! > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video > > > conferencing > > > > > solution that should just work in the browser. > > > > > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > > The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not > typically > > > > > > available > > > > > at > > > > > > 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please > > > arrange > > > > > > that. > > > > > > Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can > > > adjust > > > > > > schedules or technology as needed: > > > > > > > > > > > > Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting > September > > > > > > 30, 2021 > > > > > > Location: Zoom [2] > > > > > > Agenda: Google docs [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I > > > have > > > > > > also > > > > > > proposed adding this information to the website [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, > etc) > > > > > > Time: > > > > > Sep > > > > > > 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC > > > > > > https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of ad-hoc meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed. On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up. > > However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1] > > Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe > monthly would be a better cadence? > > Andrew > > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu wrote: > > > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet" > > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening. > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call: > > > > > > Attendees: > > > Andrew Lamb > > > Shen Yi Jie > > > Matt Turner > > > Zied BF > > > Remi Dettai > > > Rich > > > Ruihang > > > Jaiyu Liu > > > QP > > > Jorn Horstmann > > > Benson Muite > > > > > > Introductions (20 minutes) > > > > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes): > > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind > > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite < > > benson_mu...@emailplus.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Attendees: > > > > > > > > Ruihang > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > Discussion items: > > > > > > > > Self-introduction > > > > OpenVidu seemed to work > > > > Data Fusion introduction > > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases > > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees? > > > > > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > > Join link: > > > > > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a > > > > > preference for one meeting. > > > > > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> > > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC > > > > >> tomorrow. > > > > >> > > > > >> Update the google doc [1] > > > > >> > > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or > > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> Benson > > > > >> > > > > >> [1] > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > >>> Thank you! > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite > > > > >>> > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video > > conferencing > > > > solution that should just work in the browser. > > > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > > The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically > > > > > available > > > > at > > > > > 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please > > arrange > > > > > that. > > > > > Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can > > adjust > > > > > schedules or technology as needed: > > > > > > > > > > Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September > > > > > 30, 2021 > > > > > Location: Zoom [2] > > > > > Agenda: Google docs [1] > > > > > > > > > > We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I > > have > > > > > also > > > > > proposed adding this information to the website [3] > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) > > > > > Time: > > > > Sep > > > > > 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC > > > > > https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up. However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1] Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe monthly would be a better cadence? Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit# On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu wrote: > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet" > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening. > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call: > > > > Attendees: > > Andrew Lamb > > Shen Yi Jie > > Matt Turner > > Zied BF > > Remi Dettai > > Rich > > Ruihang > > Jaiyu Liu > > QP > > Jorn Horstmann > > Benson Muite > > > > Introductions (20 minutes) > > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes): > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite < > benson_mu...@emailplus.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Attendees: > > > > > > Ruihang > > > Benson > > > > > > Discussion items: > > > > > > Self-introduction > > > OpenVidu seemed to work > > > Data Fusion introduction > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees? > > > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > > Join link: > > > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a > > > > preference for one meeting. > > > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC > > > >> tomorrow. > > > >> > > > >> Update the google doc [1] > > > >> > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Benson > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > >>> Thank you! > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite > > > >>> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video > conferencing > > > solution that should just work in the browser. > > > > > > Benson > > > > > > > > > On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > > The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically > > > > available > > > at > > > > 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please > arrange > > > > that. > > > > Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can > adjust > > > > schedules or technology as needed: > > > > > > > > Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September > > > > 30, 2021 > > > > Location: Zoom [2] > > > > Agenda: Google docs [1] > > > > > > > > We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I > have > > > > also > > > > proposed adding this information to the website [3] > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) > > > > Time: > > > Sep > > > > 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC > > > > https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet" everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening. On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call: > > Attendees: > Andrew Lamb > Shen Yi Jie > Matt Turner > Zied BF > Remi Dettai > Rich > Ruihang > Jaiyu Liu > QP > Jorn Horstmann > Benson Muite > > Introductions (20 minutes) > > Discussion Items (10 minutes): > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite > wrote: > > > Attendees: > > > > Ruihang > > Benson > > > > Discussion items: > > > > Self-introduction > > OpenVidu seemed to work > > Data Fusion introduction > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases > > Maybe get time zones of attendees? > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > > Join link: > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca > > > > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a > > > preference for one meeting. > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC > > >> tomorrow. > > >> > > >> Update the google doc [1] > > >> > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Benson > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > >> > > >> > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > >>> Thank you! > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite > > >>> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing > > solution that should just work in the browser. > > > > Benson > > > > > > On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically > > > available > > at > > > 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange > > > that. > > > Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust > > > schedules or technology as needed: > > > > > > Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September > > > 30, 2021 > > > Location: Zoom [2] > > > Agenda: Google docs [1] > > > > > > We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have > > > also > > > proposed adding this information to the website [3] > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Andrew > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > > > > > [2] > > > Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) > > > Time: > > Sep > > > 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC > > > https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call: Attendees: Andrew Lamb Shen Yi Jie Matt Turner Zied BF Remi Dettai Rich Ruihang Jaiyu Liu QP Jorn Horstmann Benson Muite Introductions (20 minutes) Discussion Items (10 minutes): * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite wrote: > Attendees: > > Ruihang > Benson > > Discussion items: > > Self-introduction > OpenVidu seemed to work > Data Fusion introduction > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases > Maybe get time zones of attendees? > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > Join link: > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a > > preference for one meeting. > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC > >> tomorrow. > >> > >> Update the google doc [1] > >> > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Benson > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > >> > >> > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > >>> Thank you! > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing > solution that should just work in the browser. > > Benson > > > On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically > > available > at > > 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange > > that. > > Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust > > schedules or technology as needed: > > > > Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September > > 30, 2021 > > Location: Zoom [2] > > Agenda: Google docs [1] > > > > We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have > > also > > proposed adding this information to the website [3] > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > > > [1] > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > > [2] > > Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) > > Time: > Sep > > 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC > > https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files > > > > >>> > >> > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Attendees: Ruihang Benson Discussion items: Self-introduction OpenVidu seemed to work Data Fusion introduction Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases Maybe get time zones of attendees? On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote: Join link: https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a preference for one meeting. On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: Hi, Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC tomorrow. Update the google doc [1] Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. Regards, Benson [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: Thank you! On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite wrote: Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing solution that should just work in the browser. Benson On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically available at 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange that. Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust schedules or technology as needed: Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September 30, 2021 Location: Zoom [2] Agenda: Google docs [1] We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have also proposed adding this information to the website [3] Thanks, Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit [2] Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) Time: Sep 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Join link: https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a preference for one meeting. On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote: Hi, Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC tomorrow. Update the google doc [1] Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. Regards, Benson [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: Thank you! On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite wrote: Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing solution that should just work in the browser. Benson On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically available at 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange that. Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust schedules or technology as needed: Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September 30, 2021 Location: Zoom [2] Agenda: Google docs [1] We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have also proposed adding this information to the website [3] Thanks, Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit [2] Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) Time: Sep 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I still plan on holding a sync up at 16:00 UTC for anyone who would like to attend Zoom Link: https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 Pre-meeting Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:11 PM QP Hou wrote: > I would prefer alternating meeting time to optimize for more > attendance and reduce meeting fatigue for those who can attend both. > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:00 AM Benson Muite > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC > tomorrow. > > > > Update the google doc [1] > > > > Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or > > alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. > > > > Regards, > > Benson > > > > [1] > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite < > benson_mu...@emailplus.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing > > >> solution that should just work in the browser. > > >> > > >> Benson > > >> > > >> > > >> On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > >>> The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically > available > > >> at > > >>> 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange > that. > > >>> Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust > > >>> schedules or technology as needed: > > >>> > > >>> Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September 30, > 2021 > > >>> Location: Zoom [2] > > >>> Agenda: Google docs [1] > > >>> > > >>> We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have > also > > >>> proposed adding this information to the website [3] > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Andrew > > >>> > > >>> [1] > > >>> > > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > >>> > > >>> [2] > > >>> Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) > Time: > > >> Sep > > >>> 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC > > >>> https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 > > >>> > > >>> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I would prefer alternating meeting time to optimize for more attendance and reduce meeting fatigue for those who can attend both. On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:00 AM Benson Muite wrote: > > Hi, > > Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC tomorrow. > > Update the google doc [1] > > Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or > alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. > > Regards, > Benson > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > Thank you! > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite > > wrote: > > > >> Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing > >> solution that should just work in the browser. > >> > >> Benson > >> > >> > >> On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > >>> The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically available > >> at > >>> 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange that. > >>> Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust > >>> schedules or technology as needed: > >>> > >>> Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September 30, 2021 > >>> Location: Zoom [2] > >>> Agenda: Google docs [1] > >>> > >>> We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have also > >>> proposed adding this information to the website [3] > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Andrew > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > >>> > >>> [2] > >>> Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) Time: > >> Sep > >>> 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC > >>> https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 > >>> > >>> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files > >>> > >> > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Hi, Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC tomorrow. Update the google doc [1] Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or alternating the meeting time will work best for most people. Regards, Benson [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: Thank you! On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite wrote: Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing solution that should just work in the browser. Benson On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically available at 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange that. Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust schedules or technology as needed: Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September 30, 2021 Location: Zoom [2] Agenda: Google docs [1] We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have also proposed adding this information to the website [3] Thanks, Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit [2] Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) Time: Sep 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Thank you! On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite wrote: > Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing > solution that should just work in the browser. > > Benson > > > On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically available > at > > 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange that. > > Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust > > schedules or technology as needed: > > > > Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September 30, 2021 > > Location: Zoom [2] > > Agenda: Google docs [1] > > > > We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have also > > proposed adding this information to the website [3] > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > > > [1] > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit > > > > [2] > > Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) Time: > Sep > > 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC > > https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing solution that should just work in the browser. Benson On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote: The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically available at 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange that. Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust schedules or technology as needed: Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September 30, 2021 Location: Zoom [2] Agenda: Google docs [1] We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have also proposed adding this information to the website [3] Thanks, Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit [2] Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) Time: Sep 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically available at 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange that. Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust schedules or technology as needed: Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September 30, 2021 Location: Zoom [2] Agenda: Google docs [1] We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I have also proposed adding this information to the website [3] Thanks, Andrew [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit [2] Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc) Time: Sep 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249 [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 1:35 PM Jacques Nadeau wrote: > +1 on time variation. Please add me to to the invite. > > Thanks > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 9:49 PM Benson Muite > wrote: > > > New to this. A suggestion may be to consider two of the times, eg. 4:00 > > UTC and 16:00 UTC perhaps alternating allowing geographic diversity in > > joining convenience. > > > > On 9/20/21 6:45 AM, QP Hou wrote: > > > 16 UTC works for me too. > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:00 AM zied bf > > wrote: > > >> > > >> HI everyone, > > >> > > >> Still new to the stack and as per @Remi mentioned a few details > related > > to > > >> internal design of datafuision documents and discussion could help > > >> newcomers to understand how to contribute and at least where to start > to > > >> grasp the full implementation details and potentially contribute. > > >> > > >> I would vote for 16:00 UTC. > > >> > > >> Best > > >> > > >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 5:50 PM Rémi Dettai > wrote: > > >> > > >>> I would also vote for 16:00 UTC. > > >>> > > >>> Remi > > >>> > > >>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > 4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D > > > > On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote: > > > I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb > > wrote: > > > > > >> It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing > > at > > least > > >> a few. > > >> > > >> I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. > > Previously > > >> the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, > > >>> which I > > >> realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. > > >> > > >> Could people please respond with their preference: > > >> A) 4:00 UTC > > >> A) 10:00 UTC > > >> B) 16:00 UTC > > >> D) 22:00 UTC > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Andrew > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen < > > >>> henry.yijies...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> I have received a lot of great help since I started working on > > >> DataFusion. > > >>> It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with > > community > > >>> members "face to face". > > >>> > > >>> Best, > > >>> Yijie > > >>> > > >>> On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to > > face" > > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any > > way I > > can :) > > > > -- > > QP > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai > > wrote: > > > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at > > >>> least > > > occasionally. > > > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in > > >>> more > > >>> *informal > > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > > >>> asynchronous > > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these > > calls. An > > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two > > participants, > > >>> on a > > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work > > >> on/around > > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, > > maybe > > >>> their > > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > > > Remi > > > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb < > > >>> al...@influxdata.com> > > a > > >>> écrit : > > > > > >> A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we > > >> stopped > > >>> the > > >> Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the > > >> topic). > > >> > > >> I would like to gauge interest in
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
+1 on time variation. Please add me to to the invite. Thanks On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 9:49 PM Benson Muite wrote: > New to this. A suggestion may be to consider two of the times, eg. 4:00 > UTC and 16:00 UTC perhaps alternating allowing geographic diversity in > joining convenience. > > On 9/20/21 6:45 AM, QP Hou wrote: > > 16 UTC works for me too. > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:00 AM zied bf > wrote: > >> > >> HI everyone, > >> > >> Still new to the stack and as per @Remi mentioned a few details related > to > >> internal design of datafuision documents and discussion could help > >> newcomers to understand how to contribute and at least where to start to > >> grasp the full implementation details and potentially contribute. > >> > >> I would vote for 16:00 UTC. > >> > >> Best > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 5:50 PM Rémi Dettai wrote: > >> > >>> I would also vote for 16:00 UTC. > >>> > >>> Remi > >>> > >>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen > >>> wrote: > >>> > 4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D > > On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote: > > I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb > wrote: > > > >> It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing > at > least > >> a few. > >> > >> I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. > Previously > >> the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, > >>> which I > >> realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. > >> > >> Could people please respond with their preference: > >> A) 4:00 UTC > >> A) 10:00 UTC > >> B) 16:00 UTC > >> D) 22:00 UTC > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Andrew > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen < > >>> henry.yijies...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I have received a lot of great help since I started working on > >> DataFusion. > >>> It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with > community > >>> members "face to face". > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Yijie > >>> > >>> On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to > face" > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any > way I > can :) > > -- > QP > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai > wrote: > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at > >>> least > > occasionally. > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in > >>> more > >>> *informal > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > >>> asynchronous > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these > calls. An > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two > participants, > >>> on a > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work > >> on/around > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, > maybe > >>> their > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > Remi > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb < > >>> al...@influxdata.com> > a > >>> écrit : > > > >> A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we > >> stopped > >>> the > >> Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the > >> topic). > >> > >> I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > >> > >> I think a call could be valuable to: > >> 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other > >>> contributors > we > >> are > >> working with > >> 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives > from > >>> different > >> stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > >> > >> Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some > in > >>> person > >> discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider > splits > >>> [3]. > >> > >> As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no > decisions > >>> are > >> made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on > this > >>> mailing > >> list or in github issues / google docs. > >> > >> Andrew > >> > >> [1] > >> > >> > >>> > >> > > >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > >> >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
New to this. A suggestion may be to consider two of the times, eg. 4:00 UTC and 16:00 UTC perhaps alternating allowing geographic diversity in joining convenience. On 9/20/21 6:45 AM, QP Hou wrote: 16 UTC works for me too. On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:00 AM zied bf wrote: HI everyone, Still new to the stack and as per @Remi mentioned a few details related to internal design of datafuision documents and discussion could help newcomers to understand how to contribute and at least where to start to grasp the full implementation details and potentially contribute. I would vote for 16:00 UTC. Best On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 5:50 PM Rémi Dettai wrote: I would also vote for 16:00 UTC. Remi On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen wrote: 4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote: I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at least a few. I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. Previously the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, which I realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. Could people please respond with their preference: A) 4:00 UTC A) 10:00 UTC B) 16:00 UTC D) 22:00 UTC Thanks, Andrew On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen < henry.yijies...@gmail.com> wrote: I have received a lot of great help since I started working on DataFusion. It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with community members "face to face". Best, Yijie On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to face" and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any way I can :) -- QP On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai wrote: I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least occasionally. I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more *informal *discussions could help us understand each other better in our asynchronous work (design documents, issues, PRs). I also agree that no decision should be taken during these calls. An interesting format could be that each time, one or two participants, on a volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work on/around Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, maybe their overall vision of what they would like the project to become... Remi Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb < al...@influxdata.com> a écrit : A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we stopped the Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the topic). I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls I think a call could be valuable to: 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors we are working with 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives from different stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some in person discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider splits [3]. As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no decisions are made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on this mailing list or in github issues / google docs. Andrew [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009
Re: Re: Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
16 UTC works for me too. On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:00 AM zied bf wrote: > > HI everyone, > > Still new to the stack and as per @Remi mentioned a few details related to > internal design of datafuision documents and discussion could help > newcomers to understand how to contribute and at least where to start to > grasp the full implementation details and potentially contribute. > > I would vote for 16:00 UTC. > > Best > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 5:50 PM Rémi Dettai wrote: > > > I would also vote for 16:00 UTC. > > > > Remi > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen > > wrote: > > > > > 4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D > > > > > > On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote: > > > > I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at > > > least > > > > > a few. > > > > > > > > > > I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. > > > Previously > > > > > the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, > > which I > > > > > realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. > > > > > > > > > > Could people please respond with their preference: > > > > > A) 4:00 UTC > > > > > A) 10:00 UTC > > > > > B) 16:00 UTC > > > > > D) 22:00 UTC > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen < > > henry.yijies...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I have received a lot of great help since I started working on > > > > > DataFusion. > > > > > > It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with > > > community > > > > > > members "face to face". > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Yijie > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > > > > > > > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to > > > face" > > > > > > > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any > > > way I > > > > > > > can :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > QP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at > > least > > > > > > > > occasionally. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in > > more > > > > > > *informal > > > > > > > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > > > > > > asynchronous > > > > > > > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these > > > calls. An > > > > > > > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two > > > participants, > > > > > > on a > > > > > > > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work > > > > > on/around > > > > > > > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, > > > maybe > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb < > > al...@influxdata.com> > > > a > > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we > > > > > stopped > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the > > > > > topic). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think a call could be valuable to: > > > > > > > > > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other > > contributors > > > we > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > working with > > > > > > > > > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives > > > from > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some > > > in > > > > > > person > > > > > > > > > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider > > > splits > > > > > > [3]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no > > > decisions > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on > > > this > > > > > > mailing > > > > > > > > > list or in github issues / google docs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion
Re: Re: Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
HI everyone, Still new to the stack and as per @Remi mentioned a few details related to internal design of datafuision documents and discussion could help newcomers to understand how to contribute and at least where to start to grasp the full implementation details and potentially contribute. I would vote for 16:00 UTC. Best On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 5:50 PM Rémi Dettai wrote: > I would also vote for 16:00 UTC. > > Remi > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen > wrote: > > > 4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D > > > > On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote: > > > I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb > > wrote: > > > > > > > It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at > > least > > > > a few. > > > > > > > > I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. > > Previously > > > > the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, > which I > > > > realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. > > > > > > > > Could people please respond with their preference: > > > > A) 4:00 UTC > > > > A) 10:00 UTC > > > > B) 16:00 UTC > > > > D) 22:00 UTC > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen < > henry.yijies...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have received a lot of great help since I started working on > > > > DataFusion. > > > > > It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with > > community > > > > > members "face to face". > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Yijie > > > > > > > > > > On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > > > > > > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to > > face" > > > > > > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any > > way I > > > > > > can :) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > QP > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at > least > > > > > > > occasionally. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in > more > > > > > *informal > > > > > > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > > > > > asynchronous > > > > > > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these > > calls. An > > > > > > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two > > participants, > > > > > on a > > > > > > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work > > > > on/around > > > > > > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, > > maybe > > > > > their > > > > > > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb < > al...@influxdata.com> > > a > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we > > > > stopped > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the > > > > topic). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think a call could be valuable to: > > > > > > > > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other > contributors > > we > > > > are > > > > > > > > working with > > > > > > > > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives > > from > > > > > different > > > > > > > > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some > > in > > > > > person > > > > > > > > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider > > splits > > > > > [3]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no > > decisions > > > > > are > > > > > > > > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on > > this > > > > > mailing > > > > > > > > list or in github issues / google docs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Re: Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I would also vote for 16:00 UTC. Remi On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen wrote: > 4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D > > On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote: > > I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb > wrote: > > > > > It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at > least > > > a few. > > > > > > I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. > Previously > > > the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, which I > > > realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. > > > > > > Could people please respond with their preference: > > > A) 4:00 UTC > > > A) 10:00 UTC > > > B) 16:00 UTC > > > D) 22:00 UTC > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I have received a lot of great help since I started working on > > > DataFusion. > > > > It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with > community > > > > members "face to face". > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Yijie > > > > > > > > On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > > > > > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to > face" > > > > > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any > way I > > > > > can :) > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > QP > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least > > > > > > occasionally. > > > > > > > > > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more > > > > *informal > > > > > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > > > > asynchronous > > > > > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > > > > > > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these > calls. An > > > > > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two > participants, > > > > on a > > > > > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work > > > on/around > > > > > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, > maybe > > > > their > > > > > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > > > > > > > > > Remi > > > > > > > > > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb > a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we > > > stopped > > > > the > > > > > > > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the > > > topic). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think a call could be valuable to: > > > > > > > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors > we > > > are > > > > > > > working with > > > > > > > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives > from > > > > different > > > > > > > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some > in > > > > person > > > > > > > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider > splits > > > > [3]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no > decisions > > > > are > > > > > > > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on > this > > > > mailing > > > > > > > list or in github issues / google docs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Re: Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote: > I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at least > > a few. > > > > I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. Previously > > the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, which I > > realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. > > > > Could people please respond with their preference: > > A) 4:00 UTC > > A) 10:00 UTC > > B) 16:00 UTC > > D) 22:00 UTC > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen > > wrote: > > > > > I have received a lot of great help since I started working on > > DataFusion. > > > It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with community > > > members "face to face". > > > > > > Best, > > > Yijie > > > > > > On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > > > > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to face" > > > > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any way I > > > > can :) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > QP > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least > > > > > occasionally. > > > > > > > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more > > > *informal > > > > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > > > asynchronous > > > > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > > > > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these calls. An > > > > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two participants, > > > on a > > > > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work > > on/around > > > > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, maybe > > > their > > > > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > > > > > > > Remi > > > > > > > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we > > stopped > > > the > > > > > > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the > > topic). > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > > > > > > > > > > > I think a call could be valuable to: > > > > > > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors we > > are > > > > > > working with > > > > > > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives from > > > different > > > > > > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > > > > > > > > > > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some in > > > person > > > > > > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider splits > > > [3]. > > > > > > > > > > > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no decisions > > > are > > > > > > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on this > > > mailing > > > > > > list or in github issues / google docs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at least > a few. > > I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. Previously > the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, which I > realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. > > Could people please respond with their preference: > A) 4:00 UTC > A) 10:00 UTC > B) 16:00 UTC > D) 22:00 UTC > > Thanks, > Andrew > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen > wrote: > > > I have received a lot of great help since I started working on > DataFusion. > > It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with community > > members "face to face". > > > > Best, > > Yijie > > > > On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > > > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to face" > > > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any way I > > > can :) > > > > > > -- > > > QP > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai wrote: > > > > > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least > > > > occasionally. > > > > > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more > > *informal > > > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > > asynchronous > > > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these calls. An > > > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two participants, > > on a > > > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work > on/around > > > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, maybe > > their > > > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > > > > > Remi > > > > > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb a > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we > stopped > > the > > > > > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the > topic). > > > > > > > > > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > > > > > > > > > I think a call could be valuable to: > > > > > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors we > are > > > > > working with > > > > > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives from > > different > > > > > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > > > > > > > > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some in > > person > > > > > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider splits > > [3]. > > > > > > > > > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no decisions > > are > > > > > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on this > > mailing > > > > > list or in github issues / google docs. > > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at least a few. I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. Previously the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, which I realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. Could people please respond with their preference: A) 4:00 UTC A) 10:00 UTC B) 16:00 UTC D) 22:00 UTC Thanks, Andrew On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen wrote: > I have received a lot of great help since I started working on DataFusion. > It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with community > members "face to face". > > Best, > Yijie > > On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to face" > > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any way I > > can :) > > > > -- > > QP > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai wrote: > > > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least > > > occasionally. > > > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more > *informal > > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > asynchronous > > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these calls. An > > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two participants, > on a > > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work on/around > > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, maybe > their > > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > > > Remi > > > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb a > écrit : > > > > > > > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we stopped > the > > > > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the topic). > > > > > > > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > > > > > > > I think a call could be valuable to: > > > > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors we are > > > > working with > > > > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives from > different > > > > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > > > > > > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some in > person > > > > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider splits > [3]. > > > > > > > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no decisions > are > > > > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on this > mailing > > > > list or in github issues / google docs. > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 > > > > > > >
Re: Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I have received a lot of great help since I started working on DataFusion. It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with community members "face to face". Best, Yijie On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to face" > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any way I > can :) > > -- > QP > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai wrote: > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least > > occasionally. > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more *informal > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our asynchronous > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these calls. An > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two participants, on a > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work on/around > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, maybe their > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > Remi > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb a écrit : > > > > > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we stopped the > > > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the topic). > > > > > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > > > > > I think a call could be valuable to: > > > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors we are > > > working with > > > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives from different > > > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > > > > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some in person > > > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider splits [3]. > > > > > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no decisions are > > > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on this mailing > > > list or in github issues / google docs. > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to face" and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any way I can :) -- QP On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai wrote: > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least > occasionally. > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more *informal > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our asynchronous > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these calls. An > interesting format could be that each time, one or two participants, on a > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work on/around > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, maybe their > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > Remi > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb a écrit : > > > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we stopped the > > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the topic). > > > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > > > I think a call could be valuable to: > > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors we are > > working with > > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives from different > > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some in person > > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider splits [3]. > > > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no decisions are > > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on this mailing > > list or in github issues / google docs. > > > > Andrew > > > > [1] > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 > >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least occasionally. I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more *informal *discussions could help us understand each other better in our asynchronous work (design documents, issues, PRs). I also agree that no decision should be taken during these calls. An interesting format could be that each time, one or two participants, on a volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work on/around Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, maybe their overall vision of what they would like the project to become... Remi Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb a écrit : > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we stopped the > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the topic). > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > I think a call could be valuable to: > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors we are > working with > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives from different > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some in person > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider splits [3]. > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no decisions are > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on this mailing > list or in github issues / google docs. > > Andrew > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 >
[DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we stopped the Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the topic). I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls I think a call could be valuable to: 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors we are working with 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives from different stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some in person discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider splits [3]. As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no decisions are made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on this mailing list or in github issues / google docs. Andrew [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009
