[jira] Commented: (AVRO-703) socket transport for Python
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966771#action_12966771 ] Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-703: --- This should probably implement anonymous SASL, as described in: http://avro.apache.org/docs/current/sasl.html#anonymous That way we can have a single socket-based client-server format that can gracefully provide authentication and encryption. socket transport for Python --- Key: AVRO-703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703 Project: Avro Issue Type: New Feature Components: python Affects Versions: 1.4.1 Reporter: Eric Evans Assignee: Eric Evans Priority: Minor Attachments: 0001-python-socket-transceiver.patch Python users need a more performant alternative to HTTP transport. Patch to follow. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (AVRO-703) socket transport for Python
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966777#action_12966777 ] Eric Evans commented on AVRO-703: - make sense to me. socket transport for Python --- Key: AVRO-703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703 Project: Avro Issue Type: New Feature Components: python Affects Versions: 1.4.1 Reporter: Eric Evans Assignee: Eric Evans Priority: Minor Attachments: 0001-python-socket-transceiver.patch Python users need a more performant alternative to HTTP transport. Patch to follow. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (AVRO-703) socket transport for Python
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966282#action_12966282 ] Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-703: --- Looks good. Is performance appreciably better than over HTTP? I'd expect we might see a significant difference with one-way messages. To test this we might: . extend Python's tool.py to use socket client server when uri is avro: . extend Java's RpcSendTool and RpcReceiveTool to use sockets for avro: uris . change share/test/interop/bin/test_rpc_interop.sh to test using these avro: uris socket transport for Python --- Key: AVRO-703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703 Project: Avro Issue Type: New Feature Components: python Affects Versions: 1.4.1 Reporter: Eric Evans Assignee: Eric Evans Priority: Minor Attachments: 0001-python-socket-transceiver.patch Python users need a more performant alternative to HTTP transport. Patch to follow. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (AVRO-703) socket transport for Python
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966343#action_12966343 ] Eric Evans commented on AVRO-703: - No, actually it seems to performs worse, but the same is true with a Java client. I believe AVRO-704 is to blame. socket transport for Python --- Key: AVRO-703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703 Project: Avro Issue Type: New Feature Components: python Affects Versions: 1.4.1 Reporter: Eric Evans Assignee: Eric Evans Priority: Minor Attachments: 0001-python-socket-transceiver.patch Python users need a more performant alternative to HTTP transport. Patch to follow. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
