Re: IO plans?

2018-01-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Agree !

That's why I would like to move forward for 2.4.0 on those ones.

Regards
JB

On 01/31/2018 02:44 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Thanks JB, this is great news since they are highly used IO in the industry 
> and
> really awaited now.
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github  |
> LinkedIn 
> 
> 2018-01-31 14:42 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré  >:
> 
> By the way, short term: ParquetIO, RabbitMqIO are coming (PRs already 
> open).
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 01/31/2018 02:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi Romain,
> >
> > I have some IOs locally and some idea:
> >
> > - ExecIO (it has been proposed as PR but declined)
> > - ConsoleIO (generic)
> > - SocketIO
> > - RestIO
> > - MinaIO
> >
> > I also created the other IOs Jira.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 01/31/2018 01:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> is there a plan for future IO and some tracking somewhere?
> >>
> >> I particularly wonder if there are plans for a HTTP IO and common 
> server
> IO like
> >> SFTP, SSH, etc...
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau  > |  Blog
> >>  > |
> Old Blog
> >> >
> | Github  > |
> >> LinkedIn  >
> >
> 
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org 
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> 
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com


Re: IO plans?

2018-01-31 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Thanks JB, this is great news since they are highly used IO in the industry
and really awaited now.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn 

2018-01-31 14:42 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :

> By the way, short term: ParquetIO, RabbitMqIO are coming (PRs already
> open).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/31/2018 02:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi Romain,
> >
> > I have some IOs locally and some idea:
> >
> > - ExecIO (it has been proposed as PR but declined)
> > - ConsoleIO (generic)
> > - SocketIO
> > - RestIO
> > - MinaIO
> >
> > I also created the other IOs Jira.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 01/31/2018 01:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> is there a plan for future IO and some tracking somewhere?
> >>
> >> I particularly wonder if there are plans for a HTTP IO and common
> server IO like
> >> SFTP, SSH, etc...
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>  | Old Blog
> >>  | Github  rmannibucau> |
> >> LinkedIn 
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>


Re: IO plans?

2018-01-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
By the way, short term: ParquetIO, RabbitMqIO are coming (PRs already open).

Regards
JB

On 01/31/2018 02:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Romain,
> 
> I have some IOs locally and some idea:
> 
> - ExecIO (it has been proposed as PR but declined)
> - ConsoleIO (generic)
> - SocketIO
> - RestIO
> - MinaIO
> 
> I also created the other IOs Jira.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 01/31/2018 01:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> is there a plan for future IO and some tracking somewhere?
>>
>> I particularly wonder if there are plans for a HTTP IO and common server IO 
>> like
>> SFTP, SSH, etc...
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  | Old Blog
>>  | Github  
>> |
>> LinkedIn 
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com