Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Publish release-1.5.0 without ppc64le support for Zeppelin

2020-04-28 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
Yup, I think it is ok, as far as there is a mention in the release notes 
somewhere (which I assume would happen automatically if there's an 
appropriate JIRA for this).



--
  Cos

On 2020-04-27 20:03, Kengo Seki wrote:

Thanks Yuqi and Evans for driving this. I'm +1.

Kengo Seki apache.org>


On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:21 PM Jun HE  wrote:


I'm +1 for this.

Yuqi Gu  于2020年4月26日周日 下午1:18写道:


Yes, the VOTE is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE.

On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 12:39, Evans Ye  wrote:


So the vote is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE, am I right?
If so I'm a +1.
In 1.4.0 release, we've a support matrix[1] so that it's more clear to

user

what's there in Bigtop.

BTW PPC folks: if you'd like to work on the fix and make Zeppelin
supported. Feel free to -1 on this.
With limited resources, we'd like to focus on the core features.

However

if

someone would like to work on it its definitely welcomed.

[1]



https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Overview+of+Bigtop+1.4.0+Support+Matrix

Evans


Yuqi Gu  於 2020年4月26日 週日 上午10:32寫道:


Hi folks,

Let's go back to the discussion on PR #631
 for BIGTOP-3327.

The Zeppelin build failed on ppc64le due to the dependency issue that

the

ppc64le binaries of protoc-gen-grpc-java are still not available.

To make the new release move onward, How about to drop the ppc64le

support

for Zeppelin in the next release?

The VOTE:
[ ] +1, accept dropping the ppc64le support,
[ ] +0, I don't care either way,
[ ] -1, do not accept dropping the ppc64le support, or wanna be a
volunteer to
work on it.


BR,
Yuqi


--
With regards,
  Cos



Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Publish release-1.5.0 without ppc64le support for Zeppelin

2020-04-27 Thread Kengo Seki
Thanks Yuqi and Evans for driving this. I'm +1.

Kengo Seki apache.org>


On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:21 PM Jun HE  wrote:

> I'm +1 for this.
>
> Yuqi Gu  于2020年4月26日周日 下午1:18写道:
>
> > Yes, the VOTE is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE.
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 12:39, Evans Ye  wrote:
> >
> > > So the vote is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE, am I right?
> > > If so I'm a +1.
> > > In 1.4.0 release, we've a support matrix[1] so that it's more clear to
> > user
> > > what's there in Bigtop.
> > >
> > > BTW PPC folks: if you'd like to work on the fix and make Zeppelin
> > > supported. Feel free to -1 on this.
> > > With limited resources, we'd like to focus on the core features.
> However
> > if
> > > someone would like to work on it its definitely welcomed.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Overview+of+Bigtop+1.4.0+Support+Matrix
> > >
> > > Evans
> > >
> > >
> > > Yuqi Gu  於 2020年4月26日 週日 上午10:32寫道:
> > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > Let's go back to the discussion on PR #631
> > > >  for BIGTOP-3327.
> > > >
> > > > The Zeppelin build failed on ppc64le due to the dependency issue that
> > the
> > > > ppc64le binaries of protoc-gen-grpc-java are still not available.
> > > >
> > > > To make the new release move onward, How about to drop the ppc64le
> > > support
> > > > for Zeppelin in the next release?
> > > >
> > > > The VOTE:
> > > > [ ] +1, accept dropping the ppc64le support,
> > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > > > [ ] -1, do not accept dropping the ppc64le support, or wanna be a
> > > > volunteer to
> > > > work on it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > BR,
> > > > Yuqi
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Publish release-1.5.0 without ppc64le support for Zeppelin

2020-04-26 Thread Jun HE
I'm +1 for this.

Yuqi Gu  于2020年4月26日周日 下午1:18写道:

> Yes, the VOTE is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE.
>
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 12:39, Evans Ye  wrote:
>
> > So the vote is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE, am I right?
> > If so I'm a +1.
> > In 1.4.0 release, we've a support matrix[1] so that it's more clear to
> user
> > what's there in Bigtop.
> >
> > BTW PPC folks: if you'd like to work on the fix and make Zeppelin
> > supported. Feel free to -1 on this.
> > With limited resources, we'd like to focus on the core features. However
> if
> > someone would like to work on it its definitely welcomed.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Overview+of+Bigtop+1.4.0+Support+Matrix
> >
> > Evans
> >
> >
> > Yuqi Gu  於 2020年4月26日 週日 上午10:32寫道:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Let's go back to the discussion on PR #631
> > >  for BIGTOP-3327.
> > >
> > > The Zeppelin build failed on ppc64le due to the dependency issue that
> the
> > > ppc64le binaries of protoc-gen-grpc-java are still not available.
> > >
> > > To make the new release move onward, How about to drop the ppc64le
> > support
> > > for Zeppelin in the next release?
> > >
> > > The VOTE:
> > > [ ] +1, accept dropping the ppc64le support,
> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > > [ ] -1, do not accept dropping the ppc64le support, or wanna be a
> > > volunteer to
> > > work on it.
> > >
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Yuqi
> > >
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Publish release-1.5.0 without ppc64le support for Zeppelin

2020-04-25 Thread Yuqi Gu
Yes, the VOTE is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE.

On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 12:39, Evans Ye  wrote:

> So the vote is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE, am I right?
> If so I'm a +1.
> In 1.4.0 release, we've a support matrix[1] so that it's more clear to user
> what's there in Bigtop.
>
> BTW PPC folks: if you'd like to work on the fix and make Zeppelin
> supported. Feel free to -1 on this.
> With limited resources, we'd like to focus on the core features. However if
> someone would like to work on it its definitely welcomed.
>
> [1]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Overview+of+Bigtop+1.4.0+Support+Matrix
>
> Evans
>
>
> Yuqi Gu  於 2020年4月26日 週日 上午10:32寫道:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Let's go back to the discussion on PR #631
> >  for BIGTOP-3327.
> >
> > The Zeppelin build failed on ppc64le due to the dependency issue that the
> > ppc64le binaries of protoc-gen-grpc-java are still not available.
> >
> > To make the new release move onward, How about to drop the ppc64le
> support
> > for Zeppelin in the next release?
> >
> > The VOTE:
> > [ ] +1, accept dropping the ppc64le support,
> > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > [ ] -1, do not accept dropping the ppc64le support, or wanna be a
> > volunteer to
> > work on it.
> >
> >
> > BR,
> > Yuqi
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Publish release-1.5.0 without ppc64le support for Zeppelin

2020-04-25 Thread Evans Ye
So the vote is to just drop Zeppelin support on PPC64LE, am I right?
If so I'm a +1.
In 1.4.0 release, we've a support matrix[1] so that it's more clear to user
what's there in Bigtop.

BTW PPC folks: if you'd like to work on the fix and make Zeppelin
supported. Feel free to -1 on this.
With limited resources, we'd like to focus on the core features. However if
someone would like to work on it its definitely welcomed.

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Overview+of+Bigtop+1.4.0+Support+Matrix

Evans


Yuqi Gu  於 2020年4月26日 週日 上午10:32寫道:

> Hi folks,
>
> Let's go back to the discussion on PR #631
>  for BIGTOP-3327.
>
> The Zeppelin build failed on ppc64le due to the dependency issue that the
> ppc64le binaries of protoc-gen-grpc-java are still not available.
>
> To make the new release move onward, How about to drop the ppc64le support
> for Zeppelin in the next release?
>
> The VOTE:
> [ ] +1, accept dropping the ppc64le support,
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> [ ] -1, do not accept dropping the ppc64le support, or wanna be a
> volunteer to
> work on it.
>
>
> BR,
> Yuqi
>


[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Publish release-1.5.0 without ppc64le support for Zeppelin

2020-04-25 Thread Yuqi Gu
Hi folks,

Let's go back to the discussion on PR #631
 for BIGTOP-3327.

The Zeppelin build failed on ppc64le due to the dependency issue that the
ppc64le binaries of protoc-gen-grpc-java are still not available.

To make the new release move onward, How about to drop the ppc64le support
for Zeppelin in the next release?

The VOTE:
[ ] +1, accept dropping the ppc64le support,
[ ] +0, I don't care either way,
[ ] -1, do not accept dropping the ppc64le support, or wanna be a volunteer to
work on it.


BR,
Yuqi