[Doc] Please review: VM root disk reset on reboot doc
Hi, New doc on resetting VM on reboot is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2 branch. Please provide your feedback. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=26f1eab323672d54f2a7dfa5da89c779c9d8f5c2 Bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1682 Regards, Jessica T.
Re: [Discuss] Using XenServer 6.2's Clone-on-Boot feature on CloudStack
If we can control fall back of IntelliCache reads and writes back to the storage then it won't hinder with host maintenance mode and Xenmotion, and I think it helps handling volatile VMs without recreating the root disks. Thanks, Harikrishna On 09-Aug-2013, at 11:39 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:34:38AM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: 2013/8/9 Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com I think Intellicache is different. I found a discussion here: http://s.apache.org/NIX I see no different. Maybe I didn't explain obviously. Let see it: http://speakvirtual.com/2012/02/06/intellicache-what-how-and-when/ http://blogs.citrix.com/2011/06/22/xendesktop-and-local-storage-intellicache/ It appears Intellicache hinders with putting hosts into maintenance and the recently introduced XenMotion: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/TiTVAQ feature in cloudstack -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24902 --- Commit 6d86af85baa57bb20ec9642cbd1cd82c002dcfef in branch refs/heads/master from Wei Zhou [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=6d86af8 ] CLOUDSTACK-2729: increase waiting timeout for global file lock to 300 seconds - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Wido den Hollander. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2729 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The storage pool issue (CLOUDSTACK-2729) is because of a bug in libvirt (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706) We need to prevent deleting a volume when refreshing the pool. This patch use a simple file lock to implement it. PS: I have tested another file lock similar to Read/Write file lock, but it was very unstable. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java b8a9f0f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/diff/ Testing --- Applied on 4.0.2 and 4.0.1 Testing On 4.0.1 From 20,June 3 nodes, create a VM on each node every 15 minutes. Destroy the VMs 5 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Testing On 4.0.2 From 01,July 2 nodes, create two VMs on each node every 5 minutes. Destroy the VMs 4 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Thanks, Wei Zhou
Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24903 --- Commit dacc4e1a4f7dc3763f16acc2cddd936fdc2fbd42 in branch refs/heads/4.2 from Wei Zhou [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=dacc4e1 ] CLOUDSTACK-2729: increase waiting timeout for global file lock to 300 seconds (cherry picked from commit 6d86af85baa57bb20ec9642cbd1cd82c002dcfef) - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Wido den Hollander. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2729 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The storage pool issue (CLOUDSTACK-2729) is because of a bug in libvirt (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706) We need to prevent deleting a volume when refreshing the pool. This patch use a simple file lock to implement it. PS: I have tested another file lock similar to Read/Write file lock, but it was very unstable. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java b8a9f0f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/diff/ Testing --- Applied on 4.0.2 and 4.0.1 Testing On 4.0.1 From 20,June 3 nodes, create a VM on each node every 15 minutes. Destroy the VMs 5 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Testing On 4.0.2 From 01,July 2 nodes, create two VMs on each node every 5 minutes. Destroy the VMs 4 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Thanks, Wei Zhou
Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24904 --- Commit 64bb7007053d004fe7a8ac3b610e20df69f16bab in branch refs/heads/4.1 from Wei Zhou [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=64bb700 ] CLOUDSTACK-2729: increase waiting timeout for global file lock to 300 seconds (cherry picked from commit 6d86af85baa57bb20ec9642cbd1cd82c002dcfef) - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Wido den Hollander. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2729 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The storage pool issue (CLOUDSTACK-2729) is because of a bug in libvirt (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706) We need to prevent deleting a volume when refreshing the pool. This patch use a simple file lock to implement it. PS: I have tested another file lock similar to Read/Write file lock, but it was very unstable. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java b8a9f0f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/diff/ Testing --- Applied on 4.0.2 and 4.0.1 Testing On 4.0.1 From 20,June 3 nodes, create a VM on each node every 15 minutes. Destroy the VMs 5 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Testing On 4.0.2 From 01,July 2 nodes, create two VMs on each node every 5 minutes. Destroy the VMs 4 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Thanks, Wei Zhou
Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions
My point is that all might be a lot and admin might want to filter some classification he made using a naming convention, by typing it in a filter box On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote: Daan The point is to see everything ROOT Admin and Domain Admin are entitled to see. They can see it anyway by scrolling through the projects, but its not getting us - true - *all vms* view. I don't know if only *.mine* projects would achieve the objective. Regards ilya -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 4:38 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions maybe a column selectpr and/or a filter function; only projects matching '.*mine.*' On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote: One other challenge, if you have large number of VMs, the view is going to be very long and some point hard to read. Perhaps we can add a filter feature, such that user can choose how many VMs per page are presented, i.e. 50, 100, 250, 500? This would apply to all UI Instance view pages. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 3:24 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions +1 On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote: On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:54:02PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: This question was asked several times on dev and user mailing list. I'd like to propose following enhancement and would like to get the community feedback: Issue: Root Admin cannot see all VMs under Instance tab when all instances are selected. Root Admin user need to switch between different projects to see more vms. This approach presents a challenge as there is no single view of all VMs in ALL projects. Same would apply to a domain admin, he should be able to see all vms in his domain at a glance without looping through each project. Suggested resolution: Change the behavior of show all instances by looping through all projects and showing the vm names. We would also need to alter the Instance view and append project name column and append domain/project. What do you think? +1, and I notice that Kirk J opened CLOUDSTACK-4196 -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)*
Re: Master build failure
I have seen people ignoring a failure, but they had (good?) reason. The build has been failing for other reason then their code. another point is that the present implementation doesn't retry a build, afaik. and it should retry after each new upload, not regarding whether it failed or succeeded before. Then we will encounter crossing patches at some point. I know I will with this vpc thingy I want; two patches might build both on a given HEAD , but not in combination :} I don't think we will fix that scenario some time soon. So I think it's what we all want, but still on the horizon. On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote: Hi, Alex - sounds good, let's raise the Gerrit topic in a new thread after 4.2. Daan - you're right that if Jenkins builds, that should prove the code compiles cleanly. Have we actually been gating commits on the catofong report though? I looked at the Jenkins build behind it [1], and it hasn't succeeded in 4 days, so I'm guessing we're not gating based on it. Aside from the Jenkins integration, one of the reasons I wanted Gerrit is to put a step between writing code and it hitting master. Ideally, it would be nice to enforce that a positive code review from someone other than the author is present before pushing. Thanks, Dave. [1] http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/management/job/mgmt-build-reviewboard-requests/ On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Dave, wouldn't jenkins do a build like that? Meanng the positive cato report is a must to allow commits On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote: Yup. That was the reason why it worked on my machine but doesn't work on jenkins. It had a copy of the jar in the local maven cache so it continued to build even though it's missing. Thanks for reverting. Will fix. I still don't understand why we have problems with Gerrit. It would have prevented exactly this type of problems. I know a lot of people are busy on 4.2. Will bring it up post 4.2 again. --Alex From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.com] Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 3:45 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Dave Cahill; Alex Huang Subject: Re: Master build failure Thanks Prasanna. One suggestion I have is that if anyone makes pom file changes (or any large changes at all, to be honest), that they nuke their local Maven cache (rm -rf ~/.m2/repository) and do a clean install before submitting a patch. This way, you don't end up thinking your work builds when it just happens to build due to leftover, cached jars. Alex, do you have any ideas on build stability? There have been 2 build breakages in the past few days (ref: compile error on 4.2 thread), and looking at git log I don't see much sign of review on the changes. We discussed Gerrit a while back, but I think the conclusion was that it would slow us down? Thanks, Dave. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.orgmailto:t...@apache.org wrote: Reverted the range 30c33415..f6a2c817bc. Master builds now. Others who've checked in after these will still retain their commits but please build before push. It's clear we are only worried about 4.2 now but we are breaking master for those who are beginning to work ahead for 4.3 On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 02:15:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: Dave's been attempting to fix this and it looks to be intertwined in a few commits. Large swaths of code has moved around. I'll revert to last known state from Jenkins if we can't figure out a simple fix so Dave can proceed. On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 04:11:36PM +0900, Dave Cahill wrote: Hi, As Prasanna noted in IRC, the cloudstack-master-maven Jenkins build is failing with a similar error: https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-master-maven/2645/console Failed to execute goal on project cloud-engine-components-api: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-engine-components-api:jar:4.3.0-SNAPSHOT: Could not find artifact org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.3.0-SNAPSHOT in Nexus (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots) cause : Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-engine-components-api:jar:4.3.0-SNAPSHOT: Could not find artifact org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.3.0-SNAPSHOT in Nexus (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots) Thanks, Dave. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.commailto:dcah...@midokura.com wrote: Hi, I'm seeing a build failure with master - I've checked the usual gotchas, but this seems to be something else. Possibly related to the 4.2.0 to 4.3.0 update? The missing dependency is cloud-engine-compute. It's listed as a
Re: Review Request 13428: CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/#review24907 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 8, 2013, 12:25 p.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 12:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4187 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4187 Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixHelper.java bb7f340 setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql 8e2feda setup/db/templates.sql e030852 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/diff/ Testing --- Verified that the deployment of Windows server 2003 enterprise edition and Windows server 2000 sp4 in Xenserver 5.6FP1 is in PV mode. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling
On 08/09/2013 02:05 AM, Edison Su wrote: Hi All, For basic network, the io limit for guest network(nic 2) is 200MB/s, we set the io limit on kvm host as: I think you mean 200Mbit/s? /interface interface type='bridge' source bridge='cloudbr0'/ mac address='06:45:c4:00:00:0c'/ model type='virtio'/ bandwidth inbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ outbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ /bandwidth /interface From libvirt doc(http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html), it says above unit is KB/s, but per my testing, it sounds like it's Kb/s. Is there anybody have the same issue? No, my testing tells me it's is KB/sec (KiloByte). My libvirt version is 0.9.10 on Centos 6.3. My libvirt version is 1.0.6 under Ubuntu 12.04 using the Cloud Archive for OpenStack Havana from Canonical: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive Wido
Re: Review Request 13428: CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/#review24908 --- Commit c18492509692d590aa72133a3974512c7dff119e in branch refs/heads/4.2 from Sanjay Tripathi [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=c184925 ] CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation. - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 8, 2013, 12:25 p.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 12:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4187 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4187 Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixHelper.java bb7f340 setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql 8e2feda setup/db/templates.sql e030852 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/diff/ Testing --- Verified that the deployment of Windows server 2003 enterprise edition and Windows server 2000 sp4 in Xenserver 5.6FP1 is in PV mode. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: Review Request 13431: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/#review24909 --- Commit 8f3be62cbe11fb71e817d2e538de8c7d4e9bcbd8 in branch refs/heads/4.2 from Sanjay Tripathi [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=8f3be62 ] CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256. - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 9, 2013, 6:27 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 6:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3842 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3842 Diffs - client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ja.properties 0c61c13 client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties 496c2e9 ui/css/cloudstack3.css afebbd1 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: Review Request 13431: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/#review24910 --- Can you submit an updated patch to apply it on master. Patch applied successfully on 4.2 but is failing on master. - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 9, 2013, 6:27 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 6:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3842 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3842 Diffs - client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ja.properties 0c61c13 client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties 496c2e9 ui/css/cloudstack3.css afebbd1 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: Review Request 13428: CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/#review24911 --- Commit d6ebcd1924ad6fb0638a22386c921399fc68ae2d in branch refs/heads/master from Sanjay Tripathi [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=d6ebcd1 ] CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation. - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 8, 2013, 12:25 p.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 12:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4187 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4187 Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixHelper.java bb7f340 setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql 8e2feda setup/db/templates.sql e030852 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/diff/ Testing --- Verified that the deployment of Windows server 2003 enterprise edition and Windows server 2000 sp4 in Xenserver 5.6FP1 is in PV mode. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Review Request 13439: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for EN-US keys. Keys are ' and .
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13439/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Likitha Shetty. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2909 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for EN-US keys. Keys are ' and Diffs - services/console-proxy/server/js/ajaxkeys.js 4e4d775 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13439/diff/ Testing --- Verified the fix locally on cloudstack setup. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: Review Request 13438: CLOUDSTACK-2448: XenServer Guest OS Mapping Corrections.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13438/#review24913 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 9, 2013, 11:07 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13438/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 11:07 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Devdeep Singh, and Likitha Shetty. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2448 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-2448: XenServer Guest OS Mapping Corrections. Updated the guestOS support mapping of all the XenServer versions and also updated the mapping for XCP 1.0 and XCP 1.6 Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixHelper.java eec957b Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13438/diff/ Testing --- Verified the fix locally by deploying the VM for newly added guestOS. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: Review Request 13424: CLOUDSTACK-4123: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13424/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 11:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4123 and CLOUDSTACK-4205 Repository: cloudstack-git Description (updated) --- CLOUDSTACK-4123: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2 Updating the new system template URLs for the existing templates during upgrade to 4.2. If new 4.2 system template is registered before upgrade then marking the old templates as removed during upgrade. CLOUDSTACK-4205: System VMs are not booting up with new templates after Upgrade from 3.0.6 to 4.2. Diffs (updated) - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VMTemplateDaoImpl.java 9243225 engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade410to420.java 0941408 server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java a583954 server/src/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java e5441af server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java 17cbf5c Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13424/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Harikrishna Patnala
Re: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling
My testing result is same to what Wido mentioned. 2013/8/9 Edison Su edison...@citrix.com Hi All, For basic network, the io limit for guest network(nic 2) is 200MB/s, we set the io limit on kvm host as: /interface interface type='bridge' source bridge='cloudbr0'/ mac address='06:45:c4:00:00:0c'/ model type='virtio'/ bandwidth inbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ outbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ /bandwidth /interface From libvirt doc(http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html), it says above unit is KB/s, but per my testing, it sounds like it's Kb/s. Is there anybody have the same issue? My libvirt version is 0.9.10 on Centos 6.3.
Review Request 13441: CLOUDSTACK-3850: CPU cap should be per VM not per VCPU
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13441/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3850 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-3850: CPU cap should be per VM not per VCPU Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java e100211 plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/XenServer56FP1Resource.java d230be1 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13441/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Harikrishna Patnala
Re: Review Request 13439: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for EN-US keys. Keys are ' and .
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13439/#review24914 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Likitha Shetty On Aug. 9, 2013, 11:16 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13439/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 11:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Likitha Shetty. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2909 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for EN-US keys. Keys are ' and Diffs - services/console-proxy/server/js/ajaxkeys.js 4e4d775 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13439/diff/ Testing --- Verified the fix locally on cloudstack setup. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: OVS
Is this 4.1/4.2/master? On 8/9/13 6:13 AM, Thomas Schneider thomas.schnei...@euskill.com wrote: Hello I try to setup Cloudstack with OpenVSwitch, but SSVM and the proxy vm can't reach internet. I think it's a problem with cloud0 bridge in OVS. My config is: /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties network.bridge.type=openvswitch libvirt.vif.driver=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver OVS ovs-vsctl add-br cloudbr0 ovs-vsctl add-port cloudbr0 p49p1 ovs-vsctl add-br cloudbr1 ovs-vsctl add-port cloudbr1 p50p1 ovs-vsctl show 0771f39e-6e58-4563-b35e-c891197c858f Bridge cloud0 Port vnet0 Interface vnet0 Port cloud0 Interface cloud0 type: internal Port vnet4 Interface vnet4 Bridge cloudbr1 Port cloudbr1 Interface cloudbr1 type: internal Port p50p1 Interface p50p1 Bridge cloudbr0 Port vnet2 Interface vnet2 Port p49p1 Interface p49p1 Port vnet1 Interface vnet1 Port cloudbr0 Interface cloudbr0 type: internal Port vnet3 Interface vnet3 Port vnet5 Interface vnet5 Port vnet6 Interface vnet6 ovs_version: 1.9.0 /etc/network/interfaces # The primary network interface auto p49p1 iface p49p1 inet manual # The secondary network interface auto p50p1 iface p50p1 inet manual # Public network auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet static bridge_ports p49p1 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 address 10.10.10.30 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.10.10.0 broadcast 10.10.10.255 gateway 10.10.10.254 auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports p50p1 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 THX -- *Thomas Schneider*
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24925
---
api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#comment49071
Why don't we merge getValueFrom() and getValue()?
public String getValue(URI uri) {
if(uri.isOpaque()) {
return uri.getSchemeSpecificPart();
} else {
return uri.getHost();
}
}
- Toshiaki Hatano
On Aug. 8, 2013, 11:51 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
---
(Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 11:51 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das,
and Sheng Yang.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for
backwards compatibility.
All over the code calls are done to URI.getHost() to retrieve ids of
broadcastdomains. These id obviously are not hosts so this call is confusing
and requires maintenance all over the code base. Also for different types the
value returned by getHost has different meaning. vlan://1 is id 1 of course
but others might be ranges of vlans or colon separated values. To make things
worse a NiciraNvp has an uri of the form lswitch:uuid without the forward
slashes.
To make the system more maintainable in this perspect the changes in this
patch were made. It is my intention to replace the calls to getHost by the
member call getValueFrom or the static method getValue in time. In this way
maintenance is centralized and an overview of differnces and quirks is easily
found
Diffs
-
api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4
api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/
Testing
---
unit tests for different kind of BroadcastDomainType.values
Thanks,
daan Hoogland
RE: Quick Question about System VM problem
I seem to remember that the command line options were different and there are calls had explicit hard coded path to /usr/bin/vhd-util that were failing if I placed the new vhd-util in that location. When we bring a new XenServer online and download to /opt/xensource, I don't think we remove the old vhd-util, so I thought this was by design meant to work this way. -Soheil From: Sanjay Tripathi [sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Quick Question about System VM problem I don't think you need two versions of vhd-util. If you are adding new XenServer host, just you need to copy the existing vhd-util from /usr/sbin to its correct locations and it works fine. Can you share what are the issues you are getting if you use the existing vhd-util in XenServer host. --Sanjay -Original Message- From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 11:37 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Quick Question about System VM problem My experience was that you had to keep two versions of it on the XenServer, the original one (/usr/sbin/vhd-util) and download a new one that ends up in /opt/xensource/bin/vhd-util -Soheil From: Prasanna Santhanam [t...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 9:22 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Quick Question about System VM problem On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:25:28PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: There's a tag that is applied to you XenServer. AFAIK, the tag tells the management server not to download systemvm.iso Also, be careful not to overwrite the vhd-utils on a XenServer version 6.x and beyond. The vhd-util mentioned on the build from master page does not work with new versions of XenServer. It should be updated soon. What is the issue with the vhd-util on download.cloud.com? Can you please file a bug? I've been using the vhd-util on download.cloud.com and haven't faced any issues with my Xen 6.0.2 hosts. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
On Aug. 9, 2013, 5:23 p.m., Toshiaki Hatano wrote:
api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 172
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/9/?file=338752#file338752line172
Why don't we merge getValueFrom() and getValue()?
public String getValue(URI uri) {
if(uri.isOpaque()) {
return uri.getSchemeSpecificPart();
} else {
return uri.getHost();
}
}
Or, maybe make getValueFrom private.
I think it will make confuse if we provide 2 public method to get value of URI.
- Toshiaki
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24925
---
On Aug. 8, 2013, 11:51 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
---
(Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 11:51 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das,
and Sheng Yang.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for
backwards compatibility.
All over the code calls are done to URI.getHost() to retrieve ids of
broadcastdomains. These id obviously are not hosts so this call is confusing
and requires maintenance all over the code base. Also for different types the
value returned by getHost has different meaning. vlan://1 is id 1 of course
but others might be ranges of vlans or colon separated values. To make things
worse a NiciraNvp has an uri of the form lswitch:uuid without the forward
slashes.
To make the system more maintainable in this perspect the changes in this
patch were made. It is my intention to replace the calls to getHost by the
member call getValueFrom or the static method getValue in time. In this way
maintenance is centralized and an overview of differnces and quirks is easily
found
Diffs
-
api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4
api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/
Testing
---
unit tests for different kind of BroadcastDomainType.values
Thanks,
daan Hoogland
RE: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions
I see your point and I agree if we can implement flexible filtering! -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 3:07 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions My point is that all might be a lot and admin might want to filter some classification he made using a naming convention, by typing it in a filter box On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote: Daan The point is to see everything ROOT Admin and Domain Admin are entitled to see. They can see it anyway by scrolling through the projects, but its not getting us - true - *all vms* view. I don't know if only *.mine* projects would achieve the objective. Regards ilya -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 4:38 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions maybe a column selectpr and/or a filter function; only projects matching '.*mine.*' On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote: One other challenge, if you have large number of VMs, the view is going to be very long and some point hard to read. Perhaps we can add a filter feature, such that user can choose how many VMs per page are presented, i.e. 50, 100, 250, 500? This would apply to all UI Instance view pages. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 3:24 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions +1 On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote: On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:54:02PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: This question was asked several times on dev and user mailing list. I'd like to propose following enhancement and would like to get the community feedback: Issue: Root Admin cannot see all VMs under Instance tab when all instances are selected. Root Admin user need to switch between different projects to see more vms. This approach presents a challenge as there is no single view of all VMs in ALL projects. Same would apply to a domain admin, he should be able to see all vms in his domain at a glance without looping through each project. Suggested resolution: Change the behavior of show all instances by looping through all projects and showing the vm names. We would also need to alter the Instance view and append project name column and append domain/project. What do you think? +1, and I notice that Kirk J opened CLOUDSTACK-4196 -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)*
RE: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling
-Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:41 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling On 08/09/2013 02:05 AM, Edison Su wrote: Hi All, For basic network, the io limit for guest network(nic 2) is 200MB/s, we set the io limit on kvm host as: I think you mean 200Mbit/s? Oh, I see, it's 200Mb/s. /interface interface type='bridge' source bridge='cloudbr0'/ mac address='06:45:c4:00:00:0c'/ model type='virtio'/ bandwidth inbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ outbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ /bandwidth /interface From libvirt doc(http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html), it says above unit is KB/s, but per my testing, it sounds like it's Kb/s. Is there anybody have the same issue? No, my testing tells me it's is KB/sec (KiloByte). On centos 6.3 + libvirt 0.9.10, the number doesn't match: With the following simple test: dd if=/dev/zero of=some-nfs-mount-point bs=1M count=10 I can get 104 MB/s if nic2 speed is unlimited, while only get 1MB/s, if nic2 is configured with bandwidth inbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ outbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ /bandwidth Maybe it's an issue on Centos 6.3? My libvirt version is 0.9.10 on Centos 6.3. My libvirt version is 1.0.6 under Ubuntu 12.04 using the Cloud Archive for OpenStack Havana from Canonical: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive Wido
RE: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling
There is another issue, there is no way to change io speed from UI for system vm's guest network(nic2) in basic network model, which will impact all the template downloading in a negatively way. We'd better don't throttle system vm's io speed by default, or at least give admin the way to change the io speed. -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 11:27 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:41 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling On 08/09/2013 02:05 AM, Edison Su wrote: Hi All, For basic network, the io limit for guest network(nic 2) is 200MB/s, we set the io limit on kvm host as: I think you mean 200Mbit/s? Oh, I see, it's 200Mb/s. /interface interface type='bridge' source bridge='cloudbr0'/ mac address='06:45:c4:00:00:0c'/ model type='virtio'/ bandwidth inbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ outbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ /bandwidth /interface From libvirt doc(http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html), it says above unit is KB/s, but per my testing, it sounds like it's Kb/s. Is there anybody have the same issue? No, my testing tells me it's is KB/sec (KiloByte). On centos 6.3 + libvirt 0.9.10, the number doesn't match: With the following simple test: dd if=/dev/zero of=some-nfs-mount-point bs=1M count=10 I can get 104 MB/s if nic2 speed is unlimited, while only get 1MB/s, if nic2 is configured with bandwidth inbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ outbound average='25600' peak='25600'/ /bandwidth Maybe it's an issue on Centos 6.3? My libvirt version is 0.9.10 on Centos 6.3. My libvirt version is 1.0.6 under Ubuntu 12.04 using the Cloud Archive for OpenStack Havana from Canonical: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive Wido
Offline next week
For network part, please refer to Anthony, Alena, and Chiradeep. Please refer to Animesh for emergency. Thanks! --Sheng
Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.comwrote:
-Original Message-
From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Rohit Yadav
Sent: 02 August 2013 22:43
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.comwrote:
I needed a different configuration than DevCloud provided, so I turned
to CloudMonkey to automate setup of my test environment.
This led to a blog on automating with CloudMonkey at
http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/using-cloudmonkey-to-automate.
html
Nice.
What I forgot to mention is that automation would be a lot simpler if
we were to do the following:
1. Update Apache CloudStack logging to provide API calls in a
tidy
format that can be fed directly. E.g. POST parameters are not logged,
GET parameters are URL encoded.
2. Update CloudMonkey to allow username / password authentication
+1, send patch :)
How would you store the sessionkey?
In Python, you may use cookiejar. Another way is to bootstrap keys, i.e.
you use username:password to login and create api and secret keys. And then
use the keys to store them. In case keys exist, we load the api and secret
keys in memory in the config{} dictionary.
E.g. see written in C#:
https://github.com/lafferty/cloudstack_dotnetsdk/blob/master/CloudStack.SDK/client.cs
Specifically, see public void Login(string userName, string password,
string domainName, bool hashPassword)
3. Update CloudMonkey to not be picky about the case of command
parameters when 'api' command used.
+1, send patch :)
This is a one liner change, no?
+1
4. Update CloudMonkey to allow filter option to be used with
'api'
command.
How do you propose using that, example?
Example:
apiresult=`cloudmonkey api createPhysicalNetwork zoneid=$zone
name='Physical Network 1' isolationmethods='VLAN' `
physnetid=`echo $apiresult | sed -e 's/^.*id: //; s/,.*//'`
becomes
physnetid =`cloudmonkey filter=id api createPhysicalNetwork zoneid=$zone
name='Physical Network 1' isolationmethods='VLAN' `
Cool.
Sorry for my late reply, I think moving forward I may not be even able to
work on CloudStack during all weekends, so I would love if someone could
lead this component though I'll be here.
Regards.
Regards.
Re: OVS
I haven't tried it, but have you looked at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/15XlAQ On 8/9/13 10:23 AM, Thomas Schneider thomas.schnei...@euskill.com wrote: this is 4.1 Le 09/08/2013 18:47, Chiradeep Vittal a écrit : Is this 4.1/4.2/master? On 8/9/13 6:13 AM, Thomas Schneider thomas.schnei...@euskill.com wrote: Hello I try to setup Cloudstack with OpenVSwitch, but SSVM and the proxy vm can't reach internet. I think it's a problem with cloud0 bridge in OVS. My config is: /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties network.bridge.type=openvswitch libvirt.vif.driver=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver OVS ovs-vsctl add-br cloudbr0 ovs-vsctl add-port cloudbr0 p49p1 ovs-vsctl add-br cloudbr1 ovs-vsctl add-port cloudbr1 p50p1 ovs-vsctl show 0771f39e-6e58-4563-b35e-c891197c858f Bridge cloud0 Port vnet0 Interface vnet0 Port cloud0 Interface cloud0 type: internal Port vnet4 Interface vnet4 Bridge cloudbr1 Port cloudbr1 Interface cloudbr1 type: internal Port p50p1 Interface p50p1 Bridge cloudbr0 Port vnet2 Interface vnet2 Port p49p1 Interface p49p1 Port vnet1 Interface vnet1 Port cloudbr0 Interface cloudbr0 type: internal Port vnet3 Interface vnet3 Port vnet5 Interface vnet5 Port vnet6 Interface vnet6 ovs_version: 1.9.0 /etc/network/interfaces # The primary network interface auto p49p1 iface p49p1 inet manual # The secondary network interface auto p50p1 iface p50p1 inet manual # Public network auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet static bridge_ports p49p1 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 address 10.10.10.30 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.10.10.0 broadcast 10.10.10.255 gateway 10.10.10.254 auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports p50p1 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 THX -- *Thomas Schneider* -- *Thomas Schneider* Directeur des Opérations Euskill SARL Web: www.euskill.com Mobile: +33 (0)6 19 26 47 76 Mail: thomas.schnei...@euskill.com 5 rue de Phalsbourg F-67000 Strasbourg
HyperV support in 4.2
Hi Chip, Are we planning to officially support HyperV in 4.2, or is it pushed to the next release? I'm seeing HyperV listed in the values for hypervisor.list Global config (the list of hypervisors CS supports) - meaning that the code is in - but the bug below claims that there is no HyperV in 4.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3893 Thank you, Alena.
Re: HyperV support in 4.2
No, not supported. On 8/9/13 2:02 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Chip, Are we planning to officially support HyperV in 4.2, or is it pushed to the next release? I'm seeing HyperV listed in the values for hypervisor.list Global config (the list of hypervisors CS supports) - meaning that the code is in - but the bug below claims that there is no HyperV in 4.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3893 Thank you, Alena.
RE: HyperV support in 4.2
I see Donal's patch is pending in review board https://reviews.apache.org/r/12519/ but the branch mentioned is master. Donal can you confirm if this is for 4.2 as well. Alena here is another thread that has more context http://markmail.org/thread/asg62idkvrnn6ba7 -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:02 PM To: Chip Childers; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: HyperV support in 4.2 Hi Chip, Are we planning to officially support HyperV in 4.2, or is it pushed to the next release? I'm seeing HyperV listed in the values for hypervisor.list Global config (the list of hypervisors CS supports) - meaning that the code is in - but the bug below claims that there is no HyperV in 4.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3893 Thank you, Alena.
RE: HyperV support in 4.2
Donal if it is not for 4.2 then can you move this ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-999 out of 4.2. Copying Sudha as well -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:16 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers Cc: Donal Lafferty Subject: RE: HyperV support in 4.2 I see Donal's patch is pending in review board https://reviews.apache.org/r/12519/ but the branch mentioned is master. Donal can you confirm if this is for 4.2 as well. Alena here is another thread that has more context http://markmail.org/thread/asg62idkvrnn6ba7 -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:02 PM To: Chip Childers; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: HyperV support in 4.2 Hi Chip, Are we planning to officially support HyperV in 4.2, or is it pushed to the next release? I'm seeing HyperV listed in the values for hypervisor.list Global config (the list of hypervisors CS supports) - meaning that the code is in - but the bug below claims that there is no HyperV in 4.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3893 Thank you, Alena.
Re: HyperV support in 4.2
Animesh and Chiradeep, thanks for confirming. Donal, I see that there are some references to HypervisorType.Hyperv exist in 4.2 branch. We have to remove them all + all the type itself + global configs that I've mentioned, from 4.2 -Alena. From: Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.commailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Friday, August 9, 2013 2:16 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.commailto:chip.child...@sungard.com Cc: Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.commailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com Subject: RE: HyperV support in 4.2 I see Donal's patch is pending in review board https://reviews.apache.org/r/12519/ but the branch mentioned is master. Donal can you confirm if this is for 4.2 as well. Alena here is another thread that has more context http://markmail.org/thread/asg62idkvrnn6ba7 -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:02 PM To: Chip Childers; dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: HyperV support in 4.2 Hi Chip, Are we planning to officially support HyperV in 4.2, or is it pushed to the next release? I'm seeing HyperV listed in the values for hypervisor.list Global config (the list of hypervisors CS supports) - meaning that the code is in - but the bug below claims that there is no HyperV in 4.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3893 Thank you, Alena.
[DISCUSS] Releasing cloudmonkey 5.0.0
Hi folks, I've uploaded a new cloudmonkey tarball on pypi channel[1] using the latest git HEAD 68d5fef065b882accae86a2e4cd327f7779fddb7 from the new repository [2]. I've already proposed in another thread why we should start with 5.x but any suggestions welcome. I request if someone could help release it, do the release management, voting thing etc. We don't have any tests to verify any recent changes, so manual QA may be needed. There aren't many changes, so hopefully it will work for everyone. To test this candidate, just do: pip install cloudmonkey or pip install --upgrade cloudmonkey Suggestions, flames? [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudmonkey/5.0.0 [2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git Regards.
Review Request 13453: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in saved folder
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3858 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml under /etc/cloudstack/management, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in save folder (/etc/cloud.saved/management) then create symbolic link Diffs - packaging/centos63/cloud.spec 0a6327f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/diff/ Testing --- Tested Thanks, Rayees Namathponnan
Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks
On Aug 2, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.comwrote:
I needed a different configuration than DevCloud provided, so I turned to
CloudMonkey to automate setup of my test environment.
This led to a blog on automating with CloudMonkey at
http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/using-cloudmonkey-to-automate.html
Nice.
What I forgot to mention is that automation would be a lot simpler if we
were to do the following:
1. Update Apache CloudStack logging to provide API calls in a tidy
format that can be fed directly. E.g. POST parameters are not logged, GET
parameters are URL encoded.
2. Update CloudMonkey to allow username / password authentication
+1, send patch :)
I use following:
cloudauth.py retrieves a key pair...
cloudclient.py is a simple wrapper around cloudmonkey so that we can use it
directly from python scripts and get json replies.
usage example:
def createZone(client):
try:
response = client.request('listZones')
if response['listzonesresponse']:
return response['listzonesresponse']['zone'][0]['id']
response = client.request('createZone',
{'name': 'default',
'networktype': 'Advanced',
'domain': 'ROOT',
'dns1': PARAMS['external_dns'],
'internaldns1': PARAMS['internal_dns']})
return response['createzoneresponse']['zone']['id']
except Exception as e:
print 'Error while creating a zone:'
print e
raise
import cloudauth
from cloudmonkey.requester import monkeyrequest
import logging
import sys
class CloudClient(object):
class Error(Exception):
Base error.
pass
def __init__(self, hostname, username, password):
self.host = hostname
self.username = username
self.password = password
self.port = 8080
self.path = '/client/api'
self.protocol = 'http'
self.timeout = 3600
keypair = cloudauth.getApiKey(self.host, self.username, self.password)
if not keypair:
sys.exit(1)
(self.apiKey, self.secretKey) = keypair
def request(self, command, args={}):
response, error = monkeyrequest(command, args, True,
true, logging.getLogger(),
self.host, self.port,
self.apiKey, self.secretKey,
self.timeout, self.protocol, self.path)
if error is not None:
raise self.Error(Request %s:\n%s\nfailed with error:\n%s %
(command, str(args), error))
return response
import json
import logging
import os
import subprocess
import tempfile
import urllib
def encodeURIComponent(str):
return urllib.quote(str, safe='~()*!.\'')
def cloudLogin(hostname, username, password, tmp_name):
login = (command=loginusername= + username + password= + password +
response=json)
cmd = ['curl',
'-H', 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded',
'-H', 'Accept: application/json',
'-X', 'POST',
'-d', login,
'-c', tmp_name,
'http://' + hostname + ':8080/client/api']
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
(output, err) = proc.communicate()
response = json.loads(output)
if response.get('errorresponse'):
print response['errorresponse']['errortext']
return None
return response['loginresponse']
def getKeys(hostname, loginresp, tmp_name):
urlParam = 'response=jsonid=' + loginresp['userid'] + 'sessionkey=' + encodeURIComponent(loginresp['sessionkey'])
cmd = ['curl',
'-v',
'-H', 'Content-Type: application/json',
'-b', tmp_name,
'-X', 'POST',
'http://' + hostname + ':8080/client/api/?command=listUsers' + urlParam]
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
(output, err) = proc.communicate()
response = json.loads(output)
logging.debug(response)
user = response['listusersresponse']['user'][0]
if not 'apikey' in user:
return None
return user['apikey'], user['secretkey']
def registerKeys(hostname, loginresp, tmp_name):
urlParam = 'response=jsonid=' + loginresp['userid'] + 'sessionkey=' + encodeURIComponent(loginresp['sessionkey'])
cmd = ['curl',
'-v',
'-H', 'Content-Type: application/json',
'-b', tmp_name,
'-X', 'POST',
'http://' + hostname + ':8080/client/api/?command=registerUserKeys' + urlParam]
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
(output, err) =
Re: Review Request 12811: CLOUDSTACK-3612: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/#review24953 --- Commit 52e10d6b202e99e2e4a24e859f2a3e16339875d7 in branch refs/heads/master from frank [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=52e10d6 ] CLOUDSTACK-38333.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: cloud Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - Tables baremetal_dhcp_devices and baremetal_pxe_devices CloudStack CLOUDSTACK-3612 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - ASF Subversion and Git Services On July 24, 2013, 10:53 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/ --- (Updated July 24, 2013, 10:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: 3612 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This fix is a part of missing db_upgrade bug 3612. Adding column virtual_size that will be a part of fix for CS-2508 Diffs - setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql f9417a0 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Saksham Srivastava
Re: Review Request 12811: CLOUDSTACK-3612: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/#review24952 --- Commit ad508b7232e28ca02683bd8b60268cb87c71e36a in branch refs/heads/4.2 from frank [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ad508b7 ] CLOUDSTACK-38333.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: cloud Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - Tables baremetal_dhcp_devices and baremetal_pxe_devices CloudStack CLOUDSTACK-3612 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - ASF Subversion and Git Services On July 24, 2013, 10:53 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/ --- (Updated July 24, 2013, 10:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: 3612 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This fix is a part of missing db_upgrade bug 3612. Adding column virtual_size that will be a part of fix for CS-2508 Diffs - setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql f9417a0 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Saksham Srivastava
Re: Review Request 13453: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in saved folder
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/#review24954 --- Commit 90457edb416198dcb7a67e7009c42302c0272f18 in branch refs/heads/4.2 from rayeesn [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=90457ed ] Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in save folder - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 9, 2013, 11:09 p.m., Rayees Namathponnan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 11:09 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3858 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml under /etc/cloudstack/management, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in save folder (/etc/cloud.saved/management) then create symbolic link Diffs - packaging/centos63/cloud.spec 0a6327f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/diff/ Testing --- Tested Thanks, Rayees Namathponnan
Re: Review Request 13453: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in saved folder
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/#review24955 --- Commit e80fdcda9452fc08cf227f50634e1c144af856cf in branch refs/heads/master from rayeesn [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=e80fdcd ] Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in save folder - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 9, 2013, 11:09 p.m., Rayees Namathponnan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 11:09 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3858 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml under /etc/cloudstack/management, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in save folder (/etc/cloud.saved/management) then create symbolic link Diffs - packaging/centos63/cloud.spec 0a6327f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/diff/ Testing --- Tested Thanks, Rayees Namathponnan
Re: Review Request 13453: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in saved folder
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/#review24956 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Frank Zhang On Aug. 9, 2013, 11:09 p.m., Rayees Namathponnan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 11:09 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3858 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml under /etc/cloudstack/management, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in save folder (/etc/cloud.saved/management) then create symbolic link Diffs - packaging/centos63/cloud.spec 0a6327f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/diff/ Testing --- Tested Thanks, Rayees Namathponnan
CloudStack source which is on SourceForge but which should be with Apache?
The admin and install guides recommend pulling files from SourceForge. Specifically: SSH Key Gen script: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cloudstack/SSH%20Key%20Gen%20Script/cloud-set-guest-sshkey.in?r=http%3A%2F%2Fsourceforge.net%2Fprojects%2Fcloudstack%2Ffiles%2FSSH%2520Key%2520Gen%2520Script%2Fts=1331225219use_mirror=iweb Password management scripts: Linux: http://cloudstack.org/dl/cloud-set-guest-password Windows: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cloudstack/files/Password%20Management%20Scripts The CloudInstanceManage.msi in the last link is in binary form only; the C sources should be donated to Apache. Also, some certificate will be needed when it is built so the build instructions should note that.
Re: Review Request 12500: fix CLOUDSTACK-3495 xenserver 6.1 and 6.2 can not open vnc console
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12500/#review24957 --- Commit f39937223310cffde9308b16f26157f2e883d018 in branch refs/heads/4.2 from anthony [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=f399372 ] CLOUDSTACK-3495 CS used to access vnc server in xenserver dom0 to get VM console, now CS moves to use XenServer console API. getvncport plugin is not needed any more. remove the code related to getvncport in XenServer - ASF Subversion and Git Services On July 12, 2013, 9:58 a.m., Hongtu Zang wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12500/ --- (Updated July 12, 2013, 9:58 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3495 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- change vmops getvncport function xenserver 6.1 and 6.2 will find the vnc-port in the same path with 6.0 Diffs - scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vmops 650e955 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12500/diff/ Testing --- can open vnc console in web UI Thanks, Hongtu Zang
Re: Review Request 12500: fix CLOUDSTACK-3495 xenserver 6.1 and 6.2 can not open vnc console
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12500/#review24958 --- Commit 4333209af36ca001ca88935ddf2b4d981cc0150e in branch refs/heads/master from anthony [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4333209 ] CLOUDSTACK-3495 CS used to access vnc server in xenserver dom0 to get VM console, now CS moves to use XenServer console API. getvncport plugin is not needed any more. remove the code related to getvncport in XenServer - ASF Subversion and Git Services On July 12, 2013, 9:58 a.m., Hongtu Zang wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12500/ --- (Updated July 12, 2013, 9:58 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3495 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- change vmops getvncport function xenserver 6.1 and 6.2 will find the vnc-port in the same path with 6.0 Diffs - scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vmops 650e955 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12500/diff/ Testing --- can open vnc console in web UI Thanks, Hongtu Zang
Review Request 13459: cloudstack-3759: deployVM with state set to be stopped, attach volume to it. The volume should not be created.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13459/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: cloudstack-3759 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- When deploying a new VM, with its state set to be stopped. At that time, when attaching volume to it, we need to delay the volume creation. Because in DB, the host id and pod id, fields for the VM are empty. Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java 100aad3 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13459/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Fang Wang
Review Request 13460: VPC test case TestVMLifeCycleSharedNwVPC need to disabl, since its failing
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13460/ --- Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Frank Zhang, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- TestVMLifeCycleSharedNwVPC need to disable Netscaler config test case interface need to updated Diffs - test/integration/component/test_netscaler_configs.py 3cde40e test/integration/component/test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py 0c5dd2f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13460/diff/ Testing --- tested Thanks, Rayees Namathponnan
[DISCUSS][4.2] Using full-clone by default for VMware deployment
To better integrate with VMware features like storage live migration, fully utilize third-party integrations from vSphere eco-system, I'd like to change our default volume deploy mode from linked-clone to full-clone in VMware. If there is no objections, I'll make the change and starting from 4.2 release, we will use full-clone mode by default for VMware deployments. Kelven
Re: Review Request 13460: VPC test case TestVMLifeCycleSharedNwVPC need to disabl, since its failing
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13460/#review24962 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 10, 2013, 12:53 a.m., Rayees Namathponnan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13460/ --- (Updated Aug. 10, 2013, 12:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Frank Zhang, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- TestVMLifeCycleSharedNwVPC need to disable Netscaler config test case interface need to updated Diffs - test/integration/component/test_netscaler_configs.py 3cde40e test/integration/component/test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py 0c5dd2f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13460/diff/ Testing --- tested Thanks, Rayees Namathponnan
Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)
+1 move forward. On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Rohit Yadav rohityada...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, Looks like the previous thread failed to capture attention on the dev ML. I'm going forward with some decisions so as to move fast and as per our philosophy to ask for forgiveness later than just waste time on too much process polling now. Here are some proposals; - The version model would be to move fast, break things, release early and release often - Start with 5.0 version: Since cloudmonkey 4.x is already out there, I'm proposing we start new cloudmonkey releases from 5.0; This is just to make sure we don't end up releasing a 1.0 when we already have a 4.x - Using semver, we don't deviate from major version 5 until we have backward incompatible changes of configuration, paths, DSL etc. - We'll use git tags to track (unvoted) releasable or testable candidates. This is so we can release fast, release often. We can append a -rc for such releases on git and pypi. - A tested and voted release could take time and some process; but pypi channel may not be necessarily used for only official releases, but all and every release, even the test ones. Suggestions, flames? Moving forward, as it seems already, I may not be able to contribute on weekends. I may be only able to help with the first release, that too the non-process oriented parts, perhaps people who already have some idea about the internals of cloudmonkey like Prasanna or Sebastien can help lead the component? Regards. On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Based on our previous discussion thread[1], we've moved CloudMonkey out of ACS's repository to its new home [2]. Now, with 6f84e74a68d78705a06fe58f7927f42f61453a16 on master, we no longer have cloudmonkey in tools/cli. CloudMonkey will be within CloudStack project but now as an independent sub-project with its own repository and will have a faster need-basis release cycle. For doing that, please suggest on the release process or how it should work? If the present RM or someone wants to lead the release process? I just want to keep it simple with fast releases whenever we have a releasable candidate and semver[3] versioning. So, we ship things fast and don't worry if it breaks since we'll be shipping fast. We can after a fast lazy consensus/voting and publish via pypi and put the tarballs/zipballs under dists/ on ASF/CloudStack. Regards. [1] http://markmail.org/message/tjlr753xfhpw4uk4 [2] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git [3] http://semver.org/
[ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Vijay Bhamidipati to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way. Please join me in congratulating Vijay! -- Prasanna., on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC Powered by BigRock.com
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati
Congratulations, Vijay. -min On 8/9/13 10:00 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Vijay Bhamidipati to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way. Please join me in congratulating Vijay! -- Prasanna., on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Master build failure
The jenkins integration is broken atm. If someone has time to look into it please send a pull request with the fix here: https://github.com/CloudStack-extras/reviewboard-tools/issues/2 On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:35:01AM +0900, Dave Cahill wrote: Hi, Alex - sounds good, let's raise the Gerrit topic in a new thread after 4.2. Daan - you're right that if Jenkins builds, that should prove the code compiles cleanly. Have we actually been gating commits on the catofong report though? I looked at the Jenkins build behind it [1], and it hasn't succeeded in 4 days, so I'm guessing we're not gating based on it. Aside from the Jenkins integration, one of the reasons I wanted Gerrit is to put a step between writing code and it hitting master. Ideally, it would be nice to enforce that a positive code review from someone other than the author is present before pushing. Thanks, Dave. [1] http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/management/job/mgmt-build-reviewboard-requests/ On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote: Dave, wouldn't jenkins do a build like that? Meanng the positive cato report is a must to allow commits On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote: Yup. That was the reason why it worked on my machine but doesn't work on jenkins. It had a copy of the jar in the local maven cache so it continued to build even though it's missing. Thanks for reverting. Will fix. I still don't understand why we have problems with Gerrit. It would have prevented exactly this type of problems. I know a lot of people are busy on 4.2. Will bring it up post 4.2 again. --Alex From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.com] Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 3:45 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Dave Cahill; Alex Huang Subject: Re: Master build failure Thanks Prasanna. One suggestion I have is that if anyone makes pom file changes (or any large changes at all, to be honest), that they nuke their local Maven cache (rm -rf ~/.m2/repository) and do a clean install before submitting a patch. This way, you don't end up thinking your work builds when it just happens to build due to leftover, cached jars. Alex, do you have any ideas on build stability? There have been 2 build breakages in the past few days (ref: compile error on 4.2 thread), and looking at git log I don't see much sign of review on the changes. We discussed Gerrit a while back, but I think the conclusion was that it would slow us down? Thanks, Dave. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org mailto:t...@apache.org wrote: Reverted the range 30c33415..f6a2c817bc. Master builds now. Others who've checked in after these will still retain their commits but please build before push. It's clear we are only worried about 4.2 now but we are breaking master for those who are beginning to work ahead for 4.3 On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 02:15:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: Dave's been attempting to fix this and it looks to be intertwined in a few commits. Large swaths of code has moved around. I'll revert to last known state from Jenkins if we can't figure out a simple fix so Dave can proceed. On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 04:11:36PM +0900, Dave Cahill wrote: Hi, As Prasanna noted in IRC, the cloudstack-master-maven Jenkins build is failing with a similar error: https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-master-maven/2645/console Failed to execute goal on project cloud-engine-components-api: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-engine-components-api:jar:4.3.0-SNAPSHOT: Could not find artifact org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.3.0-SNAPSHOT in Nexus (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots) cause : Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-engine-components-api:jar:4.3.0-SNAPSHOT: Could not find artifact org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-framework-config:jar:4.3.0-SNAPSHOT in Nexus (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots) Thanks, Dave. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com mailto:dcah...@midokura.com wrote: Hi, I'm seeing a build failure with master - I've checked the usual gotchas, but this seems to be something else. Possibly related to the 4.2.0 to 4.3.0 update? The missing dependency is cloud-engine-compute. It's listed as a dependency in engine/service/pom.xml with no type specified, which AFAIK defaults to jar. So my understanding is that it's trying to download version 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT of the cloud-engine-compute jar from repository.apache.org http://repository.apache.org. How does the jar get uploaded there in the first place?
Re: Quick Question about System VM problem
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:53:55AM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4082 Not sure who to assign it to ... so I chose you :) I wish vhd-util had versioning in it. But I can't see anywhere within CloudStack where we invoke the -S (capital) option. Is it possible you have some local changes to these scripts copy_vhd*? -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: 09 August 2013 05:22 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Quick Question about System VM problem On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:25:28PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: There's a tag that is applied to you XenServer. AFAIK, the tag tells the management server not to download systemvm.iso Also, be careful not to overwrite the vhd-utils on a XenServer version 6.x and beyond. The vhd-util mentioned on the build from master page does not work with new versions of XenServer. It should be updated soon. What is the issue with the vhd-util on download.cloud.com? Can you please file a bug? I've been using the vhd-util on download.cloud.com and haven't faced any issues with my Xen 6.0.2 hosts. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
