Re: [ACS44] code freeze

[Daan Hoogland]

Well, I seem to have been forking master instead of 4.4. I am amending
this while writing this mail. Feel free to cherry-pick whatever is
needed to 4.4-forward. (but update/pull/fetch/rebase first)

sorry for the inconvenience,
Daan

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Min Chen  wrote:
> Sorry, typo. I meant to say that they are not in 4.4-forward. Now I need
> to make a commit to 4.4-forward, and not sure if I need to pursue or wait
> for your fix.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 4/21/14 3:26 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
>
>>For example, all my commit after and including
>>563efad9aee29ea31f10381694c5b55791d561fc made on 4/17 is not there in 4.4.
>>
>>Thanks
>>-min
>>
>>On 4/21/14 3:22 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
>>
>>>Daan,
>>>
>>>  How did you create 4.4-forward branch? I found that 4.4 branch has a 
>>> lot
>>>of commits that are not in 4.4-forward branch, and those commits are made
>>>before code freeze date.
>>>
>>>  Can you please double check?
>>>
>>>  Thanks
>>>  -min
>>>
>>>On 4/19/14 8:07 AM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:
>>>
All,

I created 4.4-forward. Please do all checkins for here on in on this
new branch. If you have a commit for a blocking issue, please request
for it to be cherry-picked on the 4.4 branch on this list and use the
[ACS44] tag. Hugo and I will distribute the work involved for this.

kind regards,
--
Daan
>>>
>>
>



-- 
Daan

Re: [ACS4.4, Cherry Pick]

[Daan Hoogland]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 wrote:
> 68992c8f7391acf623efbe9159807789a7ebfe1e


done

-- 
Daan

Creating or customising OS type

[Nux!]

Hi,

I need to migrate some VMs from OnApp to Cloudstack and they are 
defined with VirtIO storage and e1000 NICs. In the past Cloudstack's 
"Windows PV" OS type was giving me the same (VirtIO + e1000), but I see 
in 4.3 this is no longer the case and "Windows PV" defaults to VirtIO 
everywhere which is good but doesn't help me.


Is there any other type that could provide me virtio+e100 or how can I 
add myself a new os type? Haven't seen any such option in the 
api/cloudmonkey.



Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

Multiple hypervisor through single management server

[Tejas Gadaria]

Hi

I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server.

1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary &
secondary storage, it was working fine.
2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host. Immediately hyperv
Centos template download started.
3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster.
4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says ,

2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for network id
206 as a part of router startup in
Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-->Pool(Id))]
: Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT-->Pool(2))]
2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance
VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv]
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not been
completely downloaded to zone 1
at
com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateManagerImpl.java:1745)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)


Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to secondary
storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available.

Regards,
Tejas

Re: Dynamic Scaling of VM

[Tejas Gadaria]

Thanks Likitha,

I will check it out.

Regards,
Tejas


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Likitha Shetty
wrote:

> Tejas, you must be running into this error because Clone_VM vCenter task
> is taking more than 20 minutes to complete.
>
> To avoid this error use global configuration
> 'vmware.vcenter.session.timeout' to increase the default timeout value. In
> vCenter under Tasks and Events, check how long the CloneVM task takes to
> complete and increase the timeout value accordingly (refer -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5069).
>
> Thanks,
> Likitha
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:45 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dynamic Scaling of VM
>
> Hi Nitin,
>
> you are right,
> I changed to *enable.dynamic.scale.vm = false*
>
> Created another centos template without dynamic scaling, still facing same
> issue.
> On management server it displaying same logs as above.
>
> I am using vCenter 5.5 and Esxi host 5.1
>
> Regards,
> Tejas
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Nitin Mehta  >wrote:
>
> > Error doesn't seem to be coming from dynamic scaling. Change the
> > config below to false and see if you still hit the issue.
> > *enable.dynamic.scale.vm* = false
> >
> >
> > On 19/04/14 8:48 PM, "Tejas Gadaria"  wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I am trying to test dynamic scaling of vm on vmware with CS 4.3.
> > >I have CentOS 6.3 template with vmware tools installed.
> > >
> > >In global setting *enable.dynamic.scale.vm* = *true, *
> > >
> > >
> > >*mem.overprovisioning.factor =2 *
> > >while trying to deploy template, it's giving below error..
> > >
> > >2014-04-20 09:06:31,808 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.u.VmwareClient]
> > >(DirectAgent-27:ctx-80068c4c 10.129.151.67) Cancelling vCenter task
> > >because task failed with java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed
> > >out
> > >2014-04-20 09:06:32,354 ERROR [c.c.s.r.VmwareStorageProcessor]
> > >(DirectAgent-27:ctx-80068c4c 10.129.151.67) clone volume from base
> > >image failed due to Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException
> > >Message: vCenter task failed due to java.net.SocketTimeoutException:
> > >Read timed out
> > >
> > >java.lang.RuntimeException: vCenter task failed due to
> > >java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
> > >at
> > >com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.util.VmwareClient.waitForTask(VmwareClien
> > >t.jav
> > >a:341)
> > >at
> > >com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.mo.VirtualMachineMO.createFullClone(Virtu
> > >alMac
> > >hineMO.java:619)
> > >at
> > >com.cloud.storage.resource.VmwareStorageProcessor.createVMFullClone(V
> > >mware
> > >StorageProcessor.java:266)
> > >at
> > >com.cloud.storage.resource.VmwareStorageProcessor.cloneVolumeFromBase
> > >Templ
> > >ate(VmwareStorageProcessor.java:338)
> > >at
> > >com.cloud.storage.resource.StorageSubsystemCommandHandlerBase.execute
> > >(Stor
> > >ageSubsystemCommandHandlerBase.java:78)
> > >at
> > >com.cloud.storage.resource.VmwareStorageSubsystemCommandHandler.execu
> > >te(Vm
> > >wareStorageSubsystemCommandHandler.java:171)
> > >at
> > >com.cloud.storage.resource.StorageSubsystemCommandHandlerBase.handleS
> > >torag
> > >eCommands(StorageSubsystemCommandHandlerBase.java:50)
> > >at
> > >com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.resource.VmwareResource.executeRequest(Vm
> > >wareR
> > >esource.java:571)
> > >at
> > >com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAg
> > >entAt
> > >tache.java:216)
> > >at
> > >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Ma
> > >naged
> > >ContextRunnable.java:49)
> > >at
> > >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.ca
> > >ll(De
> > >faultManagedContext.java:56)
> > >at
> > >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.call
> > >WithC
> > >ontext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> > >at
> > >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runW
> > >ithCo
> > >ntext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> > >at
> > >org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(Mana
> > >gedCo
> > >ntextRunnable.java:46)
> > >at
> > >java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> > >at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
> > >at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
> > >at
> > >java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
> > >acces
> > >s$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
> > >at
> > >java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
> > >run(S
> > >cheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266)
> > >at
> >
> >java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:
> > >1110)
> > >at
> > >java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor
> > >.java
> > >:603)
> > >at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:6

RE: Multiple hypervisor through single management server

[Devdeep Singh]

Hi Tejas,

For Hyper-V you need to create a zone in which Hyper-V is the only hypervisor 
type. Reason being, currently in cloudstack Hyper-V only works with SMB as a 
secondary storage. You can have a zone where a mixed set of other hypervisors 
are present, for example, xenserver, kvm etc, but for hyper-v you'll have to 
create a separate zone in which hyper-v is the only hypervisor. For a hyper-v 
zone; you'll have to register a secondary storage of type SMB.

Regards,
Devdeep

> -Original Message-
> From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:22 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
> 
> Hi
> 
> I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server.
> 
> 1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary & secondary
> storage, it was working fine.
> 2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host. Immediately
> hyperv Centos template download started.
> 3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster.
> 4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says ,
> 
> 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG
> [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for network id
> 206 as a part of router startup in
> Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type--
> >Pool(Id))]
> : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT--
> >Pool(2))]
> 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance
> VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv]
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not been
> completely downloaded to zone 1
> at
> com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateMan
> agerImpl.java:1745)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 
> 
> Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to secondary
> storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available.
> 
> Regards,
> Tejas

Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server

[Tejas Gadaria]

Hi Devdeep,

Thanks for clarification about hyperv,

If I undo all the changes I made for hyperv setup and go ahead to deploy
vmware on existing xen setup, Do I need to upload vmware systemvm or it
won't be necessary.

Regards,
Tejas


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Devdeep Singh wrote:

> Hi Tejas,
>
> For Hyper-V you need to create a zone in which Hyper-V is the only
> hypervisor type. Reason being, currently in cloudstack Hyper-V only works
> with SMB as a secondary storage. You can have a zone where a mixed set of
> other hypervisors are present, for example, xenserver, kvm etc, but for
> hyper-v you'll have to create a separate zone in which hyper-v is the only
> hypervisor. For a hyper-v zone; you'll have to register a secondary storage
> of type SMB.
>
> Regards,
> Devdeep
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:22 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server.
> >
> > 1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary &
> secondary
> > storage, it was working fine.
> > 2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host. Immediately
> > hyperv Centos template download started.
> > 3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster.
> > 4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says ,
> >
> > 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG
> > [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for network
> id
> > 206 as a part of router startup in
> > Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type--
> > >Pool(Id))]
> > : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT--
> > >Pool(2))]
> > 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance
> > VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv]
> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not been
> > completely downloaded to zone 1
> > at
> > com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateMan
> > agerImpl.java:1745)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >
> >
> > Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to secondary
> > storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tejas
>

Re: Review Request 18795: Sanity code review for: JIRA CloudStack-764 nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC

[Daan Hoogland]

Sounds like a single guru should do the job.
Also I would think of some offerings that contain affinity so that the
guru has a guideline as to where to deploy the pair of routers. For a
certain type of network design a admin may already know where the
routers should be deployed and in that case it makes no sense to let
the guru do any calculations on that. The admin should be able to
specify it with tags or the likes. Of course the criteria you mention
must not conflict but I think it makes sense to have a admin created
offering override the standard algorithm.

regards,
Daan

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Karl Harris  wrote:
> The functional spec for Redundant Virtual Router for VPC's states:
> Deployment for RvR
>
>- Mgmt server would try to deploy two VR in the physical devices as far
>apart as possible. It would try different pod, different cluster, different
>storage, different host first, until there is none of above condition can
>be met, it would deploy both of them in the same host.
>
>
>
> Is a design method in a PrivateRedundantNetworkGuru NetworkGuru class(es)
> the most appropriate place to put this code?
>
> Separate Guru's for each of the pod,cluster,storage, host entities or a
> single Guru that "designs" using the above criteria?
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Karl Harris  wrote:
>
>>
>> ---
>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795/
>> ---
>>
>> Review request for cloudstack.
>>
>>
>> Repository: cloudstack-git
>>
>>
>> Description
>> ---
>>
>> Changes/additions to BASH scripts and .java files as well as pseudo code
>> comments. This posting is a sanity check review posting; before I get too
>> far along with making the changes required for this JIRA CloudStack-764
>> nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC I thought I'd publish my
>> intentions to the community to review and comment.
>>
>>
>> Diffs
>> -
>>
>>   core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/SetupGuestNetworkCommand.java
>> 2cf5bf8ffaa2b0df122c69f047ee3f56982267e1
>>
>> plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
>> 03af0da51b1eec93eb878fd1ebeca2ff2e0802ce
>>
>> plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
>> 69b7c9e07c753c0f0c93197a809acfb3399cf555
>>   systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/vpc_guestnw.sh
>> e5da2e096b30f6fdb15226e889517537d04f2e3e
>>
>> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795/diff/
>>
>>
>> Testing
>> ---
>>
>> None, yet still coding
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Karl Harris
>>
>>



-- 
Daan

RE: Multiple hypervisor through single management server

[Devdeep Singh]

Hi Tejas,

It should work but I would recommend that you seed the vmware systemvm template 
too on the secondary storage.

Regards,
Devdeep

> -Original Message-
> From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:05 PM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
> 
> Hi Devdeep,
> 
> Thanks for clarification about hyperv,
> 
> If I undo all the changes I made for hyperv setup and go ahead to deploy
> vmware on existing xen setup, Do I need to upload vmware systemvm or it
> won't be necessary.
> 
> Regards,
> Tejas
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Devdeep Singh
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tejas,
> >
> > For Hyper-V you need to create a zone in which Hyper-V is the only
> > hypervisor type. Reason being, currently in cloudstack Hyper-V only
> > works with SMB as a secondary storage. You can have a zone where a
> > mixed set of other hypervisors are present, for example, xenserver,
> > kvm etc, but for hyper-v you'll have to create a separate zone in
> > which hyper-v is the only hypervisor. For a hyper-v zone; you'll have
> > to register a secondary storage of type SMB.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Devdeep
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:22 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server.
> > >
> > > 1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary &
> > secondary
> > > storage, it was working fine.
> > > 2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host. Immediately
> > > hyperv Centos template download started.
> > > 3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster.
> > > 4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says ,
> > >
> > > 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG
> > > [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for
> > > network
> > id
> > > 206 as a part of router startup in
> > > Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type--
> > > >Pool(Id))]
> > > : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT--
> > > >Pool(2))]
> > > 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > > (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance
> > > VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv]
> > > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not
> > > been completely downloaded to zone 1
> > > at
> > >
> com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateMan
> > > agerImpl.java:1745)
> > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >
> > >
> > > Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to
> secondary
> > > storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tejas
> >

Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server

[Tejas Gadaria]

Thanks Devdeep,

Regards,
Tejas

Review Request 20557: CLOUDSTACK-6472 GenerateUsageRecords generates NPEs for expunging instances

[Pierre-Yves Ritschard]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20557/
---

Review request for cloudstack.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6472
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6472


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

This is a review request for CLOUDSTACK-6472 "GenerateUsageRecords generates 
NPEs for expunging instances"

The patch is against the 4.3 branch


Diffs
-

  server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java e543d1c 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20557/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Pierre-Yves Ritschard

Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

[Mike Tutkowski]

Hi,

This is in a basic zone in a cloud that was created with recent 4.4 code.
No upgrade involved.

Thanks!
Mike

On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Prachi Damle  wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> This looks to be an error thrown by the IAM service while checking access
> to the network but this user.
>
> Few questions to track down the problem:
> 1) Was this network newly created on 4.4? Or did you upgrade to 4.4 and
> this network already existed?
> 2) Do you know if this is a shared network or is this network created and
> owned by this account?
> 3) or, Is it a basic zone?
>
> Thanks,
> Prachi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com ]
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:43 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
>
> Looks like the user don't have permission to use the network.
> Is the network created by user or by admin?
>
>
> Thanks
> Rajesh Battala
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com ]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
>
> Hi,
>
> I created a User Account and tried to spin up a VM from it and received
> the following error:
>
> http://i.imgur.com/1jfemTW.png
>
> Any thoughts on what this means? It looks network related, but I'm not
> sure why that would be the case. Normally this set of steps has not a
> problem.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com 
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server

[Mike Tutkowski]

Yeah, that should work just fine.

I regularly run XenServer and VMware in the same zone with only having the
XenServer system template seeded.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Devdeep Singh wrote:

> Hi Tejas,
>
> It should work but I would recommend that you seed the vmware systemvm
> template too on the secondary storage.
>
> Regards,
> Devdeep
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:05 PM
> > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
> >
> > Hi Devdeep,
> >
> > Thanks for clarification about hyperv,
> >
> > If I undo all the changes I made for hyperv setup and go ahead to deploy
> > vmware on existing xen setup, Do I need to upload vmware systemvm or it
> > won't be necessary.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tejas
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Devdeep Singh
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tejas,
> > >
> > > For Hyper-V you need to create a zone in which Hyper-V is the only
> > > hypervisor type. Reason being, currently in cloudstack Hyper-V only
> > > works with SMB as a secondary storage. You can have a zone where a
> > > mixed set of other hypervisors are present, for example, xenserver,
> > > kvm etc, but for hyper-v you'll have to create a separate zone in
> > > which hyper-v is the only hypervisor. For a hyper-v zone; you'll have
> > > to register a secondary storage of type SMB.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Devdeep
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:22 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server.
> > > >
> > > > 1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary &
> > > secondary
> > > > storage, it was working fine.
> > > > 2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host. Immediately
> > > > hyperv Centos template download started.
> > > > 3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster.
> > > > 4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says ,
> > > >
> > > > 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG
> > > > [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for
> > > > network
> > > id
> > > > 206 as a part of router startup in
> > > > Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type--
> > > > >Pool(Id))]
> > > > : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT--
> > > > >Pool(2))]
> > > > 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > > > (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance
> > > > VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv]
> > > > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not
> > > > been completely downloaded to zone 1
> > > > at
> > > >
> > com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateMan
> > > > agerImpl.java:1745)
> > > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to
> > secondary
> > > > storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Tejas
> > >
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Oracle VM (OVM) Server support

[Paul Angus]

About a year ago there was some discussion around updating the Oracle VM Server 
support to the then current version.  The topic stopped and I can't find 
anything in Jira for it.

Is the support still being worked on?

Regards

Paul Angus
Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect

[cid:image002.png@01CE1071.C6CC9C10]

S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | 
T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@shapeblue
ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS

Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training
28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. 
Classromm
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line
15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line
1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

4.4 Branch Build Failure

[Alex Hitchins]

Is anyone else seeing a build failure on 4.4?

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) on
project cloud-server: There are test failures.

Cheers,

Alex



Alex Hitchins
-- 
E: a...@alexhitchins.com
W: alexhitchins.com
M: 07788 423 969
T: 01892 523 587

Re: automated apache cloudstack installation with cldstk-deploy

[Tracy Phillips]

Very, very nice. I watched your videos a month or so ago.

Good work!

Tracy Phillips
Weberize, Inc.


On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Antone Heyward
wrote:

> I wanted to get some feedback on this as I have added it github. Hopefully
> it helps some get into using apache cloudstack and make the deployment
> process easier than it already it.
>
> https://github.com/thehyperadvisor/cldstk-deploy
>
> To keep it small in size i have not included the RPMS but there is a way
> to download them. It’s not that pretty but works. I can add the RPMS if
> people don’t care about the size.
>
> Antone Heyward
> @thehyperadvisor
> http://thehyperadvisor.com
>
>

Re: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support

[Chip Childers]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:38:51PM +, Paul Angus wrote:
> About a year ago there was some discussion around updating the Oracle VM 
> Server support to the then current version.  The topic stopped and I can't 
> find anything in Jira for it.
> 
> Is the support still being worked on?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Paul Angus
> Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect

Not AFAIK

Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

[Prachi Damle]

Thanks Mike. Will you be able to share your management server logs and db dump 
so  that I can quickly analyse it?

Prachi

> On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:25 AM, "Mike Tutkowski"  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is in a basic zone in a cloud that was created with recent 4.4 code.
> No upgrade involved.
> 
> Thanks!
> Mike
> 
>> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Prachi Damle  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Mike,
>> 
>> This looks to be an error thrown by the IAM service while checking access
>> to the network but this user.
>> 
>> Few questions to track down the problem:
>> 1) Was this network newly created on 4.4? Or did you upgrade to 4.4 and
>> this network already existed?
>> 2) Do you know if this is a shared network or is this network created and
>> owned by this account?
>> 3) or, Is it a basic zone?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Prachi
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com ]
>> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:43 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
>> Subject: RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
>> 
>> Looks like the user don't have permission to use the network.
>> Is the network created by user or by admin?
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Rajesh Battala
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com ]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:14 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
>> Subject: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I created a User Account and tried to spin up a VM from it and received
>> the following error:
>> 
>> http://i.imgur.com/1jfemTW.png
>> 
>> Any thoughts on what this means? It looks network related, but I'm not
>> sure why that would be the case. Normally this set of steps has not a
>> problem.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com 
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the
>> cloud
>> *(tm)*
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*

Re: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support

[Daan Hoogland]

A schuberg philis colleague is working on it. Funs.

mobile bilingual spell checker used
Op 22 apr. 2014 18:18 schreef "Chip Childers" :

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:38:51PM +, Paul Angus wrote:
> > About a year ago there was some discussion around updating the Oracle VM
> Server support to the then current version.  The topic stopped and I can't
> find anything in Jira for it.
> >
> > Is the support still being worked on?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Paul Angus
> > Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect
>
> Not AFAIK
>

Re: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support

[David Nalley]

Is Funs doing that work anywhere that's visible?

--David

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> A schuberg philis colleague is working on it. Funs.
>
> mobile bilingual spell checker used
> Op 22 apr. 2014 18:18 schreef "Chip Childers" :
>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:38:51PM +, Paul Angus wrote:
>> > About a year ago there was some discussion around updating the Oracle VM
>> Server support to the then current version.  The topic stopped and I can't
>> find anything in Jira for it.
>> >
>> > Is the support still being worked on?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Paul Angus
>> > Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect
>>
>> Not AFAIK
>>

createTags is async?

[Marcus]

Can anyone tell me off the top of their head why the createTags call is
async? Is it doing something other than inserting a db entry? Or perhaps a
better question is where the threshold is for sync vs async, for example,
createNetwork is sync, but is rather blocky.

Re: createTags is async?

[Alena Prokharchyk]

Marcus, its due to CS API convention - all apis added after 2.x version of
CS, should be async (except for list* commands). It was designed this way
after hitting the problem when initially some commands were sync (as only
db updates were done as a part of it), then some backend calls were added
to them which require them to become async. And it used to break API
backwards compatibility.

To avoid situation I¹ve described above, we¹ve decided that all new
commands should be async no matter if they contain backend operations, or
not.

-Alena.

On 4/22/14, 10:03 AM, "Marcus"  wrote:

>Can anyone tell me off the top of their head why the createTags call is
>async? Is it doing something other than inserting a db entry? Or perhaps a
>better question is where the threshold is for sync vs async, for example,
>createNetwork is sync, but is rather blocky.

RE: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support

[Rajesh Battala]

Nice..
Can you share more details about the support of OVM?

Thanks
Rajesh Battala

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:52 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support

A schuberg philis colleague is working on it. Funs.

mobile bilingual spell checker used
Op 22 apr. 2014 18:18 schreef "Chip Childers" :

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:38:51PM +, Paul Angus wrote:
> > About a year ago there was some discussion around updating the 
> > Oracle VM
> Server support to the then current version.  The topic stopped and I 
> can't find anything in Jira for it.
> >
> > Is the support still being worked on?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Paul Angus
> > Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect
>
> Not AFAIK
>

Re: Review Request 20391: CLOUDSTACK-6255: UI for supporting region level VPC, distributed routing enabled VPC and stretched L2 neworks (ui for SDN)

[Brian Federle]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20391/#review41038
---


Gabor, for the most part the UI is good. However, I did notice the 'provider' 
fields on 'add VPC offering' are just simple text fields, instead of dropdowns 
-- is this intentional?

- Brian Federle


On April 15, 2014, 10:41 p.m., Gabor Apati-Nagy wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20391/
> ---
> 
> (Updated April 15, 2014, 10:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6255
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6255
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> CLOUDSTACK-6255: UI for supporting region level VPC, distributed routing 
> enabled VPC and stretched L2 neworks (ui for SDN)
> (UI for SDN)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties bfa9600 
>   ui/dictionary.jsp f4d380c 
>   ui/scripts/configuration.js ba6bdce 
>   ui/scripts/docs.js df4bcf0 
>   ui/scripts/network.js 6494704 
>   ui/scripts/regions.js 66dae8c 
>   ui/scripts/ui/dialog.js 50e12f9 
>   ui/scripts/vpc.js 73d34df 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20391/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gabor Apati-Nagy
> 
>

Re: 4.4 Branch Build Failure

[Mike Tutkowski]

I'll fetch from upstream and try a build now.

Get back to you in a bit.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Alex Hitchins wrote:

> Is anyone else seeing a build failure on 4.4?
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) on
> project cloud-server: There are test failures.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> Alex Hitchins
> --
> E: a...@alexhitchins.com
> W: alexhitchins.com
> M: 07788 423 969
> T: 01892 523 587
>
>
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: [ACS4.4, Cherry Pick]

[Mike Tutkowski]

Thanks, Daan!

I noticed the comment was altered to specify "[DB-CHANGE]".

That's a bit confusing to me as there is no change in the DB for this
commit.

Talk to you later!
Mike


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>  wrote:
> > 68992c8f7391acf623efbe9159807789a7ebfe1e
>
>
> done
>
> --
> Daan
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

[Mike Tutkowski]

Sure, np

Let me retrieve that and get back to you.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Prachi Damle wrote:

> Thanks Mike. Will you be able to share your management server logs and db
> dump so  that I can quickly analyse it?
>
> Prachi
>
> > On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:25 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is in a basic zone in a cloud that was created with recent 4.4 code.
> > No upgrade involved.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Mike
> >
> >> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Prachi Damle 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> This looks to be an error thrown by the IAM service while checking
> access
> >> to the network but this user.
> >>
> >> Few questions to track down the problem:
> >> 1) Was this network newly created on 4.4? Or did you upgrade to 4.4 and
> >> this network already existed?
> >> 2) Do you know if this is a shared network or is this network created
> and
> >> owned by this account?
> >> 3) or, Is it a basic zone?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Prachi
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com ]
> >> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:43 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> >> Subject: RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> >>
> >> Looks like the user don't have permission to use the network.
> >> Is the network created by user or by admin?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Rajesh Battala
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:14 AM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> >> Subject: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I created a User Account and tried to spin up a VM from it and received
> >> the following error:
> >>
> >> http://i.imgur.com/1jfemTW.png
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on what this means? It looks network related, but I'm not
> >> sure why that would be the case. Normally this set of steps has not a
> >> problem.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com 
> >> o: 303.746.7302
> >> Advancing the way the world uses the
> >> cloud
> >> *(tm)*
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud
> > *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: createTags is async?

[Marcus]

ok, sounds good.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Alena Prokharchyk <
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Marcus, its due to CS API convention - all apis added after 2.x version of
> CS, should be async (except for list* commands). It was designed this way
> after hitting the problem when initially some commands were sync (as only
> db updates were done as a part of it), then some backend calls were added
> to them which require them to become async. And it used to break API
> backwards compatibility.
>
> To avoid situation I¹ve described above, we¹ve decided that all new
> commands should be async no matter if they contain backend operations, or
> not.
>
> -Alena.
>
> On 4/22/14, 10:03 AM, "Marcus"  wrote:
>
> >Can anyone tell me off the top of their head why the createTags call is
> >async? Is it doing something other than inserting a db entry? Or perhaps a
> >better question is where the threshold is for sync vs async, for example,
> >createNetwork is sync, but is rather blocky.
>
>

Re: automated apache cloudstack installation with cldstk-deploy

[Antone Heyward]

Thanks Tracy. 

Antone Heyward
@thehyperadvisor
http://thehyperadvisor.com

On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Tracy Phillips  
wrote:

> Very, very nice. I watched your videos a month or so ago.
> 
> Good work!
> 
> Tracy Phillips
> Weberize, Inc.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Antone Heyward
> wrote:
> 
>> I wanted to get some feedback on this as I have added it github. Hopefully
>> it helps some get into using apache cloudstack and make the deployment
>> process easier than it already it.
>> 
>> https://github.com/thehyperadvisor/cldstk-deploy
>> 
>> To keep it small in size i have not included the RPMS but there is a way
>> to download them. It’s not that pretty but works. I can add the RPMS if
>> people don’t care about the size.
>> 
>> Antone Heyward
>> @thehyperadvisor
>> http://thehyperadvisor.com
>> 
>> 

Re: 4.4 Branch Build Failure

[Mike Tutkowski]

My build came back successful.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> I'll fetch from upstream and try a build now.
>
> Get back to you in a bit.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Alex Hitchins wrote:
>
>> Is anyone else seeing a build failure on 4.4?
>>
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) on
>> project cloud-server: There are test failures.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> Alex Hitchins
>> --
>> E: a...@alexhitchins.com
>> W: alexhitchins.com
>> M: 07788 423 969
>> T: 01892 523 587
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: [ACS4.4, Cherry Pick]

[Daan Hoogland]

I removed my commit hook when i raad it. Sorry

mobile bilingual spell checker used
Op 22 apr. 2014 20:35 schreef "Mike Tutkowski" :

> Thanks, Daan!
>
> I noticed the comment was altered to specify "[DB-CHANGE]".
>
> That's a bit confusing to me as there is no change in the DB for this
> commit.
>
> Talk to you later!
> Mike
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Daan Hoogland  >wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Mike Tutkowski
> >  wrote:
> > > 68992c8f7391acf623efbe9159807789a7ebfe1e
> >
> >
> > done
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>

Re: 4.4 Branch Build Failure

[Mike Tutkowski]

By the way, I built the codebase this way:

mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install -D noredist


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> My build came back successful.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll fetch from upstream and try a build now.
>>
>> Get back to you in a bit.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Alex Hitchins wrote:
>>
>>> Is anyone else seeing a build failure on 4.4?
>>>
>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test)
>>> on
>>> project cloud-server: There are test failures.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alex Hitchins
>>> --
>>> E: a...@alexhitchins.com
>>> W: alexhitchins.com
>>> M: 07788 423 969
>>> T: 01892 523 587
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>> cloud
>> *(tm)*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

RE: 4.4 Branch Build Failure

[Paul Angus]

I built this morning OK.

Regards

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Alex Hitchins [mailto:a...@alexhitchins.com]
Sent: 22 April 2014 17:02
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 4.4 Branch Build Failure

Is anyone else seeing a build failure on 4.4?

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) on 
project cloud-server: There are test failures.

Cheers,

Alex



Alex Hitchins
--
E: a...@alexhitchins.com
W: alexhitchins.com
M: 07788 423 969
T: 01892 523 587


Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training
28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. 
Classromm
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line
15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line
1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[Hugo Trippaers]

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go Chiba 
to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Go!


-The CloudStack PMC

Re: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support

[Daan Hoogland]

He is implementing an ovm3 plugin + core patch. no support for the old
ovm. When He is done he'll publish and I'll be happy to integrate and
steal the credits;)

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Rajesh Battala
 wrote:
> Nice..
> Can you share more details about the support of OVM?
>
> Thanks
> Rajesh Battala
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:52 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support
>
> A schuberg philis colleague is working on it. Funs.
>
> mobile bilingual spell checker used
> Op 22 apr. 2014 18:18 schreef "Chip Childers" :
>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:38:51PM +, Paul Angus wrote:
>> > About a year ago there was some discussion around updating the
>> > Oracle VM
>> Server support to the then current version.  The topic stopped and I
>> can't find anything in Jira for it.
>> >
>> > Is the support still being worked on?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Paul Angus
>> > Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect
>>
>> Not AFAIK
>>



-- 
Daan

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Daan Hoogland]

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
he has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Alena!


-The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Mike Tutkowski]

Congratulations!


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
> he has accepted.
>
> Join me in congratulating Alena!
>
>
> -The CloudStack PMC
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[Mike Tutkowski]

Congratulations!


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:

> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go
> Chiba to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Join me in congratulating Go!
>
>
> -The CloudStack PMC




-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 4cb3e55

[Daan Hoogland]

Anthony,

Are you sure it is needed to catch Exception in these cases? It seems
unnecessary and bad practice. Can you revert, please?

regards,
Daan

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:44 PM,   wrote:
> Repository: cloudstack
> Updated Branches:
>   refs/heads/master 1bb31412f -> 4cb3e553d
>
>
> enable XS event for XS 6.2 + SP1 + FOX
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/repo
> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/commit/4cb3e553
> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/tree/4cb3e553
> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/diff/4cb3e553
>
> Branch: refs/heads/master
> Commit: 4cb3e553d5b48e9ee7d6267562084ac1cdd528c8
> Parents: 1bb3141
> Author: Anthony Xu 
> Authored: Tue Apr 22 11:43:01 2014 -0700
> Committer: Anthony Xu 
> Committed: Tue Apr 22 11:43:43 2014 -0700
>
> --
>  .../xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java| 26 +---
>  .../xenserver/XenServerResourceNewBase.java | 20 +++
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> --
>
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/blob/4cb3e553/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
> --
> diff --git 
> a/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
>  
> b/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
> index 6226b2e..ba8be91 100644
> --- 
> a/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
> +++ 
> b/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
> @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ import org.w3c.dom.Node;
>  import org.w3c.dom.NodeList;
>  import org.xml.sax.InputSource;
>  import org.xml.sax.SAXException;
> +import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
>
>  import javax.ejb.Local;
>  import javax.naming.ConfigurationException;
> @@ -664,16 +665,11 @@ public abstract class CitrixResourceBase implements 
> ServerResource, HypervisorRe
>  + " with args " + getArgsString(args)
>  + " due to HandleInvalid clazz:" + e.clazz + ", handle:"
>  + e.handle);
> -} catch (XenAPIException e) {
> +} catch (Exception e) {
>  s_logger.warn(
>  "callHostPlugin failed for cmd: " + cmd + " with args "
>  + getArgsString(args) + " due to " + 
> e.toString(),
>  e);
> -} catch (XmlRpcException e) {
> -s_logger.warn(
> -"callHostPlugin failed for cmd: " + cmd + " with args "
> -+ getArgsString(args) + " due to " + 
> e.getMessage(),
> -e);
>  } finally {
>  if (task != null) {
>  try {
> @@ -3310,7 +3306,7 @@ public abstract class CitrixResourceBase implements 
> ServerResource, HypervisorRe
>  return false;
>  }
>
> -protected void waitForTask(Connection c, Task task, long pollInterval, 
> long timeout) throws XenAPIException, XmlRpcException {
> +protected void waitForTask(Connection c, Task task, long pollInterval, 
> long timeout) throws XenAPIException, XmlRpcException, TimeoutException {
>  long beginTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
>  if (s_logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
>  s_logger.trace("Task " + task.getNameLabel(c) + " (" + 
> task.getUuid(c) + ") sent to " + c.getSessionReference() + " is pending 
> completion with a " + timeout +
> @@ -3329,7 +3325,7 @@ public abstract class CitrixResourceBase implements 
> ServerResource, HypervisorRe
>  s_logger.warn(msg);
>  task.cancel(c);
>  task.destroy(c);
> -throw new Types.BadAsyncResult(msg);
> +throw new TimeoutException(msg);
>  }
>  }
>  }
> @@ -3349,7 +3345,7 @@ public abstract class CitrixResourceBase implements 
> ServerResource, HypervisorRe
>  }
>  }
>
> -void rebootVM(Connection conn, VM vm, String vmName) throws 
> XmlRpcException {
> +void rebootVM(Connection conn, VM vm, String vmName) throws Exception {
>  Task task = null;
>  try {
>  task = vm.cleanRebootAsync(conn);
> @@ -3405,7 +3401,7 @@ public abstract class CitrixResourceBase implements 
> ServerResource, HypervisorRe
>  //poll every 1 seconds , timeout after 10 minutes
>  waitForTask(conn, task, 1000, 10 * 60 * 1000);
>  checkForSuccess(conn, task);
> -} catch (Types.HandleInvalid e) {
> +} catch (TimeoutException e) {
>  if (vm.getPowerState(conn) == Types.VmPowerS

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

[Laszlo Hornyak]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/#review41058
---


ping?

- Laszlo Hornyak


On April 18, 2014, 11:08 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/
> ---
> 
> (Updated April 18, 2014, 11:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle, Darren Shepherd, Jessica Wang, 
> and Prasanna Santhanam.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> CloudStack at first use downloads some 3.5 MB of css and javascript to the 
> client. With a weak internet connection, this might take a long time. With 
> gzip compression content can be compressed to 850 KB.
> 
> This version of the patch uses a custom plugin to compress static resources, 
> so that no dynamic compression is needed at runtime. When the static resource 
> servlet notices that there is gzipped version of the resource and the client 
> accepts gzipped content, then it is going to send the gziped version, while 
> still respects http caching.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   client/WEB-INF/web.xml 1af38e1 
>   client/pom.xml aee2672 
>   server/src/com/cloud/servlet/StaticResourceServlet.java PRE-CREATION 
>   server/test/com/cloud/servlet/StaticResourceServletTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> yes, tested with firefox and chrome
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Laszlo Hornyak
> 
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[Nguyen Anh Tu]

Congrats Go Chiba!

--Tuna


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Congratulations!
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:
>
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go
> > Chiba to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has
> accepted.
> >
> > Join me in congratulating Go!
> >
> >
> > -The CloudStack PMC
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>

Re: [GSOC2014] Acceptance of three projects for CloudStack

[Nguyen Anh Tu]

Congratulations Ian, Seif and Darren!!!

--Tuna


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

> I am pleased to announce the acceptance of three google summer of code
> projects for Apache CloudStack in summer 2014.
>
> Our three students are:
>
> -Ian Duffy (back for one more round), who will work on a
> vagrant/puppet/travis configuration to improve on devcloud.
> -Darren Brogam, who will improve the GCE and AWS interfaces (that has he
> has co-authored)
> -Seif Eddine Jemli, who will develop a new UI for Primary Storage plug-ins
>
> Mike Tutkowski will mentor Seif, while I will mentor Ian and Darren.
>
> Join me in congratulating our three stars of gsoc 2014 !
>
> -Sebastien

[GSOC2014] Acceptance of three projects for CloudStack

[Sebastien Goasguen]

I am pleased to announce the acceptance of three google summer of code projects 
for Apache CloudStack in summer 2014.

Our three students are:

-Ian Duffy (back for one more round), who will work on a vagrant/puppet/travis 
configuration to improve on devcloud.
-Darren Brogam, who will improve the GCE and AWS interfaces (that has he has 
co-authored)
-Seif Eddine Jemli, who will develop a new UI for Primary Storage plug-ins

Mike Tutkowski will mentor Seif, while I will mentor Ian and Darren.

Join me in congratulating our three stars of gsoc 2014 !

-Sebastien

Re: [GSOC2014] Acceptance of three projects for CloudStack

[Daan Hoogland]

congratulations and good luck with your work at hand.

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu  wrote:
> Congratulations Ian, Seif and Darren!!!
>
> --Tuna
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>> I am pleased to announce the acceptance of three google summer of code
>> projects for Apache CloudStack in summer 2014.
>>
>> Our three students are:
>>
>> -Ian Duffy (back for one more round), who will work on a
>> vagrant/puppet/travis configuration to improve on devcloud.
>> -Darren Brogam, who will improve the GCE and AWS interfaces (that has he
>> has co-authored)
>> -Seif Eddine Jemli, who will develop a new UI for Primary Storage plug-ins
>>
>> Mike Tutkowski will mentor Seif, while I will mentor Ian and Darren.
>>
>> Join me in congratulating our three stars of gsoc 2014 !
>>
>> -Sebastien



-- 
Daan

Re: Review Request 20391: CLOUDSTACK-6255: UI for supporting region level VPC, distributed routing enabled VPC and stretched L2 neworks (ui for SDN)

[Gabor Apati-Nagy]

> On April 22, 2014, 6:55 p.m., Brian Federle wrote:
> > Gabor, for the most part the UI is good. However, I did notice the 
> > 'provider' fields on 'add VPC offering' are just simple text fields, 
> > instead of dropdowns -- is this intentional?

Thanks for reviewing. Yes this is intentional. On that screen, we allow only 
VpcVirtualRouter for all services except Connectivity that has 3 providers 
available.


- Gabor


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20391/#review41038
---


On April 15, 2014, 11:41 p.m., Gabor Apati-Nagy wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20391/
> ---
> 
> (Updated April 15, 2014, 11:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6255
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6255
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> CLOUDSTACK-6255: UI for supporting region level VPC, distributed routing 
> enabled VPC and stretched L2 neworks (ui for SDN)
> (UI for SDN)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties bfa9600 
>   ui/dictionary.jsp f4d380c 
>   ui/scripts/configuration.js ba6bdce 
>   ui/scripts/docs.js df4bcf0 
>   ui/scripts/network.js 6494704 
>   ui/scripts/regions.js 66dae8c 
>   ui/scripts/ui/dialog.js 50e12f9 
>   ui/scripts/vpc.js 73d34df 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20391/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gabor Apati-Nagy
> 
>

[ACS44] 4.4-forward branch creation accident

[Sheng Yang]

Wait, MASTER is very difference from 4.4 branch which is feature freezed
one month before. People are still working on MASTER for new features, I
don't think it would be possible to kick out the commits not in 4.4 branch.

I would suggest save the commits in 4.4-forward, discard the current
4.4-forward branch and re-fork from 4.4 branch.

It just has been 2 days and it's still fixable. Please don't wait until
it's too late.

--Sheng

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

> Well, I seem to have been forking master instead of 4.4. I am amending
> this while writing this mail. Feel free to cherry-pick whatever is
> needed to 4.4-forward. (but update/pull/fetch/rebase first)
>
> sorry for the inconvenience,
> Daan
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Min Chen  wrote:
> > Sorry, typo. I meant to say that they are not in 4.4-forward. Now I need
> > to make a commit to 4.4-forward, and not sure if I need to pursue or wait
> > for your fix.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -min
> >
> > On 4/21/14 3:26 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
> >
> >>For example, all my commit after and including
> >>563efad9aee29ea31f10381694c5b55791d561fc made on 4/17 is not there in
> 4.4.
> >>
> >>Thanks
> >>-min
> >>
> >>On 4/21/14 3:22 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
> >>
> >>>Daan,
> >>>
> >>>  How did you create 4.4-forward branch? I found that 4.4 branch
> has a lot
> >>>of commits that are not in 4.4-forward branch, and those commits are
> made
> >>>before code freeze date.
> >>>
> >>>  Can you please double check?
> >>>
> >>>  Thanks
> >>>  -min
> >>>
> >>>On 4/19/14 8:07 AM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:
> >>>
> All,
> 
> I created 4.4-forward. Please do all checkins for here on in on this
> new branch. If you have a commit for a blocking issue, please request
> for it to be cherry-picked on the 4.4 branch on this list and use the
> [ACS44] tag. Hugo and I will distribute the work involved for this.
> 
> kind regards,
> --
> Daan
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[Alena Prokharchyk]

Go, congratulations!

-Alena.

On 4/22/14, 12:21 PM, "Hugo Trippaers"  wrote:

>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go
>Chiba to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
>
>Join me in congratulating Go!
>
>
>-The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Amogh Vasekar]

Congrats Alena!

On 4/22/14 12:50 PM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:

>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
>Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
>he has accepted.
>
>Join me in congratulating Alena!
>
>
>-The CloudStack PMC

Re: [GSOC2014] Acceptance of three projects for CloudStack

[Mike Tutkowski]

Hi everyone,

I was waiting for Sebastien to send out this e-mail before I introduced
Seif Eddine Jemli to the group.

Seif is a student from Tunisia. I met him when he sent out a couple e-mails
to the CloudStack list about a year ago and have keep in good contact with
him. He's quite excited to have been accepted to Google Summer of Code and
is looking forward to working on his project.

Sebastien - As we discussed, please feel free to leverage me to help out
with your two students, if it would help.

Talk to you later!
Mike


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

> I am pleased to announce the acceptance of three google summer of code
> projects for Apache CloudStack in summer 2014.
>
> Our three students are:
>
> -Ian Duffy (back for one more round), who will work on a
> vagrant/puppet/travis configuration to improve on devcloud.
> -Darren Brogam, who will improve the GCE and AWS interfaces (that has he
> has co-authored)
> -Seif Eddine Jemli, who will develop a new UI for Primary Storage plug-ins
>
> Mike Tutkowski will mentor Seif, while I will mentor Ian and Darren.
>
> Join me in congratulating our three stars of gsoc 2014 !
>
> -Sebastien




-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: [ACS44] 4.4-forward branch creation accident

[Daan Hoogland]

Sheng, you are right. I will try to rename 4.4-forward and recreate
from 4.4. I didn't notice the older commits on the branch.

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
> Wait, MASTER is very difference from 4.4 branch which is feature freezed
> one month before. People are still working on MASTER for new features, I
> don't think it would be possible to kick out the commits not in 4.4 branch.
>
> I would suggest save the commits in 4.4-forward, discard the current
> 4.4-forward branch and re-fork from 4.4 branch.
>
> It just has been 2 days and it's still fixable. Please don't wait until
> it's too late.
>
> --Sheng
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> Well, I seem to have been forking master instead of 4.4. I am amending
>> this while writing this mail. Feel free to cherry-pick whatever is
>> needed to 4.4-forward. (but update/pull/fetch/rebase first)
>>
>> sorry for the inconvenience,
>> Daan
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Min Chen  wrote:
>> > Sorry, typo. I meant to say that they are not in 4.4-forward. Now I need
>> > to make a commit to 4.4-forward, and not sure if I need to pursue or wait
>> > for your fix.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > -min
>> >
>> > On 4/21/14 3:26 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
>> >
>> >>For example, all my commit after and including
>> >>563efad9aee29ea31f10381694c5b55791d561fc made on 4/17 is not there in
>> 4.4.
>> >>
>> >>Thanks
>> >>-min
>> >>
>> >>On 4/21/14 3:22 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Daan,
>> >>>
>> >>>  How did you create 4.4-forward branch? I found that 4.4 branch
>> has a lot
>> >>>of commits that are not in 4.4-forward branch, and those commits are
>> made
>> >>>before code freeze date.
>> >>>
>> >>>  Can you please double check?
>> >>>
>> >>>  Thanks
>> >>>  -min
>> >>>
>> >>>On 4/19/14 8:07 AM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:
>> >>>
>> All,
>> 
>> I created 4.4-forward. Please do all checkins for here on in on this
>> new branch. If you have a commit for a blocking issue, please request
>> for it to be cherry-picked on the 4.4 branch on this list and use the
>> [ACS44] tag. Hugo and I will distribute the work involved for this.
>> 
>> kind regards,
>> --
>> Daan
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>



-- 
Daan

Re: [GSOC2014] Acceptance of three projects for CloudStack

[Mike Tutkowski]

I should also note that I was on the phone just today with someone asking
for the feature that Seif will be working on and have heard this request
several times before from others, so it'll be a highly desired feature for
them.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I was waiting for Sebastien to send out this e-mail before I introduced
> Seif Eddine Jemli to the group.
>
> Seif is a student from Tunisia. I met him when he sent out a couple
> e-mails to the CloudStack list about a year ago and have keep in good
> contact with him. He's quite excited to have been accepted to Google Summer
> of Code and is looking forward to working on his project.
>
> Sebastien - As we discussed, please feel free to leverage me to help out
> with your two students, if it would help.
>
> Talk to you later!
> Mike
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>> I am pleased to announce the acceptance of three google summer of code
>> projects for Apache CloudStack in summer 2014.
>>
>> Our three students are:
>>
>> -Ian Duffy (back for one more round), who will work on a
>> vagrant/puppet/travis configuration to improve on devcloud.
>> -Darren Brogam, who will improve the GCE and AWS interfaces (that has he
>> has co-authored)
>> -Seif Eddine Jemli, who will develop a new UI for Primary Storage plug-ins
>>
>> Mike Tutkowski will mentor Seif, while I will mentor Ian and Darren.
>>
>> Join me in congratulating our three stars of gsoc 2014 !
>>
>> -Sebastien
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: [GSOC2014] Acceptance of three projects for CloudStack

[Alena Prokharchyk]

Congratulations, Ian, Darren and Seif!

-Alena. 

On 4/22/14, 1:22 PM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:

>congratulations and good luck with your work at hand.
>
>On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu  wrote:
>> Congratulations Ian, Seif and Darren!!!
>>
>> --Tuna
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I am pleased to announce the acceptance of three google summer of code
>>> projects for Apache CloudStack in summer 2014.
>>>
>>> Our three students are:
>>>
>>> -Ian Duffy (back for one more round), who will work on a
>>> vagrant/puppet/travis configuration to improve on devcloud.
>>> -Darren Brogam, who will improve the GCE and AWS interfaces (that has
>>>he
>>> has co-authored)
>>> -Seif Eddine Jemli, who will develop a new UI for Primary Storage
>>>plug-ins
>>>
>>> Mike Tutkowski will mentor Seif, while I will mentor Ian and Darren.
>>>
>>> Join me in congratulating our three stars of gsoc 2014 !
>>>
>>> -Sebastien
>
>
>
>-- 
>Daan

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[Chip Childers]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go 
> Chiba to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Join me in congratulating Go!
>
>
> -The CloudStack PMC

Congrats Go!

Re: [ACS44] 4.4-forward branch creation accident

[Sheng Yang]

Thanks Daan.

--Sheng


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

> Sheng, you are right. I will try to rename 4.4-forward and recreate
> from 4.4. I didn't notice the older commits on the branch.
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
> > Wait, MASTER is very difference from 4.4 branch which is feature freezed
> > one month before. People are still working on MASTER for new features, I
> > don't think it would be possible to kick out the commits not in 4.4
> branch.
> >
> > I would suggest save the commits in 4.4-forward, discard the current
> > 4.4-forward branch and re-fork from 4.4 branch.
> >
> > It just has been 2 days and it's still fixable. Please don't wait until
> > it's too late.
> >
> > --Sheng
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Daan Hoogland  >wrote:
> >
> >> Well, I seem to have been forking master instead of 4.4. I am amending
> >> this while writing this mail. Feel free to cherry-pick whatever is
> >> needed to 4.4-forward. (but update/pull/fetch/rebase first)
> >>
> >> sorry for the inconvenience,
> >> Daan
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Min Chen  wrote:
> >> > Sorry, typo. I meant to say that they are not in 4.4-forward. Now I
> need
> >> > to make a commit to 4.4-forward, and not sure if I need to pursue or
> wait
> >> > for your fix.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > -min
> >> >
> >> > On 4/21/14 3:26 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>For example, all my commit after and including
> >> >>563efad9aee29ea31f10381694c5b55791d561fc made on 4/17 is not there in
> >> 4.4.
> >> >>
> >> >>Thanks
> >> >>-min
> >> >>
> >> >>On 4/21/14 3:22 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>Daan,
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  How did you create 4.4-forward branch? I found that 4.4 branch
> >> has a lot
> >> >>>of commits that are not in 4.4-forward branch, and those commits are
> >> made
> >> >>>before code freeze date.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  Can you please double check?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  Thanks
> >> >>>  -min
> >> >>>
> >> >>>On 4/19/14 8:07 AM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> All,
> >> 
> >> I created 4.4-forward. Please do all checkins for here on in on this
> >> new branch. If you have a commit for a blocking issue, please
> request
> >> for it to be cherry-picked on the 4.4 branch on this list and use
> the
> >> [ACS44] tag. Hugo and I will distribute the work involved for this.
> >> 
> >> kind regards,
> >> --
> >> Daan
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: [ACS44] 4.4-forward branch creation accident

[Daan Hoogland]

I have recreated the branch 4.4-forward. I renamed the old 4.4-forward
locally. Please inform me if you are missing commits in the present
4.4-forward.

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
> Thanks Daan.
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> Sheng, you are right. I will try to rename 4.4-forward and recreate
>> from 4.4. I didn't notice the older commits on the branch.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
>> > Wait, MASTER is very difference from 4.4 branch which is feature freezed
>> > one month before. People are still working on MASTER for new features, I
>> > don't think it would be possible to kick out the commits not in 4.4
>> branch.
>> >
>> > I would suggest save the commits in 4.4-forward, discard the current
>> > 4.4-forward branch and re-fork from 4.4 branch.
>> >
>> > It just has been 2 days and it's still fixable. Please don't wait until
>> > it's too late.
>> >
>> > --Sheng
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Daan Hoogland > >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Well, I seem to have been forking master instead of 4.4. I am amending
>> >> this while writing this mail. Feel free to cherry-pick whatever is
>> >> needed to 4.4-forward. (but update/pull/fetch/rebase first)
>> >>
>> >> sorry for the inconvenience,
>> >> Daan
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Min Chen  wrote:
>> >> > Sorry, typo. I meant to say that they are not in 4.4-forward. Now I
>> need
>> >> > to make a commit to 4.4-forward, and not sure if I need to pursue or
>> wait
>> >> > for your fix.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> > -min
>> >> >
>> >> > On 4/21/14 3:26 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>For example, all my commit after and including
>> >> >>563efad9aee29ea31f10381694c5b55791d561fc made on 4/17 is not there in
>> >> 4.4.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Thanks
>> >> >>-min
>> >> >>
>> >> >>On 4/21/14 3:22 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>Daan,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>  How did you create 4.4-forward branch? I found that 4.4 branch
>> >> has a lot
>> >> >>>of commits that are not in 4.4-forward branch, and those commits are
>> >> made
>> >> >>>before code freeze date.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>  Can you please double check?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>  Thanks
>> >> >>>  -min
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>On 4/19/14 8:07 AM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> All,
>> >> 
>> >> I created 4.4-forward. Please do all checkins for here on in on this
>> >> new branch. If you have a commit for a blocking issue, please
>> request
>> >> for it to be cherry-picked on the 4.4 branch on this list and use
>> the
>> >> [ACS44] tag. Hugo and I will distribute the work involved for this.
>> >> 
>> >> kind regards,
>> >> --
>> >> Daan
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Daan
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>



-- 
Daan

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Chip Childers]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
> he has accepted.
>
> Join me in congratulating Alena!
>
>
> -The CloudStack PMC

Congrats Alena!

RE: 4.4 Branch Build Failure

[Alex Hitchins]

I had to re-clone in the end. My guess is I caused the issue somewhere.

Thanks to all those who helped.


Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587
-

-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] 
Sent: 22 April 2014 19:55
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.4 Branch Build Failure

My build came back successful.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> I'll fetch from upstream and try a build now.
>
> Get back to you in a bit.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Alex Hitchins
wrote:
>
>> Is anyone else seeing a build failure on 4.4?
>>
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test 
>> (default-test) on project cloud-server: There are test failures.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> Alex Hitchins
>> --
>> E: a...@alexhitchins.com
>> W: alexhitchins.com
>> M: 07788 423 969
>> T: 01892 523 587
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: 4.4 Branch Build Failure

[Sebastien Goasguen]

On Apr 22, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Alex Hitchins  wrote:

> I had to re-clone in the end. My guess is I caused the issue somewhere.
> 
> Thanks to all those who helped.
> 

Did you reboot ? sometimes it helps on windows :)

> 
> Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587
> -
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] 
> Sent: 22 April 2014 19:55
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.4 Branch Build Failure
> 
> My build came back successful.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'll fetch from upstream and try a build now.
>> 
>> Get back to you in a bit.
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Alex Hitchins
> wrote:
>> 
>>> Is anyone else seeing a build failure on 4.4?
>>> 
>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test 
>>> (default-test) on project cloud-server: There are test failures.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Alex
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Alex Hitchins
>>> --
>>> E: a...@alexhitchins.com
>>> W: alexhitchins.com
>>> M: 07788 423 969
>>> T: 01892 523 587
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>> cloud
>> *(tm)*
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
> 

Re: [ACS44] 4.4-forward branch creation accident

[Mike Tutkowski]

So - just to clarify - at the time being 4.4 and 4.4-forward are
purposefully intended on being the same, right? As I look at Git, that's
the way I see it.

Thanks


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

> I have recreated the branch 4.4-forward. I renamed the old 4.4-forward
> locally. Please inform me if you are missing commits in the present
> 4.4-forward.
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
> > Thanks Daan.
> >
> > --Sheng
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Daan Hoogland  >wrote:
> >
> >> Sheng, you are right. I will try to rename 4.4-forward and recreate
> >> from 4.4. I didn't notice the older commits on the branch.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
> >> > Wait, MASTER is very difference from 4.4 branch which is feature
> freezed
> >> > one month before. People are still working on MASTER for new
> features, I
> >> > don't think it would be possible to kick out the commits not in 4.4
> >> branch.
> >> >
> >> > I would suggest save the commits in 4.4-forward, discard the current
> >> > 4.4-forward branch and re-fork from 4.4 branch.
> >> >
> >> > It just has been 2 days and it's still fixable. Please don't wait
> until
> >> > it's too late.
> >> >
> >> > --Sheng
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Well, I seem to have been forking master instead of 4.4. I am
> amending
> >> >> this while writing this mail. Feel free to cherry-pick whatever is
> >> >> needed to 4.4-forward. (but update/pull/fetch/rebase first)
> >> >>
> >> >> sorry for the inconvenience,
> >> >> Daan
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Min Chen 
> wrote:
> >> >> > Sorry, typo. I meant to say that they are not in 4.4-forward. Now I
> >> need
> >> >> > to make a commit to 4.4-forward, and not sure if I need to pursue
> or
> >> wait
> >> >> > for your fix.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> > -min
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 4/21/14 3:26 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>For example, all my commit after and including
> >> >> >>563efad9aee29ea31f10381694c5b55791d561fc made on 4/17 is not there
> in
> >> >> 4.4.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Thanks
> >> >> >>-min
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>On 4/21/14 3:22 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>Daan,
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>  How did you create 4.4-forward branch? I found that 4.4
> branch
> >> >> has a lot
> >> >> >>>of commits that are not in 4.4-forward branch, and those commits
> are
> >> >> made
> >> >> >>>before code freeze date.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>  Can you please double check?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>  Thanks
> >> >> >>>  -min
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>On 4/19/14 8:07 AM, "Daan Hoogland" 
> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> All,
> >> >> 
> >> >> I created 4.4-forward. Please do all checkins for here on in on
> this
> >> >> new branch. If you have a commit for a blocking issue, please
> >> request
> >> >> for it to be cherry-picked on the 4.4 branch on this list and use
> >> the
> >> >> [ACS44] tag. Hugo and I will distribute the work involved for
> this.
> >> >> 
> >> >> kind regards,
> >> >> --
> >> >> Daan
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Daan
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

RE: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support

[Donal Lafferty]

Hi Daan,

I took this approach with the Hyper-V plugin.  Based on my experience, I think 
the following advice is of great value.  Could you please pass it on to Funs.

First, take Rajesh up on his request for information, because he can help with 
the systemVM.  Without a system VM, you can only run a QuickCloud deployment, 
which lacks networking and secondary storage flexibility.  Also, rolling a 
system VM requires quite different expertise than operating the hypervisor 
itself.  I don't think it's useful to learn both when there are a few system VM 
experts already kicking around.

Be clear on how you'll support the console VM.  It would be preferable to give 
someone a chance to amend an existing console VM than have to write one from 
scratch.

Make it clear what instructions you'll support.  A base plugin need only 
create/start/stop/delete, but maybe your users are expecting a richer features 
set.  There seem to be four or so potential users on this mailing list.  Why 
not ask them what they need.

Get a sanity check on the agent architecture you're going to use.  Will we have 
to install a remote agent?  Will it speak CloudStack message bus or take HTTP 
requests?  It's worth checking with the community that there won't be any 
breaking changes to this architecture when it comes time to integrate.  The 
same applies to storage.  In fact, the evolving storage model was an issue 
faced by the Hyper-V plugin's storage architecture.

Finally, crowd source your test cases.  Obviously, you want to have a test case 
for every instruction you're implemented and some functional tests that cover a 
command sequence typical of a GUI operation.  What's more interesting is 
whether you can collaborate with existing testers to speed up development time 
and increase reliability.  In fact, I've some nice examples I'd like to pass on.
 
To summarise, try to collaborate.  There's a lot of expertise beyond operating 
the hypervisor that you can safely crowd source.

Cheers,


DL

> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 22 April 2014 20:45
> To: dev
> Cc: fkes...@schubergphilis.com
> Subject: Re: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support
> 
> He is implementing an ovm3 plugin + core patch. no support for the old ovm.
> When He is done he'll publish and I'll be happy to integrate and steal the
> credits;)
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Rajesh Battala 
> wrote:
> > Nice..
> > Can you share more details about the support of OVM?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Rajesh Battala
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:52 PM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support
> >
> > A schuberg philis colleague is working on it. Funs.
> >
> > mobile bilingual spell checker used
> > Op 22 apr. 2014 18:18 schreef "Chip Childers" :
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:38:51PM +, Paul Angus wrote:
> >> > About a year ago there was some discussion around updating the
> >> > Oracle VM
> >> Server support to the then current version.  The topic stopped and I
> >> can't find anything in Jira for it.
> >> >
> >> > Is the support still being worked on?
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> > Paul Angus
> >> > Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect
> >>
> >> Not AFAIK
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Daan

CLOUDSTACK-6469 - Vmware automation blocked

[Rayees Namathponnan]

Hi All,

Vmware automation runs blocked with 4.4 build, defect 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6469 created,

Regards,
Rayees

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6469 - Vmware automation blocked

[Mike Tutkowski]

I believe I know what's going on here.

I will take the ticket.

Thanks


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Rayees Namathponnan <
rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Vmware automation runs blocked with 4.4 build, defect
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6469 created,
>
> Regards,
> Rayees
>
>
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

[ACS4.4, CHERRY_PICK] 1053952b2ac4203b486bccf246b9be34d2b20d7b

[Mike Tutkowski]

Hi Daan,

Could you please cherry pick 1053952b2ac4203b486bccf246b9be34d2b20d7b to
4.4 for CLOUDSTACK-6469?

Thanks!

-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6469 - Vmware automation blocked

[Mike Tutkowski]

OK, the code is checked into 4.4-forward and just requires Daan to cherry
pick it to 4.4.

Thanks!


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> I believe I know what's going on here.
>
> I will take the ticket.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Rayees Namathponnan <
> rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Vmware automation runs blocked with 4.4 build, defect
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6469 created,
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rayees
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[Prachi Damle]

Congratulations Go!

-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go 
> Chiba to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Join me in congratulating Go!
>
>
> -The CloudStack PMC

Congrats Go!

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Prachi Damle]

Congratulations Alena!

-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:51 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked 
> Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that 
> he has accepted.
>
> Join me in congratulating Alena!
>
>
> -The CloudStack PMC

Congrats Alena!

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #214

[jenkins]

See 

Changes:

[Alena Prokharchyk] Return isolation methods as a part of listPhysicalNetworks 
call

--
[...truncated 1360 lines...]
Num Vms= 5000 Queue size = 5000 time=1683 ms
Num Vms= 1 Queue size = 1 time=1 ms
Num Vms= 100 Queue size = 100 time=274 ms
Num Vms= 1 Queue size = 1 time=296 ms
Total jobs dequeued = 10, num queued=1010 queue current size=1000
Total jobs dequeued = 1, num queued=1001 queue current size=1000
Total jobs dequeued = 10, num queued=1000 queue current size=990
Total jobs dequeued = 10, num queued=10 queue current size=0
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.694 sec
Running com.cloud.network.vpc.VpcManagerImplTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.02 sec
Running com.cloud.network.DedicateGuestVlanRangesTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.039 sec
Running com.cloud.network.lb.AssignLoadBalancerTest
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.091 sec
Running com.cloud.network.dao.NetworkDaoTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.001 sec
Running com.cloud.vm.DeploymentPlanningManagerImplTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.81 sec
Running com.cloud.vm.snapshot.VMSnapshotManagerTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.154 sec
Running com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerTest
Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.241 sec
Running com.cloud.configuration.ValidateIpRangeTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.022 sec
Running com.cloud.configuration.ConfigurationManagerTest
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.052 sec
Running com.cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImplTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.016 sec
Running com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImplTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.008 sec
Running com.cloud.vpc.Site2SiteVpnTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.77 sec
Running com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.233 sec
Running com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLManagerTest
Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.195 sec
Running com.cloud.api.dispatch.ParamGenericValidationWorkerTest
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec
Running com.cloud.api.dispatch.DispatchChainFactoryTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.003 sec
Running com.cloud.api.dispatch.CommandCreationWorkerTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.004 sec
Running com.cloud.api.dispatch.SpecificCmdValidationWorkerTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.003 sec
Running com.cloud.api.dispatch.ParamProcessWorkerTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec
Running com.cloud.ha.KVMFencerTest
Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.023 sec
Running org.apache.cloudstack.networkoffering.CreateNetworkOfferingTest
Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.742 sec
Running org.apache.cloudstack.privategw.AclOnPrivateGwTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.193 sec
Running org.apache.cloudstack.service.ServiceOfferingVOTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.001 sec
Running org.apache.cloudstack.affinity.AffinityApiUnitTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.198 sec
Running org.apache.cloudstack.network.lb.ApplicationLoadBalancerTest
Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.377 sec
Running org.apache.cloudstack.network.lb.CertServiceTest
Tests run: 15, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.666 sec
Running 
org.apache.cloudstack.region.gslb.GlobalLoadBalancingRulesServiceImplTest
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.049 sec
Running org.apache.cloudstack.region.RegionManagerTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec

Results :

Tests run: 139, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Usage Server 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-usage ---
[INFO] Deleting 
 
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-check

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2637

[jenkins]

See 

Changes:

[Alena Prokharchyk] Return isolation methods as a part of listPhysicalNetworks 
call

--
[...truncated 4308 lines...]
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-nvp ---
[INFO] Compiling 7 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-nvp ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---
Running com.cloud.network.element.NiciraNvpElementTest
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger 
(com.cloud.network.element.NiciraNvpElement).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more 
info.
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.651 sec
Running com.cloud.network.nicira.NiciraTagTest
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.003 sec
Running com.cloud.network.nicira.NatRuleTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.112 sec
Running com.cloud.network.nicira.NiciraNvpApiTest
Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.274 sec
Running com.cloud.network.resource.NiciraNvpResourceTest
Tests run: 36, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.146 sec
Running com.cloud.network.guru.NiciraNvpGuestNetworkGuruTest
Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.175 sec

Results :

Tests run: 65, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.4:jar (default-jar) @ cloud-plugin-network-nvp ---
[INFO] Building jar: 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-nvp ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-nvp ---
[INFO] Installing 

 to 
/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-plugin-network-nvp/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-plugin-network-nvp-4.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Installing 

 to 
/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-plugin-network-nvp/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-plugin-network-nvp-4.5.0-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Plugin - BigSwitch Virtual Network Segment 
4.5.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-vns ---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-vns ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-vns ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-vns ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-vns ---
[INFO] Compiling 29 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-vns ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile

RE: CLOUDSTACK-6469 - Vmware automation blocked

[Rayees Namathponnan]

Thanks Mike, I will use latest 4.4-forward build to test this. 


-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:00 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-6469 - Vmware automation blocked

OK, the code is checked into 4.4-forward and just requires Daan to cherry pick 
it to 4.4.

Thanks!


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> 
wrote:

> I believe I know what's going on here.
>
> I will take the ticket.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Rayees Namathponnan < 
> rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Vmware automation runs blocked with 4.4 build, defect
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6469 created,
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rayees
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #215

[jenkins]

See 

--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-a00 
(cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace 

Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
Fetching upstream changes from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
FATAL: Failed to fetch from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:625)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:847)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:872)
at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1320)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:609)
at jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:88)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:518)
at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1688)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:88)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:231)
Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to connect to 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.checkCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1608)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:957)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$200(CliGitAPIImpl.java:71)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$1.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:197)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:152)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:145)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)
at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:328)
at 
hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:701)

RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

[Prachi Damle]

Mike,

I think I know what's going on with basic zone shared network, I will add a fix 
for this and let you know, you can check out if that solves your issue.

Thanks,
Prachi

-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:36 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

Sure, np

Let me retrieve that and get back to you.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Prachi Damle wrote:

> Thanks Mike. Will you be able to share your management server logs and 
> db dump so  that I can quickly analyse it?
>
> Prachi
>
> > On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:25 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is in a basic zone in a cloud that was created with recent 4.4 code.
> > No upgrade involved.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Mike
> >
> >> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Prachi Damle 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> This looks to be an error thrown by the IAM service while checking
> access
> >> to the network but this user.
> >>
> >> Few questions to track down the problem:
> >> 1) Was this network newly created on 4.4? Or did you upgrade to 4.4 
> >> and this network already existed?
> >> 2) Do you know if this is a shared network or is this network 
> >> created
> and
> >> owned by this account?
> >> 3) or, Is it a basic zone?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Prachi
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com 
> >> ]
> >> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:43 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> >> Subject: RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> >>
> >> Looks like the user don't have permission to use the network.
> >> Is the network created by user or by admin?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Rajesh Battala
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Mike Tutkowski 
> >> [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:14 AM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> >> Subject: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I created a User Account and tried to spin up a VM from it and 
> >> received the following error:
> >>
> >> http://i.imgur.com/1jfemTW.png
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on what this means? It looks network related, but I'm 
> >> not sure why that would be the case. Normally this set of steps has 
> >> not a problem.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com 
> >> o: 303.746.7302
> >> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> >> cloud
> >> *(tm)*
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the 
> > cloud
> > *(tm)*
>



--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

[Mike Tutkowski]

OK, thanks!

Sorry I have been so slow today in getting those logs...been in a lot of
meetings.

If the fix works, I guess I can skip sending the logs to you.

Thanks!


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:

> Mike,
>
> I think I know what's going on with basic zone shared network, I will add
> a fix for this and let you know, you can check out if that solves your
> issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Prachi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:36 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
>
> Sure, np
>
> Let me retrieve that and get back to you.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Prachi Damle  >wrote:
>
> > Thanks Mike. Will you be able to share your management server logs and
> > db dump so  that I can quickly analyse it?
> >
> > Prachi
> >
> > > On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:25 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is in a basic zone in a cloud that was created with recent 4.4
> code.
> > > No upgrade involved.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Prachi Damle 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Mike,
> > >>
> > >> This looks to be an error thrown by the IAM service while checking
> > access
> > >> to the network but this user.
> > >>
> > >> Few questions to track down the problem:
> > >> 1) Was this network newly created on 4.4? Or did you upgrade to 4.4
> > >> and this network already existed?
> > >> 2) Do you know if this is a shared network or is this network
> > >> created
> > and
> > >> owned by this account?
> > >> 3) or, Is it a basic zone?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Prachi
> > >>
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com
> > >> ]
> > >> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:43 PM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> > >> Subject: RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> > >>
> > >> Looks like the user don't have permission to use the network.
> > >> Is the network created by user or by admin?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Rajesh Battala
> > >>
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Mike Tutkowski
> > >> [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:14 AM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> > >> Subject: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I created a User Account and tried to spin up a VM from it and
> > >> received the following error:
> > >>
> > >> http://i.imgur.com/1jfemTW.png
> > >>
> > >> Any thoughts on what this means? It looks network related, but I'm
> > >> not sure why that would be the case. Normally this set of steps has
> > >> not a problem.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> > >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com 
> > >> o: 303.746.7302
> > >> Advancing the way the world uses the
> > >> cloud
> > >> *(tm)*
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud
> > > *(tm)*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Nitin Mehta]

Congrats Alena !!!

On 22/04/14 12:50 PM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:

>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
>Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
>he has accepted.
>
>Join me in congratulating Alena!
>
>
>-The CloudStack PMC

Re: Review Request 17586: AWSAPI: cloudstack api on POST requests (instead GET), ssl enabling fixed

[Dmitry Batkovich]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17586/
---

(Updated April 22, 2014, 10:50 p.m.)


Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Sebastien Goasguen.


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

* CloudStackClient.java http request mechanism replaced from GET requests to 
POST for supporting EC2 requests larger than 2KB
* SSL enabling fixed in EC2Engine.java


Diffs
-

  awsapi/conf/ec2-service.properties.in 82f5ad8 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/bridge/service/core/ec2/EC2Engine.java cd20214 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/bridge/util/JsonAccessor.java 2a94dea 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/bridge/util/JsonElementUtil.java PRE-CREATION 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/bridge/util/JsonElementUtil.java 2d8afb5 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/stack/CloudStackApi.java b7a1210 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/stack/CloudStackClient.java 03eba96 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/stack/CloudStackClientException.java PRE-CREATION 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/stack/CloudStackClientException.java ac1b3ef 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/stack/CloudStackCommand.java 8d6aa68 
  awsapi/src/com/cloud/stack/CloudStackQueryBuilder.java PRE-CREATION 
  awsapi/test/com/cloud/gate/util/CloudStackClientTestCase.java 826cb3a 
  awsapi/test/com/cloud/gate/util/JsonAccessorTestCase.java 8603e59 
  awsapi/test/com/cloud/gate/util/JsonElementUtilTestCase.java PRE-CREATION 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17586/diff/


Testing
---


File Attachments


cloudstack_api_post_and_ssl_fix.patch
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/21/93dfe17d-2f7f-4413-80ba-76d33a3b5a47__cloudstack_api_post_and_ssl_fix.patch


Thanks,

Dmitry Batkovich

4.4 release dashboard in ACS JIRA

[Prachi Damle]

Hi Hugo/Daan,

Will it be possible for you to setup a 4.4 release dashboard in JIRA  and share 
it? It will be helpful to track all issues getting logged for 4.4.

Thanks,
Prachi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Min Chen]

Congrats, Alena.


On 4/22/14 3:44 PM, "Nitin Mehta"  wrote:

>Congrats Alena !!!
>
>On 22/04/14 12:50 PM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:
>
>>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
>>Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
>>he has accepted.
>>
>>Join me in congratulating Alena!
>>
>>
>>-The CloudStack PMC
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Ahmad Emneina]

Oh sweet! Great job Alena!


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Min Chen  wrote:

> Congrats, Alena.
>
>
> On 4/22/14 3:44 PM, "Nitin Mehta"  wrote:
>
> >Congrats Alena !!!
> >
> >On 22/04/14 12:50 PM, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:
> >
> >>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> >>Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
> >>he has accepted.
> >>
> >>Join me in congratulating Alena!
> >>
> >>
> >>-The CloudStack PMC
> >
>
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[ilya musayev]

Welcome and congrats!
On 4/22/14, 12:50 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
he has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Alena!


-The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[ilya musayev]

Welcome and congrats!
On 4/22/14, 3:13 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:

Congratulations Go!

-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go Chiba 
to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Go!


-The CloudStack PMC

Congrats Go!

Email functionality.

[Rafael Weingartner]

Hi folks,
I was wondering that it would be awesome if through the CS UI we could
contact users, sending them emails(messages about maintenance and etc).

Imagine that we have a maintenance coming and/or some users could be
affected, or some problem happened that caused some downtime, it would be
very interesting (at least for me) if I could through the CS we send email
to those users.

Since, we already fill out a form that contains the user’s email. This way
we could give a real meaning to that email that we have to fill in when
creating a user. Is there any feature request for something like that?


-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[Ahmad Emneina]

Great job Go! Congrats!

Ahmad

> On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:
> 
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go 
> Chiba to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
> 
> Join me in congratulating Go!
> 
> 
> -The CloudStack PMC

Review Request 20596: Project Invitation & System Alert Message Email Send SMTP Auth & Port Fix

[KyungJae Lee]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20596/
---

Review request for cloudstack.


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

I worked for sending e-mail change my Project Invitation & System Alert 
Message. 
I have divided the authentication of the User SSL certificate and useAuth 
settings smtp. 
In addition, it has been sending the Port that is Fix when specifying the SMTP 
Port in Global Configuration existing.
I have modified to receive and process the value of the option.


Diffs
-


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20596/diff/


Testing
---


File Attachments


changeFile
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/5c495019-9c45-40f9-a64e-747c1203e857__review_code.tar.gz


Thanks,

KyungJae Lee

Re: Review Request 20596: Project Invitation & System Alert Message Email Send SMTP Auth & Port Fix

[KyungJae Lee]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20596/
---

(Updated April 23, 2014, 1:16 a.m.)


Review request for cloudstack.


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

I worked for sending e-mail change my Project Invitation & System Alert 
Message. 
I have divided the authentication of the User SSL certificate and useAuth 
settings smtp. 
In addition, it has been sending the Port that is Fix when specifying the SMTP 
Port in Global Configuration existing.
I have modified to receive and process the value of the option.


Diffs
-


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20596/diff/


Testing
---


File Attachments (updated)


changeFile
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/5c495019-9c45-40f9-a64e-747c1203e857__review_code.tar.gz
AlertManagerImpl.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/944aae95-7b5d-41b7-b625-8684e0e41292__AlertManagerImpl.java
Config.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/98bba1ad-2ef4-445e-a3b6-2a7b7b6b055c__Config.java
ProjectManagerImpl.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/048574c1-3cc8-4a13-918f-2cbe9e737be8__ProjectManagerImpl.java
XtrmSMTPTransport.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/baebf246-8a29-4c75-a2e5-bec997ba__XtrmSMTPTransport.java
UsageAlertManagerImpl.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/b6511be7-b14d-4cab-adfe-0b9b40a69d37__UsageAlertManagerImpl.java


Thanks,

KyungJae Lee

Re: Review Request 20596: Project Invitation & System Alert Message Email Send SMTP Auth & Port Fix

[KyungJae Lee]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20596/
---

(Updated April 23, 2014, 1:18 a.m.)


Review request for cloudstack.


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

I worked for sending e-mail change my Project Invitation & System Alert 
Message. 
I have divided the authentication of the User SSL certificate and useAuth 
settings smtp. 
In addition, it has been sending the Port that is Fix when specifying the SMTP 
Port in Global Configuration existing.
I have modified to receive and process the value of the option.


Diffs
-


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20596/diff/


Testing
---


File Attachments (updated)


AlertManagerImpl.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/944aae95-7b5d-41b7-b625-8684e0e41292__AlertManagerImpl.java
Config.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/98bba1ad-2ef4-445e-a3b6-2a7b7b6b055c__Config.java
XtrmSMTPTransport.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/baebf246-8a29-4c75-a2e5-bec997ba__XtrmSMTPTransport.java
UsageAlertManagerImpl.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/b6511be7-b14d-4cab-adfe-0b9b40a69d37__UsageAlertManagerImpl.java
ProjectManagerImpl.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/c15aafd6-275d-40ba-954d-dface1ec2356__ProjectManagerImpl.java


Thanks,

KyungJae Lee

Re: Review Request 20596: Project Invitation & System Alert Message Email Send SMTP Auth & Port Fix

[KyungJae Lee]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20596/
---

(Updated April 23, 2014, 1:23 a.m.)


Review request for cloudstack.


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description (updated)
---

I worked for sending e-mail change my Project Invitation & System Alert 
Message. 
I have divided the authentication of the User SSL and useAuth settings smtp. 
So, I added alert.smtp.ssl, the project.smtp.ssl items in Global Configuration.
In addition, it has been sending the Port that is Fix when specifying the SMTP 
Port in Global Configuration existing.
I have modified to receive and process the value of the option.


Diffs
-


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20596/diff/


Testing
---


File Attachments


AlertManagerImpl.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/944aae95-7b5d-41b7-b625-8684e0e41292__AlertManagerImpl.java
Config.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/98bba1ad-2ef4-445e-a3b6-2a7b7b6b055c__Config.java
XtrmSMTPTransport.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/baebf246-8a29-4c75-a2e5-bec997ba__XtrmSMTPTransport.java
UsageAlertManagerImpl.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/b6511be7-b14d-4cab-adfe-0b9b40a69d37__UsageAlertManagerImpl.java
ProjectManagerImpl.java
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/04/23/c15aafd6-275d-40ba-954d-dface1ec2356__ProjectManagerImpl.java


Thanks,

KyungJae Lee

[ACS44] cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-6474

[Prachi Damle]

Hi Hugo/Daan,

Could you please cherry-pick following commit to 4.4 branch?

Commit hash:be10b32b273bed1a1492f02b943b168195e762c0
CLOUDSTACK-6474: IAM - Not able to list shared networks that is created with 
scope="all"

Thanks,
Prachi

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Rajesh Battala]

Hearty Congratulations Alena :) 

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:21 AM
To: dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Alena 
Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Alena!


-The CloudStack PMC

RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

[Prachi Damle]

Hi Mike,

I fixed this issue on 4.4-forward, waiting for it to be cherry-picked to 4.4
CLOUDSTACK-6474: IAM - Not able to list shared networks that is created with 
scope="all"


Let me know if your issue gets fixed with latest 4.4 once the fix is in. 
However you will have to redo your 4.4 setup though with latest code.

Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:43 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

OK, thanks!

Sorry I have been so slow today in getting those logs...been in a lot of 
meetings.

If the fix works, I guess I can skip sending the logs to you.

Thanks!


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:

> Mike,
>
> I think I know what's going on with basic zone shared network, I will 
> add a fix for this and let you know, you can check out if that solves 
> your issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Prachi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:36 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
>
> Sure, np
>
> Let me retrieve that and get back to you.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Prachi Damle 
>  >wrote:
>
> > Thanks Mike. Will you be able to share your management server logs 
> > and db dump so  that I can quickly analyse it?
> >
> > Prachi
> >
> > > On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:25 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is in a basic zone in a cloud that was created with recent 
> > > 4.4
> code.
> > > No upgrade involved.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Prachi Damle 
> > >> 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Mike,
> > >>
> > >> This looks to be an error thrown by the IAM service while 
> > >> checking
> > access
> > >> to the network but this user.
> > >>
> > >> Few questions to track down the problem:
> > >> 1) Was this network newly created on 4.4? Or did you upgrade to 
> > >> 4.4 and this network already existed?
> > >> 2) Do you know if this is a shared network or is this network 
> > >> created
> > and
> > >> owned by this account?
> > >> 3) or, Is it a basic zone?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Prachi
> > >>
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com 
> > >> ]
> > >> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:43 PM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> > >> Subject: RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> > >>
> > >> Looks like the user don't have permission to use the network.
> > >> Is the network created by user or by admin?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Rajesh Battala
> > >>
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Mike Tutkowski
> > >> [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:14 AM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> > >> Subject: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I created a User Account and tried to spin up a VM from it and 
> > >> received the following error:
> > >>
> > >> http://i.imgur.com/1jfemTW.png
> > >>
> > >> Any thoughts on what this means? It looks network related, but 
> > >> I'm not sure why that would be the case. Normally this set of 
> > >> steps has not a problem.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> > >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com 
> > >> o: 303.746.7302
> > >> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> > >> cloud
> > >> *(tm)*
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the 
> > > cloud
> > > *(tm)*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

[Mike Tutkowski]

Thanks, Prachi!

I can update and re-run my scenario.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I fixed this issue on 4.4-forward, waiting for it to be cherry-picked to
> 4.4
> CLOUDSTACK-6474: IAM - Not able to list shared networks that is created
> with scope="all"
>
>
> Let me know if your issue gets fixed with latest 4.4 once the fix is in.
> However you will have to redo your 4.4 setup though with latest code.
>
> Thanks,
> Prachi
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:43 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
>
> OK, thanks!
>
> Sorry I have been so slow today in getting those logs...been in a lot of
> meetings.
>
> If the fix works, I guess I can skip sending the logs to you.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Prachi Damle  >wrote:
>
> > Mike,
> >
> > I think I know what's going on with basic zone shared network, I will
> > add a fix for this and let you know, you can check out if that solves
> > your issue.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Prachi
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:36 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> >
> > Sure, np
> >
> > Let me retrieve that and get back to you.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Prachi Damle
> >  > >wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Mike. Will you be able to share your management server logs
> > > and db dump so  that I can quickly analyse it?
> > >
> > > Prachi
> > >
> > > > On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:25 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This is in a basic zone in a cloud that was created with recent
> > > > 4.4
> > code.
> > > > No upgrade involved.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > >> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Prachi Damle
> > > >> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Mike,
> > > >>
> > > >> This looks to be an error thrown by the IAM service while
> > > >> checking
> > > access
> > > >> to the network but this user.
> > > >>
> > > >> Few questions to track down the problem:
> > > >> 1) Was this network newly created on 4.4? Or did you upgrade to
> > > >> 4.4 and this network already existed?
> > > >> 2) Do you know if this is a shared network or is this network
> > > >> created
> > > and
> > > >> owned by this account?
> > > >> 3) or, Is it a basic zone?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Prachi
> > > >>
> > > >> -Original Message-
> > > >> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com
> > > >> ]
> > > >> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:43 PM
> > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> > > >> Subject: RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> > > >>
> > > >> Looks like the user don't have permission to use the network.
> > > >> Is the network created by user or by admin?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >> Rajesh Battala
> > > >>
> > > >> -Original Message-
> > > >> From: Mike Tutkowski
> > > >> [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:14 AM
> > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> > > >> Subject: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> I created a User Account and tried to spin up a VM from it and
> > > >> received the following error:
> > > >>
> > > >> http://i.imgur.com/1jfemTW.png
> > > >>
> > > >> Any thoughts on what this means? It looks network related, but
> > > >> I'm not sure why that would be the case. Normally this set of
> > > >> steps has not a problem.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks!
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com 
> > > >> o: 303.746.7302
> > > >> Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > >> cloud
> > > >> *(tm)*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > cloud
> > > > *(tm)*
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud
> > *(tm)*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Ad

[ACS44] cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-6478

[Min Chen]

Hi Hugo/Daan,

Would you please cherry-pick following commit from 4.4-forward branch to
4.4 branch?

Commit: f3e9c84cddbc0ab7b89f8000dd0db42ba1570d28
CLOUDSTACK-6478: Failed to download Template when having 3 SSVM's in one
zone on Vmware.

Thanks
-min

Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server

[Tejas Gadaria]

Thanks Mike,

I will go ahead & try this.

Regards,
Tejas


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Yeah, that should work just fine.
>
> I regularly run XenServer and VMware in the same zone with only having the
> XenServer system template seeded.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Devdeep Singh  >wrote:
>
> > Hi Tejas,
> >
> > It should work but I would recommend that you seed the vmware systemvm
> > template too on the secondary storage.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Devdeep
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:05 PM
> > > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
> > >
> > > Hi Devdeep,
> > >
> > > Thanks for clarification about hyperv,
> > >
> > > If I undo all the changes I made for hyperv setup and go ahead to
> deploy
> > > vmware on existing xen setup, Do I need to upload vmware systemvm or it
> > > won't be necessary.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tejas
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Devdeep Singh
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Tejas,
> > > >
> > > > For Hyper-V you need to create a zone in which Hyper-V is the only
> > > > hypervisor type. Reason being, currently in cloudstack Hyper-V only
> > > > works with SMB as a secondary storage. You can have a zone where a
> > > > mixed set of other hypervisors are present, for example, xenserver,
> > > > kvm etc, but for hyper-v you'll have to create a separate zone in
> > > > which hyper-v is the only hypervisor. For a hyper-v zone; you'll have
> > > > to register a secondary storage of type SMB.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Devdeep
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:22 PM
> > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary &
> > > > secondary
> > > > > storage, it was working fine.
> > > > > 2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host.
> Immediately
> > > > > hyperv Centos template download started.
> > > > > 3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster.
> > > > > 4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says ,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG
> > > > > [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > > > > (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for
> > > > > network
> > > > id
> > > > > 206 as a part of router startup in
> > > > > Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type--
> > > > > >Pool(Id))]
> > > > > : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT--
> > > > > >Pool(2))]
> > > > > 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > > > > (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance
> > > > > VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv]
> > > > > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not
> > > > > been completely downloaded to zone 1
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateMan
> > > > > agerImpl.java:1745)
> > > > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to
> > > secondary
> > > > > storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Tejas
> > > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>

Re: [GSOC2014] Acceptance of three projects for CloudStack

[ilya musayev]

Welcome back and congrats!
On 4/22/14, 1:13 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

I am pleased to announce the acceptance of three google summer of code projects 
for Apache CloudStack in summer 2014.

Our three students are:

-Ian Duffy (back for one more round), who will work on a vagrant/puppet/travis 
configuration to improve on devcloud.
-Darren Brogam, who will improve the GCE and AWS interfaces (that has he has 
co-authored)
-Seif Eddine Jemli, who will develop a new UI for Primary Storage plug-ins

Mike Tutkowski will mentor Seif, while I will mentor Ian and Darren.

Join me in congratulating our three stars of gsoc 2014 !

-Sebastien

Re: Creating or customising OS type

[ilya musayev]

Nux,

Pretext: This applies to VMware and could possible apply to KVM - but 
i'm not 100% certain on that - so its an educated guess of things you 
can try.


I see 2 ways of addressing your problem.

1) If VMs are already in cloudstack, but have the wrong SCSI adapter, 
i'm under assumption you can alter the cloud.user_vm_details table for 
each respective VM id. I would use Windows host as an example to trace 
one flow. Once the change is made, power down the vm through cloudstack 
and start it back up.


2) If you building out the VMs via templates, when you go through import 
process, you can try altering vm_details tag. For example this is how i 
did it in cloudmonkey:


register template format=ova hypervisor=vmware name=OL63-26-TMPLT 
url=http://reposerver.example.com/6.3-26/ol-6.3-26.ova ispublic=true 
isfeatured=true passwordenabled=false details[0].rootDiskController=scsi 
details[0].nicAdapter=E1000 details[0].keyboard=us ostypeid=148 
zoneid=-1 displaytext=OL63-26-TMPLT


see if you can change details[0].rootDiskController=scsi to 
details[0].rootDiskController=virtio


If i understood developers correctly last time we spoke on adding custom 
parameters to vmware, you can pass on the parameters via details 
argument and cloudstack does not sanitize the input, it just passes it 
on to vmware (the only place that has some checking - is the UI, not 
really backend restriction)


Let me know if KVM behaves the same way as vmware.

Regards
ilya

On 4/22/14, 1:36 AM, Nux! wrote:

Hi,

I need to migrate some VMs from OnApp to Cloudstack and they are 
defined with VirtIO storage and e1000 NICs. In the past Cloudstack's 
"Windows PV" OS type was giving me the same (VirtIO + e1000), but I 
see in 4.3 this is no longer the case and "Windows PV" defaults to 
VirtIO everywhere which is good but doesn't help me.


Is there any other type that could provide me virtio+e100 or how can I 
add myself a new os type? Haven't seen any such option in the 
api/cloudmonkey.



Lucian

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Likitha Shetty]

Congratulations Alena !

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:21 AM
To: dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Alena 
Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Alena!


-The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Jayapal Reddy Uradi]

Congratulations Alena !

On 23-Apr-2014, at 1:20 AM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that
> he has accepted.
> 
> Join me in congratulating Alena!
> 
> 
> -The CloudStack PMC

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Suresh Sadhu]

Congratulations Alena !

Regards
sadhu
On 23-Apr-2014, at 1:20 AM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked 
> Alena Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that 
> he has accepted.
> 
> Join me in congratulating Alena!
> 
> 
> -The CloudStack PMC

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

[Saksham Srivastava]

Congratulations Alena !

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:21 AM
To: dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Alena 
Prokharchyk to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Alena!


-The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ACS44] 4.4-forward branch creation accident

[Koushik Das]

Daan,
I am not seeing the commits that went to the previously created 4.4-forward 
branch in the new 4.4-forward branch. For e.g. 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=c8f2bf2
Are you going to merge all of them into 4.4-forward?

-Koushik

On 23-Apr-2014, at 2:53 AM, Mike Tutkowski  wrote:

> So - just to clarify - at the time being 4.4 and 4.4-forward are
> purposefully intended on being the same, right? As I look at Git, that's
> the way I see it.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> 
>> I have recreated the branch 4.4-forward. I renamed the old 4.4-forward
>> locally. Please inform me if you are missing commits in the present
>> 4.4-forward.
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
>>> Thanks Daan.
>>> 
>>> --Sheng
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Daan Hoogland >> wrote:
>>> 
 Sheng, you are right. I will try to rename 4.4-forward and recreate
 from 4.4. I didn't notice the older commits on the branch.
 
 On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
> Wait, MASTER is very difference from 4.4 branch which is feature
>> freezed
> one month before. People are still working on MASTER for new
>> features, I
> don't think it would be possible to kick out the commits not in 4.4
 branch.
> 
> I would suggest save the commits in 4.4-forward, discard the current
> 4.4-forward branch and re-fork from 4.4 branch.
> 
> It just has been 2 days and it's still fixable. Please don't wait
>> until
> it's too late.
> 
> --Sheng
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> 
>> Well, I seem to have been forking master instead of 4.4. I am
>> amending
>> this while writing this mail. Feel free to cherry-pick whatever is
>> needed to 4.4-forward. (but update/pull/fetch/rebase first)
>> 
>> sorry for the inconvenience,
>> Daan
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Min Chen 
>> wrote:
>>> Sorry, typo. I meant to say that they are not in 4.4-forward. Now I
 need
>>> to make a commit to 4.4-forward, and not sure if I need to pursue
>> or
 wait
>>> for your fix.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> -min
>>> 
>>> On 4/21/14 3:26 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
>>> 
 For example, all my commit after and including
 563efad9aee29ea31f10381694c5b55791d561fc made on 4/17 is not there
>> in
>> 4.4.
 
 Thanks
 -min
 
 On 4/21/14 3:22 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
 
> Daan,
> 
> How did you create 4.4-forward branch? I found that 4.4
>> branch
>> has a lot
> of commits that are not in 4.4-forward branch, and those commits
>> are
>> made
> before code freeze date.
> 
> Can you please double check?
> 
> Thanks
> -min
> 
> On 4/19/14 8:07 AM, "Daan Hoogland" 
>> wrote:
> 
>> All,
>> 
>> I created 4.4-forward. Please do all checkins for here on in on
>> this
>> new branch. If you have a commit for a blocking issue, please
 request
>> for it to be cherry-picked on the 4.4 branch on this list and use
 the
>> [ACS44] tag. Hugo and I will distribute the work involved for
>> this.
>> 
>> kind regards,
>> --
>> Daan
> 
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Daan
>> 
 
 
 
 --
 Daan
 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Daan
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

[Likitha Shetty]

Congratulations!

-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 12:52 AM
To: 
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go Chiba 
to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Go!


-The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ACS44] 4.4-forward branch creation accident

[Daan Hoogland]

yes

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 wrote:
> So - just to clarify - at the time being 4.4 and 4.4-forward are
> purposefully intended on being the same, right? As I look at Git, that's
> the way I see it.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> I have recreated the branch 4.4-forward. I renamed the old 4.4-forward
>> locally. Please inform me if you are missing commits in the present
>> 4.4-forward.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
>> > Thanks Daan.
>> >
>> > --Sheng
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Daan Hoogland > >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sheng, you are right. I will try to rename 4.4-forward and recreate
>> >> from 4.4. I didn't notice the older commits on the branch.
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Sheng Yang  wrote:
>> >> > Wait, MASTER is very difference from 4.4 branch which is feature
>> freezed
>> >> > one month before. People are still working on MASTER for new
>> features, I
>> >> > don't think it would be possible to kick out the commits not in 4.4
>> >> branch.
>> >> >
>> >> > I would suggest save the commits in 4.4-forward, discard the current
>> >> > 4.4-forward branch and re-fork from 4.4 branch.
>> >> >
>> >> > It just has been 2 days and it's still fixable. Please don't wait
>> until
>> >> > it's too late.
>> >> >
>> >> > --Sheng
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Well, I seem to have been forking master instead of 4.4. I am
>> amending
>> >> >> this while writing this mail. Feel free to cherry-pick whatever is
>> >> >> needed to 4.4-forward. (but update/pull/fetch/rebase first)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> sorry for the inconvenience,
>> >> >> Daan
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Min Chen 
>> wrote:
>> >> >> > Sorry, typo. I meant to say that they are not in 4.4-forward. Now I
>> >> need
>> >> >> > to make a commit to 4.4-forward, and not sure if I need to pursue
>> or
>> >> wait
>> >> >> > for your fix.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks
>> >> >> > -min
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 4/21/14 3:26 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>For example, all my commit after and including
>> >> >> >>563efad9aee29ea31f10381694c5b55791d561fc made on 4/17 is not there
>> in
>> >> >> 4.4.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>Thanks
>> >> >> >>-min
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>On 4/21/14 3:22 PM, "Min Chen"  wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>>Daan,
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>  How did you create 4.4-forward branch? I found that 4.4
>> branch
>> >> >> has a lot
>> >> >> >>>of commits that are not in 4.4-forward branch, and those commits
>> are
>> >> >> made
>> >> >> >>>before code freeze date.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>  Can you please double check?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>  Thanks
>> >> >> >>>  -min
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>On 4/19/14 8:07 AM, "Daan Hoogland" 
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> All,
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I created 4.4-forward. Please do all checkins for here on in on
>> this
>> >> >> new branch. If you have a commit for a blocking issue, please
>> >> request
>> >> >> for it to be cherry-picked on the 4.4 branch on this list and use
>> >> the
>> >> >> [ACS44] tag. Hugo and I will distribute the work involved for
>> this.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> kind regards,
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Daan
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Daan
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Daan
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*



-- 
Daan