Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board

[Sebastien Goasguen]

> On Mar 30, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Kishan Kavala  wrote:
> 
> +1 for GitHub
> 
> Can we do a one-time migration of all open RB requests to GH and make RB 
> read-only?
> 

I don’t think we can do an automatic migration. We should all check RB in the 
coming days, try to close the one we can and contact the authors we know.

I would like to keep this DISCUSS open till next friday, since it’s a 
relatively big change. At that time, I will check with infra if we can make RB 
read only.


> -Original Message-
> From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org] 
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board
> 
> +1
> 
> ~Rajani
> 
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Mike Tutkowski < 
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Sebastien Goasguen 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> Since GitHub pull requests have been enabled for cloudstack, we have 
>>> closed 127 commits.
>>> 
>>> I believe this is a nicer interface, one that folks are used to when 
>>> contributing to other open source projects.
>>> 
>>> In the meantime, we still have 73 open reviews on Review Board
>>> 
>>> https://reviews.apache.org/
>>> 
>>> * I propose that we stop using RB all together, and remove any links 
>>> to
>> it
>>> from our website and README.
>>> 
>>> A few of us have tried to close some of the reviews by pinging the
>> authors
>>> already.
>>> 
>>> * My second proposition is that we write a comment in all reviews:
>>> 
>>> “Thanks for the patch, the cloudstack community has decided to stop 
>>> using Review Board in favor of github pull request.
>>> You can see  to learn how to submit a pull request to cloudstack.
>>> Could you move your patch to a PR ?
>>> Without response from you we will close this review within 7 days.
>>> "
>>> 
>>> There is good contribution guidelines in our docs README:
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs
>>> 
>>> -Sebastien
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>> *™*
>> 

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-install pull request: Updates to the vSphere secti...

[PaulAngus]

Github user PaulAngus closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/20


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Review Request 31302: CLOUDSTACK-8278: Usage test path - Correct code flow in case the usage job configuration is not to be set through test case

[Sebastien Goasguen]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31302/#review78181
---


Gaurav, can you move this one to GitHub and mark it as discarded.

thanks

- Sebastien Goasguen


On Feb. 23, 2015, 11:19 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31302/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 23, 2015, 11:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and sanjeev n.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8278
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8278
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> The flag "setUsageConfigurationThroughTestCase" dictates whether we should 
> set the usage related config from test case itself (And restart the 
> management server and usage server in the process) or not.
> 
> When the flag is False (When we don't want to disrupt other test cases and/or 
> usage server/job is already configured), then it should be ensured that the 
> code is broken anywhere. Set the current date to cls.curDate variable in this 
> case to avoid code break.
> 
> Ensured above changes are in.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   test/integration/testpaths/testpath_usage.py 17d56cc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31302/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> yes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaurav Aradhye
> 
>

Re: Review Request 21805: CLOUDSTACK-6748: Creating an instance with user-data when network doesn't support user-data should error

[Sebastien Goasguen]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21805/#review78183
---


Hari, since you are committer now, please check that the patch is in all 
required branches and mark the review as submitted.
thanks

- Sebastien Goasguen


On Nov. 25, 2014, 6:06 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21805/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Nov. 25, 2014, 6:06 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy, Kishan Kavala, Murali Reddy, 
> Rajani Karuturi, and Shengsheng Huang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6748
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6748
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> CLOUDSTACK-6748: Creating an instance with user-data when network doesn't 
> support user-data should error
> 
> When vm is deployed with userdata or ssh key or using password enabled 
> template and in the default network that does not support userdata we should 
> error the vm creation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   
> engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/NetworkOrchestrator.java
>  96dafe9 
>   server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java cf04270 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21805/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Harikrishna Patnala
> 
>

Re: Review Request 31302: CLOUDSTACK-8278: Usage test path - Correct code flow in case the usage job configuration is not to be set through test case

[Gaurav Aradhye]

Done. No open requests now.

Regards,
Gaurav

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Sebastien Goasguen 
wrote:

>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31302/
>
> Gaurav, can you move this one to GitHub and mark it as discarded.
>
> thanks
>
>
> - Sebastien Goasguen
>
> On February 23rd, 2015, 11:19 a.m. UTC, Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
>   Review request for cloudstack and sanjeev n.
> By Gaurav Aradhye.
>
> *Updated Feb. 23, 2015, 11:19 a.m.*
>  *Bugs: * CLOUDSTACK-8278
> 
>  *Repository: * cloudstack-git
> Description
>
> The flag "setUsageConfigurationThroughTestCase" dictates whether we should 
> set the usage related config from test case itself (And restart the 
> management server and usage server in the process) or not.
>
> When the flag is False (When we don't want to disrupt other test cases and/or 
> usage server/job is already configured), then it should be ensured that the 
> code is broken anywhere. Set the current date to cls.curDate variable in this 
> case to avoid code break.
>
> Ensured above changes are in.
>
>   Testing
>
> yes.
>
>   Diffs
>
>- test/integration/testpaths/testpath_usage.py (17d56cc)
>
> View Diff 
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack

[Rohit Yadav]

Thank you everyone.

On Monday 30 March 2015 09:49 AM, Kishan Kavala wrote:

Congratulations Rohit. Well deserved!!

-Original Message-
From: Vaibhav Gupta [mailto:vaibhav.gu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 4:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack

Congratulations, Rohit!!

Thanks,
Vaibhav

-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena1...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 March 2015 12:55
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack

Congrats, Rohit!

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Ahmad  wrote:


Congrats Mr Yadav! Keep kicking tail.




On Mar 27, 2015, at 1:07 AM, Sebastien Goasguen 

wrote:


The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased

to

announce that Rohit Yadav has accepted our invitation to join the PMC.

Please join me in congratulating him.

On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC








--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #192

[jenkins]

See 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Sadhu

[sadhugit]

GitHub user sadhugit opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/135

Sadhu



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/sadhugit/cloudstack sadhu

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/135.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #135


commit 09d12317d32780637e0c736088dccb2207799d90
Author: sadhu 
Date:   2015-02-19T11:30:22Z

CLOUDSTACK-8218:added missing scenrio and additional checks for 
betterdebugging

commit c173a6b148e7f96e88f55589b2cdc4906a85d809
Author: sadhu 
Date:   2015-03-30T10:01:20Z

cloudstack-8218




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

RE: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board

[Raja Pullela]

+1 for GitHub...

Some of us are already using GH and any new review requests on RB, reviewers 
should ask for the owners to post them to GH.
Otherwise, there is no easy way to stop people from using RB ?  

-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 12:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board


> On Mar 30, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Kishan Kavala  wrote:
> 
> +1 for GitHub
> 
> Can we do a one-time migration of all open RB requests to GH and make RB 
> read-only?
> 

I don’t think we can do an automatic migration. We should all check RB in the 
coming days, try to close the one we can and contact the authors we know.

I would like to keep this DISCUSS open till next friday, since it’s a 
relatively big change. At that time, I will check with infra if we can make RB 
read only.


> -Original Message-
> From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board
> 
> +1
> 
> ~Rajani
> 
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Mike Tutkowski < 
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Sebastien Goasguen 
>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> Since GitHub pull requests have been enabled for cloudstack, we have 
>>> closed 127 commits.
>>> 
>>> I believe this is a nicer interface, one that folks are used to when 
>>> contributing to other open source projects.
>>> 
>>> In the meantime, we still have 73 open reviews on Review Board
>>> 
>>> https://reviews.apache.org/
>>> 
>>> * I propose that we stop using RB all together, and remove any links 
>>> to
>> it
>>> from our website and README.
>>> 
>>> A few of us have tried to close some of the reviews by pinging the
>> authors
>>> already.
>>> 
>>> * My second proposition is that we write a comment in all reviews:
>>> 
>>> “Thanks for the patch, the cloudstack community has decided to stop 
>>> using Review Board in favor of github pull request.
>>> You can see  to learn how to submit a pull request to cloudstack.
>>> Could you move your patch to a PR ?
>>> Without response from you we will close this review within 7 days.
>>> "
>>> 
>>> There is good contribution guidelines in our docs README:
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs
>>> 
>>> -Sebastien
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>> *™*
>> 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Sadhu

[srikanteswartalluri]

Github user srikanteswartalluri commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/135#issuecomment-87629689
  
Looks good.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #193

[jenkins]

See 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Sadhu

[sadhugit]

Github user sadhugit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/135


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Sadhu

[sadhugit]

Github user sadhugit commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/135#issuecomment-87634327
  
Thanks Talluri.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack

[Abhinandan Prateek]

Congrats Rohit !

-abhi


> On 28-Mar-2015, at 8:24 am, Ian Duffy  wrote:
>
> Congrats Rohit! Well deserved :)
>
> On 27 March 2015 at 15:17, Marco Sinhoreli
>  wrote:
>> Great news! Congrats Rohit!
>>
>>
>> Marco Sinhoreli
>> Consultant Manager
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Phone: +55 21 2586 6390 | Fax: +55 21 2586 6002 | Mobile: +55 21 99159
>> 4713 | Mobile: +55 21 98276 3636
>> Praia de Botafogo 501, bloco 1 - sala 101, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ -
>> Brazil - CEP 22250-040
>> marco.sinhor...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
>>  | Twitter:@shapeBlue
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27/03/15 05:07, "Sebastien Goasguen"  wrote:
>>
>>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased
>>> to
>>> announce that Rohit Yadav has accepted our invitation to join the PMC.
>>>
>>> Please join me in congratulating him.
>>>
>>> On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
>>
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software 
>> Engineering
>> CloudStack Infrastructure 
>> Support
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>> Courses
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a 
>> company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Cloudstack simulator

[Abhinandan Prateek]

Hi,

   I am trying to run simulator on latest 4.5.

On a clean build I get the following error:


INFO  [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] (main:null) Configuring 
CloudStack Components
[ERROR] Failed startup of context 
org.mortbay.jetty.plugin.Jetty6PluginWebAppContext@6ce75188{/client,/root/cloudstack/client/target/generated-webapp}
org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextException: Failed to start bean 
'cloudStackLifeCycle'; nested exception is net.sf.ehcache.CacheException: 
Unable to create CacheManagerPeerListener. Initial cause was ccpsimulator: 
ccpsimulator: Name or service not known
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:170)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:51)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:339)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:143)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.onRefresh(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:108)


Is anyone able to run it successfully ?

-abhi
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: add network to VM by assign ip address

[Star Guo]

Does anyone focus on this ?

Best Regards,
Star Guo

-邮件原件-
发件人: Star Guo [mailto:st...@ceph.me]
发送时间: 2015年3月27日 17:22
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: add network to VM by assign ip address

Hi all,

I run cloudstack branch master in simulator. I add network to VM but cannot
assign IP for vNIC.
I just see URL:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/addNicToVirtual
Machine.html
AddNicToVirtualMachine supports assign ipaddress. Cloud any one who focus on
UI add ipaddress request parameters.
I hope UI support it instead of using CloudMonkey CLI tool but I have little
knowledge of css, js. Thanks.

Best Regards,
Star Guo

Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board

[Sanjeev N]

+1

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Raja Pullela 
wrote:

> +1 for GitHub...
>
> Some of us are already using GH and any new review requests on RB,
> reviewers should ask for the owners to post them to GH.
> Otherwise, there is no easy way to stop people from using RB ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 12:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board
>
>
> > On Mar 30, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Kishan Kavala 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for GitHub
> >
> > Can we do a one-time migration of all open RB requests to GH and make RB
> read-only?
> >
>
> I don’t think we can do an automatic migration. We should all check RB in
> the coming days, try to close the one we can and contact the authors we
> know.
>
> I would like to keep this DISCUSS open till next friday, since it’s a
> relatively big change. At that time, I will check with infra if we can make
> RB read only.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board
> >
> > +1
> >
> > ~Rajani
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
> >> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> Since GitHub pull requests have been enabled for cloudstack, we have
> >>> closed 127 commits.
> >>>
> >>> I believe this is a nicer interface, one that folks are used to when
> >>> contributing to other open source projects.
> >>>
> >>> In the meantime, we still have 73 open reviews on Review Board
> >>>
> >>> https://reviews.apache.org/
> >>>
> >>> * I propose that we stop using RB all together, and remove any links
> >>> to
> >> it
> >>> from our website and README.
> >>>
> >>> A few of us have tried to close some of the reviews by pinging the
> >> authors
> >>> already.
> >>>
> >>> * My second proposition is that we write a comment in all reviews:
> >>>
> >>> “Thanks for the patch, the cloudstack community has decided to stop
> >>> using Review Board in favor of github pull request.
> >>> You can see  to learn how to submit a pull request to cloudstack.
> >>> Could you move your patch to a PR ?
> >>> Without response from you we will close this review within 7 days.
> >>> "
> >>>
> >>> There is good contribution guidelines in our docs README:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs
> >>>
> >>> -Sebastien
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >> o: 303.746.7302
> >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> >> *™*
> >>
>
>

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #194

[jenkins]

See 

Re: Cloudstack simulator

[Rajani Karuturi]

It worked for me on master few days ago. Let me try on 4.5


On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 17:08 PM, Abhinandan Prateek <
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

Hi,

   I am trying to run simulator on latest 4.5.

On a clean build I get the following error:


INFO  [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] (main:null) Configuring
CloudStack Components
[ERROR] Failed startup of context
org.mortbay.jetty.plugin.Jetty6PluginWebAppContext@6ce75188
{/client,/root/cloudstack/client/target/generated-webapp}
org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextException: Failed to start
bean 'cloudStackLifeCycle'; nested exception is
net.sf.ehcache.CacheException: Unable to create CacheManagerPeerListener.
Initial cause was ccpsimulator: ccpsimulator: Name or service not known
at
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:170)
at
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:51)
at
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:339)
at
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:143)
at
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.onRefresh(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:108)


Is anyone able to run it successfully ?

-abhi
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software Engineering<
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



-- 
~Rajani
Sent from my Windows Phone

Mesos on CloudStack

[sebgoa]

Hi,

In case anyone is interested I just wrote a ansible playbook that creates a set 
of VM on cloudstack and then installs a few docker containers that configure a 
Mesos cluster.
The Mesos cluster is configured to use Docker itself. So you can submit Mesos 
tasks that are Docker containers.

Sounds  bit convoluted, but using Docker for deployment of a framework is 
actually very nice, and using that Framework to manage containers across hosts 
is needed.

https://github.com/runseb/ansible-mesos-cloudstack

That's just a prototype, any feedback and PR welcome.

-sebastien

Re: [VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate 4.4-RC20150324T1321

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

I'm wondering if I'm the only one not behing able to build RPMs from
noredis? I'm having this error:+ rm -rf
/data/lib/jenkins/workspace/CloudStack-4.4-RC_nodist_rpms/dist/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cloudstack-4.4.3-1.el6.x86_64/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/classes/vms

/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZuMVTc: line 105: syntax error near unexpected token `do'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZuMVTc (%install)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZuMVTc (%install)
RPM Build Failed
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure



Look like the 4.4 branch does work but I had no success with the RC branch
:-S.


Thanks

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Nux!  wrote:

> +1 (binding) from me, passes basic tests in Adv+SG zone.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nux!" 
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2015 14:16:06
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate
> 4.4-RC20150324T1321
>
> > This contains a good bunch of fixes and would be great if it went
> through.
> >
> > I'll test this ASAP and vote, need to get rid of 4.5 on my test rig. :-)
> >
> > Thanks Daan
> >
> > Lucian
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Daan Hoogland" 
> >> To: "dev" 
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2015 12:31:11
> >> Subject: [VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate
> 4.4-RC20150324T1321
> >
> >> Hi All, (please note that the last release candidate did not get
> >> enough attention to make quorum)
> >>
> >> I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
> >>
> >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150324T1321
> >> Commit: 483490534a8a091c7af7c61d1eaf5c0192f646d9
> >>
> >> List of changes:
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.4.3
> >>
> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >> location):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3
> >>
> >> PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >>
> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >>
> >> [ ] +1  approve
> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> > > Daan
>

Re: Mesos on CloudStack

[Nguyen Anh Tu]

I will try out, Sebastien. That's all I personally need to hosting
applications. The same structure I am trying on AWS.

Cheers,
--Tuna

Sent from my GT-N7000, please excuse my typos
On Mar 30, 2015 5:10 PM, "sebgoa"  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In case anyone is interested I just wrote a ansible playbook that creates
> a set of VM on cloudstack and then installs a few docker containers that
> configure a Mesos cluster.
> The Mesos cluster is configured to use Docker itself. So you can submit
> Mesos tasks that are Docker containers.
>
> Sounds  bit convoluted, but using Docker for deployment of a framework is
> actually very nice, and using that Framework to manage containers across
> hosts is needed.
>
> https://github.com/runseb/ansible-mesos-cloudstack
>
> That's just a prototype, any feedback and PR welcome.
>
> -sebastien

Re: [VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate 4.4-RC20150324T1321

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Pierre,

Yes, I’ve found and fixed the issue on 4.4 (latest). Please use the rpms that I 
shared, or use latest 4.4 for testing.

> On 30-Mar-2015, at 9:27 pm, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if I'm the only one not behing able to build RPMs from
> noredis? I'm having this error:+ rm -rf
> /data/lib/jenkins/workspace/CloudStack-4.4-RC_nodist_rpms/dist/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cloudstack-4.4.3-1.el6.x86_64/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/classes/vms
>
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZuMVTc: line 105: syntax error near unexpected token `do'
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZuMVTc (%install)
>
>
> RPM build errors:
>Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZuMVTc (%install)
> RPM Build Failed
> Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
>
>
>
> Look like the 4.4 branch does work but I had no success with the RC branch
> :-S.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Nux!  wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding) from me, passes basic tests in Adv+SG zone.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Nux!" 
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2015 14:16:06
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate
>> 4.4-RC20150324T1321
>>
>>> This contains a good bunch of fixes and would be great if it went
>> through.
>>>
>>> I'll test this ASAP and vote, need to get rid of 4.5 on my test rig. :-)
>>>
>>> Thanks Daan
>>>
>>> Lucian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
 From: "Daan Hoogland" 
 To: "dev" 
 Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2015 12:31:11
 Subject: [VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate
>> 4.4-RC20150324T1321
>>>
 Hi All, (please note that the last release candidate did not get
 enough attention to make quorum)

 I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>> vote:

 Git Branch and Commit SH:

>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150324T1321
 Commit: 483490534a8a091c7af7c61d1eaf5c0192f646d9

 List of changes:

>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.4.3

 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
 location):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3

 PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
 indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

 [ ] +1  approve
 [ ] +0  no opinion
 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)



 --
 Daan
>>

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board

[Rohit Yadav]

+1

Can we somehow disable RB for CloudStack project? We can run through pending RB 
patches and close them or move them to GH.

> On 27-Mar-2015, at 8:50 pm, David Nalley  wrote:
>
> +1 for GH
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Since GitHub pull requests have been enabled for cloudstack, we have closed 
>> 127 commits.
>>
>> I believe this is a nicer interface, one that folks are used to when 
>> contributing to other open source projects.
>>
>> In the meantime, we still have 73 open reviews on Review Board
>>
>> https://reviews.apache.org/
>>
>> * I propose that we stop using RB all together, and remove any links to it 
>> from our website and README.
>>
>> A few of us have tried to close some of the reviews by pinging the authors 
>> already.
>>
>> * My second proposition is that we write a comment in all reviews:
>>
>> “Thanks for the patch, the cloudstack community has decided to stop using 
>> Review Board in favor of github pull request.
>> You can see  to learn how to submit a pull request to cloudstack. 
>> Could you move your patch to a PR ?
>> Without response from you we will close this review within 7 days.
>> "
>>
>> There is good contribution guidelines in our docs README:
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs
>>
>> -Sebastien

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack

[Wilder Rodrigues]

Congratulation, Rohit!

Keep up the cool stuff! ;)

Cheers,
Wilder

On 27 Mar 2015, at 09:07, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:

> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased to
> announce that Rohit Yadav has accepted our invitation to join the PMC.
> 
> Please join me in congratulating him.
> 
> On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Lucian (Nux)

[Wilder Rodrigues]

Wooot, Lucian! Well done!

Cheers,
Wilder

On 26 Mar 2015, at 04:42, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:

> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Lucian to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
> 
> Join me in congratulating Lucian!
> 
> On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
> 
> ~Rajani

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack

[Harikrishna Patnala]

Congrats Rohit :)

-Harikrishna

On 31-Mar-2015, at 10:45 am, Wilder Rodrigues  
wrote:

> Congratulation, Rohit!
> 
> Keep up the cool stuff! ;)
> 
> Cheers,
> Wilder
> 
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 09:07, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:
> 
>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased to
>> announce that Rohit Yadav has accepted our invitation to join the PMC.
>> 
>> Please join me in congratulating him.
>> 
>> On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
> 

Re: Cloudstack simulator

[Rohit Yadav]

Abhi,

Travis is able to run it fine and it’s green: 
https://travis-ci.org/shapeblue/cloudstack/builds/56394003

For hints search a wiki on cwiki and see these travis configs that run 
simulator smoke tests:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/.travis.yml
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/tools/travis

> On 30-Mar-2015, at 5:08 pm, Abhinandan Prateek 
>  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>   I am trying to run simulator on latest 4.5.
>
> On a clean build I get the following error:
>
>
> INFO  [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] (main:null) Configuring 
> CloudStack Components
> [ERROR] Failed startup of context 
> org.mortbay.jetty.plugin.Jetty6PluginWebAppContext@6ce75188{/client,/root/cloudstack/client/target/generated-webapp}
> org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextException: Failed to start bean 
> 'cloudStackLifeCycle'; nested exception is net.sf.ehcache.CacheException: 
> Unable to create CacheManagerPeerListener. Initial cause was ccpsimulator: 
> ccpsimulator: Name or service not known
> at 
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:170)
> at 
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:51)
> at 
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:339)
> at 
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:143)
> at 
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.onRefresh(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:108)
>
>
> Is anyone able to run it successfully ?
>
> -abhi
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.