[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] PaulAngus commented on a change in pull request #50: modify master files for 4.13 upgrade docs

2019-07-11 Thread GitBox
PaulAngus commented on a change in pull request #50: modify master files for 
4.13 upgrade docs
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/50#discussion_r302711454
 
 

 ##
 File path: source/_global.rst
 ##
 @@ -24,18 +24,19 @@
 .. |documentation_home| replace:: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/
 
 .. Latest version systemvm template name
-.. |sysvm64-name-xen|replace:: systemvm-xenserver-4.11.3
-.. |sysvm64-name-kvm|replace:: systemvm-kvm-4.11.3
-.. |sysvm64-name-vmware| replace:: systemvm-vmware-4.11.3
-.. |sysvm64-name-hyperv| replace:: systemvm-hyperv-4.11.3
-.. |sysvm64-name-ovm|replace:: systemvm-ovm-4.11.3
+
+.. |sysvm64-name-xen|replace:: systemvm-xenserver-4.13.0
 
 Review comment:
   @rhtyd I *thought* that the changes that you merged for the system vm 
necessitate a new template?


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


Re: CloudStack Kubernetes Provider

2019-07-11 Thread Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT)
Hi Rohit,

> One of the community contributors from SwissTxt Gregor Riepl
> (@onitake) have also offered to contribute their provider (which is
> already under the Apache v2.0 license) which they have based on the
> original provider: 
> https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/672#issuecomment-510353660

This CCM is actually based on the old code in 
> 
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/release-1.15/pkg/cloudprovider/providers/cloudstack

We removed some stuff that is not relevant for a standalone controller
and added a few patches that were not accepted upstream due to the
deprecation.

There's still some open issues, if you look at the tracker at
https://github.com/swisstxt/cloudstack-cloud-controller-manager/issues

Issue #9 in particular needs fixing, or the controller will be a bit
difficult to deploy in a generic k8s environment.

> PMCs - If Gregor wants to donate their changes based on the
> old/original provider to CloudStack, is there a formal donation
> process that he/swisstxt needs to be used or a simple pull request
> can be sent?

We're open to any suggestions.
You can also simply fork the Github repo and start from there. ☺

Regards,
Gregor


Re: CloudStack Kubernetes Provider

2019-07-11 Thread Rohit Yadav
For reference, this ticket has been logged with INFRA: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18732


Regards,

Rohit Yadav

Software Architect, ShapeBlue

https://www.shapeblue.com


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 2:45:08 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
priv...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: CloudStack Kubernetes Provider

All,


Based on discussions from:

https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/672
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/88


The Kubernetes project no longer support many cloud providers including the 
CloudStack one which was removed from the current/master tree already. For 
starters, I would like to have the old codebase moved/available via a 
repository under Apache CloudStack project 
(https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/release-1.15/pkg/cloudprovider/providers/cloudstack).


One of the community contributors from SwissTxt Gregor Riepl (@onitake) have 
also offered to contribute their provider (which is already under the Apache 
v2.0 license) which they have based on the original provider: 
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/672#issuecomment-510353660


For this purpose I've requested a new repository with ASF-infra:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.git


PMCs - If Gregor wants to donate their changes based on the old/original 
provider to CloudStack, is there a formal donation process that he/swisstxt 
needs to be used or a simple pull request can be sent?


Any objections, feedback? Thanks.


Regards,

Rohit Yadav

Software Architect, ShapeBlue

https://www.shapeblue.com

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 



CloudStack Kubernetes Provider

2019-07-11 Thread Rohit Yadav
All,


Based on discussions from:

https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/672
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/88


The Kubernetes project no longer support many cloud providers including the 
CloudStack one which was removed from the current/master tree already. For 
starters, I would like to have the old codebase moved/available via a 
repository under Apache CloudStack project 
(https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/release-1.15/pkg/cloudprovider/providers/cloudstack).


One of the community contributors from SwissTxt Gregor Riepl (@onitake) have 
also offered to contribute their provider (which is already under the Apache 
v2.0 license) which they have based on the original provider: 
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/672#issuecomment-510353660


For this purpose I've requested a new repository with ASF-infra:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.git


PMCs - If Gregor wants to donate their changes based on the old/original 
provider to CloudStack, is there a formal donation process that he/swisstxt 
needs to be used or a simple pull request can be sent?


Any objections, feedback? Thanks.


Regards,

Rohit Yadav

Software Architect, ShapeBlue

https://www.shapeblue.com

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue