subject:"\[GitHub\] cloudstack issue #1711\: XenServer 7 Support"

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2017-01-29 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@ciroiriarte As @PaulAngus pointed out, you need to use VLANs as the 
isolation method if you want to use OVS on XenServer


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2017-01-29 Thread ciroiriarte

Github user ciroiriarte commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Well, I chose Security Groups on the Advanced network configuration 
options, that makes the bridge firewall configuration fail when you try to add 
hosts.

Unchecked that while adding the XS7 host, it didn't blow up this time.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2017-01-28 Thread PaulAngus

Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@ciroiriarte CloudStack orchestrates XenServers through XAPI - so how VLANs 
are created is transparent to CloudStack.  Are you using Basic or Advanced 
networks ? Advanced networks are the generally the way to go isolate networks 
through VLANs.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2017-01-28 Thread ciroiriarte

Github user ciroiriarte commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Also, is there any roadmap to add OVS support?, it's the current standard 
on XS7 and seems I'll have to go back to Linux bridge if I want to move to 
Cloudstack.

I'm moving away of a setup where I couldn't send tagged vlan to a guest 
with regular bridges but OVS did the trick.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2017-01-28 Thread ciroiriarte

Github user ciroiriarte commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Are these messages expected?

2017-01-29 00:02:24,476 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-6776e3dd ctx-a85fb6b1) (logid:a578d2b0) **Received 
unknown parameters for command addHost. Unknown parameters : clustertype**
2017-01-29 00:02:24,478 INFO  [c.c.r.ResourceManagerImpl] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-6776e3dd ctx-a85fb6b1) (logid:a578d2b0) Trying to add a 
new host at http://brick04 in data center 1
2017-01-29 00:02:24,527 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-6776e3dd ctx-a85fb6b1) (logid:a578d2b0) host X.X.X.X 
doesn't have 996dd2e7-ad95-49cc-a0be-2c9adc4dfb0b Hotfix
2017-01-29 00:02:24,533 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-6776e3dd ctx-a85fb6b1) (logid:a578d2b0) host X.X.X.X 
doesn't have 0850b186-4d47-11e3-a720-001b2151a503 Hotfix
2017-01-29 00:02:24,540 WARN  [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-6776e3dd ctx-a85fb6b1) (logid:a578d2b0) **defaulting to 
xenserver650 resource** for product brand: XenServer with product version: 7.0.0
2017-01-29 00:02:24,540 INFO  [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] 
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-6776e3dd ctx-a85fb6b1) (logid:a578d2b0) Found host 
brick04 ip=X.X.X.X product version=7.0.0



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2017-01-21 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Yes it is in 4.9.2.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2017-01-21 Thread ciroiriarte

Github user ciroiriarte commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Hi!, is this already included in 4.9.2.0?, I'm installing a new XS7 lab and 
would like to integrate it with Cloudstack.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-21 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Checked tests, the failure was due to missing licence in sql file. I've 
fixed that and a conflict as upgrade paths were missing, simply adding a sql 
file does not add it to the upgrade path. I'll proceed with merging this now 
based on manual tests and test results from previous runs.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-21 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed yes I see them now. I'll first merge #1851 to get the db upgrade 
paths and then apply your PR and include your sql changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-21 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd the file is there ... somehow doesn't show in the diff you have to 
manually load it


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-21 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd moved the DB changes to `schema-4910to4920.sql` and rebased. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-21 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed can you move the sql changes to a new path, 
setup/db/db/schema-4910to4920.sql and make appropriate db changes? Thanks. 
After this I'm willing to merge this PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-21 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
LGTM on test. Some of the failing tests are known intermittent issues or 
fixed in a separate PR. Merging this now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-21 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Trillian test result (tid-694)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 35068 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1711-t694-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 41 look ok, 7 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 565.22 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1372.16 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 572.47 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 717.84 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestVPCRedundancy>:teardown | `Error` | 877.95 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | `Error` | 20.41 | test_volumes.py
ContextSuite context=TestTemplates>:setup | `Error` | 364.60 | 
test_templates.py
test_01_primary_storage_iscsi | `Error` | 38.48 | test_primary_storage.py
ContextSuite context=TestListIdsParams>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 366.86 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 156.64 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 370.50 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 686.64 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 924.77 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1072.26 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.65 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 116.33 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 116.10 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.28 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.23 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.31 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 15.81 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 393.00 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.21 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 216.46 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 130.78 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 257.75 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.69 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.05 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 25.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 151.05 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 65.59 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 226.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 199.05 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 151.62 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 144.01 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 167.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 138.92 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.11 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.58 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 26.53 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 116.02 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.18 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.18 | test_scale_vm.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 60.44 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 55.42 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 15.26 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-20 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-65sp1) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-20 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-19 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-404


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-19 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-19 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@koushik-das we can ignore that, Trillian's env does not support iscsi 
mount point for xenserver (from my last memories).
@syed I looked at the changes and last week's result, they look good to me. 
Failing tests are already failing on base branches, so this has not introduced 
new errors. I'll kick one final round now.
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-19 Thread koushik-das

Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Code changes are good. In the last test run I am seeing 
test_01_primary_storage_iscsi is failing. Do we know the reason for that?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-19 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
I think we're good on this. We can run another round of testing.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-18 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@PaulAngus @karuturi @koushik-das @syed are we good on this PR, the changes 
look good to me and should not cause regressions. We can fire one round of 
testing.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-13 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Trillian test result (tid-676)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33149 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1711-t676-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 43 look ok, 5 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 524.58 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1340.49 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 562.24 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 798.12 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
ContextSuite context=TestTemplates>:setup | `Error` | 374.94 | 
test_templates.py
test_01_primary_storage_iscsi | `Error` | 38.18 | test_primary_storage.py
ContextSuite context=TestListIdsParams>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 295.92 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 151.58 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 583.33 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 314.56 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 663.03 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 874.69 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1037.07 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 20.67 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 110.97 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 111.39 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 25.34 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.38 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.25 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 15.68 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 392.36 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.25 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 219.35 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.73 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 277.81 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 36.72 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.06 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 20.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 110.90 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 65.58 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 226.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 259.00 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 146.62 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 148.78 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 136.66 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 168.89 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.42 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 21.31 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 129.23 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.14 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.18 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.22 | test_scale_vm.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 65.47 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 45.36 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 15.24 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.52 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 115.85

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-13 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@karuturi a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-65sp1) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-13 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-13 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@blueorangutan help



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-13 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@karuturi I understand these words: "help", "hello", "thanks", "package", 
"test"
Test command usage: test [mgmt os] [hypervisor] [additional tests]
Mgmt OS options: ['centos6', 'centos7', 'ubuntu']
Hypervisor options: ['kvm-centos6', 'kvm-centos7', 'kvm-ubuntu', 
'xenserver-65sp1', 'xenserver-62sp1', 'vmware-60u2', 'vmware-55u3', 
'vmware-51u1', 'vmware-50u1']
Additional tests: list of comma separated tests with paths relative to the 
`test/integration` directory, for example: component/test_acl_listvm.py, 
component/test_volumes.py
Note: when additional tests are passed, you need to specify mgmt server os 
and hypervisor or use the `matrix` command.

Blessed contributors for kicking Trillian test jobs: ['rhtyd', 'jburwell', 
'murali-reddy', 'abhinandanprateek', 'PaulAngus', 'borisstoyanov', 'karuturi']


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-09 Thread Rohit Yadav

Hi Marty,


The XenServer 7 PR could not be validated/tested to be included for 
4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0. I'll cut first set of RCs, depending on if we have the 
results for this next week, there is a slim chance of including this in 
4.9.1.0. Since the PR changes, don't require db changes -- we may consider this 
for 4.9.2.0.


Regards.


From: Marty Godsey <ma...@gonsource.com>
Sent: 10 December 2016 02:31:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

So will XS7 support be in this next update?


Regards,
Marty Godsey
Principal Engineer
nSource Solutions, LLC

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: blueorangutan [mailto:g...@git.apache.org]
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 4:00 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711

@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your 
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature 
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please 
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with 
INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-09 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-383


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-09 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-09 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-09 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-382


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

RE: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-09 Thread Marty Godsey

So will XS7 support be in this next update?


Regards,
Marty Godsey
Principal Engineer
nSource Solutions, LLC

-Original Message-
From: blueorangutan [mailto:g...@git.apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 4:00 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your 
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature 
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please 
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with 
INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-09 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-09 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-09 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd Rebased and sqashed the commits


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-08 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed @karuturi can you help fix the merge conflict, and rebase against 
latest 4.9. Thanks. Can commits be logically squashed, and have a JIRA id in 
their commit summary.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-08 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Yes. I think its ready code wise. since the last test run, lot of code 
changes happened. If we can run one more round of tests, that would be good.

regarding squashing, 
Please don't do that. The three commits are different and cannot be merged 
to a single commit. probably, we can get rid of the merge commit.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-08 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed @karuturi @PaulAngus can you comment if this is in a good position to 
make into 4.9 yet? On Monday, we'll cut the first set of RCs, so if we can 
satisfactory review and test results only then this would make into 
4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0. /cc @abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy 

@syed can you squash your changes and include the JIRA id in the git commit 
message. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-05 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Installed 4.9.1 using the new setup and added XenServer 7 hosts. Everything 
looking good. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-05 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Thanks @karuturi for the PR. I have merged your changes as well. 

@jburwell @rhtyd I've created a stored procedure to do idempotent inserts. 
I cleanup the procedure after the inserts are done. I have manually tested it 
and it is working. I will do a full round of testing again today.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-04 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
managed to create a PR by clicking more buttons.. somehow, it didn't show 
your fork on search

https://github.com/syed/cloudstack/pull/6


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-04 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed I cannot find your repo to create a PR.

![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/186833/20875605/10c4f0c8-bae2-11e6-8747-a60c5a300c19.png)
 
I updated the changes Here 
https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack/commits/xenserver7

If you can just download the patch from 
https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack/commit/fd77c2a690b56843266724cb94d6e43356a03091.patch
 and add it to your xenserver7 branch, it will show up in this PR.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-02 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
I have rebased this PR against 4.9. I have removed the DB changes, I will 
add a idempotent version of that after testing everything works. 

@karuturi You will have to rebase and open a PR against this branch. Sorry 
for the extra work


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-02 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed yes, please rebase it against 4.9 and change PR's base branch to 4.9? 
Using @karuturi 's suggestion, you can further simplify the changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-12-02 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@jburwell Agree with you. The problem that I had last time was making an 
SQL insert is not very elegant but I understand its importance especailly if we 
want to port it to 4.9 and move forward from there. I will try to do something 
like 
[this](https://sinking.in/blog/pure-sql-put-if-absent-or-insert-if-not-exist/)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-30 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed yes, you will add the changes to `schema-4910to4920` for the `4.9` 
port.  This will cover anyone upgrading from a version >= 4.9.1.0 to 4.9.2.0.  
I do not plan to automatically forward merge these changes.  Instead, you will 
be submitting another PR for the 4.10.1.0 and master merges which will provide 
the opportunity to re-test change in each branch.  Therefore, to cover 4.10.0.0 
users who upgrade, the most straightforward approach seems to be duplicating 
the changes in `schema-4910to4920` into `schema-41000-41100`.  We need to 
ensure that the script is idempotent to cover users who upgrade from 
4.9.2.0->4.11.0.0+.  Does this approach make sense?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-30 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Thanks Guys for testing this out. I had a question @jburwell You wanted me 
to port this to 4.9 and then it would be forward merged to 4.10 and master. How 
would the DB changes be handled? right now I have the schema in 
`schema-4910to41000.sql` now if I backport to 4.9 it would be something like 
`schema-4910to4920` correct? If so, how would you forward merge? wouldn't you 
also need `schema-4920to41010` and `schema-41010to41100` ? 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-23 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Good progress :smiley: 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-22 Thread PaulAngus

Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
I ran above smoke tests overnight - results look very promising.  I know 
that there 'was' an error in the snapshot test, I'll check to see if the 
failure was a result of that..


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-22 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Trillian test result (tid-397)
Environment: CUSTOM-XenServer (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 33140 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1711-t397-CUSTOM-XenServer.zip
Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 537.24 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1337.52 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 551.48 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | `Failure` | 16.47 | test_snapshots.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Error` | 1723.59 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_extract_template | `Error` | 5.15 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | `Error` | 5.14 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | `Error` | 75.88 | test_templates.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 337.28 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 152.26 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 528.37 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 382.42 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 693.87 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1069.99 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.84 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 86.09 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 101.23 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 20.61 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.53 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.28 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.37 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.76 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 392.55 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.23 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 216.53 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.70 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 218.72 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 92.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.31 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 71.36 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 5.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.29 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 131.25 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.11 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 196.83 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 199.35 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 121.92 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 144.04 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 137.05 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 169.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.28 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.71 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 91.09 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.21 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.26 | test_scale_vm.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 60.55 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 45.52 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 15.24 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.07 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.05 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.51 |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-20 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-192


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-20 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-20 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-17 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Sounds good @jburwell 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-16 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed I think this change will merit a separate.PR for the forward merge to 
master.  So, once we get merged to 4.9, you'll open PR against master for the 
forward merge.

In terms of the full component test run, I think the best approach would be 
to run the full suite against 4.9.1.0/XenServer 6.5 SP1 and compare the results 
against the full test run for this PR.

Do these proposals make sense?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-16 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
That sounds good John. Ill reopen this against 4.9
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 18:36 John Burwell  wrote:

> @syed  also, could you please change the base
> branch to 4.9? I would like to include this support in LTS as many
> XenServer users will be stranded on old hardware without it.
>
> â
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> ,
> or mute the thread
> 

> .
>



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-16 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed also, could you please change the base branch to 4.9?  I would like 
to include this support in LTS as many XenServer users will be stranded on old 
hardware without it.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-16 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed I would like to hold this item for the next release cycle.  We have a 
very few PRs left to get 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0 out the door.  It will 
also give us time to run all of the component tests against this PR which will 
take a few days to complete.  Seem reasonable to you?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-16 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@jburwell I think this is looking good (unless you have any other comments) 
What can I do to help get this in? 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

2016-11-09 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@PaulAngus @jburwell This PR is looking good now. Can we re-run the tests 
with this PR? 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

61 matches

Mail list logo