Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
We are on #cloudstack-meeting to start discussing the redundant vpc vr. Please all feel welcome to join in. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, write you then. > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Karl Harris > wrote: >> 20:00 utc ;-) missed the last change in time! >> >> >> Karl >> >> >> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland >> wrote: >>> >>> Karl, That’s midnight over here! :( >>> >>> >>> >>> \DaanH >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com] >>> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 2:43 >>> To: Daan Hoogland >>> Cc: Hugo Trippaers; dev; Sheng Yang; Sander Botman; Alena Prokharchyk; >>> kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >>> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >>> >>> >>> >>> Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 >>> UTC! >>> >>> >>> >>> Karl >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: >>> >>> I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC >>> >>> I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > >>> > Hugo >>> > >>> > >>> > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Quite right: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis >>> >> >>> >> - Reusable work by Karl >>> >> >>> >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant >>> >> router (and how to avoid them) >>> >> >>> >> - Work division >>> >> >>> >> - (next meeting needed?) >>> >> >>> >> Any additions? >>> >> >>> >> \DaanH >>> >> >>> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >>> >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 >>> >> To: Sander Botman >>> >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; >>> >> kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >>> >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >>> >> >>> >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the >>> >> meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. >>> >> >>> >> --Sheng >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman >>> >> mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: >>> >> Hi all >>> >> >>> >> I can make 15:00. >>> >> >>> >> Cannon join at 20:00. >>> >> >>> >> Cheers Sander >>> >> >>> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >>> >> >>> >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >>> >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende >>> >>> geschreven: >>> >>> >>> >>> nice, >>> >>> >>> >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >>> >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >>> >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >>> >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >>> >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >>> >>> as well. >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >>> >>>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> I will be happy to join! >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>> >>>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>> >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away >>> >>>>> from >>> >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>> >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>> >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>> >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>> >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also > > > > -- > Daan -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
ok, write you then. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Karl Harris wrote: > 20:00 utc ;-) missed the last change in time! > > > Karl > > > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland > wrote: >> >> Karl, That’s midnight over here! :( >> >> >> >> \DaanH >> >> >> >> From: Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com] >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 2:43 >> To: Daan Hoogland >> Cc: Hugo Trippaers; dev; Sheng Yang; Sander Botman; Alena Prokharchyk; >> kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >> >> >> >> Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 >> UTC! >> >> >> >> Karl >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC >> >> I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting >> >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers >> wrote: >> > >> > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Hugo >> > >> > >> > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Quite right: >> >> >> >> >> >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis >> >> >> >> - Reusable work by Karl >> >> >> >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant >> >> router (and how to avoid them) >> >> >> >> - Work division >> >> >> >> - (next meeting needed?) >> >> >> >> Any additions? >> >> >> >> \DaanH >> >> >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 >> >> To: Sander Botman >> >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; >> >> kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >> >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >> >> >> >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the >> >> meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. >> >> >> >> --Sheng >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman >> >> mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> >> >> I can make 15:00. >> >> >> >> Cannon join at 20:00. >> >> >> >> Cheers Sander >> >> >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >> >> >> >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >> >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende >> >>> geschreven: >> >>> >> >>> nice, >> >>> >> >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >> >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >> >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >> >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >> >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >> >>> as well. >> >>> >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >> >>>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >> >>>> I will be happy to join! >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >> >>>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >> >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away >> >>>>> from >> >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >> >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >> >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >> >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >> >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
20:00 utc ;-) missed the last change in time! Karl On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Karl, That’s midnight over here! :( > > > > *\*DaanH > > > > *From:* Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com > ] > *Sent:* dinsdag 10 juni 2014 2:43 > *To:* Daan Hoogland > *Cc:* Hugo Trippaers; dev; Sheng Yang; Sander Botman; Alena Prokharchyk; > kis...@cloud.com ; > Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit > *Subject:* Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs > > > > Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 > UTC! > > > > Karl > > > > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC > > I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers > wrote: > > > > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Hugo > > > > > > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > >> Quite right: > >> > >> > >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis > >> > >> - Reusable work by Karl > >> > >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant > router (and how to avoid them) > >> > >> - Work division > >> > >> - (next meeting needed?) > >> > >> Any additions? > >> > >> \DaanH > >> > >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 > >> To: Sander Botman > >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; > kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit > >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs > >> > >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the > meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. > >> > >> --Sheng > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman < > sbot...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> I can make 15:00. > >> > >> Cannon join at 20:00. > >> > >> Cheers Sander > >> > >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > >> > >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" < > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende > geschreven: > >>> > >>> nice, > >>> > >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > >>> as well. > >>> > >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris < > karl.har...@sungardas.com<mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: > >>>> I will be happy to join! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland < > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away > from > >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also >
RE: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Karl, That’s midnight over here! :( \DaanH From: Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com] Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 2:43 To: Daan Hoogland Cc: Hugo Trippaers; dev; Sheng Yang; Sander Botman; Alena Prokharchyk; kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 UTC! Karl On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers mailto:h...@trippaers.nl>> wrote: > > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland > mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > >> Quite right: >> >> >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis >> >> - Reusable work by Karl >> >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router >> (and how to avoid them) >> >> - Work division >> >> - (next meeting needed?) >> >> Any additions? >> >> \DaanH >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 >> To: Sander Botman >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; >> kis...@cloud.com<mailto:kis...@cloud.com>; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo >> Trippaers; int-toolkit >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >> >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? >> I just want to make sure it's efficient. >> >> --Sheng >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman >> mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com%3cmailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>>> >> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I can make 15:00. >> >> Cannon join at 20:00. >> >> Cheers Sander >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >> >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com%3cmailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>> >>> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> nice, >>> >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >>> as well. >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >>>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com<mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com%3cmailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> I will be happy to join! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com%3cmailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>>>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>>>> >>>>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>>>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>>>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>>>> -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Recovering from a laptop hard disk crash should be back online by 22:00 UTC! Karl On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC > > I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers > wrote: > > > > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Hugo > > > > > > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > >> Quite right: > >> > >> > >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis > >> > >> - Reusable work by Karl > >> > >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant > router (and how to avoid them) > >> > >> - Work division > >> > >> - (next meeting needed?) > >> > >> Any additions? > >> > >> \DaanH > >> > >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 > >> To: Sander Botman > >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; > kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit > >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs > >> > >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the > meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. > >> > >> --Sheng > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman < > sbot...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> I can make 15:00. > >> > >> Cannon join at 20:00. > >> > >> Cheers Sander > >> > >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > >> > >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" <mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven: > >>> > >>> nice, > >>> > >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > >>> as well. > >>> > >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris < > karl.har...@sungardas.com<mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: > >>>> I will be happy to join! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland <mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away > from > >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > >>>>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > >>>>> > >>>>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > >>>>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > >>>>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. > >>>>> > -- > Daan >
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> Quite right: >> >> >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis >> >> - Reusable work by Karl >> >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router >> (and how to avoid them) >> >> - Work division >> >> - (next meeting needed?) >> >> Any additions? >> >> \DaanH >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 >> To: Sander Botman >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; kis...@cloud.com; >> Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >> >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? >> I just want to make sure it's efficient. >> >> --Sheng >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman >> mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I can make 15:00. >> >> Cannon join at 20:00. >> >> Cheers Sander >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >> >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende >>> geschreven: >>> >>> nice, >>> >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >>> as well. >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >>>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >>>> I will be happy to join! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>>>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>>>> >>>>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>>>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>>>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>>>> >>>>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>>>> -- >>>>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >> > -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. Cheers, Hugo On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Quite right: > > > - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis > > - Reusable work by Karl > > - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router (and > how to avoid them) > > - Work division > > - (next meeting needed?) > > Any additions? > > \DaanH > > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 > To: Sander Botman > Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; kis...@cloud.com; > Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit > Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs > > BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? > I just want to make sure it's efficient. > > --Sheng > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman > mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > Hi all > > I can make 15:00. > > Cannon join at 20:00. > > Cheers Sander > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > >> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende >> geschreven: >> >> nice, >> >> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >> as well. >> >>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >>> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >>> I will be happy to join! >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>>> >>>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>>> >>>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>>> -- >>>> Daan >> >> >> >> -- >> Daan >
RE: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Quite right: - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis - Reusable work by Karl - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router (and how to avoid them) - Work division - (next meeting needed?) Any additions? \DaanH From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 To: Sander Botman Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; kis...@cloud.com; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. --Sheng On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Hi all I can make 15:00. Cannon join at 20:00. Cheers Sander Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" > mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende > geschreven: > > nice, > > so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > as well. > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >> mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >> I will be happy to join! >> >> >> >>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>> >>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>> >>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>> -- >>> Daan > > > > -- > Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. --Sheng On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman wrote: > Hi all > > I can make 15:00. > > Cannon join at 20:00. > > Cheers Sander > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > > > Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" > het volgende geschreven: > > > > nice, > > > > so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > > utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > > (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > > the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > > highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > > as well. > > > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris > wrote: > >> I will be happy to join! > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > >>> > >>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > >>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from > >>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > >>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > >>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > >>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > >>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > >>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > >>> > >>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > >>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > >>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. > >>> > >>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) > >>> -- > >>> Daan > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan >
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Hi all I can make 15:00. Cannon join at 20:00. Cheers Sander Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" het > volgende geschreven: > > nice, > > so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > as well. > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >> wrote: >> I will be happy to join! >> >> >> >>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: >>> >>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>> >>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>> >>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>> -- >>> Daan > > > > -- > Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
nice, so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine as well. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris wrote: > I will be happy to join! > > > > On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >> >> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >> >> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >> -- >> Daan >> > -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
I will be happy to join! On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from > it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > > So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > ascension so tuesday is our intention. > > on behalf of some very impatient operators;) > -- > Daan > >
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
Yes, I am in Pacific Time. --Sheng On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, I think your on pacific time, are you? > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > > I would be glad to join. > > > > --Sheng > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Daan Hoogland > > wrote: > >> > >> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > >> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from > >> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > >> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > >> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > >> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > >> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > >> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > >> > >> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > >> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > >> ascension so tuesday is our intention. > >> > >> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) > >> -- > >> Daan > > > > > > > > -- > Daan >
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
ok, I think your on pacific time, are you? On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > I would be glad to join. > > --Sheng > > > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: >> >> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >> >> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >> >> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >> -- >> Daan > > -- Daan
Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs
I would be glad to join. --Sheng On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant > way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from > it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources > for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to > experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present > routers to support this. However we would very much like input from > the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing > to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. > > So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject > coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after > ascension so tuesday is our intention. > > on behalf of some very impatient operators;) > -- > Daan >
