Re: [VOTE] Migrate from the aging ECM
Berin Loritsch wrote: The new Cocoon should be able to use the new Fortress container. This should have little to no impact on component writers. It boasts faster startup, and it provides easier component definition. I will be happy to do the work. +1 from me. +1 for you.
Re: Porting Cocoon Logging to Log4j - Proposal and Discussion
Hi all, Per-Olof Noren wrote: Hi, "Should Cocoon be configured out-of-the-box for logging to a Log4J backend?" I'd put my two cents worth of opinion in favor of this suggestion. Regards, Pelle If it is as easy as one line in the configuration file change, does it matter? Configuring cocoon involves configuring "sitemap.xml"s, block.properties, cocoon.xconf already. People who can get (or need to) setup cocoon should be able to tweak with the configuration files to make log4j the logger. my 1/2 cent: Let's make sure it is configurable, and note it somewhere how to do it. -- Boon Tek
Re: Personality in docs (Was: Re: 'Production' build for Cocoon?)
Tony Collen wrote: I don't mind making the docs a little more "pofessional sounding" but I'd really, really hate to see the personality stripped from them as well. We're all people here, not robots. I'd rather read someone's genuine opinion about why Cocoon kicks so much ass instead of reading about the latest buzzword of the day. +1
Re: [RT] Improving Sitemap and Flowscript
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: [and it seems that nobody is catching up with my plan for implementation so I will have to get my hands dirty and implement the whole thing by myself, :-( Can't speak for others but I think the plan is still too complex for most of us to follow at this point. Oh, and I did read the rest of your mail, and you were right about AAA, interceptors and flow. I understand now. Thanks for your repeated efforts in educating the clueless. ;-D What is AAA? I tried looking throught the mailing list but was too lazy to scour through tons of AAA. None of the recent mail I can find gives an explanation of AAA. Is it something related to AOP? For this reason, I'm prepared to stand against years of people's inertia on radical paradigm changes, so I wouldn't say "clueless", I would just say "inertial". But I have seen too many faces "illuminated" by the continuations :) concepts. I can only wonder what continuations and interception, together, can do to them ;-) -- Boon Tek
