Re: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-16 Thread Upayavira
David Crossley wrote:
Okay the initial coordination table is now ready.
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html
The next task is to review the table to ensure that
all entries have been added for sitemap components.
Are you proposing to update all of the docs in 2.1.X and then later 
synchronise with trunk?

I have just written up the RequestMethodSelector after an 'oh, aren't 
the docs crap' complaint on user list, and am not sure whether to put it 
in trunk as well or not.

Regards, Upayavira


Re: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-16 Thread David Crossley
Upayavira wrote:
 David Crossley wrote:
 
 Okay the initial coordination table is now ready.
 http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html
 
 The next task is to review the table to ensure that
 all entries have been added for sitemap components.
 
 Are you proposing to update all of the docs in 2.1.X and then later 
 synchronise with trunk?
 
 I have just written up the RequestMethodSelector after an 'oh, aren't 
 the docs crap' complaint on user list, and am not sure whether to put it 
 in trunk as well or not.

I have been wondering how to handle that. In the past we have kept the
trunk and the release branch synchronised. It is too easy to lose stuff
otherwise. Sometimes the docs are deliberately different, so it will
be impossible to do a 'diff -r' to keep a check on things.

So i think that it is better to keep synchonised as we go.
What do you reckon?

--David


Re: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 2 déc. 04, à 04:32, David Crossley a écrit :
Okay the initial coordination table is now ready.
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html
big big thanks for making this happen, it is an important step I think. 
Hope to find time to help here.

Maybe a periodic nag email to here with the number of unreviewed 
entries would be good? And/or a single bugzilla issue to keep track of 
the work done on this table might be good?

Did you document the process already, i.e. how do new entries come into 
the table when someone adds a new component? (I have not reread the 
whole thread so I might be missing something obvious, please bear with 
me).

-Bertrand


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-02 Thread David Crossley
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
David Crossley a écrit :
Okay the initial coordination table is now ready.
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html

big big thanks for making this happen, it is an important step I think. 
Hope to find time to help here.
You already are.
Maybe a periodic nag email to here with the number of unreviewed entries 
would be good?
The xdocs source for that doc is consistent and
has some xml comments. It could be parsed and grepped
with standard UNIX tools or could be processed with
an ant task and XSL.
I do want to use tools to help process the xml table.
For example, i have a 'sed' script to add a blank
column. Should i commit those somewhere?
And/or a single bugzilla issue to keep track of the work 
done on this table might be good?
Not sure what you mean there. I was expecting that
just the svn commit log messages would suffice.
However, i was wondering about using Bugzilla
to assist somehow. Perhaps have one bugzilla entry
per document, then have a parent issue that creates
a roadmap from the child issues.
Each issue would enable people to add patches or even
comments about that particular sitemap component.
Did you document the process already, i.e. how do new entries come into 
the table when someone adds a new component? (I have not reread the 
whole thread so I might be missing something obvious, please bear with me).
Good questions. I do have a local work log
of the steps, so that i can repeat it later.
My inial goal was to set up a functional table manually,
then work on ways to automate its population and ways
to ensure that it stays synchronised.
I developed some basic UNIX shell scripts to scan the
code and xdocs. The output was manually reviewed
to weed out some cruft. After an initial automated load,
rows were added manually with copy-and-paste.
The next steps are in the To Do list at the bottom of
that coordination page. Let us take it steadily. It is
a long road.
--David


Re: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-02 Thread Sylvain Wallez
David Crossley wrote:
Okay the initial coordination table is now ready.
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html

Wow, impressive work!
The next task is to review the table to ensure that
all entries have been added for sitemap components.

Another impressive work to do ;-)
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez  Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain   http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }


RE: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-02 Thread H . vanderLinden
Great! Thanks for doing this.

Bye, Helma

 -Original Message-
 From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, 02 December, 2004 04:32
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: review of sitemap component documentation
 
 
 Okay the initial coordination table is now ready. 
 http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html
 
 The next task is to review the table to ensure that
 all entries have been added for sitemap components.
 
 --David
 
 
 
 
 


Re: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-02 Thread Jorg Heymans
superb effort David thanks!
Cheers
Jorg
David Crossley wrote:
Okay the initial coordination table is now ready.
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html
The next task is to review the table to ensure that
all entries have been added for sitemap components.
--David






Re: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-02 Thread Luca Morandini
David Crossley wrote:
Okay the initial coordination table is now ready.
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html
The next task is to review the table to ensure that
all entries have been added for sitemap components.
At a glance I can see that Ant generator from scratchpad is missing 
(org.apache.cocoon.ant.AntBuildGenerator).

Regards,
P.S.
Thanks a lot, this is something that goes a long way towards narrowing 
the code/doc divide in Cocoon.

---
 Luca Morandini
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lucamorandini.it
---


Re: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-02 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
David Crossley wrote:
Okay the initial coordination table is now ready.
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/plan/review-sitemap-docs.html
The next task is to review the table to ensure that
all entries have been added for sitemap components.
applause/
--
Stefano.


Re: review of sitemap component documentation

2004-12-02 Thread David Crossley
Luca Morandini wrote:
At a glance I can see that Ant generator from scratchpad is missing 
(org.apache.cocoon.ant.AntBuildGenerator).
Thanks Luca, that revealed a flaw in my 'find' script.
I was expecting stuff to be organised in directories
like org/apache/cocoon/.../generation/ etc.
However, there are others like:
org/apache/cocoon/ant/AntBuildGenerator.java
So now i am finding based on filenames, e.g. *Generator.java
Updated table coming soon.
--David