Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL based on RC1

2017-12-03 Thread Oliver Heger
Here is the stack trace:

---
Test set: org.apache.bcel.generic.JDKGenericDumpTestCase
---
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.657
sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.bcel.generic.JDKGenericDumpTestCase
initializationError(org.apache.bcel.generic.JDKGenericDumpTestCase)
Time elapsed: 0 sec  <<< ERROR!
com.sun.jna.platform.win32.Win32Exception: Das System kann die
angegebene Datei nicht finden.
at
org.apache.bcel.generic.JDKGenericDumpTestCase.addAllJavaHomesOnWindows(JDKGenericDumpTestCase.java:65)
at
org.apache.bcel.generic.JDKGenericDumpTestCase.findJavaHomesOnWindows(JDKGenericDumpTestCase.java:97)
at
org.apache.bcel.generic.JDKGenericDumpTestCase.findJavaHomes(JDKGenericDumpTestCase.java:87)
at
org.apache.bcel.generic.JDKGenericDumpTestCase.data(JDKGenericDumpTestCase.java:82)

Oliver

Am 03.12.2017 um 16:58 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> Do you have a full stack trace? It smells like the code that looks for JDK
> and JRE locations is failing.
> 
> Gary
> 
> On Dec 3, 2017 08:33, "Oliver Heger"  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> when building on Windows 10 with both Java 1.7 and 1.8 I get the test
>> failure below. Does anybody else see this?
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>> Results :
>>
>> Tests in error:
>>
>> JDKGenericDumpTestCase.data:82->findJavaHomes:87->
>> findJavaHomesOnWindows:97->addAllJavaHomesOnWindows:65
>> ▒ Win32
>>
>> Tests run: 107, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
>>
>> $ mvn --version
>> Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
>> 2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
>> Maven home: C:\data\dev\tools\apache-maven-3.3.9
>> Java version: 1.8.0_144, vendor: Oracle Corporation
>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre
>> Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
>> OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
>>
>>
>> Am 01.12.2017 um 05:17 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>> We fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since we released Apache
>>> Commons BCEL 6.1, so I would like to release Commons BCEL 6.2.
>>>
>>> Commons BCEL 6.2 RC1 is available for review here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel at svn revision:
>>> 23349
>>>
>>> The tag is here:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/
>> BCEL_6_2_RC1/
>>> (svn revision 1816763)
>>> N.B. the SVN revision is required because SVN tags are not immutable.
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts are here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapachecommons-1294
>>>
>>> These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes
>>>
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-test-sources.jar
>>> (SHA1: feef9dc39b67bf76d90a16abf3b5711d894bdafc)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.jar.asc
>>> (SHA1: 10911db34eabbf5ed77175147d890431815a66e9)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-tests.jar.asc
>>> (SHA1: dd32ec245d2d664ee69a70bde304df5f577c3e8b)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.tar.gz.asc
>>> (SHA1: 1b6562ffec86267c8d1935dc1fa33c0fd225a094)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.tar.gz.asc
>>> (SHA1: b7c31d213469b4044361b780890732f67859ec7e)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.zip.asc
>>> (SHA1: 7137b7dfbc135aed1b2f8c7c974289e5ad645e3b)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-tests.jar
>>> (SHA1: 9de7ca4bbce76f7a877700ffc88bc2e36ef065ea)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-javadoc.jar
>>> (SHA1: 6eba2e55001a6093c8a9aa72132385e93fbe09d3)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-sources.jar
>>> (SHA1: df05f2afa0f58aefe5c3344fc67295ffc2050d53)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-test-sources.jar.asc
>>> (SHA1: 4999bb9f6d5ad677f13f1e5e856f8a76fdf3c8fc)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.pom.asc
>>> (SHA1: 6fd1c5c4fbc96b83f06c421a99fc3ee7f975c310)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.jar
>>> (SHA1: 2c1499b28bf2638cbdb5fa94350d41a46d2bd4e0)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.tar.gz
>>> (SHA1: 9116cfccfb5f55a5a9e46fb685c7aa344712d52e)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.zip.asc
>>> (SHA1: 4b86e83b5c0dcd0e3abe86fda7ff5a9aaa1ab67d)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.zip
>>> (SHA1: 95e191ca708c0187292dbef4fe42fd60f52d1d1a)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-sources.jar.asc
>>> (SHA1: 7e36d6e1ba882adf877306940184732f49c0385b)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-javadoc.jar.asc
>>> (SHA1: bee5e89f33d3e29d0d2c2d6ab6c56e0c06f0d20c)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.tar.gz
>>> (SHA1: 496c6f58f74ae55f513ed14c7268833289649236)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.pom
>>> (SHA1: 3932199e50571760ae8acdd0f153a32891b5696c)
>>> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.zip
>>> (SHA1: 42c1b8e8ae6d3dafc56ae9c05c3f3ca0819c782c)
>>>
>>> I have tested this with Oracle Java 7 using Maven 3.5.2 on Windows 10.
>>>
>>> Details of changes since 6.1 are in the release notes:
>>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL based on RC1

2017-12-03 Thread Gary Gregory
Do you have a full stack trace? It smells like the code that looks for JDK
and JRE locations is failing.

Gary

On Dec 3, 2017 08:33, "Oliver Heger"  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> when building on Windows 10 with both Java 1.7 and 1.8 I get the test
> failure below. Does anybody else see this?
>
> Oliver
>
> Results :
>
> Tests in error:
>
> JDKGenericDumpTestCase.data:82->findJavaHomes:87->
> findJavaHomesOnWindows:97->addAllJavaHomesOnWindows:65
> ▒ Win32
>
> Tests run: 107, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
>
> $ mvn --version
> Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
> 2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
> Maven home: C:\data\dev\tools\apache-maven-3.3.9
> Java version: 1.8.0_144, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre
> Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
>
>
> Am 01.12.2017 um 05:17 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > We fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since we released Apache
> > Commons BCEL 6.1, so I would like to release Commons BCEL 6.2.
> >
> > Commons BCEL 6.2 RC1 is available for review here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel at svn revision:
> > 23349
> >
> > The tag is here:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/
> BCEL_6_2_RC1/
> > (svn revision 1816763)
> > N.B. the SVN revision is required because SVN tags are not immutable.
> >
> > Maven artifacts are here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachecommons-1294
> >
> > These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes
> >
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-test-sources.jar
> > (SHA1: feef9dc39b67bf76d90a16abf3b5711d894bdafc)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.jar.asc
> > (SHA1: 10911db34eabbf5ed77175147d890431815a66e9)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-tests.jar.asc
> > (SHA1: dd32ec245d2d664ee69a70bde304df5f577c3e8b)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.tar.gz.asc
> > (SHA1: 1b6562ffec86267c8d1935dc1fa33c0fd225a094)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.tar.gz.asc
> > (SHA1: b7c31d213469b4044361b780890732f67859ec7e)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.zip.asc
> > (SHA1: 7137b7dfbc135aed1b2f8c7c974289e5ad645e3b)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-tests.jar
> > (SHA1: 9de7ca4bbce76f7a877700ffc88bc2e36ef065ea)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-javadoc.jar
> > (SHA1: 6eba2e55001a6093c8a9aa72132385e93fbe09d3)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-sources.jar
> > (SHA1: df05f2afa0f58aefe5c3344fc67295ffc2050d53)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-test-sources.jar.asc
> > (SHA1: 4999bb9f6d5ad677f13f1e5e856f8a76fdf3c8fc)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.pom.asc
> > (SHA1: 6fd1c5c4fbc96b83f06c421a99fc3ee7f975c310)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.jar
> > (SHA1: 2c1499b28bf2638cbdb5fa94350d41a46d2bd4e0)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.tar.gz
> > (SHA1: 9116cfccfb5f55a5a9e46fb685c7aa344712d52e)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.zip.asc
> > (SHA1: 4b86e83b5c0dcd0e3abe86fda7ff5a9aaa1ab67d)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.zip
> > (SHA1: 95e191ca708c0187292dbef4fe42fd60f52d1d1a)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-sources.jar.asc
> > (SHA1: 7e36d6e1ba882adf877306940184732f49c0385b)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-javadoc.jar.asc
> > (SHA1: bee5e89f33d3e29d0d2c2d6ab6c56e0c06f0d20c)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.tar.gz
> > (SHA1: 496c6f58f74ae55f513ed14c7268833289649236)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.pom
> > (SHA1: 3932199e50571760ae8acdd0f153a32891b5696c)
> > /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.zip
> > (SHA1: 42c1b8e8ae6d3dafc56ae9c05c3f3ca0819c782c)
> >
> > I have tested this with Oracle Java 7 using Maven 3.5.2 on Windows 10.
> >
> > Details of changes since 6.1 are in the release notes:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-
> NOTES.txt
> >
> >
> > Site:
> > https://people.apache.org/~ggregory/commons-bcel-3.2-RC1-site.zip
> >   (note some *relative* links are broken and the 1.2 directories are
> >   not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
> >
> > The Clirr and RAT Reports (compared to 6.1) are in the zipped site.
> >
> > KEYS:
> >   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >
> > Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no
> > sooner that 72 hours from now, sometime after 05:00 UTC 4-December 2017
> >
> >   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >   [ ] +0 OK, but...
> >   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> >   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Gary Gregory,
> > Apache Commons PMC Chair
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL based on RC1

2017-12-03 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi,

when building on Windows 10 with both Java 1.7 and 1.8 I get the test
failure below. Does anybody else see this?

Oliver

Results :

Tests in error:

JDKGenericDumpTestCase.data:82->findJavaHomes:87->findJavaHomesOnWindows:97->addAllJavaHomesOnWindows:65
▒ Win32

Tests run: 107, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0

$ mvn --version
Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
Maven home: C:\data\dev\tools\apache-maven-3.3.9
Java version: 1.8.0_144, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_144\jre
Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"


Am 01.12.2017 um 05:17 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> We fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since we released Apache
> Commons BCEL 6.1, so I would like to release Commons BCEL 6.2.
> 
> Commons BCEL 6.2 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel at svn revision:
> 23349
> 
> The tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_2_RC1/
> (svn revision 1816763)
> N.B. the SVN revision is required because SVN tags are not immutable.
> 
> Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1294
> 
> These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes
> 
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-test-sources.jar
> (SHA1: feef9dc39b67bf76d90a16abf3b5711d894bdafc)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.jar.asc
> (SHA1: 10911db34eabbf5ed77175147d890431815a66e9)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-tests.jar.asc
> (SHA1: dd32ec245d2d664ee69a70bde304df5f577c3e8b)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.tar.gz.asc
> (SHA1: 1b6562ffec86267c8d1935dc1fa33c0fd225a094)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.tar.gz.asc
> (SHA1: b7c31d213469b4044361b780890732f67859ec7e)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.zip.asc
> (SHA1: 7137b7dfbc135aed1b2f8c7c974289e5ad645e3b)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-tests.jar
> (SHA1: 9de7ca4bbce76f7a877700ffc88bc2e36ef065ea)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-javadoc.jar
> (SHA1: 6eba2e55001a6093c8a9aa72132385e93fbe09d3)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-sources.jar
> (SHA1: df05f2afa0f58aefe5c3344fc67295ffc2050d53)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-test-sources.jar.asc
> (SHA1: 4999bb9f6d5ad677f13f1e5e856f8a76fdf3c8fc)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.pom.asc
> (SHA1: 6fd1c5c4fbc96b83f06c421a99fc3ee7f975c310)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.jar
> (SHA1: 2c1499b28bf2638cbdb5fa94350d41a46d2bd4e0)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.tar.gz
> (SHA1: 9116cfccfb5f55a5a9e46fb685c7aa344712d52e)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.zip.asc
> (SHA1: 4b86e83b5c0dcd0e3abe86fda7ff5a9aaa1ab67d)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-bin.zip
> (SHA1: 95e191ca708c0187292dbef4fe42fd60f52d1d1a)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-sources.jar.asc
> (SHA1: 7e36d6e1ba882adf877306940184732f49c0385b)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-javadoc.jar.asc
> (SHA1: bee5e89f33d3e29d0d2c2d6ab6c56e0c06f0d20c)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.tar.gz
> (SHA1: 496c6f58f74ae55f513ed14c7268833289649236)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2.pom
> (SHA1: 3932199e50571760ae8acdd0f153a32891b5696c)
> /org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.2/bcel-6.2-src.zip
> (SHA1: 42c1b8e8ae6d3dafc56ae9c05c3f3ca0819c782c)
> 
> I have tested this with Oracle Java 7 using Maven 3.5.2 on Windows 10.
> 
> Details of changes since 6.1 are in the release notes:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> 
> 
> Site:
> https://people.apache.org/~ggregory/commons-bcel-3.2-RC1-site.zip
>   (note some *relative* links are broken and the 1.2 directories are
>   not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
> 
> The Clirr and RAT Reports (compared to 6.1) are in the zipped site.
> 
> KEYS:
>   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> 
> Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no
> sooner that 72 hours from now, sometime after 05:00 UTC 4-December 2017
> 
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Gary Gregory,
> Apache Commons PMC Chair
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [all] Preventing assembly archives from being deployed to nexus.

2017-12-03 Thread sebb
On 3 December 2017 at 01:32, Rob Tompkins  wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 2, 2017, at 4:42 PM, Charles Honton  wrote:
>>
>> I’ve been down this path about a year ago.  We’re relying on the side effect 
>> of these assemblies being artifacts for the GPG plugin to sign them.  There 
>> is an outstanding JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MGPG-43 
>> ) to support signing 
>> un-attached files.  Unfortunately, this was not sufficient.  The maven 
>> deploy plugin generates the md5/sha1/asc files.  I suggested adding this 
>> functionality to the GPG plugin.  The response 
>> (http://maven-dev.markmail.org/search/?q=MGPG-43#query:MGPG-43+page:1+mid:6huxvhef5rzmzmsh+state:results
>>  
>> )
>>  was not positive.
>
> Ugh. This sounds like an unfortunate situation. Many thanks for those 
> insights. You’ve definitely saved me a week of figuring that out.
>
>>
>> The step to take now is to create a new plugin and work with the maven core 
>> team to accept a new plugin to support our use case.  Alternatively, we can 
>> change our release process to something similar to what the Maven team does. 
>>  There is native support for their process.
>
> I’ll try to read their documentation on their release process.

Another approach I tried a while back (*) is to keep the current deploy process.
I.e. deploy the ASF mirror artefacts to Nexus along with the rest.
This ensures that the non-Maven zips are created and signed under target

An additional stage then copies the ASF archives/sigs/hashes from
target/ to dist/dev/commons using svnmucc.

Optionally the Nexus directory can be tidied up to remove the
unnecessary archives/sigs/hashes
Ideally they would be excluded from the upload so this was not
necessary, but that could be part of a separate effort.

(*) 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/commons-staging-plugin/trunk/

> -Rob
>
>>
>> chas
>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Rob Tompkins  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> In my work on the [build-plugin], I’ve come across the following mechanism 
>>> to prevent the [maven-assembly-plugin] from deploying the artifacts to 
>>> nexus. If in the configuration section of the plugin, you put 
>>> “false” the archives that the [maven-assembly-plugin] 
>>> creates will not get pushed up to nexus. For example I have locally in 
>>> [text] the following:
>>>
>>> 
>>>  maven-assembly-plugin
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  src/assembly/bin.xml
>>>  src/assembly/src.xml
>>>  
>>>  gnu
>>>  false
>>>  
>>> 
>>>
>>> and with that, using "-Ptest-deploy" profile, the archives aren’t pushed to 
>>> "./target/deploy”.
>>>
>>> As previously stated, my plan is to streamline the release process 
>>> considerably with java updates to the build plugin, but for the time being, 
>>> this should be helpful.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Rob
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

2017-12-03 Thread Gilles

On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 11:18:18 +0100, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Gilles  
wrote:



There hasn't been any progress towards a decision.
There isn't even a consensus on one of the central tenets of
Apache ("Those who do the work..."): how sad/strange (?).


Those who do the work are welcome to decide on their own, if they do
not involve others.


The conditional is not part of the well-known mantra.

The issue here is to answer the question of what to do with
a non-trivial code base.  My stance is to try and fix the
problem(s), a.o. difficult management, by rooting out its
main cause: CM has become an aggregate of components with
completely different subject matters, scopes, designs,
efficiencies, provisions for extension, etc.
[An array of issues which "maven" modules will not solve.]

We are seemingly faced with a choice between:
1. Maintain CM as the huge library that it is now.
2. Incrementally create maintainable components.

A long time has passed since these alternatives were first
exposed, only proving that none of the people who informally
chose option(1) invested work to make it a reality.

Refusing option (2) not only "involves others"; it is harming
them (very real people, having done a lot of work here, on
that code base).


Establishing a new commons component doesn't
qualify, IMO.


True; that's why we are stalled, despite that a majority
of the PMC did not explicitly oppose option (2).

A handful of PMC people prefer to let the code base become
"dormant" rather than give any chance to an alternate view.
[If, say, you looked at the "Commons RNG" project, and
concluded that, decidedly, this is not how a component
should look like, then I could perhaps fathom out where
those reservations come from.]

Gilles



Jochen



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

2017-12-03 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Gilles  wrote:

> There hasn't been any progress towards a decision.
> There isn't even a consensus on one of the central tenets of
> Apache ("Those who do the work..."): how sad/strange (?).

Those who do the work are welcome to decide on their own, if they do
not involve others. Establishing a new commons component doesn't
qualify, IMO.

Jochen


-- 
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org