Re: The case for a Commons component
I’ll be nice an summarize. Giles started two vote threads. The first was polluted with discussion and eventually closed. The second has not passed and is effectively dead but Giles hasn’t closed the vote. So nothing has been approved. Ralph > On May 14, 2021, at 5:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Are seriously asking someone else to read through 40 emails and summarize > for you? Perhaps part of your contribution might be to do this yourself? > > Gary > > On Fri, May 14, 2021, 08:15 Avijit Basak wrote: > >> Hi All >> >>This has been a long mail thread. It will be really helpful if >> anyone can summarize the decisions. >>Is the proposal of developing the new machine learning component >> approved? >>If the team repository is not provided is there any way to go >> ahead? >>Waiting for a response. >> >> Thanks & Regards >> --Avijit Basak >> >> On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 02:26, sebb wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:13, Gary Gregory >> wrote: It is true that there much less friction these days to get a repository going with GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket, but, for now, the Commons >>> Sandbox is still available. If we want to do away with the sandbox, then let's talk about that separately. >>> >>> There is no need for a Sandbox component to use SVN, and it's easy to >>> create a new Commons git repo. >>> >>> A non-ASF code repo would require code to be checked for license >>> compliance etc before it could become a Commons component. >>> A Sandbox component does not require that. >>> Gary On Thu, May 6, 2021, 11:26 Ralph Goers >>> wrote: > > >> On May 6, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Gary Gregory >>> wrote: >> >> What about the Commons Sandox? Would that be a good place to start? >> > > Emmanuel just sort of proposed doing away with it. As he put it, >> anyone > can create a > GitHub repo so why does it need to be under the apache user. He >> hasn’t > formally > made a proposal for that and I’m not sure how I would vote on it if >> he > did. He does > have a point. At the same time I’m not sure I’d close off doing > experimental or > early development within the ASF space. > > Ralph > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Avijit Basak >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [text][geometry] DoubleFormats utility
Hi. Le ven. 14 mai 2021 à 04:17, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Hello, > > Yes, the JDK definitely has number formatting capabilities. The class that I > propose moving to text was designed specifically for data IO operations, > where large numbers of doubles need to be serialized to strings in some > standard, non-localized format. I was unable to find exactly what I wanted > for this in the JDK, so I wrote my own class. The main advantages to this > code are that the produced formatters are 1) completely thread-safe, Out of curiosity, what are use-cases for this feature? > 2) easy to use, 3) offer a range of formats, and 4) are at least as > performant as BigDecimal and DecimalFormat. As a concrete discussion point, it might be interesting to post benchmarks comparisons. Regards, Gilles >> [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: The case for a Commons component
Are seriously asking someone else to read through 40 emails and summarize for you? Perhaps part of your contribution might be to do this yourself? Gary On Fri, May 14, 2021, 08:15 Avijit Basak wrote: > Hi All > > This has been a long mail thread. It will be really helpful if > anyone can summarize the decisions. > Is the proposal of developing the new machine learning component > approved? > If the team repository is not provided is there any way to go > ahead? > Waiting for a response. > > Thanks & Regards > --Avijit Basak > > On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 02:26, sebb wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:13, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > > > It is true that there much less friction these days to get a repository > > > going with GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket, but, for now, the Commons > > Sandbox > > > is still available. If we want to do away with the sandbox, then let's > > > talk about that separately. > > > > > > > There is no need for a Sandbox component to use SVN, and it's easy to > > create a new Commons git repo. > > > > A non-ASF code repo would require code to be checked for license > > compliance etc before it could become a Commons component. > > A Sandbox component does not require that. > > > > > Gary > > > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2021, 11:26 Ralph Goers > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Gary Gregory > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > What about the Commons Sandox? Would that be a good place to start? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Emmanuel just sort of proposed doing away with it. As he put it, > anyone > > > > can create a > > > > GitHub repo so why does it need to be under the apache user. He > hasn’t > > > > formally > > > > made a proposal for that and I’m not sure how I would vote on it if > he > > > > did. He does > > > > have a point. At the same time I’m not sure I’d close off doing > > > > experimental or > > > > early development within the ASF space. > > > > > > > > Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Avijit Basak >
Re: The case for a Commons component
Hi All This has been a long mail thread. It will be really helpful if anyone can summarize the decisions. Is the proposal of developing the new machine learning component approved? If the team repository is not provided is there any way to go ahead? Waiting for a response. Thanks & Regards --Avijit Basak On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 02:26, sebb wrote: > On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:13, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > It is true that there much less friction these days to get a repository > > going with GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket, but, for now, the Commons > Sandbox > > is still available. If we want to do away with the sandbox, then let's > > talk about that separately. > > > > There is no need for a Sandbox component to use SVN, and it's easy to > create a new Commons git repo. > > A non-ASF code repo would require code to be checked for license > compliance etc before it could become a Commons component. > A Sandbox component does not require that. > > > Gary > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2021, 11:26 Ralph Goers > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > > > > > What about the Commons Sandox? Would that be a good place to start? > > > > > > > > > > Emmanuel just sort of proposed doing away with it. As he put it, anyone > > > can create a > > > GitHub repo so why does it need to be under the apache user. He hasn’t > > > formally > > > made a proposal for that and I’m not sure how I would vote on it if he > > > did. He does > > > have a point. At the same time I’m not sure I’d close off doing > > > experimental or > > > early development within the ASF space. > > > > > > Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Avijit Basak
