Re: Office Calc crash
Elaine, Unfortunately you are turning to the wrong mailing list. Apache is a large community of ~300 projects, of which Apache Open Office is a relatively small part. This mailing list discusses issues that are common across all projects, and not specific to any particular piece of software. I think you should contact, us...@openoffice.apache.org, which might require you to so called subscribe first to be guaranteed to reach it. See http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#users-mailing-list-public for details on that. Good Luck Niclas On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Elaine Berger elainegber...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was updating a list of companies that I have built up for a month and after updating my latest entry, the spreadsheet just closed on me. When reopening it, lots of entries were gone. That is a whole day work. I have used this list for follow up of out coming mail. In all, 60 companies are gone along with their addresses, phone numbers and contact person. I was not able to retrieve a previous version. It is saved on a USB key who was not saving previous copies (Now it is!) Is there somehow a way to retrieve those data? And by the way, I have experienced lots of software crashes with the Calc program. Thanks for your help! Elaine -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: FOSDEM
On 14 Jul 2015 02:09, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: I've spoken to the FOSDEM team, and the next step is playing the waiting game. They will announce real soon the where/how/when of getting a booth, and when that happens, we'll request just that. So, stay tuned! With regards, Daniel. On 2015-07-13 19:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: I'd like to volunteer! Next steps? Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: FOSDEM dates have been announced. This is a reminder that several months ago we talked about the notion of having an ASF presence at FOSDEM (as opposed to just an AOO presence) and people were generally in favor of the idea. I will be there, but will already be working two other tables in the community space, and can't head this up. Several people suggested that they might have the bandwidth to take a lead on this. It's probably time to start thinking logistics, as well as connecting with the Open Office people who have already been doing this for years. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time?
Just read this page: https://projects.apache.org/about.html I'll create a COMDEV ticket and try to fix it myself. This would be my first contribution to the Apache community. :-) - Ajoy On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Ajoy Bhatia ajoy.bha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category, the only 2 occurrences of hadoop are the link to the Apache Hadoop https://projects.apache.org/project.html?hadoop project page in the *database* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#database category, and as the *hadoop* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#hadoop category itself. I think that Apache Hadoop should also be listed in the *big-data* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#big-data category, as well as in the eponymous *hadoop* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#hadoop category. Don't you agree? Thanks... - Ajoy On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: Fixed in r1691109, thanks for spotting this. With regards, Daniel. On 2015-07-15 01:21, Ted Dunning wrote: The label on the second pie graph is broken. It refers to language (cut and paste from the first caption, I think). On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org wrote: So ...we've had a tweet from Roman last month, and now JimJag (bcc'd) has done so as well https://twitter.com/jimjag/status/620940463558782976 Are we officially live yet? If not, please let me know when I can promote. Cheers, Sally From: Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com To: jan i j...@apache.org; dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org Cc: David Crossley cross...@apache.org; Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015, 6:53 Subject: Re: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Aha! OK --that's exactly it. I didn't realize that it was going to replace the old link. So yes, you are correct, Jan, we don't want to do that. As such, I'll be standing by to hear when you (collectively) are ready. Thanks again, Sally [From the mobile; please excuse top-posting, spelling/spacing errors, and brevity] - Reply message - From: jan i j...@apache.org To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org Cc: David Crossley cross...@apache.org, Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Subject: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Date: Sat, Jun 20, 2015 06:39 On 20 June 2015 at 12:34, Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com .invalid wrote: Thanks, David! I noticed that Roman tweeted the link yesterday, so I guess the cat is out of the bag, as the saying goes. As such, barring any objections, I'll start spreading the word. Do we really want to do marketing on the temporary URL ? In my opinion, we should do some renaming so the current one is called -old and the new one replaces the current one. rgds jan i. Are there plans in place to link this from the apache.org homepage? Thanks again, Sally [From the mobile; please excuse top-posting, spelling/spacing errors, and brevity] - Reply message - From: David Crossley cross...@apache.org To: dev@community.apache.org, Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Subject: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Date: Sat, Jun 20, 2015 03:03 Previous discussion here was about how to maintain the actual project data. Also various items listed here: https://projects-new.apache.org/about.html ~David On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 08:55:52PM +, Sally Khudairi wrote: Hello Uli and the Apache ComDev team --I hope this message finds you well. Per below, I'm interested in promoting the new Projects page. Can you please let me know if/when we're ready to do so? Thanks so much, Sally - Forwarded Message - From: David Nalley da...@gnsa.us To: Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com Cc: Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org; ASF Infrastructure infrastruct...@apache.org Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 11:50 AM Subject: Re: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Hi Sally: projects-new.apache.org is a ComDev managed resource, not an infrastructure managed resource. I think the PMC has had a discussion or two about when to migrate projects-new to projects.a.o --David On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello Daniel and David --I hope you are both well. I was wondering if the new Projects page at https://projects-new.apache.org/ was ready to be publicly deployed/announced/promoted. There's so much great information there and it's an incredible resource (I use it every week for the News Round-ups and we relied on it for the Annual Report), if there's no reason why it should still be in stealth mode, I'd like to shout out about it from the
Re: FOSDEM
On 15/07/2015 jan i wrote: On 14 July 2015 at 09:06, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 13/07/2015 jan i wrote: who takes lead on keeping an eye on the FOSDEM team? I usually monitor that, and I can notify this list too this year (even though now is way too early for me to have any ideas about my possible commitment to an OpenOffice and/or and Apache presence). thanks a lot for volunteering to help keep a finger on the pulse. It might be that you do not have any idea about the AOO presence, but it seems I am in a more lucky position Well, it seems I didn't write it in a clear way. My quote above should mean something like I have no idea if I will be at FOSDEM, not I have no idea if OpenOffice/Apache will be at FOSDEM. I doubt that could be misunderstood, but with a lot of mails misunderstandings just happen and are not a big issue. For reference: last year the call was mid-September with a deadline of mid-November and the conference was in late January like this year. The dates I have been told are saturday 30 january 2016 to sunday 31 january 2016. These are the official dates, sure. I wanted to say (and here I admit I wrote it in a confusing way!): FOSDEM 2016 will be more or less in the same period as FOSDEM 2015. For FOSDEM 2015 calls were sent out mid-September 2014 with a deadline in mid-November 2014. It is reasonable to expect a similar timeline this year. - AOO traditionally has a double table on the first floor, I would would like (as ASF and AOO) to get 4 tables in the ground floor. It would be great to have both, not at the expense of visibility though. I would suggest to wait for the call and read it before exploring possibilities. I'm much in favor of an Apache presence. I don't know if one can ask for a specific floor... but again, reading the call can probably help a lot! - if we have enough projects, we can try and make a Apache dev.room (AOO might prefer to be in open editors room). Is it ok if I write to all PMCS asking for interest ? I tend to think like Rich on this: a virtual track would be very smart (i.e., we --oops, I am already assuming I will be at FOSDEM!-- have a poster at the booth where we highlight all Apache-related talks), but these talks happen in different devrooms, since the devrooms are not arranged by Foundation but by topic. - Which message to do we want to bring across ? just that we exist or more ? More! - Is the booth a place for people to join Apache, or just a we exist, go and look us up ? It is a developer conference. I would consider it a success if developers who visit the booth consider putting their reasonably serious projects in the Incubator and have a good understanding of the advantages this brings. Please if somebody feel I bully by taking lead, please tell me Come on... You are welcome to do so! Simply, I can't take commitments since at this moment late January 2016 is off the radar for me (to be clear, I want to say: it's too early for me to know whether I will be in Brussels at FOSDEM in late January 2016). Regards, Andrea.
Re: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time?
no need for COMDEV Jira issue: it's Hadoop DOAP that requires to be improved, that is under Hadoop project responsibility in Hadoop svn: http://hadoop.apache.org/doap.rdf Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 15 juillet 2015 13:24:55 Ajoy Bhatia a écrit : Just read this page: https://projects.apache.org/about.html I'll create a COMDEV ticket and try to fix it myself. This would be my first contribution to the Apache community. :-) - Ajoy On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Ajoy Bhatia ajoy.bha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category, the only 2 occurrences of hadoop are the link to the Apache Hadoop https://projects.apache.org/project.html?hadoop project page in the *database* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#database category, and as the *hadoop* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#hadoop category itself. I think that Apache Hadoop should also be listed in the *big-data* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#big-data category, as well as in the eponymous *hadoop* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#hadoop category. Don't you agree? Thanks... - Ajoy On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: Fixed in r1691109, thanks for spotting this. With regards, Daniel. On 2015-07-15 01:21, Ted Dunning wrote: The label on the second pie graph is broken. It refers to language (cut and paste from the first caption, I think). On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org wrote: So ...we've had a tweet from Roman last month, and now JimJag (bcc'd) has done so as well https://twitter.com/jimjag/status/620940463558782976 Are we officially live yet? If not, please let me know when I can promote. Cheers, Sally From: Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com To: jan i j...@apache.org; dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org Cc: David Crossley cross...@apache.org; Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015, 6:53 Subject: Re: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Aha! OK --that's exactly it. I didn't realize that it was going to replace the old link. So yes, you are correct, Jan, we don't want to do that. As such, I'll be standing by to hear when you (collectively) are ready. Thanks again, Sally [From the mobile; please excuse top-posting, spelling/spacing errors, and brevity] - Reply message - From: jan i j...@apache.org To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org Cc: David Crossley cross...@apache.org, Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Subject: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Date: Sat, Jun 20, 2015 06:39 On 20 June 2015 at 12:34, Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com .invalid wrote: Thanks, David! I noticed that Roman tweeted the link yesterday, so I guess the cat is out of the bag, as the saying goes. As such, barring any objections, I'll start spreading the word. Do we really want to do marketing on the temporary URL ? In my opinion, we should do some renaming so the current one is called -old and the new one replaces the current one. rgds jan i. Are there plans in place to link this from the apache.org homepage? Thanks again, Sally [From the mobile; please excuse top-posting, spelling/spacing errors, and brevity] - Reply message - From: David Crossley cross...@apache.org To: dev@community.apache.org, Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Subject: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Date: Sat, Jun 20, 2015 03:03 Previous discussion here was about how to maintain the actual project data. Also various items listed here: https://projects-new.apache.org/about.html ~David On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 08:55:52PM +, Sally Khudairi wrote: Hello Uli and the Apache ComDev team --I hope this message finds you well. Per below, I'm interested in promoting the new Projects page. Can you please let me know if/when we're ready to do so? Thanks so much, Sally - Forwarded Message - From: David Nalley da...@gnsa.us To: Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com Cc: Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org; ASF Infrastructure infrastruct...@apache.org Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 11:50 AM Subject: Re: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Hi Sally: projects-new.apache.org is a ComDev managed resource, not an infrastructure managed resource. I think the PMC has had a discussion or two about when to migrate projects-new to projects.a.o --David On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:30 AM,
Re: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time?
Hi all, On https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category, the only 2 occurrences of hadoop are the link to the Apache Hadoop https://projects.apache.org/project.html?hadoop project page in the *database* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#database category, and as the *hadoop* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#hadoop category itself. I think that Apache Hadoop should also be listed in the *big-data* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#big-data category, as well as in the eponymous *hadoop* https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#hadoop category. Don't you agree? Thanks... - Ajoy On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: Fixed in r1691109, thanks for spotting this. With regards, Daniel. On 2015-07-15 01:21, Ted Dunning wrote: The label on the second pie graph is broken. It refers to language (cut and paste from the first caption, I think). On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org wrote: So ...we've had a tweet from Roman last month, and now JimJag (bcc'd) has done so as well https://twitter.com/jimjag/status/620940463558782976 Are we officially live yet? If not, please let me know when I can promote. Cheers, Sally From: Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com To: jan i j...@apache.org; dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org Cc: David Crossley cross...@apache.org; Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, 20 June 2015, 6:53 Subject: Re: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Aha! OK --that's exactly it. I didn't realize that it was going to replace the old link. So yes, you are correct, Jan, we don't want to do that. As such, I'll be standing by to hear when you (collectively) are ready. Thanks again, Sally [From the mobile; please excuse top-posting, spelling/spacing errors, and brevity] - Reply message - From: jan i j...@apache.org To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org Cc: David Crossley cross...@apache.org, Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Subject: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Date: Sat, Jun 20, 2015 06:39 On 20 June 2015 at 12:34, Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com .invalid wrote: Thanks, David! I noticed that Roman tweeted the link yesterday, so I guess the cat is out of the bag, as the saying goes. As such, barring any objections, I'll start spreading the word. Do we really want to do marketing on the temporary URL ? In my opinion, we should do some renaming so the current one is called -old and the new one replaces the current one. rgds jan i. Are there plans in place to link this from the apache.org homepage? Thanks again, Sally [From the mobile; please excuse top-posting, spelling/spacing errors, and brevity] - Reply message - From: David Crossley cross...@apache.org To: dev@community.apache.org, Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Subject: Fw: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Date: Sat, Jun 20, 2015 03:03 Previous discussion here was about how to maintain the actual project data. Also various items listed here: https://projects-new.apache.org/about.html ~David On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 08:55:52PM +, Sally Khudairi wrote: Hello Uli and the Apache ComDev team --I hope this message finds you well. Per below, I'm interested in promoting the new Projects page. Can you please let me know if/when we're ready to do so? Thanks so much, Sally - Forwarded Message - From: David Nalley da...@gnsa.us To: Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com Cc: Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org; ASF Infrastructure infrastruct...@apache.org Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 11:50 AM Subject: Re: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime time? Hi Sally: projects-new.apache.org is a ComDev managed resource, not an infrastructure managed resource. I think the PMC has had a discussion or two about when to migrate projects-new to projects.a.o --David On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Sally Khudairi sallykhuda...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello Daniel and David --I hope you are both well. I was wondering if the new Projects page at https://projects-new.apache.org/ was ready to be publicly deployed/announced/promoted. There's so much great information there and it's an incredible resource (I use it every week for the News Round-ups and we relied on it for the Annual Report), if there's no reason why it should still be in stealth mode, I'd like to shout out about it from the rooftops. Just let me know if we're good to go and if there are any disclaimers/caveats we should be aware of. Warm thanks, Sally = = = = = vox +1 617 921 8656 off2 +1 646 583 3362 skype sallykhudairi
Re: FOSDEM
This is turning into quite a long thread ;-) Shall we start a wiki page to coordinate all the FOSDEM activities (same way we do for ApacheCON)? I don't seem to have enough karma to start a new page on ComDev wiki, but I can surely contribute if somebody at least starts a page. Any takers? Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 15/07/2015 jan i wrote: On 14 July 2015 at 09:06, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 13/07/2015 jan i wrote: who takes lead on keeping an eye on the FOSDEM team? I usually monitor that, and I can notify this list too this year (even though now is way too early for me to have any ideas about my possible commitment to an OpenOffice and/or and Apache presence). thanks a lot for volunteering to help keep a finger on the pulse. It might be that you do not have any idea about the AOO presence, but it seems I am in a more lucky position Well, it seems I didn't write it in a clear way. My quote above should mean something like I have no idea if I will be at FOSDEM, not I have no idea if OpenOffice/Apache will be at FOSDEM. I doubt that could be misunderstood, but with a lot of mails misunderstandings just happen and are not a big issue. For reference: last year the call was mid-September with a deadline of mid-November and the conference was in late January like this year. The dates I have been told are saturday 30 january 2016 to sunday 31 january 2016. These are the official dates, sure. I wanted to say (and here I admit I wrote it in a confusing way!): FOSDEM 2016 will be more or less in the same period as FOSDEM 2015. For FOSDEM 2015 calls were sent out mid-September 2014 with a deadline in mid-November 2014. It is reasonable to expect a similar timeline this year. - AOO traditionally has a double table on the first floor, I would would like (as ASF and AOO) to get 4 tables in the ground floor. It would be great to have both, not at the expense of visibility though. I would suggest to wait for the call and read it before exploring possibilities. I'm much in favor of an Apache presence. I don't know if one can ask for a specific floor... but again, reading the call can probably help a lot! - if we have enough projects, we can try and make a Apache dev.room (AOO might prefer to be in open editors room). Is it ok if I write to all PMCS asking for interest ? I tend to think like Rich on this: a virtual track would be very smart (i.e., we --oops, I am already assuming I will be at FOSDEM!-- have a poster at the booth where we highlight all Apache-related talks), but these talks happen in different devrooms, since the devrooms are not arranged by Foundation but by topic. - Which message to do we want to bring across ? just that we exist or more ? More! - Is the booth a place for people to join Apache, or just a we exist, go and look us up ? It is a developer conference. I would consider it a success if developers who visit the booth consider putting their reasonably serious projects in the Incubator and have a good understanding of the advantages this brings. Please if somebody feel I bully by taking lead, please tell me Come on... You are welcome to do so! Simply, I can't take commitments since at this moment late January 2016 is off the radar for me (to be clear, I want to say: it's too early for me to know whether I will be in Brussels at FOSDEM in late January 2016). Regards, Andrea.
Re: FOSDEM
On 07/14/2015 07:46 PM, jan i wrote: I hereby volunteer to be the pointman at FOSDEM (if somebody else wants to do I am pleased to hand it over). So lets start discuss what we want: - AOO traditionally has a double table on the first floor, I would would like (as ASF and AOO) to get 4 tables in the ground floor. - if we have enough projects, we can try and make a Apache dev.room (AOO might prefer to be in open editors room). Is it ok if I write to all PMCS asking for interest ? I suspect that projects will be better served by participating in the topic-relevant dev room. Cloudstack/libcloud/whatever in the cloud/virt dev room, Hadoop/Spark/etc in the big data dev room, and so on. But what I'd like to see is a virtual dev room - that is, we actively track what PMCs have events, and print up a schedule list that we have at the table. That also eliminates the enormous logistical overhead of running a dev room. I mean, unless you want to. I surely don't. - The table need to be manned throughout both days, I can supply materials (I will coordinate with melissa and sally), but we need 2-3 persons extra, volunteers ? - swag will be supplied from the european logistic center (me :-) ). I'll be there, but can't promise a lot of time on booth, as I'm already split between two other booths. I'm sure, however, I can fit in an hour. Now the more soft parts: - Which message to do we want to bring across ? just that we exist or more ? - Is the booth a place for people to join Apache, or just a we exist, go and look us up ? We should get Sally to help us craft a message, but here's some things I'd like to say: * We're not just httpd (and not just AOO), but we have 300+ thriving projects. * We're every bit as relevant as the FSF over there selling their stickers. (Free As In Stickers!) The FSF wants to present itself as the source of all free software, and more power to them, but we are also the source of a HUGE amount of the really important free software in use today, and we should trumpet this. * We are behind half (or whatever) of the projects that are presenting here at this event. - Do the projects present at FOSDEM, want to help on the booth, and maybe have some why join us folders ? For several years we've talked about per-project brochures. It's a major undertaking, but it would be awesome to aim at having, say, a top 20 at FOSDEM. (And this has the added benefit that projects that aren't in that top 20 will say, why aren't we in there, and step up to correct the injustice!) -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: FOSDEM
Hi Just to keep everybody informed, I spoke with Stehmann who usually organize and man the AOO stand at FOSCOM. They intent to be at FOSDEM this year, and welcomes a combined stand ! This actually means that we have to a large degree solved the problem about manning the stand (Stehmann, myself and a couple of volunteers). rgds jan I. On 15 July 2015 at 01:46, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 14 July 2015 at 09:06, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 13/07/2015 jan i wrote: who takes lead on keeping an eye on the FOSDEM team? I usually monitor that, and I can notify this list too this year (even though now is way too early for me to have any ideas about my possible commitment to an OpenOffice and/or and Apache presence). thanks a lot for volunteering to help keep a finger on the pulse. It might be that you do not have any idea about the AOO presence, but it seems I am in a more lucky position, because I know we will have a presence, either the stehmanns will do their normal elegant job, or I will personally represent AOO at the booth. For reference: last year the call was mid-September with a deadline of mid-November and the conference was in late January like this year. The dates I have been told are saturday 30 january 2016 to sunday 31 january 2016. I hereby volunteer to be the pointman at FOSDEM (if somebody else wants to do I am pleased to hand it over). So lets start discuss what we want: - AOO traditionally has a double table on the first floor, I would would like (as ASF and AOO) to get 4 tables in the ground floor. - if we have enough projects, we can try and make a Apache dev.room (AOO might prefer to be in open editors room). Is it ok if I write to all PMCS asking for interest ? - The table need to be manned throughout both days, I can supply materials (I will coordinate with melissa and sally), but we need 2-3 persons extra, volunteers ? - swag will be supplied from the european logistic center (me :-) ). Now the more soft parts: - Which message to do we want to bring across ? just that we exist or more ? - Is the booth a place for people to join Apache, or just a we exist, go and look us up ? - Do the projects present at FOSDEM, want to help on the booth, and maybe have some why join us folders ? Looking forward to hear what you think. Please if somebody feel I bully by taking lead, please tell me so and I will step down. rgds jan i. Regards , Andrea.
