Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-16 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 18:34, Paul J. Davis
 wrote:
> 1.0.3 is on my list for today

Any progress?

Thanks,

Dirkjan


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-15 Thread Paul J. Davis
1.0.3 is on my list for today

On May 15, 2011, at 11:50 AM, till  wrote:

> Just wanted to ask what the status of either release is?
> 
> Are the two tests failing still failing, or can we move on to make dist? :-)
> 
> Till
> 
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Benoit Chesneau  wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Randall Leeds  
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:54, Paul Davis  
>>> wrote:
 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jan Lehnardt  wrote:
> Putting 140 on an infinite loop (while(true); do ./test/etap/run 
> test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t ; done) eventually gives me 
> http://www.friendpaste.com/2JCA8dvre9orA3UysYYTCe on both SSD Mac OS X 
> 10.6 and Ubuntu 10.04 on disk in a VMWare.
> 
 
 That's the error that I was getting.
 
> I also got one instance of 
> http://www.friendpaste.com/7EpB1eJGRoRFBvjXvmFG3V on the Ubuntu.
> 
 
 Never seen this one which makes things more fun.
 
> The first one comes up reliably after half a minute or so and repeats 
> itself, it may well be a socket ulimit or something. The second one I 
> only ever saw once so far.
> 
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>>> 
>>> Just distchecked 1.0.x and 1.1.x no problem.
>>> Give it a shot, Paul?
>>> 
>> the same, osx (with & without ssd)
>> 
>> - benoît
>> 


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-15 Thread till
Just wanted to ask what the status of either release is?

Are the two tests failing still failing, or can we move on to make dist? :-)

Till

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Benoit Chesneau  wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Randall Leeds  
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:54, Paul Davis  
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jan Lehnardt  wrote:
 Putting 140 on an infinite loop (while(true); do ./test/etap/run 
 test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t ; done) eventually gives me 
 http://www.friendpaste.com/2JCA8dvre9orA3UysYYTCe on both SSD Mac OS X 
 10.6 and Ubuntu 10.04 on disk in a VMWare.

>>>
>>> That's the error that I was getting.
>>>
 I also got one instance of 
 http://www.friendpaste.com/7EpB1eJGRoRFBvjXvmFG3V on the Ubuntu.

>>>
>>> Never seen this one which makes things more fun.
>>>
 The first one comes up reliably after half a minute or so and repeats 
 itself, it may well be a socket ulimit or something. The second one I only 
 ever saw once so far.

 Cheers
 Jan
 --
>>
>> Just distchecked 1.0.x and 1.1.x no problem.
>> Give it a shot, Paul?
>>
> the same, osx (with & without ssd)
>
> - benoît
>


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-12 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Randall Leeds  wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:54, Paul Davis  wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jan Lehnardt  wrote:
>>> Putting 140 on an infinite loop (while(true); do ./test/etap/run 
>>> test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t ; done) eventually gives me 
>>> http://www.friendpaste.com/2JCA8dvre9orA3UysYYTCe on both SSD Mac OS X 10.6 
>>> and Ubuntu 10.04 on disk in a VMWare.
>>>
>>
>> That's the error that I was getting.
>>
>>> I also got one instance of 
>>> http://www.friendpaste.com/7EpB1eJGRoRFBvjXvmFG3V on the Ubuntu.
>>>
>>
>> Never seen this one which makes things more fun.
>>
>>> The first one comes up reliably after half a minute or so and repeats 
>>> itself, it may well be a socket ulimit or something. The second one I only 
>>> ever saw once so far.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Jan
>>> --
>
> Just distchecked 1.0.x and 1.1.x no problem.
> Give it a shot, Paul?
>
the same, osx (with & without ssd)

- benoît


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-12 Thread Paul Davis
Sounds like a plan.

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Randall Leeds  wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:54, Paul Davis  wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jan Lehnardt  wrote:
>>> Putting 140 on an infinite loop (while(true); do ./test/etap/run 
>>> test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t ; done) eventually gives me 
>>> http://www.friendpaste.com/2JCA8dvre9orA3UysYYTCe on both SSD Mac OS X 10.6 
>>> and Ubuntu 10.04 on disk in a VMWare.
>>>
>>
>> That's the error that I was getting.
>>
>>> I also got one instance of 
>>> http://www.friendpaste.com/7EpB1eJGRoRFBvjXvmFG3V on the Ubuntu.
>>>
>>
>> Never seen this one which makes things more fun.
>>
>>> The first one comes up reliably after half a minute or so and repeats 
>>> itself, it may well be a socket ulimit or something. The second one I only 
>>> ever saw once so far.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Jan
>>> --
>
> Just distchecked 1.0.x and 1.1.x no problem.
> Give it a shot, Paul?
>


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-11 Thread Randall Leeds
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:54, Paul Davis  wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jan Lehnardt  wrote:
>> Putting 140 on an infinite loop (while(true); do ./test/etap/run 
>> test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t ; done) eventually gives me 
>> http://www.friendpaste.com/2JCA8dvre9orA3UysYYTCe on both SSD Mac OS X 10.6 
>> and Ubuntu 10.04 on disk in a VMWare.
>>
>
> That's the error that I was getting.
>
>> I also got one instance of http://www.friendpaste.com/7EpB1eJGRoRFBvjXvmFG3V 
>> on the Ubuntu.
>>
>
> Never seen this one which makes things more fun.
>
>> The first one comes up reliably after half a minute or so and repeats 
>> itself, it may well be a socket ulimit or something. The second one I only 
>> ever saw once so far.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --

Just distchecked 1.0.x and 1.1.x no problem.
Give it a shot, Paul?


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jan Lehnardt  wrote:
> Putting 140 on an infinite loop (while(true); do ./test/etap/run 
> test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t ; done) eventually gives me 
> http://www.friendpaste.com/2JCA8dvre9orA3UysYYTCe on both SSD Mac OS X 10.6 
> and Ubuntu 10.04 on disk in a VMWare.
>

That's the error that I was getting.

> I also got one instance of http://www.friendpaste.com/7EpB1eJGRoRFBvjXvmFG3V 
> on the Ubuntu.
>

Never seen this one which makes things more fun.

> The first one comes up reliably after half a minute or so and repeats itself, 
> it may well be a socket ulimit or something. The second one I only ever saw 
> once so far.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
>


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Jan Lehnardt
More info:

the Mac is on R14B02 and Ubuntu is on R13B03.

Cheers
Jan
-- 

On 10 May 2011, at 15:49, Jan Lehnardt wrote:

> Putting 140 on an infinite loop (while(true); do ./test/etap/run 
> test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t ; done) eventually gives me 
> http://www.friendpaste.com/2JCA8dvre9orA3UysYYTCe on both SSD Mac OS X 10.6 
> and Ubuntu 10.04 on disk in a VMWare.
> 
> I also got one instance of http://www.friendpaste.com/7EpB1eJGRoRFBvjXvmFG3V 
> on the Ubuntu.
> 
> The first one comes up reliably after half a minute or so and repeats itself, 
> it may well be a socket ulimit or something. The second one I only ever saw 
> once so far.
> 
> Cheers
> Jan
> -- 
> 
> 



Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Putting 140 on an infinite loop (while(true); do ./test/etap/run 
test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t ; done) eventually gives me 
http://www.friendpaste.com/2JCA8dvre9orA3UysYYTCe on both SSD Mac OS X 10.6 and 
Ubuntu 10.04 on disk in a VMWare.

I also got one instance of http://www.friendpaste.com/7EpB1eJGRoRFBvjXvmFG3V on 
the Ubuntu.

The first one comes up reliably after half a minute or so and repeats itself, 
it may well be a socket ulimit or something. The second one I only ever saw 
once so far.

Cheers
Jan
-- 




Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Jan Lehnardt

On 10 May 2011, at 15:28, Paul Davis wrote:

> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Jan Lehnardt  wrote:
>> 
>> On 10 May 2011, at 15:21, Paul Davis wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman  wrote:
 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:08, Paul Davis  
 wrote:
> Like Jan says, it'd be awesome to have more people familiar with the
> release procedure. Although if you're interested in speeding up
> releases the best place to start would be by learning some internals.
> The issues that usually keep things from shipping is that a test is
> randomly failing or there's a bug waiting to be fixed.
 
 Right, but that's not the case now, is it? So I would like to help out
 with all the non-internals and chasing after other committers to fix
 up the bugs, as that seems an area that's currently understaffed.
 
 Which doesn't mean that maybe I won't get into the internals at some
 point, but I think doing the other things could be valuable to, and
 the project needs more of it.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dirkjan
 
>>> 
>>> I haven't run through prepping the 1.1.x branch for a release, but
>>> 1.0.3 is being held up because I've sen the 090 and 140 etap tests
>>> fail and no one (me included) has felt like fixing them yet.
>> 
>> This is the first time I hear of this (I'm a little behind on JIRA),
>> is there a ticket for this? What system specs do you have where you
>> see the errors?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> New 13" MBA. I've seen the 090 and 140 etap tests both fail. New 13"
> MBA. I can get 140 to reproduce by running it many times. Haven't yet
> tried to reproduce 090 (but it was during a distcheck for anyone
> trying).

Is this on SSD or spinning disk?

Cheers
Jan
-- 



Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Jan Lehnardt  wrote:
>
> On 10 May 2011, at 15:21, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman  wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:08, Paul Davis  
>>> wrote:
 Like Jan says, it'd be awesome to have more people familiar with the
 release procedure. Although if you're interested in speeding up
 releases the best place to start would be by learning some internals.
 The issues that usually keep things from shipping is that a test is
 randomly failing or there's a bug waiting to be fixed.
>>>
>>> Right, but that's not the case now, is it? So I would like to help out
>>> with all the non-internals and chasing after other committers to fix
>>> up the bugs, as that seems an area that's currently understaffed.
>>>
>>> Which doesn't mean that maybe I won't get into the internals at some
>>> point, but I think doing the other things could be valuable to, and
>>> the project needs more of it.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dirkjan
>>>
>>
>> I haven't run through prepping the 1.1.x branch for a release, but
>> 1.0.3 is being held up because I've sen the 090 and 140 etap tests
>> fail and no one (me included) has felt like fixing them yet.
>
> This is the first time I hear of this (I'm a little behind on JIRA),
> is there a ticket for this? What system specs do you have where you
> see the errors?
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
>

New 13" MBA. I've seen the 090 and 140 etap tests both fail. New 13"
MBA. I can get 140 to reproduce by running it many times. Haven't yet
tried to reproduce 090 (but it was during a distcheck for anyone
trying).


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Robert Dionne
Paul,

  I'll try to take a look at 090 and 140 tonight after work, I know I've seen 
140 randomly failing. 

Bob


On May 10, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Paul Davis wrote:

> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman  wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:08, Paul Davis  
>> wrote:
>>> Like Jan says, it'd be awesome to have more people familiar with the
>>> release procedure. Although if you're interested in speeding up
>>> releases the best place to start would be by learning some internals.
>>> The issues that usually keep things from shipping is that a test is
>>> randomly failing or there's a bug waiting to be fixed.
>> 
>> Right, but that's not the case now, is it? So I would like to help out
>> with all the non-internals and chasing after other committers to fix
>> up the bugs, as that seems an area that's currently understaffed.
>> 
>> Which doesn't mean that maybe I won't get into the internals at some
>> point, but I think doing the other things could be valuable to, and
>> the project needs more of it.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Dirkjan
>> 
> 
> I haven't run through prepping the 1.1.x branch for a release, but
> 1.0.3 is being held up because I've sen the 090 and 140 etap tests
> fail and no one (me included) has felt like fixing them yet.



Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Jan Lehnardt

On 10 May 2011, at 15:21, Paul Davis wrote:

> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman  wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:08, Paul Davis  
>> wrote:
>>> Like Jan says, it'd be awesome to have more people familiar with the
>>> release procedure. Although if you're interested in speeding up
>>> releases the best place to start would be by learning some internals.
>>> The issues that usually keep things from shipping is that a test is
>>> randomly failing or there's a bug waiting to be fixed.
>> 
>> Right, but that's not the case now, is it? So I would like to help out
>> with all the non-internals and chasing after other committers to fix
>> up the bugs, as that seems an area that's currently understaffed.
>> 
>> Which doesn't mean that maybe I won't get into the internals at some
>> point, but I think doing the other things could be valuable to, and
>> the project needs more of it.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Dirkjan
>> 
> 
> I haven't run through prepping the 1.1.x branch for a release, but
> 1.0.3 is being held up because I've sen the 090 and 140 etap tests
> fail and no one (me included) has felt like fixing them yet.

This is the first time I hear of this (I'm a little behind on JIRA),
is there a ticket for this? What system specs do you have where you
see the errors?

Cheers
Jan
-- 




Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman  wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:08, Paul Davis  wrote:
>> Like Jan says, it'd be awesome to have more people familiar with the
>> release procedure. Although if you're interested in speeding up
>> releases the best place to start would be by learning some internals.
>> The issues that usually keep things from shipping is that a test is
>> randomly failing or there's a bug waiting to be fixed.
>
> Right, but that's not the case now, is it? So I would like to help out
> with all the non-internals and chasing after other committers to fix
> up the bugs, as that seems an area that's currently understaffed.
>
> Which doesn't mean that maybe I won't get into the internals at some
> point, but I think doing the other things could be valuable to, and
> the project needs more of it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>

Also, that's not meant to discourage from getting involved with RM. I
think you're quite right that we need more people focusing on those
aspects. I was just responding about the desire to have quicker
releases.


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman  wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:08, Paul Davis  wrote:
>> Like Jan says, it'd be awesome to have more people familiar with the
>> release procedure. Although if you're interested in speeding up
>> releases the best place to start would be by learning some internals.
>> The issues that usually keep things from shipping is that a test is
>> randomly failing or there's a bug waiting to be fixed.
>
> Right, but that's not the case now, is it? So I would like to help out
> with all the non-internals and chasing after other committers to fix
> up the bugs, as that seems an area that's currently understaffed.
>
> Which doesn't mean that maybe I won't get into the internals at some
> point, but I think doing the other things could be valuable to, and
> the project needs more of it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>

I haven't run through prepping the 1.1.x branch for a release, but
1.0.3 is being held up because I've sen the 090 and 140 etap tests
fail and no one (me included) has felt like fixing them yet.


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:08, Paul Davis  wrote:
> Like Jan says, it'd be awesome to have more people familiar with the
> release procedure. Although if you're interested in speeding up
> releases the best place to start would be by learning some internals.
> The issues that usually keep things from shipping is that a test is
> randomly failing or there's a bug waiting to be fixed.

Right, but that's not the case now, is it? So I would like to help out
with all the non-internals and chasing after other committers to fix
up the bugs, as that seems an area that's currently understaffed.

Which doesn't mean that maybe I won't get into the internals at some
point, but I think doing the other things could be valuable to, and
the project needs more of it.

Cheers,

Dirkjan


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Paul Davis
Like Jan says, it'd be awesome to have more people familiar with the
release procedure. Although if you're interested in speeding up
releases the best place to start would be by learning some internals.
The issues that usually keep things from shipping is that a test is
randomly failing or there's a bug waiting to be fixed.

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt  wrote:
> Dirkjan,
>
> thanks for your offer, I think it is a great idea to add more helping
> hands to the release process.
>
> The first stop for making a release is 
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_procedure
>
> In general, you should be able to build and test CouchDB from source
> and be comfortable with the troubleshooting of issues, but I know
> you are :)
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
> On 10 May 2011, at 09:25, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Since I note that the release process for 1.1 seems to have been
>> stalled again, I wonder if there was stuff I could do. I'd be happy to
>> join the RM team to help Apache CouchDB provide more timely releases
>> so that companies like mine can benefit sooner from the latest fruits
>> of the committers.
>>
>> Please let me know how I would go about learning all the stuff I need
>> to know (and hopefully at some point keys to the required infra).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dirkjan
>
>


Re: Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Dirkjan,

thanks for your offer, I think it is a great idea to add more helping
hands to the release process.

The first stop for making a release is 
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Release_procedure

In general, you should be able to build and test CouchDB from source 
and be comfortable with the troubleshooting of issues, but I know 
you are :)

Cheers
Jan
-- 


On 10 May 2011, at 09:25, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> Since I note that the release process for 1.1 seems to have been
> stalled again, I wonder if there was stuff I could do. I'd be happy to
> join the RM team to help Apache CouchDB provide more timely releases
> so that companies like mine can benefit sooner from the latest fruits
> of the committers.
> 
> Please let me know how I would go about learning all the stuff I need
> to know (and hopefully at some point keys to the required infra).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dirkjan



Helping out with releases

2011-05-10 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
Hi there,

Since I note that the release process for 1.1 seems to have been
stalled again, I wonder if there was stuff I could do. I'd be happy to
join the RM team to help Apache CouchDB provide more timely releases
so that companies like mine can benefit sooner from the latest fruits
of the committers.

Please let me know how I would go about learning all the stuff I need
to know (and hopefully at some point keys to the required infra).

Cheers,

Dirkjan