Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > have previous releases shipped with these mochiweb bugs? Not mochiweb, ibrowse :) Maybe, but I think some parts of ibrowse were rewritten for release 2.0.0. > > I'm a bit equivocal on whether we should hold 1.0.2 up for these now. > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Filipe David Manana > wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Filipe David Manana >> wrote: >>> I'm now -1 on it until Ibrowse issue >>> https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues#issue/24 is fixed. It >>> affects push replications only. >>> However a new Ibrowse release is going to be made very soon (today or >>> tomorrow), perhaps with that exact patch. So should be pretty quick. >> >> Now there are 2 more: >> https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/pull/25 >> https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/pull/26 >> >> Both affect fetching attachments during pull replications. >> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Randall Leeds >>> wrote: +1 on getting this release out the door. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:56, till wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Filipe David Manana > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: >>> Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever >>> happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? >>> >>> I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x >>> feature? >> >> Till, >> >> I think that is planned to go into 1.2. Afaik, there are no plans to >> add more new features to 1.1.x. > > OK, good to know! > > Anyway, my two cents: I'd like the patch for the futon bug to be applied. > > Less bugs = better release (my super-duper rule of thumb =)) > > Till > >> >>> >>> Till >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Filipe David Manana, >> fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org >> >> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. >> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. >> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Filipe David Manana, >>> fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org >>> >>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. >>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. >>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Filipe David Manana, >> fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org >> >> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. >> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. >> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >> > -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
have previous releases shipped with these mochiweb bugs? I'm a bit equivocal on whether we should hold 1.0.2 up for these now. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Filipe David Manana > wrote: >> I'm now -1 on it until Ibrowse issue >> https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues#issue/24 is fixed. It >> affects push replications only. >> However a new Ibrowse release is going to be made very soon (today or >> tomorrow), perhaps with that exact patch. So should be pretty quick. > > Now there are 2 more: > https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/pull/25 > https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/pull/26 > > Both affect fetching attachments during pull replications. > >> >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Randall Leeds >> wrote: >>> +1 on getting this release out the door. >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:56, till wrote: On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: >> Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever >> happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? >> >> I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x >> feature? > > Till, > > I think that is planned to go into 1.2. Afaik, there are no plans to > add more new features to 1.1.x. OK, good to know! Anyway, my two cents: I'd like the patch for the futon bug to be applied. Less bugs = better release (my super-duper rule of thumb =)) Till > >> >> Till >> > > > > -- > Filipe David Manana, > fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Filipe David Manana, >> fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org >> >> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. >> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. >> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >> > > > > -- > Filipe David Manana, > fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > I'm now -1 on it until Ibrowse issue > https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues#issue/24 is fixed. It > affects push replications only. > However a new Ibrowse release is going to be made very soon (today or > tomorrow), perhaps with that exact patch. So should be pretty quick. Now there are 2 more: https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/pull/25 https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/pull/26 Both affect fetching attachments during pull replications. > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: >> +1 on getting this release out the door. >> >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:56, till wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Filipe David Manana >>> wrote: On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: > Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever > happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? > > I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x > feature? Till, I think that is planned to go into 1.2. Afaik, there are no plans to add more new features to 1.1.x. >>> >>> OK, good to know! >>> >>> Anyway, my two cents: I'd like the patch for the futon bug to be applied. >>> >>> Less bugs = better release (my super-duper rule of thumb =)) >>> >>> Till >>> > > Till > -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >>> >> > > > > -- > Filipe David Manana, > fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." > -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
I'm now -1 on it until Ibrowse issue https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues#issue/24 is fixed. It affects push replications only. However a new Ibrowse release is going to be made very soon (today or tomorrow), perhaps with that exact patch. So should be pretty quick. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > +1 on getting this release out the door. > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:56, till wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Filipe David Manana >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x feature? >>> >>> Till, >>> >>> I think that is planned to go into 1.2. Afaik, there are no plans to >>> add more new features to 1.1.x. >> >> OK, good to know! >> >> Anyway, my two cents: I'd like the patch for the futon bug to be applied. >> >> Less bugs = better release (my super-duper rule of thumb =)) >> >> Till >> >>> Till >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Filipe David Manana, >>> fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org >>> >>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. >>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. >>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >>> >> > -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
+1 on getting this release out the door. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:56, till wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Filipe David Manana > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: >>> Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever >>> happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? >>> >>> I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x feature? >> >> Till, >> >> I think that is planned to go into 1.2. Afaik, there are no plans to >> add more new features to 1.1.x. > > OK, good to know! > > Anyway, my two cents: I'd like the patch for the futon bug to be applied. > > Less bugs = better release (my super-duper rule of thumb =)) > > Till > >> >>> >>> Till >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Filipe David Manana, >> fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org >> >> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. >> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. >> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >> >
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: >> Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever >> happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? >> >> I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x feature? > > Till, > > I think that is planned to go into 1.2. Afaik, there are no plans to > add more new features to 1.1.x. OK, good to know! Anyway, my two cents: I'd like the patch for the futon bug to be applied. Less bugs = better release (my super-duper rule of thumb =)) Till > >> >> Till >> > > > > -- > Filipe David Manana, > fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: > Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever > happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? > > I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x feature? Till, I think that is planned to go into 1.2. Afaik, there are no plans to add more new features to 1.1.x. > > Till > -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:15, till wrote: > Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever > happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? > > I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x feature? IIRC it was slated for 1.2. Cheers, Dirkjan
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Davis > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:09 AM, till wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis >>> wrote: Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998 >>> >>> Just curious -- why is the patch attached not applied? >>> >>> Till >>> >> >> I reckon it's because no one that knows JavaScript has reviewed it to >> decide if it should be applied. >> > > I answered to the ticket. If I read correctly the futon code, the > patch is OK. Can't commit from this machine so I will let you do the > final step :) > > - benoit > Thanks, Benoit! Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x feature? Till
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:09 AM, till wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis >> wrote: >>> Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that >>> COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. >>> Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm >>> inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. >>> >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998 >>> >> >> Just curious -- why is the patch attached not applied? >> >> Till >> > > I reckon it's because no one that knows JavaScript has reviewed it to > decide if it should be applied. > I answered to the ticket. If I read correctly the futon code, the patch is OK. Can't commit from this machine so I will let you do the final step :) - benoit
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:09 AM, till wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis > wrote: >> Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that >> COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. >> Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm >> inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998 >> > > Just curious -- why is the patch attached not applied? > > Till > I reckon it's because no one that knows JavaScript has reviewed it to decide if it should be applied.
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
Ok to me. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Paul Davis wrote: > Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that > COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. > Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm > inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998 > -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:09 AM, till wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis > wrote: >> Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that >> COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. >> Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm >> inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998 >> > > Just curious -- why is the patch attached not applied? > > Till > I'm pretty sure it doesn't work in all cases. I think a encode(decode(..)) may be better. - benoit
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis wrote: > Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that > COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. > Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm > inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998 > Just curious -- why is the patch attached not applied? Till
Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis wrote: > Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that > COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. > Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm > inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998 > I don't see this issue as a blocker for 1.0.2 . +1 for the release. - benoît
Preparing 1.0.2 release.
Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998
