Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?
+1 Sergey On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was released 18 months ago. Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central, but that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support. (Almost 50% are on 2.6.x already. Great to see people updating and keeping current.) Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8 (almost 75% were for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating on the 2.4.x line (which is concerning due to the security implications) or if they are updating, they are moving to the more recent branches. Thoughts? -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?
+1 from me. Colm. On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming… > > Jeff > > On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss > whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was > released 18 months ago. > > > > Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central, > but that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support. (Almost > 50% are on 2.6.x already. Great to see people updating and keeping > current.) Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8 > (almost 75% were for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating > on the 2.4.x line (which is concerning due to the security implications) or > if they are updating, they are moving to the more recent branches. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?
I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming… Jeff On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss whether > we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was released 18 > months ago. > > Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central, but > that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support. (Almost 50% > are on 2.6.x already. Great to see people updating and keeping current.) > Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8 (almost 75% were > for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating on the 2.4.x line > (which is concerning due to the security implications) or if they are > updating, they are moving to the more recent branches. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >
[DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?
With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was released 18 months ago. Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central, but that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support. (Almost 50% are on 2.6.x already. Great to see people updating and keeping current.) Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8 (almost 75% were for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating on the 2.4.x line (which is concerning due to the security implications) or if they are updating, they are moving to the more recent branches. Thoughts? -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
