Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?

2012-10-10 Thread Sergey Beryozkin

+1

Sergey


On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulpdk...@apache.org  wrote:


With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss

whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line.   2.4.0 was
released 18 months ago.


Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central,

but that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support.   (Almost
50% are on 2.6.x already.  Great to see people updating and keeping
current.) Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8
  (almost 75% were for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating
on the 2.4.x line (which is concerning due to the security implications) or
if they are updating, they are moving to the more recent branches.


Thoughts?

--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com










--
Sergey Beryozkin

Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/

Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com


Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?

2012-10-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1 from me.

Colm.

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jeff Genender jgenen...@apache.org wrote:

 I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming…

 Jeff

 On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:

  With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss
 whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line.   2.4.0 was
 released 18 months ago.
 
  Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central,
 but that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support.   (Almost
 50% are on 2.6.x already.  Great to see people updating and keeping
 current.) Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8
  (almost 75% were for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating
 on the 2.4.x line (which is concerning due to the security implications) or
 if they are updating, they are moving to the more recent branches.
 
  Thoughts?
 
  --
  Daniel Kulp
  dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
  Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
 




-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com


Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?

2012-10-06 Thread Jeff Genender
I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming…

Jeff

On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:

 With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss whether 
 we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line.   2.4.0 was released 18 
 months ago.
 
 Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central, but 
 that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't support.   (Almost 50% 
 are on 2.6.x already.  Great to see people updating and keeping current.) 
 Of the 12%, less than 10% of those were for 2.4.9 and 2.4.8  (almost 75% were 
 for 2.4.4 and lower) which shows very few people updating on the 2.4.x line 
 (which is concerning due to the security implications) or if they are 
 updating, they are moving to the more recent branches.
 
 Thoughts?
 
 -- 
 Daniel Kulp
 dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
 Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com