Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
+1 I checked: * all developer tests pass (test, it:test) * all ibm compatibility tests pass for all known schemas * includes all the portable ones at github DFDLSchemas, and a few other non-public schemas * all known schemas pass daffodil tests - excepting vcard - which is a known documented regression * This includes testing the user-defined-functions feature, which is used by one non-public DFDL schema * examples like the java API "helloworld" example pass their tests. * Release notes page looks good. * Scaladoc/javadoc looks good. From: Steve Lawrence Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 10:21 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 +1 I checked: [OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct [OK] signature of git tag is correct [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file) [OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE LANG) [OK] jars in helper binaries and the repository are exactly the same [OK] jars built from source are exactly the same as helper binary jars [OK] src, binaries, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE [OK] RAT check passes [OK] no unexpected binaries in source [OK] distributed dependencies in helper binaries are same as from maven [OK] rpm and msi install and run with basic usage [OK] ~60 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests [OK] No issues found in JavaDoc and ScalaDoc On 5/17/21 9:55 AM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote: > +1 > > I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my laptop): > > [OK] rpm installs correctly on Fedora Workstation 34 > > [OK] some daffodil CLI commands work (generate c, test on runtime2 examples) > > [OK] signature of git tag is correct > > [OK] hash and signature of each download is correct > > [OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER > > [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file) > > [OK] no unexpected binaries in source > > [OK] source compiles and all tests pass > > [OK] RAT check passes > > [OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars > > John > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Lawrence > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 > > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found > at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to > slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here: > > https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2. > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0: > > https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, > 17 May 2021, 4pm EST). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
+1 I checked [OK] RPM installs and runs as expected on CentOS 8 [OK] Signatures and hashes for RPM and source are correct [OK] Correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in src, RPM, JAR files [OK] Source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file) [OK] No unexpected binaries in source [OK] Source compiles and all tests pass [OK] RAT check passes Josh From: Steve Lawrence Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 10:21 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 +1 I checked: [OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct [OK] signature of git tag is correct [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file) [OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE LANG) [OK] jars in helper binaries and the repository are exactly the same [OK] jars built from source are exactly the same as helper binary jars [OK] src, binaries, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE [OK] RAT check passes [OK] no unexpected binaries in source [OK] distributed dependencies in helper binaries are same as from maven [OK] rpm and msi install and run with basic usage [OK] ~60 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests [OK] No issues found in JavaDoc and ScalaDoc On 5/17/21 9:55 AM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote: > +1 > > I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my laptop): > > [OK] rpm installs correctly on Fedora Workstation 34 > > [OK] some daffodil CLI commands work (generate c, test on runtime2 examples) > > [OK] signature of git tag is correct > > [OK] hash and signature of each download is correct > > [OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER > > [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file) > > [OK] no unexpected binaries in source > > [OK] source compiles and all tests pass > > [OK] RAT check passes > > [OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars > > John > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Lawrence > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 > > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found > at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to > slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here: > > https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2. > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0: > > https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, > 17 May 2021, 4pm EST). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
+1 I checked: [OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct [OK] signature of git tag is correct [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file) [OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE LANG) [OK] jars in helper binaries and the repository are exactly the same [OK] jars built from source are exactly the same as helper binary jars [OK] src, binaries, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE [OK] RAT check passes [OK] no unexpected binaries in source [OK] distributed dependencies in helper binaries are same as from maven [OK] rpm and msi install and run with basic usage [OK] ~60 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests [OK] No issues found in JavaDoc and ScalaDoc On 5/17/21 9:55 AM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote: > +1 > > I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my laptop): > > [OK] rpm installs correctly on Fedora Workstation 34 > > [OK] some daffodil CLI commands work (generate c, test on runtime2 examples) > > [OK] signature of git tag is correct > > [OK] hash and signature of each download is correct > > [OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER > > [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file) > > [OK] no unexpected binaries in source > > [OK] source compiles and all tests pass > > [OK] RAT check passes > > [OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars > > John > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Lawrence > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 > > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found > at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to > slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here: > > https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2. > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0: > > https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, > 17 May 2021, 4pm EST). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
+1 I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my laptop): [OK] rpm installs correctly on Fedora Workstation 34 [OK] some daffodil CLI commands work (generate c, test on runtime2 examples) [OK] signature of git tag is correct [OK] hash and signature of each download is correct [OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file) [OK] no unexpected binaries in source [OK] source compiles and all tests pass [OK] RAT check passes [OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars John -Original Message- From: Steve Lawrence Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2. All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/ Staging artifacts can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/ This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here: https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2. For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0: https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0 For a summary of the changes in this release, see: https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/ Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST). [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
