Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?

2021-02-26 Thread Steve Lawrence
Everything was resolved with infra and the PR for this has been merged
into the new repo. You can now run the following to generate a template
for a new DFDL schema project:

  sbt new apache/daffodil-schema.g8

- Steve

On 2/25/21 1:18 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
> I asked INFRA because I saw that the basic tooling doesn't support it.
> 
> If it's not something easy for them I suggest we should not bother with this, 
> just put it on github/OpenDFDL with ASL license as now.
> 
> 
> 
> From: Steve Lawrence 
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 1:12 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
> 
> Is it possible that the github mirror the .git extension is removed? For
> example, our daffodil repo isn't daffodil.git. We don't really care what
> the gitbox repo name is.
> 
> I'd also like to give a chance for others to provide input before we
> bother infra with this in case a better name is determined, or if
> there's a valid objection.
> 
> On 2/25/21 12:58 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
>> I have an INFRA ticket requesting this. We'll see if they can do this for us.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21478
>> 
>> From: Beckerle, Mike 
>> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:54 PM
>> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
>> Subject: Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
>>
>> To get a repository created with this ".g8" extension will require an INFRA 
>> ticket.
>> The GUI for creating a new Apache repo just takes a name like "schema" and 
>> creates a repo named "daffodil-schema.git" from it.
>> ____
>> From: Steve Lawrence 
>> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:44 PM
>> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
>> Subject: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
>>
>>
>> The below relates to DAFFODIL-2144:
>>
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2144
>>
>> On github.com/OpenDFDL, there is a repository called
>> "dfdl-project-layout.g8". This repository is a Giter8 [1] template repo
>> that makes it easier for users to create a new schema that follows the
>> standard project layout for developing schemas with Daffodil, as
>> described here:
>>
>>   https://daffodil.apache.org/dfdl-layout/
>>
>> With this template repo, users can run the following command to generate
>> a standard project layout for a new format:
>>
>>   sbt new OpenDFDL/dfdl-project-layout.g8
>>
>> This will ask a couple questions and then generate files/dirs based on
>> the template in the repo. This is very convenient for users to quickly
>> start with Daffodil schema development.
>>
>> However, since this project is so closely related to Daffodil, and since
>> it can all be contributed as ALv2, that I think it makes more sense to
>> move the template to a repository on ASF infrastructure. A Giter8
>> template repo has some requirements though:
>>
>> 1) It be in its own repository
>> 2) The repository name ends .g8
>> 3) The repository is hosted on GitHub
>>
>> Requirements 1 and 2 mean we cannot use the existing daffodil repo, so a
>> new repo is required. We can very easily create a new repo on Apache
>> infrastructure with GitBox to meet those requirments, and  GitBox will
>> mirror it to GitHub to meet the third requirement.
>>
>> So questions are:
>>
>> 1) Are there any objections to moving this to Apache infrastructure?
>>
>> 2) Assuming no objections, what should the name of this new repo be? I
>> was thinking something simple like "daffodil-schema.g8" might be a good
>> candidate. It's short and easy to remember, and it reads nicely when
>> considering that the command to use it would look like
>>
>>   sbt new apache/daffodil-schema.g8
>>
>> But I'm open to other suggestions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Steve
>>
>> [1] http://www.foundweekends.org/giter8/
>>
> 
> 



Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?

2021-02-25 Thread Steve Lawrence
For those interested, I've created a new pull request so that we can see
what this would look like:

  https://github.com/apache/daffodil-schema.g8/pull/1

If you want to test it out, you can run the command:

  sbt new stevedlawrence/daffodil-schema.g8

- Steve

On 2/25/21 1:18 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
> I asked INFRA because I saw that the basic tooling doesn't support it.
> 
> If it's not something easy for them I suggest we should not bother with this, 
> just put it on github/OpenDFDL with ASL license as now.
> 
> 
> 
> From: Steve Lawrence 
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 1:12 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
> 
> Is it possible that the github mirror the .git extension is removed? For
> example, our daffodil repo isn't daffodil.git. We don't really care what
> the gitbox repo name is.
> 
> I'd also like to give a chance for others to provide input before we
> bother infra with this in case a better name is determined, or if
> there's a valid objection.
> 
> On 2/25/21 12:58 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
>> I have an INFRA ticket requesting this. We'll see if they can do this for us.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21478
>> 
>> From: Beckerle, Mike 
>> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:54 PM
>> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
>> Subject: Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
>>
>> To get a repository created with this ".g8" extension will require an INFRA 
>> ticket.
>> The GUI for creating a new Apache repo just takes a name like "schema" and 
>> creates a repo named "daffodil-schema.git" from it.
>> ____
>> From: Steve Lawrence 
>> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:44 PM
>> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
>> Subject: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
>>
>>
>> The below relates to DAFFODIL-2144:
>>
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2144
>>
>> On github.com/OpenDFDL, there is a repository called
>> "dfdl-project-layout.g8". This repository is a Giter8 [1] template repo
>> that makes it easier for users to create a new schema that follows the
>> standard project layout for developing schemas with Daffodil, as
>> described here:
>>
>>   https://daffodil.apache.org/dfdl-layout/
>>
>> With this template repo, users can run the following command to generate
>> a standard project layout for a new format:
>>
>>   sbt new OpenDFDL/dfdl-project-layout.g8
>>
>> This will ask a couple questions and then generate files/dirs based on
>> the template in the repo. This is very convenient for users to quickly
>> start with Daffodil schema development.
>>
>> However, since this project is so closely related to Daffodil, and since
>> it can all be contributed as ALv2, that I think it makes more sense to
>> move the template to a repository on ASF infrastructure. A Giter8
>> template repo has some requirements though:
>>
>> 1) It be in its own repository
>> 2) The repository name ends .g8
>> 3) The repository is hosted on GitHub
>>
>> Requirements 1 and 2 mean we cannot use the existing daffodil repo, so a
>> new repo is required. We can very easily create a new repo on Apache
>> infrastructure with GitBox to meet those requirments, and  GitBox will
>> mirror it to GitHub to meet the third requirement.
>>
>> So questions are:
>>
>> 1) Are there any objections to moving this to Apache infrastructure?
>>
>> 2) Assuming no objections, what should the name of this new repo be? I
>> was thinking something simple like "daffodil-schema.g8" might be a good
>> candidate. It's short and easy to remember, and it reads nicely when
>> considering that the command to use it would look like
>>
>>   sbt new apache/daffodil-schema.g8
>>
>> But I'm open to other suggestions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Steve
>>
>> [1] http://www.foundweekends.org/giter8/
>>
> 
> 



Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?

2021-02-25 Thread Beckerle, Mike
I asked INFRA because I saw that the basic tooling doesn't support it.

If it's not something easy for them I suggest we should not bother with this, 
just put it on github/OpenDFDL with ASL license as now.



From: Steve Lawrence 
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 1:12 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
Subject: Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?

Is it possible that the github mirror the .git extension is removed? For
example, our daffodil repo isn't daffodil.git. We don't really care what
the gitbox repo name is.

I'd also like to give a chance for others to provide input before we
bother infra with this in case a better name is determined, or if
there's a valid objection.

On 2/25/21 12:58 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
> I have an INFRA ticket requesting this. We'll see if they can do this for us.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21478
> 
> From: Beckerle, Mike 
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:54 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
>
> To get a repository created with this ".g8" extension will require an INFRA 
> ticket.
> The GUI for creating a new Apache repo just takes a name like "schema" and 
> creates a repo named "daffodil-schema.git" from it.
> 
> From: Steve Lawrence 
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:44 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
> Subject: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
>
>
> The below relates to DAFFODIL-2144:
>
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2144
>
> On github.com/OpenDFDL, there is a repository called
> "dfdl-project-layout.g8". This repository is a Giter8 [1] template repo
> that makes it easier for users to create a new schema that follows the
> standard project layout for developing schemas with Daffodil, as
> described here:
>
>   https://daffodil.apache.org/dfdl-layout/
>
> With this template repo, users can run the following command to generate
> a standard project layout for a new format:
>
>   sbt new OpenDFDL/dfdl-project-layout.g8
>
> This will ask a couple questions and then generate files/dirs based on
> the template in the repo. This is very convenient for users to quickly
> start with Daffodil schema development.
>
> However, since this project is so closely related to Daffodil, and since
> it can all be contributed as ALv2, that I think it makes more sense to
> move the template to a repository on ASF infrastructure. A Giter8
> template repo has some requirements though:
>
> 1) It be in its own repository
> 2) The repository name ends .g8
> 3) The repository is hosted on GitHub
>
> Requirements 1 and 2 mean we cannot use the existing daffodil repo, so a
> new repo is required. We can very easily create a new repo on Apache
> infrastructure with GitBox to meet those requirments, and  GitBox will
> mirror it to GitHub to meet the third requirement.
>
> So questions are:
>
> 1) Are there any objections to moving this to Apache infrastructure?
>
> 2) Assuming no objections, what should the name of this new repo be? I
> was thinking something simple like "daffodil-schema.g8" might be a good
> candidate. It's short and easy to remember, and it reads nicely when
> considering that the command to use it would look like
>
>   sbt new apache/daffodil-schema.g8
>
> But I'm open to other suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
> [1] http://www.foundweekends.org/giter8/
>



Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?

2021-02-25 Thread Steve Lawrence
Is it possible that the github mirror the .git extension is removed? For
example, our daffodil repo isn't daffodil.git. We don't really care what
the gitbox repo name is.

I'd also like to give a chance for others to provide input before we
bother infra with this in case a better name is determined, or if
there's a valid objection.

On 2/25/21 12:58 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
> I have an INFRA ticket requesting this. We'll see if they can do this for us.
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21478
> 
> From: Beckerle, Mike 
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:54 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
> 
> To get a repository created with this ".g8" extension will require an INFRA 
> ticket.
> The GUI for creating a new Apache repo just takes a name like "schema" and 
> creates a repo named "daffodil-schema.git" from it.
> 
> From: Steve Lawrence 
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:44 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
> Subject: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?
> 
> 
> The below relates to DAFFODIL-2144:
> 
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2144
> 
> On github.com/OpenDFDL, there is a repository called
> "dfdl-project-layout.g8". This repository is a Giter8 [1] template repo
> that makes it easier for users to create a new schema that follows the
> standard project layout for developing schemas with Daffodil, as
> described here:
> 
>   https://daffodil.apache.org/dfdl-layout/
> 
> With this template repo, users can run the following command to generate
> a standard project layout for a new format:
> 
>   sbt new OpenDFDL/dfdl-project-layout.g8
> 
> This will ask a couple questions and then generate files/dirs based on
> the template in the repo. This is very convenient for users to quickly
> start with Daffodil schema development.
> 
> However, since this project is so closely related to Daffodil, and since
> it can all be contributed as ALv2, that I think it makes more sense to
> move the template to a repository on ASF infrastructure. A Giter8
> template repo has some requirements though:
> 
> 1) It be in its own repository
> 2) The repository name ends .g8
> 3) The repository is hosted on GitHub
> 
> Requirements 1 and 2 mean we cannot use the existing daffodil repo, so a
> new repo is required. We can very easily create a new repo on Apache
> infrastructure with GitBox to meet those requirments, and  GitBox will
> mirror it to GitHub to meet the third requirement.
> 
> So questions are:
> 
> 1) Are there any objections to moving this to Apache infrastructure?
> 
> 2) Assuming no objections, what should the name of this new repo be? I
> was thinking something simple like "daffodil-schema.g8" might be a good
> candidate. It's short and easy to remember, and it reads nicely when
> considering that the command to use it would look like
> 
>   sbt new apache/daffodil-schema.g8
> 
> But I'm open to other suggestions.
> 
> Thanks,
> - Steve
> 
> [1] http://www.foundweekends.org/giter8/
> 



Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?

2021-02-25 Thread Beckerle, Mike
I have an INFRA ticket requesting this. We'll see if they can do this for us.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21478

From: Beckerle, Mike 
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:54 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
Subject: Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?

To get a repository created with this ".g8" extension will require an INFRA 
ticket.
The GUI for creating a new Apache repo just takes a name like "schema" and 
creates a repo named "daffodil-schema.git" from it.

From: Steve Lawrence 
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:44 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
Subject: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?


The below relates to DAFFODIL-2144:

  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2144

On github.com/OpenDFDL, there is a repository called
"dfdl-project-layout.g8". This repository is a Giter8 [1] template repo
that makes it easier for users to create a new schema that follows the
standard project layout for developing schemas with Daffodil, as
described here:

  https://daffodil.apache.org/dfdl-layout/

With this template repo, users can run the following command to generate
a standard project layout for a new format:

  sbt new OpenDFDL/dfdl-project-layout.g8

This will ask a couple questions and then generate files/dirs based on
the template in the repo. This is very convenient for users to quickly
start with Daffodil schema development.

However, since this project is so closely related to Daffodil, and since
it can all be contributed as ALv2, that I think it makes more sense to
move the template to a repository on ASF infrastructure. A Giter8
template repo has some requirements though:

1) It be in its own repository
2) The repository name ends .g8
3) The repository is hosted on GitHub

Requirements 1 and 2 mean we cannot use the existing daffodil repo, so a
new repo is required. We can very easily create a new repo on Apache
infrastructure with GitBox to meet those requirments, and  GitBox will
mirror it to GitHub to meet the third requirement.

So questions are:

1) Are there any objections to moving this to Apache infrastructure?

2) Assuming no objections, what should the name of this new repo be? I
was thinking something simple like "daffodil-schema.g8" might be a good
candidate. It's short and easy to remember, and it reads nicely when
considering that the command to use it would look like

  sbt new apache/daffodil-schema.g8

But I'm open to other suggestions.

Thanks,
- Steve

[1] http://www.foundweekends.org/giter8/


Re: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?

2021-02-25 Thread Beckerle, Mike
To get a repository created with this ".g8" extension will require an INFRA 
ticket.
The GUI for creating a new Apache repo just takes a name like "schema" and 
creates a repo named "daffodil-schema.git" from it.

From: Steve Lawrence 
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 12:44 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org 
Subject: New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?


The below relates to DAFFODIL-2144:

  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2144

On github.com/OpenDFDL, there is a repository called
"dfdl-project-layout.g8". This repository is a Giter8 [1] template repo
that makes it easier for users to create a new schema that follows the
standard project layout for developing schemas with Daffodil, as
described here:

  https://daffodil.apache.org/dfdl-layout/

With this template repo, users can run the following command to generate
a standard project layout for a new format:

  sbt new OpenDFDL/dfdl-project-layout.g8

This will ask a couple questions and then generate files/dirs based on
the template in the repo. This is very convenient for users to quickly
start with Daffodil schema development.

However, since this project is so closely related to Daffodil, and since
it can all be contributed as ALv2, that I think it makes more sense to
move the template to a repository on ASF infrastructure. A Giter8
template repo has some requirements though:

1) It be in its own repository
2) The repository name ends .g8
3) The repository is hosted on GitHub

Requirements 1 and 2 mean we cannot use the existing daffodil repo, so a
new repo is required. We can very easily create a new repo on Apache
infrastructure with GitBox to meet those requirments, and  GitBox will
mirror it to GitHub to meet the third requirement.

So questions are:

1) Are there any objections to moving this to Apache infrastructure?

2) Assuming no objections, what should the name of this new repo be? I
was thinking something simple like "daffodil-schema.g8" might be a good
candidate. It's short and easy to remember, and it reads nicely when
considering that the command to use it would look like

  sbt new apache/daffodil-schema.g8

But I'm open to other suggestions.

Thanks,
- Steve

[1] http://www.foundweekends.org/giter8/


New Repository for Daffodil Schema Template?

2021-02-25 Thread Steve Lawrence


The below relates to DAFFODIL-2144:

  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2144

On github.com/OpenDFDL, there is a repository called
"dfdl-project-layout.g8". This repository is a Giter8 [1] template repo
that makes it easier for users to create a new schema that follows the
standard project layout for developing schemas with Daffodil, as
described here:

  https://daffodil.apache.org/dfdl-layout/

With this template repo, users can run the following command to generate
a standard project layout for a new format:

  sbt new OpenDFDL/dfdl-project-layout.g8

This will ask a couple questions and then generate files/dirs based on
the template in the repo. This is very convenient for users to quickly
start with Daffodil schema development.

However, since this project is so closely related to Daffodil, and since
it can all be contributed as ALv2, that I think it makes more sense to
move the template to a repository on ASF infrastructure. A Giter8
template repo has some requirements though:

1) It be in its own repository
2) The repository name ends .g8
3) The repository is hosted on GitHub

Requirements 1 and 2 mean we cannot use the existing daffodil repo, so a
new repo is required. We can very easily create a new repo on Apache
infrastructure with GitBox to meet those requirments, and  GitBox will
mirror it to GitHub to meet the third requirement.

So questions are:

1) Are there any objections to moving this to Apache infrastructure?

2) Assuming no objections, what should the name of this new repo be? I
was thinking something simple like "daffodil-schema.g8" might be a good
candidate. It's short and easy to remember, and it reads nicely when
considering that the command to use it would look like

  sbt new apache/daffodil-schema.g8

But I'm open to other suggestions.

Thanks,
- Steve

[1] http://www.foundweekends.org/giter8/