Re: Go for a Apache Directory Studio 1.5.4 Bugfix Release
On 3/23/11 9:17 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: On 3/23/11 4:37 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: Hi devs, it's almost one year since the last Apache Directory Studio release (1.5.3). I think the 2.0.0 release will take some more time. So I think we should release a 1.5.4 bugfix release in the next future. I browsed the issue list in Jira and there are already some issues marked as fixed for 1.5.4. There are also many bugs reported by users within the last year we should fix. Last not least I also found some issues with MS AD and ADAM I'd like to fix. yes, sure. Or we may also want to eat the Milestone road instead. Like releasing a 2.0.0-M1 instead of a 1.5.4. IMO that are distinct cases. Milestone releases to a 2.0.0 would be good, +1. But the current trunk contains lot of changes. Not all people want to use a milestone to work on productive directory servers. I think a bugfix release of the current stable version makes sense. The thing is that it will depend on a milestone itself (ie, LDAP API 1.0.0-M2, or even M3). This is why I suggested to release a 2.0.0-M1 instead of a 1.5.4. However, it's not a really big deal, IMO. Whatever fits you is ok. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
Re: Go for a Apache Directory Studio 1.5.4 Bugfix Release
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 3/23/11 4:37 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> >> Hi devs, >> >> it's almost one year since the last Apache Directory Studio release >> (1.5.3). >> I think the 2.0.0 release will take some more time. >> >> So I think we should release a 1.5.4 bugfix release in the next future. >> >> I browsed the issue list in Jira and there are already some issues marked >> as >> fixed for 1.5.4. There are also many bugs reported by users within the >> last >> year we should fix. Last not least I also found some issues with MS AD and >> ADAM I'd like to fix. > > yes, sure. Or we may also want to eat the Milestone road instead. Like > releasing a 2.0.0-M1 instead of a 1.5.4. IMO that are distinct cases. Milestone releases to a 2.0.0 would be good, +1. But the current trunk contains lot of changes. Not all people want to use a milestone to work on productive directory servers. I think a bugfix release of the current stable version makes sense. Kind Regards Stefan
Re: isSchemaAware() : ( was: Re: svn commit: r1084531 - in /directory: )
On 3/23/11 4:56 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:41 PM, wrote: o Renamed the isNormalized() method to isSchemaAware() Just a thought ... I know we all started talking in terms of schema awareness but wondering if isSchemaContrained or isSchemaEnabled better describes what's happening isSchemaEnabled is ok too. hasSchema() ? The problem is that it's now months we are talking about schema awareness, and the doco reflects this now. I'm a bit reluctant to change that now... Also note that this is just one method which will not be used frequently, IMO. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
isSchemaAware() : ( was: Re: svn commit: r1084531 - in /directory: )
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:41 PM, wrote: > o Renamed the isNormalized() method to isSchemaAware() > Just a thought ... I know we all started talking in terms of schema awareness but wondering if isSchemaContrained or isSchemaEnabled better describes what's happening here. Thoughts? Regards, Alex
Re: Go for a Apache Directory Studio 1.5.4 Bugfix Release
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 3/23/11 4:37 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > >> Hi devs, >> >> it's almost one year since the last Apache Directory Studio release >> (1.5.3). >> I think the 2.0.0 release will take some more time. >> >> So I think we should release a 1.5.4 bugfix release in the next future. >> >> I browsed the issue list in Jira and there are already some issues marked >> as >> fixed for 1.5.4. There are also many bugs reported by users within the >> last >> year we should fix. Last not least I also found some issues with MS AD and >> ADAM I'd like to fix. >> > > yes, sure. Or we may also want to eat the Milestone road instead. Like > releasing a 2.0.0-M1 instead of a 1.5.4. > > +1 to all points. Alex
Re: Go for a Apache Directory Studio 1.5.4 Bugfix Release
On 3/23/11 4:37 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: Hi devs, it's almost one year since the last Apache Directory Studio release (1.5.3). I think the 2.0.0 release will take some more time. So I think we should release a 1.5.4 bugfix release in the next future. I browsed the issue list in Jira and there are already some issues marked as fixed for 1.5.4. There are also many bugs reported by users within the last year we should fix. Last not least I also found some issues with MS AD and ADAM I'd like to fix. yes, sure. Or we may also want to eat the Milestone road instead. Like releasing a 2.0.0-M1 instead of a 1.5.4. wdyt ? -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
Go for a Apache Directory Studio 1.5.4 Bugfix Release
Hi devs, it's almost one year since the last Apache Directory Studio release (1.5.3). I think the 2.0.0 release will take some more time. So I think we should release a 1.5.4 bugfix release in the next future. I browsed the issue list in Jira and there are already some issues marked as fixed for 1.5.4. There are also many bugs reported by users within the last year we should fix. Last not least I also found some issues with MS AD and ADAM I'd like to fix. Thoughts? Kind Regards Stefan
Re: In memory partition.
The module xdbm-partition has a in-memory partition implementation. Take a look at [1] [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/directory/apacheds/trunk/xdbm-partition/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/partition/impl/avl/AvlPartition.java?view=co HTH On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Guilherme wrote: > Hi. > Someone have a in meory partiton example to send to me. > Thanks. > > -- Kiran Ayyagari
In memory partition.
Hi. Someone have a in meory partiton example to send to me. Thanks.
