I've tested the snapshot, both in a personal project and in Apache ACE, and it
works nicely, so no objections from me.
Greetings, Marcel
On Sep 12, 2013, at 15:50 PM, Jan Willem Janssen janwillem.jans...@luminis.eu
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I think it's time for a new release of the HTTP implementation. Are
there any objections to this? Any urgent issues that *must* be fixed?
- --
Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
+31 631 765 814
/My world is revolving around PulseOn and Amdatu/
Luminis Technologies B.V.
J.C. Wilslaan 29
7313 HK Apeldoorn
+31 88 586 46 30
http://www.luminis-technologies.com
http://www.luminis.eu
KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=L44K
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
