[RESULT][VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.6.0-incubating for release

[Nazeer Shaik]

Hello all,

Voting for Apache Fineract 0.6.0-incubating is now closed. The release has
passed this step of process.

The vote breakdown is as follows:

+1 Nazeer Shaik

+1 Adi Raju

+Myrle  Krantz

+Jim Jagielski *(Binding)*

+1 Markus Geiß

*Total: +5*

Now we are going ahead for vote on the gene...@incubator.apache.org list.
Thank you all for your inputs and votes.

Thanks,

Nazeer

Re: Connecting mifos Android app

[Rajan Maurya]

Hi Christopher,

App code base has changed a lot and working fine.
I have emailed you the latest APK please check and we are going to
release the app very soon on play store.




On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Christopher Stewart <
christopher.mckenzie.stew...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Has anyone managed to connect and use the mifos Android client
> successfully?
>
> I see many posts regarding connection failures and I myself are getting the
> 'there was some issue processing your request' error.
>
> My mifos instance is hosted on an ip address and not domain name. Ex:
> 204.xxx.xxx.xxx/#/ port 80.
>
> The isn't version is 3 and I have the November 2016 version of mifos
> running.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Chris
>
> On Dec 23, 2016 7:48 PM, "Sander van der Heyden" <
> sandervanderhey...@musonisystem.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Adi,
>
> We are wondering whether you had a chance to look at the interest
> calculation excel? We are still unable to reconcile amounts for subsequent
> instalments.
>
> In addition we've also started seeing more problems with loans that are
> prepaid significantly early on in the schedule, unfortunately I cannot test
> this on the demo as the ability to create new loans seems to be broken
> right now.
>
> Thanks,
> Sander van der Heyden
>
>
>
> On 15 December 2016 at 11:16, Sander van der Heyden <
> sandervanderhey...@musonisystem.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Adi,
> >
> > Was wondering if you had seen my previous mail?
> >
> > In addition we've also got an issue when backdating the interest
> > recalculation loans that have compounding on Interest enabled, and use
> the
> > "Same as repayment period" compounding type for interest and principal.
> > This sample loan (https://demo.openmf.org/#/loanaccount/333/disburse)
> cannot
> > be disbursed as a result of an EMI error:
> > *error.msg.loanschedule.emi.amount.must.be.greter.than.interest*, when
> > you disburse with date of 1st of October.
> >
> > If you try to disburse as per 1st of November then it does work fine,
> > which leads me to believe there is an issue in the error handling around
> > compounding for backdated loans. As there are no params on a loan level,
> > that we can adjust to not trigger interest recalculation when disbursing
> > I'm not sure how to get around this one?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sander
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sander van der Heyden
> >
> > CTO Musoni Services
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mobile (NL): +31 (0)6 14239505
> > Skype: s.vdheyden
> > Website: musonisystem.com
> > Follow us on Twitter!  
> > Postal address: Hillegomstraat 12-14, office 0.09, 1058 LS, Amsterdam,
> > The Netherlands
> >
> > On 13 December 2016 at 08:52, Sander van der Heyden <
> > sandervanderhey...@musonisystem.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Adi,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your feedback, but not sure whether we can make this
> >> calculation work, see attached excel using the same logic. It works fine
> >> for working out instalment one, but does leave us with a 0.4 difference
> on
> >> the second instalment compared to today's schedule. Could you let me
> know
> >> where we are going wrong, or whether this is actually a bug?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sander
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12 December 2016 at 06:20, Adi Raju  com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Interest calculation on future dates will be based on the assumption
> >>> that payment has been made up-to-date and assuming no arrears.
> >>> Interest on the unpaid or compounded amount will be calculated and
> >>> provided as part of schedule only till as of that day.
> >>>
> >>> So in the example,
> >>> EMI is due on 1st  Dec and 2nd Jan. No repayment is made as of today
> >>> (12/12).
> >>> So interest calculation will be as follows:
> >>> Interest on compounded amount as of 1 Dec for 11 days (1st to 12th of
> >>> dec)
> >>> Plus
> >>> Interest on amount as per original schedule for 21 days (13th dec to
> 2nd
> >>> of jan)
> >>>
> >>> As and when interest recalculation job runs every day, interest will be
> >>> revised to include calculations as of that day.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Adi Raju
> >>>
> >>> Principal Architect, Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd
> >>> Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block,
> >>> Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any
> >>> files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the sole
> use
> >>> of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you are not the
> >>> intended recipient, please email: supp...@confluxtechnologies.com and
> >>> destroy/delete all copies and attachment thereto along with the
> original
> >>> message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
> >>> forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in
> >>> reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. The
> >>> recipient acknowledges that Conflux Technologies Private Limited or its
> 

Re: Connecting mifos Android app

[Christopher Stewart]

Hi,

Has anyone managed to connect and use the mifos Android client
successfully?

I see many posts regarding connection failures and I myself are getting the
'there was some issue processing your request' error.

My mifos instance is hosted on an ip address and not domain name. Ex:
204.xxx.xxx.xxx/#/ port 80.

The isn't version is 3 and I have the November 2016 version of mifos
running.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance

Chris

On Dec 23, 2016 7:48 PM, "Sander van der Heyden" <
sandervanderhey...@musonisystem.com> wrote:

Hi Adi,

We are wondering whether you had a chance to look at the interest
calculation excel? We are still unable to reconcile amounts for subsequent
instalments.

In addition we've also started seeing more problems with loans that are
prepaid significantly early on in the schedule, unfortunately I cannot test
this on the demo as the ability to create new loans seems to be broken
right now.

Thanks,
Sander van der Heyden



On 15 December 2016 at 11:16, Sander van der Heyden <
sandervanderhey...@musonisystem.com> wrote:

> Hi Adi,
>
> Was wondering if you had seen my previous mail?
>
> In addition we've also got an issue when backdating the interest
> recalculation loans that have compounding on Interest enabled, and use the
> "Same as repayment period" compounding type for interest and principal.
> This sample loan (https://demo.openmf.org/#/loanaccount/333/disburse)  cannot
> be disbursed as a result of an EMI error:
> *error.msg.loanschedule.emi.amount.must.be.greter.than.interest*, when
> you disburse with date of 1st of October.
>
> If you try to disburse as per 1st of November then it does work fine,
> which leads me to believe there is an issue in the error handling around
> compounding for backdated loans. As there are no params on a loan level,
> that we can adjust to not trigger interest recalculation when disbursing
> I'm not sure how to get around this one?
>
> Thanks,
> Sander
>
>
>
>
> Sander van der Heyden
>
> CTO Musoni Services
>
>
>
>
> Mobile (NL): +31 (0)6 14239505
> Skype: s.vdheyden
> Website: musonisystem.com
> Follow us on Twitter!  
> Postal address: Hillegomstraat 12-14, office 0.09, 1058 LS, Amsterdam,
> The Netherlands
>
> On 13 December 2016 at 08:52, Sander van der Heyden <
> sandervanderhey...@musonisystem.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Adi,
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback, but not sure whether we can make this
>> calculation work, see attached excel using the same logic. It works fine
>> for working out instalment one, but does leave us with a 0.4 difference on
>> the second instalment compared to today's schedule. Could you let me know
>> where we are going wrong, or whether this is actually a bug?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sander
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12 December 2016 at 06:20, Adi Raju 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Interest calculation on future dates will be based on the assumption
>>> that payment has been made up-to-date and assuming no arrears.
>>> Interest on the unpaid or compounded amount will be calculated and
>>> provided as part of schedule only till as of that day.
>>>
>>> So in the example,
>>> EMI is due on 1st  Dec and 2nd Jan. No repayment is made as of today
>>> (12/12).
>>> So interest calculation will be as follows:
>>> Interest on compounded amount as of 1 Dec for 11 days (1st to 12th of
>>> dec)
>>> Plus
>>> Interest on amount as per original schedule for 21 days (13th dec to 2nd
>>> of jan)
>>>
>>> As and when interest recalculation job runs every day, interest will be
>>> revised to include calculations as of that day.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Adi Raju
>>>
>>> Principal Architect, Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd
>>> Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block,
>>> Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>>>
>>>
>>> Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any
>>> files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the sole use
>>> of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you are not the
>>> intended recipient, please email: supp...@confluxtechnologies.com and
>>> destroy/delete all copies and attachment thereto along with the original
>>> message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
>>> forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in
>>> reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. The
>>> recipient acknowledges that Conflux Technologies Private Limited or its
>>> subsidiaries and associated companies are unable to exercise control or
>>> ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information
>>> contained in e-mail transmissions. Before opening any attachments, please
>>> check.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Sander van der Heyden [mailto:sandervanderhey...@musonisystem.com]
>>> Sent: 09 December 2016 22:08
>>> To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
>>> Cc: A good place to start for users or folks new to Mifos.
>>> Subject: Re: Issues in interest recalculation
>>>

RE: [VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.6.0-incubating for release

[Markus Geiß]

+1 

Note: We may should clarify that Apache Fineract is currently only supporting 
MySQL 5.6.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 02:46 PM
To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.6.0-incubating for release

+1 to all.

> On Jan 10, 2017, at 7:39 AM, Myrle Krantz  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> +1
> 
> The build is working
> Signatures are good
> 
> Things we should improve by the next release:
> * Create a branch in git and tag the release changeset before the call 
> to vote is sent out.  In the future I will vote against a release if 
> the changeset it is drawn from is not tagged.
> * Instead of exempting files like uglify.js in the rat configuration, 
> we should add the allowed license text for those licenses. Here's how 
> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-licens
> e.html
> 
> Greets from the Voreifel, Germany,
> Myrle
> 
> 
> 
> *Myrle Krantz*
> Solutions Architect
> RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative
> mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org 
>   
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Adi Raju 
> 
> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Build working
>> Signatures are good
>> Checksums are good
>> Integration tests passing
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Adi Raju
>> 
>> Principal Architect, Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd
>> Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, 
>> Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>> 
>> 
>> Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any 
>> files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the sole 
>> use of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you are not 
>> the intended recipient, please email: supp...@confluxtechnologies.com 
>> and destroy/delete all copies and attachment thereto along with the 
>> original message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, 
>> dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any 
>> action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and is 
>> unlawful. The recipient acknowledges that Conflux Technologies 
>> Private Limited or its subsidiaries and associated companies are 
>> unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity 
>> of/over the contents of the information contained in e-mail 
>> transmissions. Before opening any attachments, please check.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nazeer Shaik [mailto:nazeer1100...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 4:05 PM
>> To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.6.0-incubating for release
>> 
>> Hello Fineract community,
>> 
>> We have created Apache Fineract 0.6.0-incubating release, with the 
>> artifacts below up for a vote.
>> 
>> 
>> *These are the goals of this release:*
>> 
>>   - Address some of the review comments of Apache Fineract
>>   0.5.0-incubating release
>>   - Share the new features & bugs fixes that have been developed so far,
>>   to give the community a good sense of the upcoming 0.6.0 release
>> 
>> *For more information including release notes, please see:*
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/0.
>> 6.0-incubating+Release-+Apache+Fineract
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *** Please download, review and vote by Mon Jan  09, 2017 @ 6pm PST 
>> ***
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *Source & Binary files:*
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/0.
>> 6.0-incubating/
>> 
>> · Source:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/0.
>> 6.0-incubating/apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>> 
>> · Binary/War :
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/0.
>> 6.0-incubating/apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-binary.tar.gz
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *Commit to be voted on:*
>> 
>> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
>> fineract.git;a=commit;h=refs/heads/0.6.0-incubating
>> > fineract.git;a=commit;h=refs/heads/0.6.0-incubating>*
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *Source build verification steps can be found at:*
>> 
>> Refer 'README.md' in apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *Binary Deployment steps can be found at:*
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
>> Fineract+Installation+on+Ubuntu+Server
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:*
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/KEYS
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Note:
>> 
>>   - *Maven repo is not included in place of binary. This will be addressed
>>   in future releases*
>>   - *RAT (Release Audit Tool) is integrated in sub-directory. But it will
>>   check all directories and files  from top level directory. This 
>> will also
>>   be addressed in future releases. We have added steps how to run RAT in
>>   readme.md  file. *
>> 
>> To help in tallying the vote, member

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

[Jim Jagielski]

Agreed.

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 8:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik  wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>> Could our Apache Fineract mentors please provide some guidance on a couple
>> of the areas we need to improve upon:
>> 
>> QU10 "*The project is open and honest about the quality of its code.
>> Various levels of quality and maturity for various modules are natural and
>> acceptable as long as they are clearly communicated." -*
>> 
>> Do you have any other projects you could point to that have strong
>> transparent measures of quality and maturity clearly available We want to
>> follow best practices and adopt similar to display at
>> http://fineract.incubator.apache.org
> 
> Regular deployment of tools like Findbugs is a good indication that you take
> this requirement seriously.
> 
>> *QU30: The project provides a well-documented channel to report security
>> issues, along with a documented way of responding to them.*
>> 
>> Currently we just link to: http://www.apache.org/security/ Are we able to
>> do as other projects at http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html or is
>> a private channel not something we can set up till we're out of
>> incubation.  If we can move forwarde, I'd suggest we have a security page
>> on our site, document and fix known vulnerabilities and then provide clear
>> instruction on reporting vulnerabilities to a private channel like
>> secur...@fineract.incubator..apache.org
> 
> This is less about security@fineract vs.  http://www.apache.org/security/
> and more about the community being ready for when the first 0 day
> hits either of those. Being ready is a combination of tribal knowledge,
> wiki recommendations and a release policy that would allow you to patch
> at a drop of a hat.
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman.

Re: [VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.6.0-incubating for release

[Jim Jagielski]

+1 to all.

> On Jan 10, 2017, at 7:39 AM, Myrle Krantz  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> +1
> 
> The build is working
> Signatures are good
> 
> Things we should improve by the next release:
> * Create a branch in git and tag the release changeset before the call to
> vote is sent out.  In the future I will vote against a release if the
> changeset it is drawn from is not tagged.
> * Instead of exempting files like uglify.js in the rat configuration, we
> should add the allowed license text for those licenses. Here's how
> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html
> 
> Greets from the Voreifel, Germany,
> Myrle
> 
> 
> 
> *Myrle Krantz*
> Solutions Architect
> RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative
> mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org
>   
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Adi Raju 
> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Build working
>> Signatures are good
>> Checksums are good
>> Integration tests passing
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Adi Raju
>> 
>> Principal Architect, Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd
>> Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, Bengaluru,
>> Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>> 
>> 
>> Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any
>> files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the sole use
>> of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, please email: supp...@confluxtechnologies.com and
>> destroy/delete all copies and attachment thereto along with the original
>> message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
>> forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in
>> reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. The
>> recipient acknowledges that Conflux Technologies Private Limited or its
>> subsidiaries and associated companies are unable to exercise control or
>> ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information
>> contained in e-mail transmissions. Before opening any attachments, please
>> check.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nazeer Shaik [mailto:nazeer1100...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 4:05 PM
>> To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.6.0-incubating for release
>> 
>> Hello Fineract community,
>> 
>> We have created Apache Fineract 0.6.0-incubating release, with the
>> artifacts below up for a vote.
>> 
>> 
>> *These are the goals of this release:*
>> 
>>   - Address some of the review comments of Apache Fineract
>>   0.5.0-incubating release
>>   - Share the new features & bugs fixes that have been developed so far,
>>   to give the community a good sense of the upcoming 0.6.0 release
>> 
>> *For more information including release notes, please see:*
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/0.
>> 6.0-incubating+Release-+Apache+Fineract
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *** Please download, review and vote by Mon Jan  09, 2017 @ 6pm PST ***
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *Source & Binary files:*
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/0.
>> 6.0-incubating/
>> 
>> · Source:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/0.
>> 6.0-incubating/apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>> 
>> · Binary/War :
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/0.
>> 6.0-incubating/apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-binary.tar.gz
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *Commit to be voted on:*
>> 
>> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
>> fineract.git;a=commit;h=refs/heads/0.6.0-incubating
>> > fineract.git;a=commit;h=refs/heads/0.6.0-incubating>*
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *Source build verification steps can be found at:*
>> 
>> Refer 'README.md' in apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *Binary Deployment steps can be found at:*
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
>> Fineract+Installation+on+Ubuntu+Server
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:*
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/KEYS
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Note:
>> 
>>   - *Maven repo is not included in place of binary. This will be addressed
>>   in future releases*
>>   - *RAT (Release Audit Tool) is integrated in sub-directory. But it will
>>   check all directories and files  from top level directory. This will
>> also
>>   be addressed in future releases. We have added steps how to run RAT in
>>   readme.md  file. *
>> 
>> To help in tallying the vote, members please be sure to indicate
>> "(binding)" with your vote.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> 
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> 
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> 
>> 
>> *Here is my +1 (non-binding)*
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Nazeer
>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.6.0-incubating for release

[Myrle Krantz]

Hi all,

+1

The build is working
Signatures are good

Things we should improve by the next release:
* Create a branch in git and tag the release changeset before the call to
vote is sent out.  In the future I will vote against a release if the
changeset it is drawn from is not tagged.
* Instead of exempting files like uglify.js in the rat configuration, we
should add the allowed license text for those licenses. Here's how
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html

Greets from the Voreifel, Germany,
Myrle



*Myrle Krantz*
Solutions Architect
RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative
mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org
  


On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Adi Raju 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Build working
> Signatures are good
> Checksums are good
> Integration tests passing
>
> Regards,
> Adi Raju
>
> Principal Architect, Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd
> Address: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, Bengaluru,
> Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>
>
> Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any
> files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the sole use
> of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please email: supp...@confluxtechnologies.com and
> destroy/delete all copies and attachment thereto along with the original
> message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
> forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in
> reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. The
> recipient acknowledges that Conflux Technologies Private Limited or its
> subsidiaries and associated companies are unable to exercise control or
> ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information
> contained in e-mail transmissions. Before opening any attachments, please
> check.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nazeer Shaik [mailto:nazeer1100...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 4:05 PM
> To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] [APACHE FINERACT] 0.6.0-incubating for release
>
> Hello Fineract community,
>
> We have created Apache Fineract 0.6.0-incubating release, with the
> artifacts below up for a vote.
>
>
> *These are the goals of this release:*
>
>- Address some of the review comments of Apache Fineract
>0.5.0-incubating release
>- Share the new features & bugs fixes that have been developed so far,
>to give the community a good sense of the upcoming 0.6.0 release
>
> *For more information including release notes, please see:*
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/0.
> 6.0-incubating+Release-+Apache+Fineract
>
>
>
>  *** Please download, review and vote by Mon Jan  09, 2017 @ 6pm PST ***
>
>
>
> *Source & Binary files:*
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/0.
> 6.0-incubating/
>
> · Source:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/0.
> 6.0-incubating/apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> · Binary/War :
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/0.
> 6.0-incubating/apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-binary.tar.gz
>
>
>
> *Commit to be voted on:*
>
> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> fineract.git;a=commit;h=refs/heads/0.6.0-incubating
>  fineract.git;a=commit;h=refs/heads/0.6.0-incubating>*
>
>
>
> *Source build verification steps can be found at:*
>
> Refer 'README.md' in apache-fineract-0.6.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
>
>
> *Binary Deployment steps can be found at:*
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
> Fineract+Installation+on+Ubuntu+Server
>
>
>
> *KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:*
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/fineract/KEYS
>
>
>
> Note:
>
>- *Maven repo is not included in place of binary. This will be addressed
>in future releases*
>- *RAT (Release Audit Tool) is integrated in sub-directory. But it will
>check all directories and files  from top level directory. This will
> also
>be addressed in future releases. We have added steps how to run RAT in
>readme.md  file. *
>
> To help in tallying the vote, members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with your vote.
>
>
>
> [ ] +1  approve
>
> [ ] +0  no opinion
>
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> *Here is my +1 (non-binding)*
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nazeer
>
>

Re: Jira Ticket version fields for Apache Fineract project.

[sendoro]

Dear Myrle,

+1

I had the same feeling...

Regards
Sendoro



On 2017-01-10 12:34, Myrle Krantz wrote:

Hi all,

When checking a release, I'd like to be able to look at which Jira 
issues

affect a particular release.  I noticed that our JIRA project isn't
configured to display the fixed in version and affects version fields.
These version fields would be useful not only for creating release 
notes,
and checking a release.  They would also be useful for customers trying 
to
understand the quality of a particular release or to find out if an 
issue
they are seeing is new or not.  I'd like us to add the JIRA fields, and 
set

them for the currently open tickets.

What do you all think?

Greets from the Voreifel, Germany,
Myrle


*Myrle Krantz*
Solutions Architect
RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative
mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org
  

Jira Ticket version fields for Apache Fineract project.

[Myrle Krantz]

Hi all,

When checking a release, I'd like to be able to look at which Jira issues
affect a particular release.  I noticed that our JIRA project isn't
configured to display the fixed in version and affects version fields.
These version fields would be useful not only for creating release notes,
and checking a release.  They would also be useful for customers trying to
understand the quality of a particular release or to find out if an issue
they are seeing is new or not.  I'd like us to add the JIRA fields, and set
them for the currently open tickets.

What do you all think?

Greets from the Voreifel, Germany,
Myrle


*Myrle Krantz*
Solutions Architect
RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative
mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org
  

Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR

[Santosh Math]

Thank You Sir.. :)

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:59 PM,  wrote:

> Dear Santosh,
>
> I must say, we do appreciate your support very much!!!...
>
> Regards
> Sendoro
>
>
>
> On 2017-01-10 12:26, Shaik Nazeer wrote:
>
>> Thank you Santosh :-)
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Santosh Math [mailto:sant...@confluxtechnologies.com]
>> Sent: 10 January 2017 17:55
>> To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; Ed Cable
>> Subject: Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR
>>
>> Hi Ed,
>> I have tested these in the previous release of Mifos ,ie.. 16.11.01.
>> These  issues are not regression one. These are existing issues. I
>> have already tested and made comments with description related to it
>> on the following link
>>
>> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
>> *
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>>
>> Adi/Nazeer,
>>>
>>> Are we looking into a fix for this? Is this a regression that was
>>> introduced during the entity data table checks work?
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Zayyad A. Said <
>>> zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Santosh,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I have noticed that you cannot approve any item in checker inbox and
>>> > not just collection sheet.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Try approving these items:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6755
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/4776
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6152
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > This creates a very big problem that MFIs will have to completely
>>> > disable Maker Checker functionality.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I strongly believe there is need for an IMMEDIATE fix.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards;
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > *
>>> >
>>> > *Zayyad A. Said | Chairman & C.E.O*
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Cell No.: +254 716 615274 <+254%20716%20615274> | Skype: *zsaid2011*
>>> >
>>> > Email: zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > [image: Email banner]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > *From:* Santosh Math [mailto:sant...@confluxtechnologies.com]
>>> > *Sent:* 06 January 2017 13:09
>>> > *To:* dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; Zayyad A. Said
>>> > *Cc:* Mifos software development
>>> > *Subject:* Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hi Zayyad,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > We noticed this is major  issue related to 'Maker-Checker' and have
>>> > already raised the issue on Jira.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Meanwhile, Is it possible, you can submit collection sheet disabling
>>> maker
>>> > checker?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > OR
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Right now, you are submitting collection sheet selecting the center
>>> > but not selecting  the groups individually so that all groups
>>> > collection
>>> sheet
>>> >  can be submitted in one go.. Can you try with selecting center as
>>> > well
>>> as
>>> > group in collection sheet  and submit  it?  I think it should work..
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Zayyad A. Said <
>>> > zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Sampath,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Yes this is checker inbox.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Here are the steps:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 1.   Enable maker checker tasks for SAVE COLLECTIONSHEET and also
>>> > SAVEORUPDATEATTENDANCE MEETING.
>>> >
>>> > 2.   Book JLG loans for a group.
>>> >
>>> > 3.   Use collection sheet module to post repayments for this group
>>> > (it will save successfully).
>>> >
>>> > 4.   Open the transaction in checker inbox and click on approve
>>> (this
>>> > is where it throws the error).
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Let me know if you are successful.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards;
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > *
>>> >
>>> > *Zayyad A. Said | Chairman & C.E.O*
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Cell No.: +254 716 615274 <+254%20716%20615274> | Skype: *zsaid2011*
>>> >
>>> > Email: zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > *From:* Sampath Kumar G [mailto:samp...@confluxtechnologies.com]
>>> > *Sent:* 04 January 2017 14:29
>>> > *To:* Mifos software development
>>> > *Cc:* dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
>>> > *Subject:* Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hi Zayyad,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The attached screenshot looks like checker inbox. Are you submitting
>>> > the collection sheet by maker-checker task? If yes, can you give the
>>> > steps which you had followed and also relevant screenshots?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks and regards,
>>> >
>>> > Sampath
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ​
>>> >
>>> > *Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd 
>>> > *
>>> >
>>> > #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road
>>> >
>>> > HRBR Layout 1st Block
>>> >
>>> > Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>>

RE: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR

[sendoro]

Dear Santosh,

I must say, we do appreciate your support very much!!!...

Regards
Sendoro


On 2017-01-10 12:26, Shaik Nazeer wrote:

Thank you Santosh :-)

-Original Message-
From: Santosh Math [mailto:sant...@confluxtechnologies.com]
Sent: 10 January 2017 17:55
To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; Ed Cable
Subject: Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR

Hi Ed,
I have tested these in the previous release of Mifos ,ie.. 16.11.01.
These  issues are not regression one. These are existing issues. I
have already tested and made comments with description related to it
on the following link

*https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
*

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:


Adi/Nazeer,

Are we looking into a fix for this? Is this a regression that was
introduced during the entity data table checks work?

Ed

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Zayyad A. Said <
zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com> wrote:

> Hi Santosh,
>
>
>
> I have noticed that you cannot approve any item in checker inbox and
> not just collection sheet.
>
>
>
> Try approving these items:
>
>
>
> https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6755
>
>
>
> https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/4776
>
>
>
> https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6152
>
>
>
> This creates a very big problem that MFIs will have to completely
> disable Maker Checker functionality.
>
>
>
> I strongly believe there is need for an IMMEDIATE fix.
>
>
>
> Regards;
>
>
>
>
>
> *
>
> *Zayyad A. Said | Chairman & C.E.O*
>
>
>
> Cell No.: +254 716 615274 <+254%20716%20615274> | Skype: *zsaid2011*
>
> Email: zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com
>
>
>
> [image: Email banner]
>
>
>
> *From:* Santosh Math [mailto:sant...@confluxtechnologies.com]
> *Sent:* 06 January 2017 13:09
> *To:* dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; Zayyad A. Said
> *Cc:* Mifos software development
> *Subject:* Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR
>
>
>
> Hi Zayyad,
>
>
>
> We noticed this is major  issue related to 'Maker-Checker' and have
> already raised the issue on Jira.
>
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
>
>
>
> Meanwhile, Is it possible, you can submit collection sheet disabling
maker
> checker?
>
>
>
> OR
>
>
>
> Right now, you are submitting collection sheet selecting the center
> but not selecting  the groups individually so that all groups
> collection
sheet
>  can be submitted in one go.. Can you try with selecting center as
> well
as
> group in collection sheet  and submit  it?  I think it should work..
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Zayyad A. Said <
> zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sampath,
>
>
>
> Yes this is checker inbox.
>
>
>
> Here are the steps:
>
>
>
> 1.   Enable maker checker tasks for SAVE COLLECTIONSHEET and also
> SAVEORUPDATEATTENDANCE MEETING.
>
> 2.   Book JLG loans for a group.
>
> 3.   Use collection sheet module to post repayments for this group
> (it will save successfully).
>
> 4.   Open the transaction in checker inbox and click on approve (this
> is where it throws the error).
>
>
>
> Let me know if you are successful.
>
>
>
> Regards;
>
>
>
> *
>
> *Zayyad A. Said | Chairman & C.E.O*
>
>
>
> Cell No.: +254 716 615274 <+254%20716%20615274> | Skype: *zsaid2011*
>
> Email: zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sampath Kumar G [mailto:samp...@confluxtechnologies.com]
> *Sent:* 04 January 2017 14:29
> *To:* Mifos software development
> *Cc:* dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR
>
>
>
> Hi Zayyad,
>
>
>
> The attached screenshot looks like checker inbox. Are you submitting
> the collection sheet by maker-checker task? If yes, can you give the
> steps which you had followed and also relevant screenshots?
>
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Sampath
>
>
>
>
>
> ​
>
> *Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd 
> *
>
> #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road
>
> HRBR Layout 1st Block
>
> Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any
> files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the
> sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you
> are not the intended recipient, please email:
> supp...@confluxtechnologies.com and destroy/delete all copies and
> attachment thereto along with the original message. Any unauthorised
> review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or
> copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail
> is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. The recipient acknowledges
> that Conflux Technologies Private Limited or its subsidiaries and
> associated companies are unable to exercise control or ensure or
> guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information
> contained in e-mail transmissions. Before opening any attachments, please 
check.
>
>
>
> On 

RE: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR

[Shaik Nazeer]

Thank you Santosh :-)

-Original Message-
From: Santosh Math [mailto:sant...@confluxtechnologies.com] 
Sent: 10 January 2017 17:55
To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; Ed Cable
Subject: Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR

Hi Ed,
I have tested these in the previous release of Mifos ,ie.. 16.11.01. These  
issues are not regression one. These are existing issues. I have already tested 
and made comments with description related to it on the following link

*https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
*

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:

> Adi/Nazeer,
>
> Are we looking into a fix for this? Is this a regression that was 
> introduced during the entity data table checks work?
>
> Ed
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Zayyad A. Said < 
> zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Santosh,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have noticed that you cannot approve any item in checker inbox and 
> > not just collection sheet.
> >
> >
> >
> > Try approving these items:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6755
> >
> >
> >
> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/4776
> >
> >
> >
> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6152
> >
> >
> >
> > This creates a very big problem that MFIs will have to completely 
> > disable Maker Checker functionality.
> >
> >
> >
> > I strongly believe there is need for an IMMEDIATE fix.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards;
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *
> >
> > *Zayyad A. Said | Chairman & C.E.O*
> >
> >
> >
> > Cell No.: +254 716 615274 <+254%20716%20615274> | Skype: *zsaid2011*
> >
> > Email: zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com
> >
> >
> >
> > [image: Email banner]
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Santosh Math [mailto:sant...@confluxtechnologies.com]
> > *Sent:* 06 January 2017 13:09
> > *To:* dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; Zayyad A. Said
> > *Cc:* Mifos software development
> > *Subject:* Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Zayyad,
> >
> >
> >
> > We noticed this is major  issue related to 'Maker-Checker' and have 
> > already raised the issue on Jira.
> >
> >
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
> >
> >
> >
> > Meanwhile, Is it possible, you can submit collection sheet disabling
> maker
> > checker?
> >
> >
> >
> > OR
> >
> >
> >
> > Right now, you are submitting collection sheet selecting the center 
> > but not selecting  the groups individually so that all groups 
> > collection
> sheet
> >  can be submitted in one go.. Can you try with selecting center as 
> > well
> as
> > group in collection sheet  and submit  it?  I think it should work..
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Zayyad A. Said < 
> > zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sampath,
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes this is checker inbox.
> >
> >
> >
> > Here are the steps:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.   Enable maker checker tasks for SAVE COLLECTIONSHEET and also
> > SAVEORUPDATEATTENDANCE MEETING.
> >
> > 2.   Book JLG loans for a group.
> >
> > 3.   Use collection sheet module to post repayments for this group
> > (it will save successfully).
> >
> > 4.   Open the transaction in checker inbox and click on approve (this
> > is where it throws the error).
> >
> >
> >
> > Let me know if you are successful.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards;
> >
> >
> >
> > *
> >
> > *Zayyad A. Said | Chairman & C.E.O*
> >
> >
> >
> > Cell No.: +254 716 615274 <+254%20716%20615274> | Skype: *zsaid2011*
> >
> > Email: zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Sampath Kumar G [mailto:samp...@confluxtechnologies.com]
> > *Sent:* 04 January 2017 14:29
> > *To:* Mifos software development
> > *Cc:* dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
> > *Subject:* Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Zayyad,
> >
> >
> >
> > The attached screenshot looks like checker inbox. Are you submitting 
> > the collection sheet by maker-checker task? If yes, can you give the 
> > steps which you had followed and also relevant screenshots?
> >
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Sampath
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ​
> >
> > *Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd  
> > *
> >
> > #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road
> >
> > HRBR Layout 1st Block
> >
> > Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
> >
> >
> >
> > Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any 
> > files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the 
> > sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you 
> > are not the intended recipient, please email: 
> > supp...@confluxtechnologies.com and destroy/delete all copies and 
> > attachment thereto along with the original message. Any unauthorised 
> > review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or 
> > copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail 
> > is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. The recipient acknowledges 
> 

Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR

[Santosh Math]

Hi Ed,
I have tested these in the previous release of Mifos ,ie.. 16.11.01. These
 issues are not regression one. These are existing issues. I have already
tested and made comments with description related to it on the following
link

*https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
*

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:

> Adi/Nazeer,
>
> Are we looking into a fix for this? Is this a regression that was
> introduced during the entity data table checks work?
>
> Ed
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Zayyad A. Said <
> zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Santosh,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have noticed that you cannot approve any item in checker inbox and not
> > just collection sheet.
> >
> >
> >
> > Try approving these items:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6755
> >
> >
> >
> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/4776
> >
> >
> >
> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6152
> >
> >
> >
> > This creates a very big problem that MFIs will have to completely disable
> > Maker Checker functionality.
> >
> >
> >
> > I strongly believe there is need for an IMMEDIATE fix.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards;
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *
> >
> > *Zayyad A. Said | Chairman & C.E.O*
> >
> >
> >
> > Cell No.: +254 716 615274 <+254%20716%20615274> | Skype: *zsaid2011*
> >
> > Email: zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com
> >
> >
> >
> > [image: Email banner]
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Santosh Math [mailto:sant...@confluxtechnologies.com]
> > *Sent:* 06 January 2017 13:09
> > *To:* dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org; Zayyad A. Said
> > *Cc:* Mifos software development
> > *Subject:* Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Zayyad,
> >
> >
> >
> > We noticed this is major  issue related to 'Maker-Checker' and have
> > already raised the issue on Jira.
> >
> >
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
> >
> >
> >
> > Meanwhile, Is it possible, you can submit collection sheet disabling
> maker
> > checker?
> >
> >
> >
> > OR
> >
> >
> >
> > Right now, you are submitting collection sheet selecting the center but
> > not selecting  the groups individually so that all groups collection
> sheet
> >  can be submitted in one go.. Can you try with selecting center as well
> as
> > group in collection sheet  and submit  it?  I think it should work..
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Zayyad A. Said <
> > zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sampath,
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes this is checker inbox.
> >
> >
> >
> > Here are the steps:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.   Enable maker checker tasks for SAVE COLLECTIONSHEET and also
> > SAVEORUPDATEATTENDANCE MEETING.
> >
> > 2.   Book JLG loans for a group.
> >
> > 3.   Use collection sheet module to post repayments for this group
> > (it will save successfully).
> >
> > 4.   Open the transaction in checker inbox and click on approve (this
> > is where it throws the error).
> >
> >
> >
> > Let me know if you are successful.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards;
> >
> >
> >
> > *
> >
> > *Zayyad A. Said | Chairman & C.E.O*
> >
> >
> >
> > Cell No.: +254 716 615274 <+254%20716%20615274> | Skype: *zsaid2011*
> >
> > Email: zay...@intrasofttechnologies.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Sampath Kumar G [mailto:samp...@confluxtechnologies.com]
> > *Sent:* 04 January 2017 14:29
> > *To:* Mifos software development
> > *Cc:* dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
> > *Subject:* Re: [Mifos-developer] APPROVE COLLECTION SHEET ERROR
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Zayyad,
> >
> >
> >
> > The attached screenshot looks like checker inbox. Are you submitting the
> > collection sheet by maker-checker task? If yes, can you give the steps
> > which you had followed and also relevant screenshots?
> >
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Sampath
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ​
> >
> > *Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd  *
> >
> > #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road
> >
> > HRBR Layout 1st Block
> >
> > Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA
> >
> >
> >
> > Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any
> > files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the sole use
> > of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, please email: supp...@confluxtechnologies.com and
> > destroy/delete all copies and attachment thereto along with the original
> > message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
> > forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in
> > reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. The
> > recipient acknowledges that Conflux Technologies Private Limited or its
> > subsidiaries and associated companies are unable to exercise control or
> > ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information
> > contained in e-mail transmissions. Before opening any attachments, please
> > ch

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FINERACT-364) Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error

[Santosh Math (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814824#comment-15814824
 ] 

Santosh Math edited comment on FINERACT-364 at 1/10/17 12:20 PM:
-

Through Maker-Checker, Submitting Savings, Fixed Deposit and Recurring Deposit 
account application works fine.

But Approving as well as Activating Savings, Fixed Deposit and Recurring 
Deposit for the client doesn't work and maker checker throws the same error in 
the screenshot(Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png) attached with issue.

I tested it in the older version of Mifos 16.11.01 and also I tested creating 
separate 'checker' user. 


was (Author: santoshmath):
Through Maker-Checker, Submitting Savings, Fixed Deposit and Recurring Deposit 
account application works fine.

But Approving as well as Activating Savings, Fixed Deposit and Recurring 
Deposit for the client doesn't work and maker checker throws the same error in 
the screenshot(Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png) attached with issue.



> Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error
> 
>
> Key: FINERACT-364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
> Project: Apache Fineract
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Loan
>Reporter: Santosh Math
>Assignee: Markus Geiss
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: 1.png, 2.png, Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png
>
>
> 1. Enable Maker Checker in System>>Configuration.
> 2. Go to  System>>Configure Maker Checker Tasks and click on 'Edit', select 
> the center and check 'SAVECOLLECTIONSHEET CENTER'. (check attached screenshot)
> 3. Disburse JLG Loan to a client.
> 4. Go to collection sheet and fill the details and select the center name but 
> don't select the group name.
> 5. Click  on Submit button, which goes to Checker Inbox. 
> 6. When you try to approve it , it throws the error,
> "The parameter `loanTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request.
> The parameter `SavingsTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request."  
> Check the attached file/screenshots. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (FINERACT-364) Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error

[Santosh Math (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814824#comment-15814824
 ] 

Santosh Math commented on FINERACT-364:
---

Through Maker-Checker, Submitting Savings, Fixed Deposit and Recurring Deposit 
account application works fine.

But Approving as well as Activating Savings, Fixed Deposit and Recurring 
Deposit for the client doesn't work and maker checker throws the same error in 
the screenshot(Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png) attached with issue.



> Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error
> 
>
> Key: FINERACT-364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
> Project: Apache Fineract
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Loan
>Reporter: Santosh Math
>Assignee: Markus Geiss
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: 1.png, 2.png, Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png
>
>
> 1. Enable Maker Checker in System>>Configuration.
> 2. Go to  System>>Configure Maker Checker Tasks and click on 'Edit', select 
> the center and check 'SAVECOLLECTIONSHEET CENTER'. (check attached screenshot)
> 3. Disburse JLG Loan to a client.
> 4. Go to collection sheet and fill the details and select the center name but 
> don't select the group name.
> 5. Click  on Submit button, which goes to Checker Inbox. 
> 6. When you try to approve it , it throws the error,
> "The parameter `loanTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request.
> The parameter `SavingsTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request."  
> Check the attached file/screenshots. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FINERACT-364) Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error

[Santosh Math (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814595#comment-15814595
 ] 

Santosh Math edited comment on FINERACT-364 at 1/10/17 10:28 AM:
-

1. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6755

This issue  is related to 'Approving' Saving Account through Checker Inbox & 
Tasks. That is, we can 'Submit'  Saving Account  application  through 
Maker-Checker successfully. But while approving it through maker-checker 
throwing the error.(refer Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png  , attached 
with this issue). This is not Regression Error.

2. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6152

 i. The above issue doesn't arise, If you create a client and activate him 
through maker-checker (also entity-data table check for "creating client" 
should not be defined).

ii.  The  above issue doesn't arise if you define both entity-data table check 
for 'creating & activating' client AND also maker checker enabled for both 
creating  and activating client.(You should not try to activate client  at the 
time of creating him, first  create him, enter data table for creating then it 
goes for checker approval and it will be submitted successfully. Now the client 
is 'Submitted' but yet to activate. Now, you can enter data table for 
activating client then activate with date. Now it goes for maker-checker and 
gets submitted successfully) 

iii. The above issue only arises, when you have to create a client(with no 
entity-data table check) and approval of checker is still pending to 'Create' a 
client. At this time, you create an entity-data table check for 'Creating' 
Client. Then, you go to maker-checker to approve 'Creating' Client, the error 
will be thrown as 'error.msg.entry.required.in.datatable'.

3.https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/4776

 Hi [~intrasofttechKE], I am unable to understand it. 



was (Author: santoshmath):
1. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6755

This issue  is related to 'Approving' Saving Account through Checker Inbox & 
Tasks. That is, we can 'Submit'  Saving Account  application  through 
Maker-Checker successfully. But while approving it through maker-checker 
throwing the error.(refer Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png  , attached 
with this issue). This is not Regression Error.

2. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6152

 i. The above issue doesn't arise, If you create a client and activate him 
through maker-checker (also entity-data table check for "creating client" 
should not be defined).

ii.  The  above issue doesn't arise if you define both entity-data table check 
for 'creating & activating' client AND also maker checker enabled for both 
creating  and activating client.(You should not try to activate client  at the 
time of creating him, first  create him, enter data table for creating then it 
goes for checker approval and it will be submitted successfully. Now the client 
is 'Submitted' but yet to activate, now you can data table for activating 
client then activate with date. Now it goes for maker-checker and gets 
submitted successfully) 

iii. The above issue only arises, when you have to create a client(with no 
entity-data table check) and approval of checker is still pending to 'Create' a 
client. At this time, you create an entity-data table check for 'Creating' 
Client. Then, you go to maker-checker to approve 'Creating' Client, the error 
will be thrown as 'error.msg.entry.required.in.datatable'.

3.https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/4776

 Hi [~intrasofttechKE], I am unable to understand it. 


> Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error
> 
>
> Key: FINERACT-364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
> Project: Apache Fineract
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Loan
>Reporter: Santosh Math
>Assignee: Markus Geiss
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: 1.png, 2.png, Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png
>
>
> 1. Enable Maker Checker in System>>Configuration.
> 2. Go to  System>>Configure Maker Checker Tasks and click on 'Edit', select 
> the center and check 'SAVECOLLECTIONSHEET CENTER'. (check attached screenshot)
> 3. Disburse JLG Loan to a client.
> 4. Go to collection sheet and fill the details and select the center name but 
> don't select the group name.
> 5. Click  on Submit button, which goes to Checker Inbox. 
> 6. When you try to approve it , it throws the error,
> "The parameter `loanTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request.
> The parameter `SavingsTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request."  
> Check the attached file/screenshots. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FINERACT-364) Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error

[Santosh Math (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814595#comment-15814595
 ] 

Santosh Math edited comment on FINERACT-364 at 1/10/17 10:25 AM:
-

1. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6755

This issue  is related to 'Approving' Saving Account through Checker Inbox & 
Tasks. That is, we can 'Submit'  Saving Account  application  through 
Maker-Checker successfully. But while approving it through maker-checker 
throwing the error.(refer Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png  , attached 
with this issue). This is not Regression Error.

2. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6152

 i. The above issue doesn't arise, If you create a client and activate him 
through maker-checker (also entity-data table check for "creating client" 
should not be defined).

ii.  The  above issue doesn't arise if you define both entity-data table check 
for 'creating & activating' client AND also maker checker enabled for both 
creating  and activating client.(You should not try to activate client  at the 
time of creating him, first  create him, enter data table for creating then it 
goes for checker approval and it will be submitted successfully. Now the client 
is 'Submitted' but yet to activate, now you can data table for activating 
client then activate with date. Now it goes for maker-checker and gets 
submitted successfully) 

iii. The above issue only arises, when you have to create a client(with no 
entity-data table check) and approval of checker is still pending to 'Create' a 
client. At this time, you create an entity-data table check for 'Creating' 
Client. Then, you go to maker-checker to approve 'Creating' Client, the error 
will be thrown as 'error.msg.entry.required.in.datatable'.

3.https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/4776

 Hi [~intrasofttechKE], I am unable to understand it. 



was (Author: santoshmath):
1. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6755

This issue  is related to 'Approving' Saving Account through Checker Inbox & 
Tasks. That is we can 'Submit'  Saving Account  application  through 
Maker-Checker successfully. But while approving it through maker-checker 
throwing the error.(refer Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png  , attached 
with this issue). This is not Regression Error.

2. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6152

 i. The above issue doesn't arise, If you create a client and activate him 
through maker-checker (also entity-data table check for "creating client" 
should not be defined).

ii.  The  above issue doesn't arise if you define both entity-data table check 
for 'creating & activating' client AND also maker checker enabled for both 
creating  and activating client.(You should not try to activate client  at the 
time of creating him, first  create him, enter data table for creating then it 
goes for checker approval and it will be submitted successfully. Now the client 
is 'Submitted' but yet to activate, now you can data table for activating 
client then activate with date. Now it goes for maker-checker and gets 
submitted successfully) 

iii. The above issue only arises, when you have to create a client(with no 
entity-data table check) and approval of checker is still pending to 'Create' a 
client. At this time, you create an entity-data table check for 'Creating' 
Client. Then, you go to maker-checker to approve 'Creating' Client, the error 
will be thrown as 'error.msg.entry.required.in.datatable'.

3.https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/4776

 Hi [~intrasofttechKE], I am unable to understand it. 


> Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error
> 
>
> Key: FINERACT-364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
> Project: Apache Fineract
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Loan
>Reporter: Santosh Math
>Assignee: Markus Geiss
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: 1.png, 2.png, Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png
>
>
> 1. Enable Maker Checker in System>>Configuration.
> 2. Go to  System>>Configure Maker Checker Tasks and click on 'Edit', select 
> the center and check 'SAVECOLLECTIONSHEET CENTER'. (check attached screenshot)
> 3. Disburse JLG Loan to a client.
> 4. Go to collection sheet and fill the details and select the center name but 
> don't select the group name.
> 5. Click  on Submit button, which goes to Checker Inbox. 
> 6. When you try to approve it , it throws the error,
> "The parameter `loanTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request.
> The parameter `SavingsTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request."  
> Check the attached file/screenshots. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332

[jira] [Commented] (FINERACT-364) Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error

[Santosh Math (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814595#comment-15814595
 ] 

Santosh Math commented on FINERACT-364:
---

1. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6755

This issue  is related to 'Approving' Saving Account through Checker Inbox & 
Tasks. That is we can 'Submit'  Saving Account  application  through 
Maker-Checker successfully. But while approving it through maker-checker 
throwing the error.(refer Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png  , attached 
with this issue). This is not Regression Error.

2. https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/6152

 i. The above issue doesn't arise, If you create a client and activate him 
through maker-checker (also entity-data table check for "creating client" 
should not be defined).

ii.  The  above issue doesn't arise if you define both entity-data table check 
for 'creating & activating' client AND also maker checker enabled for both 
creating  and activating client.(You should not try to activate client  at the 
time of creating him, first  create him, enter data table for creating then it 
goes for checker approval and it will be submitted successfully. Now the client 
is 'Submitted' but yet to activate, now you can data table for activating 
client then activate with date. Now it goes for maker-checker and gets 
submitted successfully) 

iii. The above issue only arises, when you have to create a client(with no 
entity-data table check) and approval of checker is still pending to 'Create' a 
client. At this time, you create an entity-data table check for 'Creating' 
Client. Then, you go to maker-checker to approve 'Creating' Client, the error 
will be thrown as 'error.msg.entry.required.in.datatable'.

3.https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewcheckerinbox/4776

 Hi [~intrasofttechKE], I am unable to understand it. 


> Submitting Collection Sheet through Maker Checker Throwing Error
> 
>
> Key: FINERACT-364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-364
> Project: Apache Fineract
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Loan
>Reporter: Santosh Math
>Assignee: Markus Geiss
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: 1.png, 2.png, Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 9.40.16 AM.png
>
>
> 1. Enable Maker Checker in System>>Configuration.
> 2. Go to  System>>Configure Maker Checker Tasks and click on 'Edit', select 
> the center and check 'SAVECOLLECTIONSHEET CENTER'. (check attached screenshot)
> 3. Disburse JLG Loan to a client.
> 4. Go to collection sheet and fill the details and select the center name but 
> don't select the group name.
> 5. Click  on Submit button, which goes to Checker Inbox. 
> 6. When you try to approve it , it throws the error,
> "The parameter `loanTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request.
> The parameter `SavingsTransactions` has been passed and is not supported for 
> this request."  
> Check the attached file/screenshots. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)