Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[Alex Harui]

To be clear, none of my findings are deal killers for the proposed name.

BOJA is the stock symbol for Bojangles Inc.  A chain of fried chicken
restaurants.
Wiktionary defined variants of boja [1].  What did you say you thought it
meant?
Boja has 163 matches on Github, but I didn't see an exact match but didn't
check all.
https://github.com/mudroljub/bojanka is "Simple JavaScript application for
drawing in HTML5 canvas"

-Alex

[1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/boja


On 9/16/17, 10:38 PM, "Harbs"  wrote:

>
>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Alex Harui 
>>wrote:
>> 
>> A quick "suitable name search" on some other candidates:
>> 
>> Braid:  260 repos match with Braid on Github.  There is a project call
>> BraidApps.  Could pose some confusion since we produce apps.
>> 
>> Strand:  697 repos match Strand on Github.  First match was
>> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>om%2FMediaMath%2Fstrand=02%7C01%7C%7C1dc156ada9f442f4ee0a08d4fd8e519
>>b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636412235077272615=Y
>>k5oLCpwtkSlGYJSqsfSd1dyRNl3rOx9LiNQh4IHLQU%3D=0.  It is a
>>"collection of modular,
>> reusable Web Components built upon Polymer"
>> 
>> Beads:  971 repos match Bead on Github.  One,
>> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>om%2Forsjb%2Fbeads=02%7C01%7C%7C1dc156ada9f442f4ee0a08d4fd8e519b%7Cf
>>a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636412235077272615=OQuLf5
>>ueW9aEbEV2rKSndy%2FbCHgWU33N0FgXG%2B%2BHmKc%3D=0 claims to be
>>"The Beads Project".
>> 
>> Bend:  1676 repos match Bend on Github.  One,
>> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>om%2Fevanw%2Fbend=02%7C01%7C%7C1dc156ada9f442f4ee0a08d4fd8e519b%7Cfa
>>7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636412235077272615=dpS%2Fg
>>FLFnwl0X2lgFfRpmHE1hrNeS7A2XnZ5ofFWqD4%3D=0 is a
>>"statically-typed programming language
>> for the web"
>> 
>> Limber: 70 repos match Limber on Github.  One,
>> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>om%2Fggoodman%2Flimber=02%7C01%7C%7C1dc156ada9f442f4ee0a08d4fd8e519b
>>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636412235077272615=Yh
>>ZN5g76iGW8AtsBkb8zRu0bw%2Fo6spbqJU7SlYe%2BYpU%3D=0 is a
>>"Javascript graphics engine
>> written in coffee-script"
>> 
>> Boinga: 3 matches.  The exact math is an empty repo.  Boinga has
>> interesting definitions in the urban dictionaries:
>> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urban
>>dictionary.com%2Fdefine.php%3Fterm%3DBoinga=02%7C01%7C%7C1dc156ada9f
>>442f4ee0a08d4fd8e519b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636412
>>235077272615=l1VYfLrPS5RL7cyzmzm6u7p1ujQSPQdrLUXL69HzXfk%3D
>>d=0
>> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdefinith
>>ing.com%2Fboinga%2F=02%7C01%7C%7C1dc156ada9f442f4ee0a08d4fd8e519b%7C
>>fa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636412235077272615=1mc5O
>>j7MYL%2FqLZVjeo0fT1FupVfb0yumUQLMm07Fb9g%3D=0
>> And used in a song in a popular children's animation sung by Alicia
>>Keys.
>> 
>Ouch… :-(
>
>> Names like Böja are interesting, but for me, typing letters with
>> accents/umlauts/grave is hard for me.
>
>What about dropping the accents: Boja?
>
>
>> HTH,
>> -Alex
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/16/17, 3:33 PM, "Harbs"  wrote:
>> 
>>> I like this one.
>>> 
>>> Harbs
>>> 
 On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:31 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
 wrote:
 
 Braid (bunch of strands, right?)
>>> 
>> 
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[Harbs]

> On Sep 17, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> A quick "suitable name search" on some other candidates:
> 
> Braid:  260 repos match with Braid on Github.  There is a project call
> BraidApps.  Could pose some confusion since we produce apps.
> 
> Strand:  697 repos match Strand on Github.  First match was
> https://github.com/MediaMath/strand.  It is a "collection of modular,
> reusable Web Components built upon Polymer"
> 
> Beads:  971 repos match Bead on Github.  One,
> https://github.com/orsjb/beads claims to be "The Beads Project".
> 
> Bend:  1676 repos match Bend on Github.  One,
> https://github.com/evanw/bend is a "statically-typed programming language
> for the web"
> 
> Limber: 70 repos match Limber on Github.  One,
> https://github.com/ggoodman/limber is a "Javascript graphics engine
> written in coffee-script"
> 
> Boinga: 3 matches.  The exact math is an empty repo.  Boinga has
> interesting definitions in the urban dictionaries:
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Boinga
> https://definithing.com/boinga/
> And used in a song in a popular children's animation sung by Alicia Keys.
> 
Ouch… :-(

> Names like Böja are interesting, but for me, typing letters with
> accents/umlauts/grave is hard for me.

What about dropping the accents: Boja?


> HTH,
> -Alex
> 
> 
> On 9/16/17, 3:33 PM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> 
>> I like this one.
>> 
>> Harbs
>> 
>>> On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:31 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Braid (bunch of strands, right?)
>> 
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[Alex Harui]

A quick "suitable name search" on some other candidates:

Braid:  260 repos match with Braid on Github.  There is a project call
BraidApps.  Could pose some confusion since we produce apps.

Strand:  697 repos match Strand on Github.  First match was
https://github.com/MediaMath/strand.  It is a "collection of modular,
reusable Web Components built upon Polymer"

Beads:  971 repos match Bead on Github.  One,
https://github.com/orsjb/beads claims to be "The Beads Project".

Bend:  1676 repos match Bend on Github.  One,
https://github.com/evanw/bend is a "statically-typed programming language
for the web"

Limber: 70 repos match Limber on Github.  One,
https://github.com/ggoodman/limber is a "Javascript graphics engine
written in coffee-script"

Boinga: 3 matches.  The exact math is an empty repo.  Boinga has
interesting definitions in the urban dictionaries:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Boinga
https://definithing.com/boinga/
And used in a song in a popular children's animation sung by Alicia Keys.

Names like Böja are interesting, but for me, typing letters with
accents/umlauts/grave is hard for me.

HTH,
-Alex


On 9/16/17, 3:33 PM, "Harbs"  wrote:

>I like this one.
>
>Harbs
>
>> On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:31 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
>>wrote:
>> 
>> Braid (bunch of strands, right?)
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[Alex Harui]

I mentioned STeVe but after reading this [1][2], I withdraw that
suggestion as I think STV is intended for choosing multiple from multiple
instead of one of multiple.  (I did not read all of [2]).

My takeaway is that, unless a true majority results, the results of other
system can be challenged.  So, pick a system.  Harb's proposal is fine.
Start a vote and hope a true majority shows up.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

[1] https://plus.maths.org/content/which-voting-system-best
[2] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/voting-methods/

On 9/16/17, 3:32 PM, "Harbs"  wrote:

>To me it seems like overkill for our needs, but if someone wants to try
>and make it work I have no objection.
>
>Harbs
>
>> On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:45 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Someone up thread mentioned that Apache STeVe could be used for this.
>> 
>> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsteve.ap
>>ache.org%2Fvote_types.html=02%7C01%7C%7C207aa8a7a82943b48d8b08d4fd52
>>d28c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636411979543044718
>>a=IW5fRDPE2k01ktSYi1pY72Fdl%2BHjxvFSE9bFBBfPXoY%3D=0
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>> 
>> On Sep 16, 2017 1:22 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Harbs,
>> 
>> Nice idea. It allows picking up for anyone couple of options.
>> 
>> Piotr
>> 
>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017, 21:57 Harbs  wrote:
>> 
>>> I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me.
>>> 
>>> Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned.
>>> 
>>> I personally like Limber/Limbre.
>>> 
>>> I like Boinga in a different way.
>>> 
>>> I think that Böja has a great ring to it.
>>> 
>>> One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick
>>>up to
>>> three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and
>> option
>>> 3 for 1.
>>> 
>>> We could then tally up the points for the winners.
>>> 
>>> At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call
>>> another vote to decide between the two with the most points.
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> Harbs
>>> 
 On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui 
>>> wrote:
 
 Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we
>>> might
 need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other
 suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second
 candidate?  I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name.
 
 If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to
>>> this
 post with that name.  Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe
or
 not.
 
 Thanks,
 -Alex
 
 On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>>> Muppirala"
  wrote:
 
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting
>>vote
>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his
>>> own
>> name idea and others can give him +1.
>> 
> 
> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider.  We
> should
> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another
>>> thread.
> All this feels a bit rushed,  I am having a bit of a hard time
>> following
> discussions/decisions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Om
> 
> 
>> 
>> Piotr
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone
>> who
>>> would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex
>>>world.
>>> 
>>> We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path
>> where
>>> first target will be ports the old one applications.
>>> 
>>> As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company
>> as an
>>> Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently
>> they
>>> change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone
>> from
>>> initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite
>> there
>>> were very good press out there in the company as in outside in
>> Cracow.
>>> 
>>> I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such
>>>tremendous
>>> opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - This
>> is
>> what
>>> we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS
>>>for
>> the
>>> port, cause it provides me what I need.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin 
>>>wrote:
>>> 
> 
> have a problem if someone created a 

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[Harbs]

I like this one.

Harbs

> On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:31 PM, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
> 
> Braid (bunch of strands, right?)

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[OmPrakash Muppirala]

Someone up thread mentioned that Apache STeVe could be used for this.

https://steve.apache.org/vote_types.html

Thanks,
Om

On Sep 16, 2017 1:22 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Harbs,

Nice idea. It allows picking up for anyone couple of options.

Piotr

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017, 21:57 Harbs  wrote:

> I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me.
>
> Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned.
>
> I personally like Limber/Limbre.
>
> I like Boinga in a different way.
>
> I think that Böja has a great ring to it.
>
> One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick up to
> three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and
option
> 3 for 1.
>
> We could then tally up the points for the winners.
>
> At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call
> another vote to decide between the two with the most points.
>
> Thoughts?
> Harbs
>
> > On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui 
> wrote:
> >
> > Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we
> might
> > need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other
> > suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second
> > candidate?  I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name.
> >
> > If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to
> this
> > post with that name.  Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe or
> > not.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala"
> >  wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting vote
> >>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his
> own
> >>> name idea and others can give him +1.
> >>>
> >>
> >> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider.  We
> >> should
> >> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another
> thread.
> >> All this feels a bit rushed,  I am having a bit of a hard time
following
> >> discussions/decisions.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone
> >>> who
>  would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex world.
> 
>  We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path
> >>> where
>  first target will be ports the old one applications.
> 
>  As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company
> >>> as an
>  Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently
they
>  change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone
> >>> from
>  initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite
> >>> there
>  were very good press out there in the company as in outside in
Cracow.
> 
>  I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such tremendous
>  opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - This
is
> >>> what
>  we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS for
> >>> the
>  port, cause it provides me what I need.
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Piotr
> 
>  On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin  wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target
> >>> called
> >> "Dover".
> >>
> >
> > Are you testing the non-native speakers?
> >
> > I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-)
> >
> > EdB
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> > Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > 3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> > T. 06-51952295
> > I.
> >>>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>>
> =02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
> >>>
> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643=BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z%2B%2FPa%2FHfu
> >>> ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D=0
> >
> 
> >>>
> >
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[Andrew Wetmore]

Nsurgent

Deliver

Carrier

Braid (bunch of strands, right?)



On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:

> Royale, in my part of the world, is a low-grade line of processed food
> products: styrofoam-flavored ice cream, and so on.
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  > wrote:
>
>> Hi Harbs,
>>
>> Nice idea. It allows picking up for anyone couple of options.
>>
>> Piotr
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017, 21:57 Harbs  wrote:
>>
>> > I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me.
>> >
>> > Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned.
>> >
>> > I personally like Limber/Limbre.
>> >
>> > I like Boinga in a different way.
>> >
>> > I think that Böja has a great ring to it.
>> >
>> > One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick up
>> to
>> > three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and
>> option
>> > 3 for 1.
>> >
>> > We could then tally up the points for the winners.
>> >
>> > At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call
>> > another vote to decide between the two with the most points.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> > Harbs
>> >
>> > > On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui 
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we
>> > might
>> > > need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other
>> > > suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second
>> > > candidate?  I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name.
>> > >
>> > > If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to
>> > this
>> > > post with that name.  Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe
>> or
>> > > not.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > -Alex
>> > >
>> > > On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>> > Muppirala"
>> > >  wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> > >> 
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting
>> vote
>> > >>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his
>> > own
>> > >>> name idea and others can give him +1.
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider.  We
>> > >> should
>> > >> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another
>> > thread.
>> > >> All this feels a bit rushed,  I am having a bit of a hard time
>> following
>> > >> discussions/decisions.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Om
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Piotr
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki <
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> >  As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone
>> > >>> who
>> >  would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex
>> world.
>> > 
>> >  We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path
>> > >>> where
>> >  first target will be ports the old one applications.
>> > 
>> >  As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company
>> > >>> as an
>> >  Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently
>> they
>> >  change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone
>> > >>> from
>> >  initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite
>> > >>> there
>> >  were very good press out there in the company as in outside in
>> Cracow.
>> > 
>> >  I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such
>> tremendous
>> >  opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread -
>> This is
>> > >>> what
>> >  we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS
>> for
>> > >>> the
>> >  port, cause it provides me what I need.
>> > 
>> >  Thanks,
>> >  Piotr
>> > 
>> >  On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin 
>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > >>
>> > >> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target
>> > >>> called
>> > >> "Dover".
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Are you testing the non-native speakers?
>> > >
>> > > I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-)
>> > >
>> > > EdB
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Ix Multimedia Software
>> > >
>> > > Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> > > 3521 VB Utrecht
>> > >
>> > > T. 06-51952295
>> > > I.
>> > >>>
>> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.
>> ixsoftware.nl
>> > >>>
>> > =02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3
>> 4438794aed2c1
>> > >>>
>> > 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643=BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z%
>> 2B%2FPa%2FHfu
>> > >>> ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D=0
>> > >
>> > 
>> > >>>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[Andrew Wetmore]

Royale, in my part of the world, is a low-grade line of processed food
products: styrofoam-flavored ice cream, and so on.

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> Hi Harbs,
>
> Nice idea. It allows picking up for anyone couple of options.
>
> Piotr
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017, 21:57 Harbs  wrote:
>
> > I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me.
> >
> > Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned.
> >
> > I personally like Limber/Limbre.
> >
> > I like Boinga in a different way.
> >
> > I think that Böja has a great ring to it.
> >
> > One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick up
> to
> > three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and
> option
> > 3 for 1.
> >
> > We could then tally up the points for the winners.
> >
> > At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call
> > another vote to decide between the two with the most points.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we
> > might
> > > need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other
> > > suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second
> > > candidate?  I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name.
> > >
> > > If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to
> > this
> > > post with that name.  Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe
> or
> > > not.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> > Muppirala"
> > >  wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
> > >> 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting vote
> > >>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his
> > own
> > >>> name idea and others can give him +1.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider.  We
> > >> should
> > >> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another
> > thread.
> > >> All this feels a bit rushed,  I am having a bit of a hard time
> following
> > >> discussions/decisions.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Om
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Piotr
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone
> > >>> who
> >  would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex
> world.
> > 
> >  We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path
> > >>> where
> >  first target will be ports the old one applications.
> > 
> >  As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company
> > >>> as an
> >  Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently
> they
> >  change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone
> > >>> from
> >  initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite
> > >>> there
> >  were very good press out there in the company as in outside in
> Cracow.
> > 
> >  I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such tremendous
> >  opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - This
> is
> > >>> what
> >  we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS
> for
> > >>> the
> >  port, cause it provides me what I need.
> > 
> >  Thanks,
> >  Piotr
> > 
> >  On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin 
> wrote:
> > 
> > >>
> > >> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target
> > >>> called
> > >> "Dover".
> > >>
> > >
> > > Are you testing the non-native speakers?
> > >
> > > I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-)
> > >
> > > EdB
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ix Multimedia Software
> > >
> > > Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > > 3521 VB Utrecht
> > >
> > > T. 06-51952295
> > > I.
> > >>>
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.ixsoftware.nl
> > >>>
> > =02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
> > >>>
> > 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643=
> BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z%2B%2FPa%2FHfu
> > >>> ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D=0
> > >
> > 
> > >>>
> > >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi Harbs,

Nice idea. It allows picking up for anyone couple of options.

Piotr

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017, 21:57 Harbs  wrote:

> I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me.
>
> Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned.
>
> I personally like Limber/Limbre.
>
> I like Boinga in a different way.
>
> I think that Böja has a great ring to it.
>
> One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick up to
> three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and option
> 3 for 1.
>
> We could then tally up the points for the winners.
>
> At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call
> another vote to decide between the two with the most points.
>
> Thoughts?
> Harbs
>
> > On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui 
> wrote:
> >
> > Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we
> might
> > need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other
> > suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second
> > candidate?  I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name.
> >
> > If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to
> this
> > post with that name.  Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe or
> > not.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala"
> >  wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting vote
> >>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his
> own
> >>> name idea and others can give him +1.
> >>>
> >>
> >> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider.  We
> >> should
> >> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another
> thread.
> >> All this feels a bit rushed,  I am having a bit of a hard time following
> >> discussions/decisions.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone
> >>> who
>  would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex world.
> 
>  We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path
> >>> where
>  first target will be ports the old one applications.
> 
>  As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company
> >>> as an
>  Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently they
>  change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone
> >>> from
>  initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite
> >>> there
>  were very good press out there in the company as in outside in Cracow.
> 
>  I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such tremendous
>  opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - This is
> >>> what
>  we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS for
> >>> the
>  port, cause it provides me what I need.
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Piotr
> 
>  On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin  wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target
> >>> called
> >> "Dover".
> >>
> >
> > Are you testing the non-native speakers?
> >
> > I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-)
> >
> > EdB
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> > Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > 3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> > T. 06-51952295
> > I.
> >>>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>>
> =02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
> >>>
> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643=BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z%2B%2FPa%2FHfu
> >>> ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D=0
> >
> 
> >>>
> >
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

[Harbs]

I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me.

Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned.

I personally like Limber/Limbre.

I like Boinga in a different way.

I think that Böja has a great ring to it.

One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick up to 
three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and option 3 
for 1.

We could then tally up the points for the winners.

At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call another 
vote to decide between the two with the most points.

Thoughts?
Harbs

> On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we might
> need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other
> suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second
> candidate?  I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name.
> 
> If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to this
> post with that name.  Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe or
> not.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
>  wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting vote
>>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his own
>>> name idea and others can give him +1.
>>> 
>> 
>> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider.  We
>> should
>> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another thread.
>> All this feels a bit rushed,  I am having a bit of a hard time following
>> discussions/decisions.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone
>>> who
 would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex world.
 
 We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path
>>> where
 first target will be ports the old one applications.
 
 As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company
>>> as an
 Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently they
 change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone
>>> from
 initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite
>>> there
 were very good press out there in the company as in outside in Cracow.
 
 I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such tremendous
 opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - This is
>>> what
 we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS for
>>> the
 port, cause it provides me what I need.
 
 Thanks,
 Piotr
 
 On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin  wrote:
 
>> 
>> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target
>>> called
>> "Dover".
>> 
> 
> Are you testing the non-native speakers?
> 
> I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-)
> 
> EdB
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
> 
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
> 
> T. 06-51952295
> I. 
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl
>>> =02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643=BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z%2B%2FPa%2FHfu
>>> ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D=0
> 
 
>>> 
> 

Re: [FlexJS, AMF] Steps to make FlexJS / Java - RemoteObject / AMF sample work

[PKumar]

Alex,

I kept ClassAliasBead at Application level and my demo started working. I
noted following issues:

VO with inheritance not working, as Car  extends Vehicle
ArrayList  serialization not working
Custom Array not working

I am testing with more dataType and will update you further.

Thanks,
Prashant




--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

[Alex Harui]

Abstain.  Gonna go with the flow...

On 9/15/17, 4:22 PM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:

>Alex -you have not voted. Please vote folks.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
>> 
>> Is this a No Binging VOTE?
>> 
>>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui 
>>>wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name?  I
>>>don't
>>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Alex
>>> 
 On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent"  wrote:
 
 No (binding)
 
> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
> 
> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> 
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be
> discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called.
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00
>UT.
> 
 
>>> 
>> 
>