Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Nope. I'm still waiting on Michelle on confirmation of both the Tour de Flex and Flex Docs donation status. Alex has been helping me ping her on the Tour de Flex ones. -Nick On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:36 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure that Adobe has to submit the Software Grant. I'll check > > with Michelle off-list. > > > > Regarding Nokia images, you might have to settle for hand-drawing some > > artwork. > > > > > Hi, > > Any update on this process? > > Nick, should we go ahead and create the top level "flex-examples" repo as > discussed? Any objections? > > Thanks, > Om > > > > > > On 4/22/13 6:27 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > > > > Not yet. Don't know if it is my place to do it, or somebody at Adobe. > > If > > > you can help with that aspect, that would rock. I was merely working > on > > > the coding side to make sure that it meets the technical requirements > > > (passing RAT, updating logos, etc.). Other than the actual putting the > > > code into the repo, I still need to find a suitable replacement of the > > > nokia images... Otherwise, we are good to go with it.. > > > > > > -Nick > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 4/21/13 9:28 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Alex Harui > wrote: > > >>> > > > > > > > > On 4/20/13 5:23 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" > wrote: > > > > > > > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on > it > > for a > > > few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last > > version > > > Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming > > we > > will > > > be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to > > >> hosting > > > the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place > > for > > it > > > would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT > > repo... > > Nick, what are the legal aspects of you donating this? Is it open > > >> source > > under a compatible license? Even then, I think it needs Adobe > > >> sign-off, or > > did I miss something? > > > > > > >>> I've been working with the ADC team (Michelle in particular). She > has > > >> the > > >>> Adobe sign-off for donation for that project. I've gone through the > > >> project > > >>> and updated the headers and removed a few examples that were written > by > > >> 3rd > > >>> party contributors attributed with non-compatible licenses (for > > example, > > >>> the samples written by IBM for the Elixr component sets). We, > > >> collectively > > >>> can re-introduce those components examples should we want to host > them. > > >> I > > >>> imagine that will happen with some of them. > > >>> > > >>> Michelle is still working on getting the Flex Docs donated as well. > No > > >>> word on that front for a while, but I would like to get the Tour de > > Flex > > >> up > > >>> and public again. > > >> > > >> OK, thanks for working on it. Did the paperwork for Tour de Flex get > > filed > > >> with Apache? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Alex Harui > > >> Flex SDK Team > > >> Adobe Systems, Inc. > > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > >> > > >> > > > > -- > > Alex Harui > > Flex SDK Team > > Adobe Systems, Inc. > > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > > > >
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Still no word from Michelle. I'll try again. On 5/20/13 11:36 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> I'm pretty sure that Adobe has to submit the Software Grant. I'll check >> with Michelle off-list. >> >> Regarding Nokia images, you might have to settle for hand-drawing some >> artwork. >> >> >Hi, > >Any update on this process? > >Nick, should we go ahead and create the top level "flex-examples" repo as >discussed? Any objections? > >Thanks, >Om > > >> >> On 4/22/13 6:27 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: >> >> > Not yet. Don't know if it is my place to do it, or somebody at Adobe. >> If >> > you can help with that aspect, that would rock. I was merely working >>on >> > the coding side to make sure that it meets the technical requirements >> > (passing RAT, updating logos, etc.). Other than the actual putting >>the >> > code into the repo, I still need to find a suitable replacement of the >> > nokia images... Otherwise, we are good to go with it.. >> > >> > -Nick >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 4/21/13 9:28 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Alex Harui >>wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> >> On 4/20/13 5:23 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" >>wrote: >> >> >> > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting >>on it >> for a >> > few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last >> version >> > Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm >>assuming >> we >> will >> > be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to >> >> hosting >> > the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good >>place >> for >> it >> > would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT >> repo... >> Nick, what are the legal aspects of you donating this? Is it open >> >> source >> under a compatible license? Even then, I think it needs Adobe >> >> sign-off, or >> did I miss something? >> >> >> >>> I've been working with the ADC team (Michelle in particular). She >>has >> >> the >> >>> Adobe sign-off for donation for that project. I've gone through the >> >> project >> >>> and updated the headers and removed a few examples that were >>written by >> >> 3rd >> >>> party contributors attributed with non-compatible licenses (for >> example, >> >>> the samples written by IBM for the Elixr component sets). We, >> >> collectively >> >>> can re-introduce those components examples should we want to host >>them. >> >> I >> >>> imagine that will happen with some of them. >> >>> >> >>> Michelle is still working on getting the Flex Docs donated as well. >> No >> >>> word on that front for a while, but I would like to get the Tour de >> Flex >> >> up >> >>> and public again. >> >> >> >> OK, thanks for working on it. Did the paperwork for Tour de Flex get >> filed >> >> with Apache? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Alex Harui >> >> Flex SDK Team >> >> Adobe Systems, Inc. >> >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Alex Harui >> Flex SDK Team >> Adobe Systems, Inc. >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >> >>
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > I'm pretty sure that Adobe has to submit the Software Grant. I'll check > with Michelle off-list. > > Regarding Nokia images, you might have to settle for hand-drawing some > artwork. > > Hi, Any update on this process? Nick, should we go ahead and create the top level "flex-examples" repo as discussed? Any objections? Thanks, Om > > On 4/22/13 6:27 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > > Not yet. Don't know if it is my place to do it, or somebody at Adobe. > If > > you can help with that aspect, that would rock. I was merely working on > > the coding side to make sure that it meets the technical requirements > > (passing RAT, updating logos, etc.). Other than the actual putting the > > code into the repo, I still need to find a suitable replacement of the > > nokia images... Otherwise, we are good to go with it.. > > > > -Nick > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/21/13 9:28 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >>> > > > > On 4/20/13 5:23 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > > > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it > for a > > few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last > version > > Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming > we > will > > be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to > >> hosting > > the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place > for > it > > would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT > repo... > Nick, what are the legal aspects of you donating this? Is it open > >> source > under a compatible license? Even then, I think it needs Adobe > >> sign-off, or > did I miss something? > > > >>> I've been working with the ADC team (Michelle in particular). She has > >> the > >>> Adobe sign-off for donation for that project. I've gone through the > >> project > >>> and updated the headers and removed a few examples that were written by > >> 3rd > >>> party contributors attributed with non-compatible licenses (for > example, > >>> the samples written by IBM for the Elixr component sets). We, > >> collectively > >>> can re-introduce those components examples should we want to host them. > >> I > >>> imagine that will happen with some of them. > >>> > >>> Michelle is still working on getting the Flex Docs donated as well. No > >>> word on that front for a while, but I would like to get the Tour de > Flex > >> up > >>> and public again. > >> > >> OK, thanks for working on it. Did the paperwork for Tour de Flex get > filed > >> with Apache? > >> > >> -- > >> Alex Harui > >> Flex SDK Team > >> Adobe Systems, Inc. > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >> > >> > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
RE: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Hi, >> the samples written by IBM for the Elixr component sets I checked out the IBM link below to see what hits Tour de Flex is getting and I was amazed to see the it was getting around 7-10 hits a minute from around the world http://visunetdemos.demos.ibm.com/tourdeflex/TdFDashboard/TourDeFlexDashboar d.html This shows that there is still a huge interest in Flex.. Regards, Sugan -Original Message- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as] Sent: 22 April 2013 03:28 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up Not yet. Don't know if it is my place to do it, or somebody at Adobe. If you can help with that aspect, that would rock. I was merely working on the coding side to make sure that it meets the technical requirements (passing RAT, updating logos, etc.). Other than the actual putting the code into the repo, I still need to find a suitable replacement of the nokia images... Otherwise, we are good to go with it.. -Nick On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 4/21/13 9:28 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/20/13 5:23 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > >> > >> > >>> - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on > >>> it > >> for a > >>> few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version > >>> Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we > >> will > >>> be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to > hosting > >>> the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good > >>> place for > >> it > >>> would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT > >> repo... > >> Nick, what are the legal aspects of you donating this? Is it open > source > >> under a compatible license? Even then, I think it needs Adobe > sign-off, or > >> did I miss something? > >> > >> > > I've been working with the ADC team (Michelle in particular). She > > has > the > > Adobe sign-off for donation for that project. I've gone through the > project > > and updated the headers and removed a few examples that were written > > by > 3rd > > party contributors attributed with non-compatible licenses (for > > example, the samples written by IBM for the Elixr component sets). > > We, > collectively > > can re-introduce those components examples should we want to host them. > I > > imagine that will happen with some of them. > > > > Michelle is still working on getting the Flex Docs donated as well. > > No word on that front for a while, but I would like to get the Tour > > de Flex > up > > and public again. > > OK, thanks for working on it. Did the paperwork for Tour de Flex get > filed with Apache? > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
I'm pretty sure that Adobe has to submit the Software Grant. I'll check with Michelle off-list. Regarding Nokia images, you might have to settle for hand-drawing some artwork. On 4/22/13 6:27 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > Not yet. Don't know if it is my place to do it, or somebody at Adobe. If > you can help with that aspect, that would rock. I was merely working on > the coding side to make sure that it meets the technical requirements > (passing RAT, updating logos, etc.). Other than the actual putting the > code into the repo, I still need to find a suitable replacement of the > nokia images... Otherwise, we are good to go with it.. > > -Nick > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 4/21/13 9:28 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >>> On 4/20/13 5:23 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it for a > few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version > Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we will > be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to >> hosting > the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for it > would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT repo... Nick, what are the legal aspects of you donating this? Is it open >> source under a compatible license? Even then, I think it needs Adobe >> sign-off, or did I miss something? >>> I've been working with the ADC team (Michelle in particular). She has >> the >>> Adobe sign-off for donation for that project. I've gone through the >> project >>> and updated the headers and removed a few examples that were written by >> 3rd >>> party contributors attributed with non-compatible licenses (for example, >>> the samples written by IBM for the Elixr component sets). We, >> collectively >>> can re-introduce those components examples should we want to host them. >> I >>> imagine that will happen with some of them. >>> >>> Michelle is still working on getting the Flex Docs donated as well. No >>> word on that front for a while, but I would like to get the Tour de Flex >> up >>> and public again. >> >> OK, thanks for working on it. Did the paperwork for Tour de Flex get filed >> with Apache? >> >> -- >> Alex Harui >> Flex SDK Team >> Adobe Systems, Inc. >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >> >> -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Not yet. Don't know if it is my place to do it, or somebody at Adobe. If you can help with that aspect, that would rock. I was merely working on the coding side to make sure that it meets the technical requirements (passing RAT, updating logos, etc.). Other than the actual putting the code into the repo, I still need to find a suitable replacement of the nokia images... Otherwise, we are good to go with it.. -Nick On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 4/21/13 9:28 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/20/13 5:23 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > >> > >> > >>> - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it > >> for a > >>> few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version > >>> Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we > >> will > >>> be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to > hosting > >>> the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for > >> it > >>> would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT > >> repo... > >> Nick, what are the legal aspects of you donating this? Is it open > source > >> under a compatible license? Even then, I think it needs Adobe > sign-off, or > >> did I miss something? > >> > >> > > I've been working with the ADC team (Michelle in particular). She has > the > > Adobe sign-off for donation for that project. I've gone through the > project > > and updated the headers and removed a few examples that were written by > 3rd > > party contributors attributed with non-compatible licenses (for example, > > the samples written by IBM for the Elixr component sets). We, > collectively > > can re-introduce those components examples should we want to host them. > I > > imagine that will happen with some of them. > > > > Michelle is still working on getting the Flex Docs donated as well. No > > word on that front for a while, but I would like to get the Tour de Flex > up > > and public again. > > OK, thanks for working on it. Did the paperwork for Tour de Flex get filed > with Apache? > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
On 4/21/13 9:28 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 4/20/13 5:23 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: >> >> >>> - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it >> for a >>> few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version >>> Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we >> will >>> be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting >>> the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for >> it >>> would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT >> repo... >> Nick, what are the legal aspects of you donating this? Is it open source >> under a compatible license? Even then, I think it needs Adobe sign-off, or >> did I miss something? >> >> > I've been working with the ADC team (Michelle in particular). She has the > Adobe sign-off for donation for that project. I've gone through the project > and updated the headers and removed a few examples that were written by 3rd > party contributors attributed with non-compatible licenses (for example, > the samples written by IBM for the Elixr component sets). We, collectively > can re-introduce those components examples should we want to host them. I > imagine that will happen with some of them. > > Michelle is still working on getting the Flex Docs donated as well. No > word on that front for a while, but I would like to get the Tour de Flex up > and public again. OK, thanks for working on it. Did the paperwork for Tour de Flex get filed with Apache? -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Fred,
Can you update the Mustella WIKI page with that information?
-Nick
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> To be more precise, the result of this git command gives, for the 2 first
> chars, the status of the index and the working copy changes/add/remove of
> the files, for that reason, it has to cleaned up of this extra info before
> to be used by the chooser, or, the other option it to make the chooser
> compatible making it accepting both format.
>
> Update: I just had a look at the code:
>
> var files:Array = statusLog.text.split("\n");
> var modFiles:Array = [];
> for (var i:int = 0; i < n; i++)
> {
>var file:String = files[i];
>if (file.charAt(0) == "M")
>{
>modFiles.push(file);
>}
> }
>
> So, apparently, it uses only the modified files, so, the git command
> should be git status -s | grep "^[ M]"
>
> The code could be left trimmed on the 2 first chars of the line before: if
> (file.charAt(0) == "M")
>
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 6:01 PM
>
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
>
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
> **wrote:
>
> ok, did you compile the all test at least once and ran mustella db ?
>>
>>
> Yes. I have been able to use the tool successfully before the move to SVN.
>
>
> one more point, if there is a space as a first char of the output lines,
>> they should be remove before you can use them as the chooser input.
>>
>>
>> I will check on that. That may be the problem (other than the change from
> SVN to GIT, I'm now using gitbash instead of cygwin. I've noticed that
> copy/paste is a bit wonky under gitbash which may be adding to the
> issues).
>
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
To be more precise, the result of this git command gives, for the 2 first
chars, the status of the index and the working copy changes/add/remove of
the files, for that reason, it has to cleaned up of this extra info before
to be used by the chooser, or, the other option it to make the chooser
compatible making it accepting both format.
Update: I just had a look at the code:
var files:Array = statusLog.text.split("\n");
var modFiles:Array = [];
for (var i:int = 0; i < n; i++)
{
var file:String = files[i];
if (file.charAt(0) == "M")
{
modFiles.push(file);
}
}
So, apparently, it uses only the modified files, so, the git command should
be git status -s | grep "^[ M]"
The code could be left trimmed on the 2 first chars of the line before: if
(file.charAt(0) == "M")
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 6:01 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
ok, did you compile the all test at least once and ran mustella db ?
Yes. I have been able to use the tool successfully before the move to SVN.
one more point, if there is a space as a first char of the output lines,
they should be remove before you can use them as the chooser input.
I will check on that. That may be the problem (other than the change from
SVN to GIT, I'm now using gitbash instead of cygwin. I've noticed that
copy/paste is a bit wonky under gitbash which may be adding to the issues).
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 4/20/13 5:23 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > > > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it > for a > > few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version > > Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we > will > > be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting > > the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for > it > > would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT > repo... > Nick, what are the legal aspects of you donating this? Is it open source > under a compatible license? Even then, I think it needs Adobe sign-off, or > did I miss something? > > I've been working with the ADC team (Michelle in particular). She has the Adobe sign-off for donation for that project. I've gone through the project and updated the headers and removed a few examples that were written by 3rd party contributors attributed with non-compatible licenses (for example, the samples written by IBM for the Elixr component sets). We, collectively can re-introduce those components examples should we want to host them. I imagine that will happen with some of them. Michelle is still working on getting the Flex Docs donated as well. No word on that front for a while, but I would like to get the Tour de Flex up and public again. -Nick
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > ok, did you compile the all test at least once and ran mustella db ? > Yes. I have been able to use the tool successfully before the move to SVN. > one more point, if there is a space as a first char of the output lines, > they should be remove before you can use them as the chooser input. > > I will check on that. That may be the problem (other than the change from SVN to GIT, I'm now using gitbash instead of cygwin. I've noticed that copy/paste is a bit wonky under gitbash which may be adding to the issues).
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
ok, did you compile the all test at least once and ran mustella db ? one more point, if there is a space as a first char of the output lines, they should be remove before you can use them as the chooser input. -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 4:22 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up I don't think that is working as expected... I'll play around a bit more with it, though... Might be because I'm on Windows... -Nick On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: For the MustellaTestChooser, use as input, the output of: git status -s | grep "^[A M]" -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 2:23 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up Hey everybody! I've been out of the loop for the last three weeks or so. Life has gotten in the way. Anyway, I have a few questions : - Has MustellaTestChooser been updated to use output from GIT? Been working on a few different bugs and I'm getting tired of waiting for all the tests to run ;P - What is the status of the Whiteboard stuff? I have a few updates I wanted to make to one of the components I was working on I'm assuming this is still on SVN for the time being? - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it for a few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we will be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for it would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT repo... - I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the framework to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. Is somebody working on the documentation to include that? - From what I've been seeing, people have been fixing bugs in develop yet I see a few branches for specific bug fixes. What standard should I be following going forward? Thanks! -Nick
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
On 4/20/13 5:23 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it for a > few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version > Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we will > be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting > the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for it > would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT repo... Nick, what are the legal aspects of you donating this? Is it open source under a compatible license? Even then, I think it needs Adobe sign-off, or did I miss something? -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Waiting shouldn't be a problem. I've been developing on my own machine. I'll merge the changes when things are cleared up. On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > On Apr 20, 2013 5:24 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > > > Hey everybody! > > > > I've been out of the loop for the last three weeks or so. Life has > gotten > > in the way. > > > > Anyway, I have a few questions : > > > > - Has MustellaTestChooser been updated to use output from GIT? Been > > working on a few different bugs and I'm getting tired of waiting for all > > the tests to run ;P > > - What is the status of the Whiteboard stuff? I have a few updates I > > wanted to make to one of the components I was working on I'm > assuming > > this is still on SVN for the time being? > > I think SVN is read-only now. I am working on the GitHub prototype which I > will be sending out an email about soon. > > I hope you can wait for a bit? > > Thanks, > Om > > > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it for > a > > few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version > > Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we > will > > be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting > > the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for > it > > would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT > repo... > > - I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the > framework > > to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. Is somebody > > working on the documentation to include that? > > - From what I've been seeing, people have been fixing bugs in > develop > > yet I see a few branches for specific bug fixes. What standard should I > > be following going forward? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Nick >
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
I don't think that is working as expected... I'll play around a bit more with it, though... Might be because I'm on Windows... -Nick On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > For the MustellaTestChooser, use as input, the output of: git status -s | > grep "^[A M]" > > -Fred > > -Message d'origine- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 2:23 AM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up > > > Hey everybody! > > I've been out of the loop for the last three weeks or so. Life has gotten > in the way. > > Anyway, I have a few questions : > > - Has MustellaTestChooser been updated to use output from GIT? Been > working on a few different bugs and I'm getting tired of waiting for all > the tests to run ;P > - What is the status of the Whiteboard stuff? I have a few updates I > wanted to make to one of the components I was working on I'm assuming > this is still on SVN for the time being? > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it for a > few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version > Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we will > be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting > the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for it > would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT repo... > - I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the framework > to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. Is somebody > working on the documentation to include that? > - From what I've been seeing, people have been fixing bugs in develop > yet I see a few branches for specific bug fixes. What standard should I > be following going forward? > > Thanks! > > -Nick >
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > utilities seems a good place to me. People may want to add examples for > the new experimental components? > > > - I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the framework > > to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. > It's documented in README - there are still some minor issues with it. > "The build scripts assume that the tlf folder is a sibling of the sdk > folder. If > this is not true, then set the TLF_HOME environment variable to point to > the > tlf folder. Instead of setting an environment variable you may also set > it in > env.properties." > > I just saw it. It is not documented in the env-template.properties, nor do we talk about it in the Install Prerequisites section (where we talk about the other environment vars). We may want to move it so people as ignorant as me don't miss it ;) -Nick
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Hi, > I would love to see a top-level flex-examples repo for this like this. > Utilities is not the right place for this. That also works. Justin
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
On Apr 20, 2013 5:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > > - What is the status of the Whiteboard stuff? > Still undecided as far as I know. Githib mirrors still browen as well. Yes, no action from Infra on the related JIRA ticket. I will give it a bump when I get a chance. > > > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate. Where do we want this to appear? > A top level folder in utilities seems a good place to me. People may want to add examples for the new experimental components? I would love to see a top-level flex-examples repo for this like this. Utilities is not the right place for this. > > > - I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the framework > > to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. > It's documented in README - there are still some minor issues with it. > "The build scripts assume that the tlf folder is a sibling of the sdk folder. If > this is not true, then set the TLF_HOME environment variable to point to the > tlf folder. Instead of setting an environment variable you may also set it in > env.properties." > > > - From what I've been seeing, people have been fixing bugs in develop > Unless there's a need for more than one person working on it no need to share a branch. > > Thanks, > Justin >
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
On Apr 20, 2013 5:24 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > Hey everybody! > > I've been out of the loop for the last three weeks or so. Life has gotten > in the way. > > Anyway, I have a few questions : > > - Has MustellaTestChooser been updated to use output from GIT? Been > working on a few different bugs and I'm getting tired of waiting for all > the tests to run ;P > - What is the status of the Whiteboard stuff? I have a few updates I > wanted to make to one of the components I was working on I'm assuming > this is still on SVN for the time being? I think SVN is read-only now. I am working on the GitHub prototype which I will be sending out an email about soon. I hope you can wait for a bit? Thanks, Om > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it for a > few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version > Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we will > be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting > the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for it > would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT repo... > - I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the framework > to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. Is somebody > working on the documentation to include that? > - From what I've been seeing, people have been fixing bugs in develop > yet I see a few branches for specific bug fixes. What standard should I > be following going forward? > > Thanks! > > -Nick
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
For the MustellaTestChooser, use as input, the output of: git status -s | grep "^[A M]" -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 2:23 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up Hey everybody! I've been out of the loop for the last three weeks or so. Life has gotten in the way. Anyway, I have a few questions : - Has MustellaTestChooser been updated to use output from GIT? Been working on a few different bugs and I'm getting tired of waiting for all the tests to run ;P - What is the status of the Whiteboard stuff? I have a few updates I wanted to make to one of the components I was working on I'm assuming this is still on SVN for the time being? - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it for a few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we will be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for it would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT repo... - I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the framework to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. Is somebody working on the documentation to include that? - From what I've been seeing, people have been fixing bugs in develop yet I see a few branches for specific bug fixes. What standard should I be following going forward? Thanks! -Nick
Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Hi, > - What is the status of the Whiteboard stuff? Still undecided as far as I know. Githib mirrors still browen as well. > - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate. Where do we want this to > appear? A top level folder in utilities seems a good place to me. People may want to add examples for the new experimental components? > - I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the framework > to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. It's documented in README - there are still some minor issues with it. "The build scripts assume that the tlf folder is a sibling of the sdk folder. If this is not true, then set the TLF_HOME environment variable to point to the tlf folder. Instead of setting an environment variable you may also set it in env.properties." > - From what I've been seeing, people have been fixing bugs in develop Unless there's a need for more than one person working on it no need to share a branch. Thanks, Justin
Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Hey everybody! I've been out of the loop for the last three weeks or so. Life has gotten in the way. Anyway, I have a few questions : - Has MustellaTestChooser been updated to use output from GIT? Been working on a few different bugs and I'm getting tired of waiting for all the tests to run ;P - What is the status of the Whiteboard stuff? I have a few updates I wanted to make to one of the components I was working on I'm assuming this is still on SVN for the time being? - I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it for a few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we will be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for it would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT repo... - I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the framework to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. Is somebody working on the documentation to include that? - From what I've been seeing, people have been fixing bugs in develop yet I see a few branches for specific bug fixes. What standard should I be following going forward? Thanks! -Nick
