Re: FlexUnit open pull request from github

2013-09-03 Thread Alex Harui


On 9/3/13 1:17 PM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
 wrote:

>>I will check the patches and see if any of the names cross-reference
>>with those who had signed agreements, but I highly doubt it or their
>>patches would have likely already been integrated.
>
>None have agreements. I can post a comment on each github issue asking
>them to approve the integration into Apache. What did we decide was
>requisite to accept the existing pull request. If we had each comment on
>the jira issue acknowledging they created the patch and wish to donate
>it, would that be acceptable? Honestly, I think it's unlikely you are
>going to get much of a response to that request let alone a larger one.
JIRA or email is probably good enough.

-Alex



RE: FlexUnit open pull request from github

2013-09-03 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>FWIW, Adobe did not need to contact any of its prior patch providers because 
>the terms and conditions of providing the patch gave Adobe ownership and 
>therefore the right to donate.

We did have an agreement, in fact the Adobe one since FlexUnit .9 was under the 
Adobe banner. This had to be signed by anyone whose patch was integrated into 
our master. However, as is the nature of github, anyone could create a patch at 
any time and, according to our license, distribute that code for others to use.

I will check the patches and see if any of the names cross-reference with those 
who had signed agreements, but I highly doubt it or their patches would have 
likely already been integrated.

Mike



RE: FlexUnit open pull request from github

2013-09-03 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>I will check the patches and see if any of the names cross-reference with 
>those who had signed agreements, but I highly doubt it or their patches would 
>have likely already been integrated.

None have agreements. I can post a comment on each github issue asking them to 
approve the integration into Apache. What did we decide was requisite to accept 
the existing pull request. If we had each comment on the jira issue 
acknowledging they created the patch and wish to donate it, would that be 
acceptable? Honestly, I think it's unlikely you are going to get much of a 
response to that request let alone a larger one.

Mike



FlexUnit open pull request from github

2013-09-03 Thread Cyrill Zadra
Hi

There are still 4 patches for FlexUnit in JIRA which needs approvment by
their author. They only have to approve the move to Apache through a JIRA
comment . I tried to get in contact with them but was only successful with
one person.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33571
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33573
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33574
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33575

I need some help here . Maybe someone knows here anyone of those authors
and have some direct contact.

Thanks
Cyrill


Re: FlexUnit open pull request from github

2013-09-03 Thread Alex Harui
FWIW, Adobe did not need to contact any of its prior patch providers
because the terms and conditions of providing the patch gave Adobe
ownership and therefore the right to donate.

Was there any similar agreement for FlexUnit?

-Alex

On 9/3/13 8:50 AM, "Cyrill Zadra"  wrote:

>Hi
>
>There are still 4 patches for FlexUnit in JIRA which needs approvment by
>their author. They only have to approve the move to Apache through a JIRA
>comment . I tried to get in contact with them but was only successful with
>one person.
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33571
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33573
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33574
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33575
>
>I need some help here . Maybe someone knows here anyone of those authors
>and have some direct contact.
>
>Thanks
>Cyrill