[RESULT] [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Ufuk Celebi]

Hi everyone,

I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved the integration of
the Docker image publication into the Flink release process.

+1s (17 votes in total, 6 binding, 11 non-binding):

- Till Rohrmann (binding)
- Stephan Ewen (binding)
- Fabian Hüske (binding)
- Konstantin Knauf (non-binding)
- Patrick Lucas (non-binding)
- Yun Tang (non-binding)
- Ismaël Mejía (non-binding)
- Rong Rong (binding)
- Yang Wang (non-binding)
- Peter Huang (non-binding)
- Hequn Cheng (non-binding)
- Arvid Heise (non-binding)
- Yu Li (binding)
- Igal Shilman (non-binding)
- Aihua Li (non-binding)
- Jingsong Li (non-binding)
- Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai (binding)

No -1s.

As noted in the VOTE thread, the vote was executed as a "Release Plan",
counting committer votes as binding [1].

I created the following ticket to track development of this proposal:

  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15828

– Ufuk

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Ufuk Celebi]

Thanks a lot for your voting. The voting period has passed and we have a
sufficient number of votes.

I’ll summarize the result in a separate email.

Cheers,

Ufuk


On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Cheers,
> Gordon
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:16 PM Jingsong Li 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Official docker support really looks good to me.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jingsong Lee
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:55 AM aihua li  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > > 2020年1月30日 下午7:36，Igal Shilman  写道：
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li  wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Best Regards,
> > > >> Yu
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise 
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske 
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi Ismael,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > > >> official
> > > >>>> docker image in this case?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
> > > >> images
> > > >>>> for every Flink release.
> > > >>>> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> > > >>>> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via
> > ASF
> > > >>> Infra
> > > >>>> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>> Fabian
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> > > >>>> chenghe...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>> :
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
> > > >> main
> > > >>>>> repo,
> > > >>>>> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> > > >>> huangzhenqiu0...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <
> danrtsey...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>> Yang
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>> Rong
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
> > > >> ieme...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> > > >>> 

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai]

+1 (binding)

Cheers,
Gordon

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:16 PM Jingsong Li  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Official docker support really looks good to me.
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:55 AM aihua li  wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > > 2020年1月30日 下午7:36，Igal Shilman  写道：
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li  wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Yu
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Ismael,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > >> official
> > >>>> docker image in this case?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
> > >> images
> > >>>> for every Flink release.
> > >>>> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> > >>>> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via
> ASF
> > >>> Infra
> > >>>> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Fabian
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> > >>>> chenghe...@gmail.com
> > >>>>> :
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
> > >> main
> > >>>>> repo,
> > >>>>> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> > >>> huangzhenqiu0...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang 
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>> Yang
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Rong
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
> > >> ieme...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> > >>> was
> > >>>>>> mostly
> > >>>>>>>>> done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > >>>>>>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > >>>>>> official
> > >>>>>>>>> docker image in this case?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>> Ismaël
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> > >>>>> target.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> >

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Jingsong Li]

+1 (non-binding)

Official docker support really looks good to me.

Best,
Jingsong Lee

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:55 AM aihua li  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > 2020年1月30日 下午7:36，Igal Shilman  写道：
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li  wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yu
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise  wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Ismael,
> >>>>
> >>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> >> official
> >>>> docker image in this case?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
> >> images
> >>>> for every Flink release.
> >>>> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> >>>> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> >>>>
> >>>> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF
> >>> Infra
> >>>> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Fabian
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> >>>>
> >>>> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> >>>> chenghe...@gmail.com
> >>>>> :
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
> >> main
> >>>>> repo,
> >>>>> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> >>> huangzhenqiu0...@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>> Yang
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Rong
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
> >> ieme...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> >>> was
> >>>>>> mostly
> >>>>>>>>> done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> >>>>>>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> >>>>>> official
> >>>>>>>>> docker image in this case?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>> Ismaël
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> >>>>> target.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> >>>> fhue...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> >>>>>>> myas...@live.com
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>&g

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[aihua li]

+1 (non-binding)

> 2020年1月30日 下午7:36，Igal Shilman  写道：
> 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li  wrote:
> 
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Yu
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise  wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Ismael,
>>>> 
>>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
>> official
>>>> docker image in this case?
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
>> images
>>>> for every Flink release.
>>>> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
>>>> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
>>>> 
>>>> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF
>>> Infra
>>>> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Fabian
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
>>>> 
>>>> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
>>>> chenghe...@gmail.com
>>>>> :
>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
>> main
>>>>> repo,
>>>>> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
>>> huangzhenqiu0...@gmail.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Yang
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Rong
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
>> ieme...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
>>> was
>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>>>> done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
>>>>>>>>> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
>>>>>> official
>>>>>>>>> docker image in this case?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Ismaël
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
>>>>> target.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
>>>> fhue...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
>>>>>>> myas...@live.com
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen 
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
>>>>>>>>>>> patr...@ververica.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image
>>> publication
>>>>> into
>>>>>>>> Flink
>>>>>>>>>>> release process
>&

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Igal Shilman]

+1 (non-binding)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:18 PM Yu Li  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise  wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ismael,
> > >
> > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> official
> > > docker image in this case?
> > >
> > > Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub
> images
> > > for every Flink release.
> > > Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> > > apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> > >
> > > Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF
> > Infra
> > > under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Fabian
> > >
> > > [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> > >
> > > Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> > > chenghe...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink
> main
> > > > repo,
> > > > but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> > huangzhenqiu0...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Yang
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Rong
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <
> ieme...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> > was
> > > > > mostly
> > > > > > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > > > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > > > > official
> > > > > > > > docker image in this case?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Ismaël
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> > > > target.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> > > fhue...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > > > > > myas...@live.com
> > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen 
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > > > > > To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> > > > > > > > > > patr...@ververica.com>
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image
> > publication
> > > > into
> > > > > > > Flink
> > > > > > > > > > release process
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Yu Li]

+1 (non-binding)

Best Regards,
Yu


On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 18:35, Arvid Heise  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske  wrote:
>
> > Hi Ismael,
> >
> > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> > docker image in this case?
> >
> > Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub images
> > for every Flink release.
> > Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> > apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
> >
> > Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF
> Infra
> > under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
> >
> > Best,
> > Fabian
> >
> > [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
> >
> > Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> > chenghe...@gmail.com
> > >:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink main
> > > repo,
> > > but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <
> huangzhenqiu0...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Yang
> > > > >
> > > > > Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Rong
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it
> was
> > > > mostly
> > > > > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > > > official
> > > > > > > docker image in this case?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Ismaël
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> > > target.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> > fhue...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > > > > myas...@live.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen 
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > > > > To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> > > > > > > > > patr...@ververica.com>
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image
> publication
> > > into
> > > > > > Flink
> > > > > > > > > release process
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > > > > patr...@ververica.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Arvid Heise]

+1 (non-binding)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske  wrote:

> Hi Ismael,
>
> > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> docker image in this case?
>
> Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub images
> for every Flink release.
> Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
> apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.
>
> Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF Infra
> under the Apache DockerHub user [1].
>
> Best,
> Fabian
>
> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
>
> Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng <
> chenghe...@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink main
> > repo,
> > but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Yang
> > > >
> > > > Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Rong
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was
> > > mostly
> > > > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > > official
> > > > > > docker image in this case?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Ismaël
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> > target.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <
> fhue...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > > > myas...@live.com
> > > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen 
> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > > > To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> > > > > > > > patr...@ververica.com>
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication
> > into
> > > > > Flink
> > > > > > > > release process
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > > > patr...@ververica.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <
> u...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
> > scripts
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the
> Flink
> > > > > project.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Fabian Hueske]

Hi Ismael,

> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
docker image in this case?

Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub images
for every Flink release.
Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to
apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before.

Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF Infra
under the Apache DockerHub user [1].

Best,
Fabian

[1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache

Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng :

> +1
>
> Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink main
> repo,
> but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.
>
> Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Yang
> > >
> > > Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rong
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was
> > mostly
> > > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> > official
> > > > > docker image in this case?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Ismaël
> > > > >
> > > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future
> target.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > > myas...@live.com
> > > > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen 
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > > To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> > > > > > > patr...@ververica.com>
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication
> into
> > > > Flink
> > > > > > > release process
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > > patr...@ververica.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and
> scripts
> > > of
> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink
> > > > project.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the
> reasoning
> > > for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to
> update
> > > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide
> specific
> > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> > earliest
> > > > on:
> > > > > > > > January
> > > > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan"
> as
> > > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider
> > > this a
> > > > > > > > different
> > > > > > > > > category.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Hequn Cheng]

+1

Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink main
repo,
but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea.

Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang 
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang  wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Yang
> >
> > Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rong
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was
> mostly
> > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an
> official
> > > > docker image in this case?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Ismaël
> > > >
> > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> > myas...@live.com
> > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen 
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > > To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> > > > > > patr...@ververica.com>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into
> > > Flink
> > > > > > release process
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> > patr...@ververica.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts
> > of
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink
> > > project.
> > > > > The
> > > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the
> earliest
> > > on:
> > > > > > > January
> > > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> > > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider
> > this a
> > > > > > > different
> > > > > > > > category.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Peter Huang]

+1 (non-binding)



On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> Best,
> Yang
>
> Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：
>
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Rong
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was mostly
> > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> > > docker image in this case?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Ismaël
> > >
> > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <
> myas...@live.com
> > >:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > 
> > > > > From: Stephan Ewen 
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > > To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> > > > > patr...@ververica.com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into
> > Flink
> > > > > release process
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <
> patr...@ververica.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Patrick
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi 
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts
> of
> > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink
> > project.
> > > > The
> > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning
> for
> > > the
> > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> > > > comments)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest
> > on:
> > > > > > January
> > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> > > > mentioned
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider
> this a
> > > > > > different
> > > > > > > category.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Yang Wang]

+1 (non-binding)


Best,
Yang

Rong Rong  于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道：

> +1
>
> --
> Rong
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía  wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was mostly
> > done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> > docker image in this case?
> >
> > Best,
> > Ismaël
> >
> > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske 
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang  >:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > ________
> > > > From: Stephan Ewen 
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > > To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> > > > patr...@ververica.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into
> Flink
> > > > release process
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Patrick
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink
> project.
> > > The
> > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for
> > the
> > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> > > comments)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest
> on:
> > > > > January
> > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ufuk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> > > mentioned
> > > > > in
> > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> > > > > different
> > > > > > category.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > > [2]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Rong Rong]

+1

--
Rong

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was mostly
> done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
> Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
> docker image in this case?
>
> Best,
> Ismaël
>
> ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang :
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > 
> > > From: Stephan Ewen 
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > > To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> > > patr...@ververica.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink
> > > release process
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Patrick
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project.
> > The
> > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for
> the
> > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > > >
> > > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > > apache/flink-docker
> > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > > >
> > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> > comments)
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> > > > January
> > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Ufuk
> > > > >
> > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> > mentioned
> > > > in
> > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> > > > different
> > > > > category.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > > [2]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Ismaël Mejía]

+1 (non-binding)

No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was mostly
done by Patrick, all kudos to him.
Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official
docker image in this case?

Best,
Ismaël

ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target.



On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske  wrote:

> +1
>
> Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang :
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > 
> > From: Stephan Ewen 
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> > To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> > patr...@ververica.com>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink
> > release process
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project.
> The
> > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> > > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > > >
> > > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> > apache/flink-docker
> > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > > >
> > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific
> comments)
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> > > January
> > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Ufuk
> > > >
> > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as
> mentioned
> > > in
> > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> > > different
> > > > category.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Fabian Hueske]

+1

Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang :

> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> From: Stephan Ewen 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
> To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com <
> patr...@ververica.com>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink
> release process
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > --
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi  wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> > > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> > >
> > > The proposal is as follows:
> > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to
> apache/flink-docker
> > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> > >
> > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> > January
> > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Ufuk
> > >
> > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned
> > in
> > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> > different
> > > category.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Yun Tang]

+1 (non-binding)

From: Stephan Ewen 
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36
To: dev ; patr...@ververica.com 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release 
process

+1

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas  wrote:

> Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> --
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi  wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> >
> > The proposal is as follows:
> > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
> > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> >
> > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> January
> > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ufuk
> >
> > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned
> in
> > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> different
> > category.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > [2]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Patrick Lucas]

Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk.

+1 (non-binding)

--
Patrick

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi  wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> proposal and can be found here: [1].
>
> The proposal is as follows:
> * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
> * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> apache/flink-docker for new releases
>
> Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
>
> The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on: January
> 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ufuk
>
> PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned in
> the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a different
> category.
>
> [1]
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Till Rohrmann]

+1 (binding)

Cheers,
Till

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 7:17 PM Konstantin Knauf 
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi  wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> > proposal and can be found here: [1].
> >
> > The proposal is as follows:
> > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
> > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> > apache/flink-docker for new releases
> >
> > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on:
> January
> > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ufuk
> >
> > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned
> in
> > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a
> different
> > category.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> > [2]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Konstantin Knauf | Solutions Architect
>
> +49 160 91394525
>
>
> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica 
>
>
> --
>
> Join Flink Forward  - The Apache Flink
> Conference
>
> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>
> --
>
> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
>
> --
> Ververica GmbH
> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
> (Tony) Cheng
>

Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Konstantin Knauf]

+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi  wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
> https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
> discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
> proposal and can be found here: [1].
>
> The proposal is as follows:
> * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
> * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
> * Update the release documentation to describe how to update
> apache/flink-docker for new releases
>
> Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the proposal
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)
>
> The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on: January
> 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ufuk
>
> PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned in
> the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a different
> category.
>
> [1]
>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
>


-- 

Konstantin Knauf | Solutions Architect

+49 160 91394525


Follow us @VervericaData Ververica 


--

Join Flink Forward  - The Apache Flink
Conference

Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time

--

Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany

--
Ververica GmbH
Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
(Tony) Cheng

[VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink release process

[Ufuk Celebi]

Hey all,

there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of
https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. The
discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the
proposal and can be found here: [1].

The proposal is as follows:
* Request a new repository apache/flink-docker
* Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/flink-docker
* Update the release documentation to describe how to update
apache/flink-docker for new releases

Please review and vote on this proposal as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the proposal
[ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific comments)

The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on: January
30th 2020, 17:00 UTC.

Cheers,

Ufuk

PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as mentioned in
the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a different
category.

[1]
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026