[Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin
I haven't had time to dig into this in detail, but I hope someone familiar with plugins will help me fill in the missing pieces. I tried to build some site with the new 0.7rc1, which contains simplified docbook documents. The site built successfully, but the pages were empty (shouldn't this fail?). Anyway, I added the simplified-docbook plugin to forrest.properties, and ran forrest init-plugins, which failed with: ... check-plugin: org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.simplified-docbook is not available in the build dir ... ERROR = Unable to retrieve the org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.simplified plugin. There may be more information about the reason for this in output ... My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin simplified. Ron
Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin
Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin simplified. That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying plugin names cannot have a hyphen. It never occured to me that the simplified-docbook has a hyphen in it. Doh! I will fix tonight. Ross
Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin
Ross Gardler wrote: Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin simplified. That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying plugin names cannot have a hyphen. It never occured to me that the simplified-docbook has a hyphen in it. Doh! should we change that to sdocbook ?
Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin
Ross Gardler wrote: Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin simplified. That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying plugin names cannot have a hyphen. It never occured to me that the simplified-docbook has a hyphen in it. Doh! should be change that to sdocbook ?
Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin simplified. That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying plugin names cannot have a hyphen. It never occured to me that the simplified-docbook has a hyphen in it. Doh! should we change that to sdocbook ? I just changed to simplifiedDocbook, hope that is OK with everyone. I've redeployed the plugin and plugins.xml file so that 'forrest availablePlugins' reports the correct name. Ross
Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin
Ross Gardler wrote: Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name simplified-docbook collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that docbook is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin simplified. That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying plugin names cannot have a hyphen. It never occured to me that the simplified-docbook has a hyphen in it. Doh! should we change that to sdocbook ? I just changed to simplifiedDocbook, hope that is OK with everyone. well, sdocbook is shorter and that is used already on the stylesheet: sdocbook2document.xsl I've redeployed the plugin and plugins.xml file so that 'forrest availablePlugins' reports the correct name.
