Re: incubator-freemarker-docgen git commit: Changed footer layout to accept arbitrary long copyright text. Added copyrightSuffix setting, where you can add the trademark notes and such.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:39 PM, wrote:
> Repository: incubator-freemarker-docgen
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 05ddf9339 -> f968b192e
>
>
> Changed footer layout to accept arbitrary long copyright text. Added
> copyrightSuffix setting, where you can add the trademark notes and such.
> [...]
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-freemarker-docgen/blob/
> f968b192/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
> --
> diff --git a/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
> b/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
> index ac43e17..29d9a27 100644
> --- a/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
> +++ b/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
>
> @@ -73,7 +72,8 @@
>
> © ${copyrightStartYear?string('0')
> }<#rt>
> <#lt><#if transformStartTime?string('')?number !=
> copyrightStartYear>–${transformStartTime?string('')}
> -http://schema.org/Organization";
> itemprop="copyrightHolder"
> href="http://freemarker.org";>${copyrightHolder}.
> All rights reserved.<#t>
> +http://schema.org/Organization";
> itemprop="copyrightHolder" href="http://freemarker.org";>$
> {copyrightHolder}<#t>
> +<#if copyrightSuffix??>. ${copyrightSuffix}<#t>
>
>
>
This is minor but I think we should change the url of the "copyright
holder" from freemarker.org to apache.org.
Jacopo
Re: incubator-freemarker-docgen git commit: Changed footer layout to accept arbitrary long copyright text. Added copyrightSuffix setting, where you can add the trademark notes and such.
Thanks, I have fixed this!
Monday, January 23, 2017, 9:00:04 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:39 PM, wrote:
>
>> Repository: incubator-freemarker-docgen
>> Updated Branches:
>> refs/heads/master 05ddf9339 -> f968b192e
>>
>>
>> Changed footer layout to accept arbitrary long copyright text. Added
>> copyrightSuffix setting, where you can add the trademark notes and such.
>> [...]
>>
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-freemarker-docgen/blob/
>> f968b192/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
>> --
>> diff --git a/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
>> b/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
>> index ac43e17..29d9a27 100644
>> --- a/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
>> +++ b/src/main/org/freemarker/docgen/templates/footer.ftlh
>>
>> @@ -73,7 +72,8 @@
>>
>> © ${copyrightStartYear?string('0')
>> }<#rt>
>> <#lt><#if transformStartTime?string('')?number !=
>> copyrightStartYear>–${transformStartTime?string('')}
>> -http://schema.org/Organization";
>> itemprop="copyrightHolder"
>> href="http://freemarker.org";>${copyrightHolder}.
>> All rights reserved.<#t>
>> +http://schema.org/Organization";
>> itemprop="copyrightHolder" href="http://freemarker.org";>$
>> {copyrightHolder}<#t>
>> +<#if copyrightSuffix??>. ${copyrightSuffix}<#t>
>>
>>
>>
>
> This is minor but I think we should change the url of the "copyright
> holder" from freemarker.org to apache.org.
>
> Jacopo
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
Hi Daniel, thanks for your commit. I have noticed that there is no link to the new security page in the left bar but it used to generate one when I tested in my local box. Is it intentional or I am missing something? Jacopo On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Daniel Dekany > wrote: > >> >> Thanks! But, do all PMC members get a notification if there's a mail >> waiting for moderation at private@freemarker.i.a.o? Does somebody know >> that (or else I will try it)? >> > > Only the mailing list moderators will receive the message and I am not > sure who they are currently. I think I am (I think I have received some > "moderator" email from private@freemarker) and you should too. > We should ask Infra about the list of moderators for our three lists and > also ask them to update it with the people that are volunteering for this > task. > And we can also ask infra to setup a security@freemarker list. > But we could also proceed with the above two steps right after a > successful graduation when FreeMarker will be a full-fledged top level > project. > What do you think? > > Jacopo > >
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
Monday, January 23, 2017, 8:45:14 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> >> Thanks! But, do all PMC members get a notification if there's a mail >> waiting for moderation at private@freemarker.i.a.o? Does somebody know >> that (or else I will try it)? >> > > Only the mailing list moderators will receive the message and I am not sure > who they are currently. I think I am (I think I have received some > "moderator" email from private@freemarker) and you should too. > We should ask Infra about the list of moderators for our three lists and > also ask them to update it with the people that are volunteering for this > task. > And we can also ask infra to setup a security@freemarker list. > But we could also proceed with the above two steps right after a successful > graduation when FreeMarker will be a full-fledged top level project. > What do you think? I have just went ahead and published what you have written on the site (with some minor edits). The related pages: http://freemarker.org/report-security-vulnerabilities.html And I have also added this: http://freemarker.org/committer-howto.html#handle-security-vulnerabilities I have also updated the wiki page to to refer to these under QU30, and set its status to YES. Of course, we can refine this later if there's a need. > Jacopo -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
Monday, January 23, 2017, 3:28:22 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > thanks for your commit. I have noticed that there is no link to the new > security page in the left bar but it used to generate one when I tested in > my local box. Is it intentional or I am missing something? I don't know, it's visible for me. Maybe you haven't waited for the publishing commit, or it's a browser cache issue? > Jacopo > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Daniel Dekany >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thanks! But, do all PMC members get a notification if there's a mail >>> waiting for moderation at private@freemarker.i.a.o? Does somebody know >>> that (or else I will try it)? >>> >> >> Only the mailing list moderators will receive the message and I am not >> sure who they are currently. I think I am (I think I have received some >> "moderator" email from private@freemarker) and you should too. >> We should ask Infra about the list of moderators for our three lists and >> also ask them to update it with the people that are volunteering for this >> task. >> And we can also ask infra to setup a security@freemarker list. >> But we could also proceed with the above two steps right after a >> successful graduation when FreeMarker will be a full-fledged top level >> project. >> What do you think? >> >> Jacopo >> >> -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > I don't know, it's visible for me. Maybe you haven't waited for the > publishing commit, or it's a browser cache issue? > > Weird... do you see the link under the COMMUNITY group in the left bar? Jacopo
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > > I have just went ahead and published what you have written on the site > (with some minor edits). > > The related pages: > http://freemarker.org/report-security-vulnerabilities.html > And I have also added this: > http://freemarker.org/committer-howto.html#handle-security-vulnerabilities > > I have also updated the wiki page to to refer to these under QU30, and > set its status to YES. > Thanks, they look great to me. Jacopo
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
Monday, January 23, 2017, 4:00:06 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> >> I don't know, it's visible for me. Maybe you haven't waited for the >> publishing commit, or it's a browser cache issue? >> >> > Weird... do you see the link under the COMMUNITY group in the left bar? Yes, it looks like this: Community Report bugs Bugs still in the old tracker Report security vulnerability Ask help on Stack Overflow ... > Jacopo -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
Monday, January 23, 2017, 4:18:47 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Oh yes, I see the same when I open the page in a different browser! Please > ignore and thanks. Am... I still find this a bit worrisome. Why the other browser has this problem? What if you press Ctrl+R there? > Jacopo > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> Monday, January 23, 2017, 4:00:06 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Daniel Dekany >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> I don't know, it's visible for me. Maybe you haven't waited for the >> >> publishing commit, or it's a browser cache issue? >> >> >> >> >> > Weird... do you see the link under the COMMUNITY group in the left bar? >> >> Yes, it looks like this: >> >> Community >> >> Report bugs >> Bugs still in the old tracker >> Report security vulnerability >> Ask help on Stack Overflow >> ... >> >> > Jacopo >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
Oh yes, I see the same when I open the page in a different browser! Please ignore and thanks. Jacopo On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Monday, January 23, 2017, 4:00:06 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Daniel Dekany > wrote: > > > >> > >> I don't know, it's visible for me. Maybe you haven't waited for the > >> publishing commit, or it's a browser cache issue? > >> > >> > > Weird... do you see the link under the COMMUNITY group in the left bar? > > Yes, it looks like this: > > Community > > Report bugs > Bugs still in the old tracker > Report security vulnerability > Ask help on Stack Overflow > ... > > > Jacopo > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > >
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Monday, January 23, 2017, 4:18:47 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > > Oh yes, I see the same when I open the page in a different browser! > Please > > ignore and thanks. > > Am... I still find this a bit worrisome. Why the other browser has > this problem? What if you press Ctrl+R there? Yes, I did ti without luck. I have sent you a personal mail with the screenshot attached to it (attachments are not allowed in this mailing list). Jacopo
Re: FreeMarker Project Maturity Model Assessment
Le 23/01/2017 à 16:00, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: I have just went ahead and published what you have written on the site (with some minor edits). The related pages: http://freemarker.org/report-security-vulnerabilities.html And I have also added this: http://freemarker.org/committer-howto.html#handle-security-vulnerabilities I have also updated the wiki page to to refer to these under QU30, and set its status to YES. Thanks, they look great to me. Jacopo +1 Jacques
Template Loader Implementation that loads from a database (DataSource)
I am working on a TemplateLoader implementation that loads from a database. From a previous e-mail with Daniel Dekany, he mentioned that this is something you still need, and may be interested in integrating. I have the source code on github: rbenitez22/freemarker-datasource-loader || rbenitez22/freemarker-datasource-loader | | This is something I am still tweaking as I learn more about the inner workings of the frame work. Let me know if you have further thoughts on what could be modified to make it integrate better. --Roberto
