Re: Changing official domain to freemarker.apache.org now? Was: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

2017-10-23 Thread Ralph Goers 
There is no requirement that you ever get rid of the freemarker.org domain. 
This is not the first project to have its own domain.

Ralph

> On Oct 23, 2017, at 7:49 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
> 
> Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:10:27 PM, Christoph Rüger wrote:
> 
>> +1 for the change.
>> 
>> Please keep the structure of the urls the same as before as we have linked
>> to the Freemarker docs from various of our pages. This would make migration
>> of deeplinks easier.
>> http://freemarker.org/docs/ref_builtins_string.html 
>> 
>> should then be
>> http://freemarker.apache.org/docs/ref_builtins_string.html 
>> 
> 
> Sure, it will be HTTP 301 redirection where only the domain is
> replaced.
> 
>> Also it would be helpful to keep freemarker.org  
>> around for a while with a
>> redirect.
> 
> Hopefully the ASF will keep it for a good while.
> 
>> We need some time to migrate all the links.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2017-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Daniel Dekany :
>> 
>>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up again
>>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. Also
>>> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> 
 
> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
> 
> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> 
>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> 
 Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> 
>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>> Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), also I hear
>>> that starting from October they want to show warning in Chrome if
>>> you
>>> have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page under
>>> http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and
>>> http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form.
>>> 
>>> Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this?
>>> 
>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October.
> That would be great, thanks!
> 
>> Jacques
>> 
>> 
 Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it yet.
 But I should be able to start this week, most likely Monday...
>>> No problem, and thanks for keep us informed!
>>> 
 Jacques
>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be available
>>> before November
>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far all seems
>>> OK :)
> 
> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, so no
> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for now.)
> 
> Thanks for the checking the release!
 
 I should also point out that in the last board report the issue of
 freemarker not yet having an apache.org  web
 site came up. I would suggest that the project make that transition
 sooner than later if graduation is desired.
 
 Ralph
 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel Dekany
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Christoph Rüger, Geschäftsführer
>> Synesty  - Anbinden und Automatisieren ohne
>> Programmieren - Automatisierung, Schnittstellen, Datenfeeds
>> 
>> Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Christoph_Rueger2
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christoph-rueger/a/685/198
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany

Re: Changing official domain to freemarker.apache.org now? Was: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

2017-10-23 Thread Daniel Dekany 
Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:10:27 PM, Christoph Rüger wrote:

> +1 for the change.
>
> Please keep the structure of the urls the same as before as we have linked
> to the Freemarker docs from various of our pages. This would make migration
> of deeplinks easier.
> http://freemarker.org/docs/ref_builtins_string.html
> should then be
> http://freemarker.apache.org/docs/ref_builtins_string.html

Sure, it will be HTTP 301 redirection where only the domain is
replaced.

> Also it would be helpful to keep freemarker.org around for a while with a
> redirect.

Hopefully the ASF will keep it for a good while.

> We need some time to migrate all the links.
>
>
>
> 2017-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Daniel Dekany :
>
>> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up again
>> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. Also
>> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it?
>>
>>
>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>  Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> 
>> > Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> >> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>  Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), also I hear
>>  that starting from October they want to show warning in Chrome if
>> you
>>  have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page under
>>  http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and
>>  http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form.
>> 
>>  Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this?
>> 
>> >>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October.
>> >> That would be great, thanks!
>> >>
>> >>> Jacques
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> > Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it yet.
>> > But I should be able to start this week, most likely Monday...
>>  No problem, and thanks for keep us informed!
>> 
>> > Jacques
>> >>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be available
>> before November
>> >>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far all seems
>> OK :)
>> >>
>> >> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, so no
>> >> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for now.)
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the checking the release!
>> >
>> > I should also point out that in the last board report the issue of
>> > freemarker not yet having an apache.org  web
>> > site came up. I would suggest that the project make that transition
>> > sooner than later if graduation is desired.
>> >
>> > Ralph
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>  Daniel Dekany
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Christoph Rüger, Geschäftsführer
> Synesty  - Anbinden und Automatisieren ohne
> Programmieren - Automatisierung, Schnittstellen, Datenfeeds
>
> Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Christoph_Rueger2
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christoph-rueger/a/685/198
>

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany

Re: Changing official domain to freemarker.apache.org now? Was: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

2017-10-23 Thread Christoph Rüger 
+1 for the change.

Please keep the structure of the urls the same as before as we have linked
to the Freemarker docs from various of our pages. This would make migration
of deeplinks easier.
http://freemarker.org/docs/ref_builtins_string.html
should then be
http://freemarker.apache.org/docs/ref_builtins_string.html

Also it would be helpful to keep freemarker.org around for a while with a
redirect.
We need some time to migrate all the links.



2017-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Daniel Dekany :

> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up again
> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. Also
> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it?
>
>
> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
> >>
> >> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>
> >>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>  Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> 
> > Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
> >> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>
> >>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>  Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), also I hear
>  that starting from October they want to show warning in Chrome if
> you
>  have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page under
>  http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and
>  http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form.
> 
>  Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this?
> 
> >>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October.
> >> That would be great, thanks!
> >>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>>
> > Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it yet.
> > But I should be able to start this week, most likely Monday...
>  No problem, and thanks for keep us informed!
> 
> > Jacques
> >>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be available
> before November
> >>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far all seems
> OK :)
> >>
> >> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, so no
> >> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for now.)
> >>
> >> Thanks for the checking the release!
> >
> > I should also point out that in the last board report the issue of
> > freemarker not yet having an apache.org  web
> > site came up. I would suggest that the project make that transition
> > sooner than later if graduation is desired.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>


-- 
Christoph Rüger, Geschäftsführer
Synesty  - Anbinden und Automatisieren ohne
Programmieren - Automatisierung, Schnittstellen, Datenfeeds

Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Christoph_Rueger2
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christoph-rueger/a/685/198

-- 
Synesty GmbH
Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a
07745 Jena
Tel.: +49 3641 559649
Fax.: +49 3641 5596499
Internet: http://synesty.com

Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger
Unternehmenssitz: Jena
Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena
Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766
Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982

Re: Changing official domain to freemarker.apache.org now? Was: Migrating [try.]freemarker.org to HTTPS, anyone?

2017-10-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato 
+1 for the migration. And right after that I think we should start the
graduation process.

Jacopo

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:

> As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up again
> and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. Also
> to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it?
>
>
> Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany  wrote:
> >>
> >> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>
> >>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>  Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> 
> > Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
> >> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>
> >>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>  Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), also I hear
>  that starting from October they want to show warning in Chrome if
> you
>  have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page under
>  http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and
>  http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form.
> 
>  Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this?
> 
> >>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October.
> >> That would be great, thanks!
> >>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>>
> > Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it yet.
> > But I should be able to start this week, most likely Monday...
>  No problem, and thanks for keep us informed!
> 
> > Jacques
> >>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be available
> before November
> >>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far all seems
> OK :)
> >>
> >> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, so no
> >> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for now.)
> >>
> >> Thanks for the checking the release!
> >
> > I should also point out that in the last board report the issue of
> > freemarker not yet having an apache.org  web
> > site came up. I would suggest that the project make that transition
> > sooner than later if graduation is desired.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.27 (incubating)

2017-10-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato 
+1 (binding)

Jacopo

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Woonsan Ko  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.27-incubating! If this voting
> passes, another similar voting will be started on
> gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
> release this version.
>
> Note that because there weren't many deep changes since
> 2.3.26-incubating, we have no Release Candidate this time. Thus, it's
> important that you don't skip testing this release with your dependent
> projects.
>
> Release Notes:
> http://freemarker.org/builds/2.3.27-voting/documentation/_ht
> ml/versions_2_3_27.html
>
> Before proceed, you should know that FreeMarker 2.3.x, for a long
> time, always releases a normal and a "gae" variant on the same time,
> which are technically two independent source trees (Git branches). The
> "gae" variant contains a few small modification in the Java source
> code to be Google App Engine compliant, and has freemarker-gae as the
> Maven artifact name. Otherwise the normal and the "gae" branches are
> identical. Hence they will be voted on together.
>
> The commits to be voted upon are:
> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
>   https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemark
> er.git;a=commit;h=8e501b8ab83fb7d312791a4907ca94ef8acaf3e5
>   Commit hash: 8e501b8ab83fb7d312791a4907ca94ef8acaf3e5
> - "gae" variant:
>   https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemark
> er.git;a=commit;h=cf2ae45d174d07a38d096958a44977cb79b1a68d
>   Commit hash: cf2ae45d174d07a38d096958a44977cb79b1a68d
>
> The artifacts to be voted upon are located here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/
> engine/2.3.27-incubating/source/
> where the source release artifacts are:
> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
>   apache-freemarker-2.3.27-incubating-src.tar.gz
> - "gae" variant:
>   apache-freemarker-gae-2.3.27-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> See the README inside them for build instructions!
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex=on;
> search=0xA25D65D27C13ADCE
>
> Note that for convenience, we also provide binaries:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/
> engine/2.3.27-incubating/binaries/
> and Maven artifacts in the ASF staging repositories:
> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/o
> rg/freemarker/freemarker/2.3.27-incubating/
> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/o
> rg/freemarker/freemarker-gae/2.3.27-incubating/
>
> Please try out the package and vote!
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.27-incubating
> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding.
>
>
> Woonsan Ko
> on behalf of the Apache FreeMarker project team
>